The emerging issue of ratio of metastatic to resected lymph nodes in gastrointestinal cancers: An overview of literature

Convenient method to improve efficiency of lymph node examination after gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The D2 procedure has been accepted as the standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC) in East Asia. Determination of the number of lymph nodes (LNs) after gastrectomy may influence the pathological stage assessment of lymph node metastasis, significantly influencing prognostic evaluations and formulation of chemotherapy regimens.

METHODS

Between January 2020 and January 2022, the medical files of 312 patients with clinical stage T0-4aN0-3M0 gastric cancer were reviewed retrospectively, and the patients were assigned to the normal group (lymph nodes were examined roughly), manual group (lymph nodes were manually examined meticulously), and device group (lymph nodes were examined by device). The clinical and pathologic characteristics, number of lymph nodes harvested, and the time required for lymph node examination was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 312 gastric cancer patients (mean age 65.8 ± 10.3 years, 85 females and 227 males) underwent gastrectomy with curative intent at our department. Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, clinical TNM stage, and pathologic TNM stage in the three groups showed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). The mean number of harvested lymph nodes in the normal, manual, and device group was 24.2, 36.6 and 35.2, respectively, which showed significant differences (P < 0.0001). The mean number of positive lymph nodes in the normal, manual, and device group was 3.5, 3.9 and 3.9, respectively (P = 0.99). The mean time consumption in device group was 15 min while the time consumption in manual group was 52.3 min, which showed a significant difference (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This improved lymph node examination method offers a simple approach that is worth promoting, and it can improve the number of harvested lymph nodes efficiently.

A modified mTNM staging system based on lymph node ratio for colon neuroendocrine tumors: A recursive partitioning analysis

BACKGROUND

In the current tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for colon neuroendocrine tumors, lymph node status is divided into N1 and N0. An assessment of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and a proposal for a modified mTNM staging system were the objectives of this study.

METHODS

Selecting the optimal cut-off value of LNR was done using X-tile. A Cox regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method were performed to calculate patient cancer-specific survival in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cohort. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to improve TNM staging.

RESULTS

The study included 674 patients. The current TNM staging system showed inadequate discriminatory power between stage I and stage II patients (p = 0.088). The optimal cut-off value was determined as 0.6 for LNR. Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, the modified mN classification could be classified into mN 0 (LNR = 0.00), mN 1 (LNR = 0.01-0.60), and mN 2 (LNR > 0.60), and was found to be an independent factor affecting prognosis (p < 0.001). Using the American Joint Committee on Cancer T and modified mN classifications, the modified mTNM system was constructed, and it exhibited better prognostic discriminatory power ability than the traditional TNM system (C-index: 0.587 vs. 0.665).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study determined that LNR is a prognostic factor in colon NET patients. In addition, to more accurately assess the prognosis of colon NET patients, we proposed a modified mTNM staging system.

Prognostic Factors for Recurrence in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery: A Single-institution Analysis

Background The purpose of this study is to analyze potential predisposing factors for a higher risk of recurrence in our esophageal cancer patients managed with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery, and to determine their impact on disease-free survival (DFS) and time to recurrence. Methods A total of 154 of 232 patients staged T1b to T4a managed electively at our institute from July 2005 through July 2015 with a tri-modality approach were retrospectively evaluated. Basic demographic, clinical, radiological, operative, and pathological disease-related parameters, along with waiting time for surgery and type of neoadjuvant modality used, were assessed as potential risk factors. The primary endpoint was the impact of these on the risk of recurrence. The secondary endpoint was to study their relation on DFS and time to recurrence. Results The recurrence rate in this particular study was 33.1% over a median follow-up of 35 months (interquartile range = 19-50.3). The median time to recurrence was 12 months, and 94% of recurrences occurred within two years. The median DFS was 33 months, and the one- and three-year DFS was 90% and 72%, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analysis, a complete pathological response (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-10.11), negative resection margins (HR: 5.9, 95% CI: 1.69-20.45), and a low nodal index (HR: 6.3, 95% CI: 1.37-28.67 for an index of 0.1-0.2; and HR: 15.2, 95% CI: 0.96-241.73 for an index of >0.2) were found as statistically significant (P = < 0.05) for risk to recurrence. In addition to these three, a low comorbidity index (P = 0.03; HR: 3.5; 95% CI: 1.16-10.52) was an individual positive predictor of DFS. Conclusions A complete pathological response, low nodal index, and margin-negative resection were the identified predictors of freedom from recurrence, with a better DFS and a low comorbidity index as additional indicators of prolonged DFS.

Clinico-pathological correlates and survival outcomes in 214 resected ampullary adenocarcinomas - are outcomes different in intestinal and pancreatobiliary subtypes with adjuvant gemcitabine?

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that intestinal type (IT) and pancreatobiliary (PB) subtypes of ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) may have different outcomes. The current study evaluated differences in outcomes between these subtypes and the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AT).

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent upfront resection for AC from January 2012 to March 2016 was conducted. A dedicated pathologist reported differentiation between IT and PB subtypes.

RESULTS

214 patients were included for analysis: 105 PB subtype and 109 IT subtype. With a median follow up of 46.3 months, estimated 4 year overall survival (OS) was 65.8%. In patients with stage II-III disease, lymph-node ratio (LNR) < 0.2 [Not reached (NR) vs. 30.72 months; p = 0.002], absence of perineural invasion (PNI) (NR vs. 31.61 months; p = 0.032) and AT (gemcitabine - 96.1%) (NR vs. 22.28 months) were prognostic for superior OS. There was no difference in OS between IT and PB subtypes, but both subtypes with stage II-III disease benefitted from AT statistically as compared to observation (IT: NR vs. 28.62 months; PB: 18.46 months vs. 58.09 months; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AC-IT and AC-PB did not have a different OS when treated with resection and adjuvant gemcitabine, though adjuvant therapy benefitted both subtypes individually.

An Immunoscore System Based On CD3+ And CD8+ Infiltrating Lymphocytes Densities To Predict The Outcome Of Patients With Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the Immunoscore (IS) methodology as a prognostic marker of colorectal adenocarcinoma in Tunisian population. Tumor blocks were retrospectively collected from 106 patients with sporadic colorectal cancer.

Methods

Immunohistochemical staining and images analysis software were used to quantify the density of CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the center of the tumor and invasive margin.

Results

The density of CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ was significantly associated with 5-year overall survival (P=0.001 and P=0.00098, respectively) and 5-year disease-free survival (P=0.0006 and P=0.0056, respectively). The earlier stage and the absence of vascular emboli showed a significant association with IS analysis. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that Immunoscore (from I0 to I4) was more significantly correlated with overall survival (P=0.00011) and disease-free survival (P=0.0008) than Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) staging (P=0.057 and P=0.039, respectively). Patients with low IS were associated with inferior disease-free survival and overall survival, contrary to patients with high IS.

Conclusion

This is the first study which evaluated the prognostic value of IS methodology in colorectal cancer in African and Arabic population. The IS methodology carries out in this study allows to estimate the risk of relapse in patients with colorectal cancer. Overall, our results support the implementation of the consensus Immunoscore as a new component for the classification of cancer, designated TNM-Immune.

Exploration of exact significance of lymph node ratio and construction of a novel stage in colon cancer with no distant metastasis

Aim

Lymph node ratio (LNR) seems to be more precise than classic N stage in classifying cancer stage. Thus, we aim to construct a modified classification system based on LNR for colon cancer without distant metastasis.

Methods

This study enrolled two independent cohorts of patients. The primary cohort enrolled 2,152 patients from 2008 to 2013 in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. The validation cohort consisted of 77,406 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry from 2004 to 2014. The inclusion criteria were: pathologically confirmed colon cancer, and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I/II/III. The exclusion criteria included: incomplete follow-up information, rectal cancer, and multiple primary sites. The prognostic value of LNR for overall survival was evaluated. The cutoff value of LNR was determined by the X-tile. Predictive performance of modified classification was determined by the concordance index.

Results

After analysis, 0.05 and 0.50 were determined as the best threshold values of LNR. A value of <0.05, 0.05–0.50 and >0.50 was reclassified as the mN0, mN1 and mN2 stage. A modified classification based on mN0, mN1, and mN2 was further constructed for stage I/II/III colon cancer. C-index of the modified classification was statistically more precise than AJCC classification (0.687 versus 0.605, P<0.001). The same results can also be determined in the validation cohort (0.715 versus 0.640, P<0.001). Furthermore, a prognostic nomogram including independent factors was constructed. The constructed nomogram showed good performance according to the calibration curve.

Conclusion

The clinical value of LNR level was preferable to classic N stage in colon cancer patients. Our proposed classification based on LNR and AJCC T category can effectively differentiate patients with varied survival outcomes.

Lymph Node Ratio Versus TNM System As Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer Staging. a Single Center Experience

Objective

This study aims to establish the actual validity of the lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic factor for colorectal cancer patients, and to verify differences of survival and disease-free interval.

Methods

Patients referred with colorectal cancer who underwent potentially curative surgery between January 1997 and December 2011 were included. Lymph node ratio, TNM staging and survival were extracted from surgical, histological and follow-up records.

Results

Two hundred eigthy six patients with different stages of colorectal cancer underwent surgery, with comparison of survival prediction based on lymph node ratio and TNM staging. The overall survival rate was 78.3%, the recurrence rate was 11.9% and the mortality rate was estimated as 21.7%. Univariate analysis in relation to survival was significant for the following variables: serum level of CEA, CA 19.9 value, degree of histological differentiation, and tumor growth. There weren’t any statistically significant differences for the LNR (LNR </ ≥0.16: p = 0.116). The TNM system was effective both in discriminating between survival stages (Stage II vs. Stage III: p = 0.05) and in differentiating sub-groups (p = 0.05).

Conclusions

LNR alone could not be considered a better prognostic factor than the TNM system. However, future studies are needed in a larger number of patients with a standardized surgical, pathological and medical protocol.

Comparison of 3 Ways of Dissecting the Pancreatoduodenectomy Specimen and Their Impact in the Lymph Node Count and the Lymph Node Metastatic Ratio

Background. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a strong prognostic factor in the cancer of the pancreatobiliary tree, but it is influenced by the number of lymph nodes (LNs). The lymph node ratio (LNR) is considered a more reliable factor than the number of LNM. The aim was to examine the LN retrieval and the LNR of 3 pathologic work-up strategies. Methods. Pancreaticoduodenectomies (n = 165) were analyzed comparing 3 pathological dissection techniques, classified as “control,” “Verbeke method,” and “Adsay method” groups. Results. The mean of the dissected LNs and the number of cases with >20 LNs were superior in the Adsay method group, compared with the other groups ( P < .001). The LNR was different between the Adsay and Verbeke groups (0.144 vs 0.069, P = .032). The median of the 3 positive LNs was associated with decreased survival compared with an absence of LNM (3-year specific survival of 48% vs 22%, P = .011). In the multivariate analysis, LNM (hazard ratio = 6.148, 95% confidence interval = 2.02-8.1, P = .042) and the evaluation of >15 LNs (hazard ratio = 12.52, 95% confidence interval = 5.51-21.01, P = .001) were independent predictors of survival. Conclusion. The Adsay technique for LN retrieval was associated with a better LN count, more cases with LNM, and an LNR >0.1.

A systematic review of the prognostic value of lymph node ratio, number of positive nodes and total nodes examined in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is the most common pancreatic cancer. Five-year overall survival is currently 3.3-6.0%. The aim of this review was to evaluate the prognostic value of lymph node ratio, number of positive nodes and total nodes examined on overall survival rate following pancreatic resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search was conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review databases, from January 1996 to January 2016. RESULTS Overall, 19 studies including 4,883 patients examined the relationship between lymph node ratio and overall survival. A high lymph node ratio was associated with decreased overall survival in 17 studies. A total of 12 studies examined the relationship between the number of positive nodes and overall survival, and 11 studies revealed that an increase in the number of positive nodes was associated with decreased overall survival. In 15 studies examining the relationship between the total nodes examined and overall survival, there was no association with overall survival in 12 studies. CONCLUSIONS Lymph node ratio and number of positive nodes are factors associated with overall survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, but not total nodes examined.

Number of evaluated lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes, lymph node ratio, and log odds evaluation in early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: numerology or valid indicators of patient outcome?

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the prognostic significance and universal validity of the total number of evaluated lymph nodes (ELN), number of positive lymph nodes (PLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in a relatively large and homogenous cohort of surgically treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients.

METHODS

Prospectively accrued data were retrospectively analyzed for 282 PDAC patients who had pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at our institution. Long-term survival was analyzed according to the ELN, PLN, LNR, and LODDS.

RESULTS

Of these patients, 168 patients (59.5 %) had LN metastasis (N1). Mean ELN and PLN were 13.5 and 1.6, respectively. LN positivity correlated with a greater number of evaluated lymph nodes; positive lymph nodes were identified in 61.4 % of the patients with ELN ≥ 13 compared with 44.9 % of the patients with ELN < 13 (p = 0.014). Median overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS rate were higher in N0 than in N1 patients, 22.4 vs. 18.7 months and 35 vs. 11 %, respectively (p = 0.008). Mean LNR was 0.12; 91 patients (54.1 %) had LNR < 0.3. Among the N1 patients, median OS was comparable in those with LNR ≥ 0.3 vs. LNR < 0.3 (16.7 vs. 14.1 months, p = 0.950). Neither LODDS nor various ELN and PLN cutoff values provided more discriminative information within the group of N1 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirms that lymph node positivity strongly reflects PDAC biology and thus patient outcome. While a higher number of evaluated lymph nodes may provide a more accurate nodal staging, it does not have any prognostic value among N1 patients. Similarly, PLN, LNR, and LODDS had limited prognostic relevance.

Lymph node ratio as parameter of regional lymph node involvement in pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To determine which indicators, anatomical nodal metastasis (Japan Pancreas Society, JPS), number of positive lymph nodes (PLN), or lymph node ratio (LNR), is the best means of assessing lymph node involvement in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 275 patients with pancreatic cancer treated at a single institution. Survival curves according to the JPS, PLN, or LNR were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic value of each classification was explored by Cox regression analysis after adjustments for clinical factors.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis showed that, relative to n0 in the JPS, hazard ratios (HR) in n1, n2, and n3 were 1.72, 1.73, and 2.75, respectively, with no difference in survival between n1 and n2. Relative to PLN of 0, the HR in the PLN categories of 1∼2, 3, and >3 were 1.39, 1.65, and 3.03, respectively. Relative to LNR of 0, the HR in the categories of 0 < LNR ≤ 0.1, 0.1 < LNR ≤ 0.2, and LNR > 0.2 were 1.27, 2.00, and 5.58, respectively. An incremental increase in the HR was observed as the LNR category progressed, and differences between the survivals were distinct when stratified by the LNR.

CONCLUSIONS

The LNR was an accurate predictor of survival among three assessment strategies and could be proposed as a candidate for use as N categories, pending validation studies.

Patterns and prognostic value of lymph node dissection for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Lymph node metastasis is a major prognostic factor for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). However, prognostic significance of extent of node dissection, lymph node ratio (LNR), and number and location of positive nodes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether node status, LNR, or number or location of positive nodes are independent factors for staging in PHC and to determine the minimum requirements for node examination.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify 1116 resected PHCs from 1998 to 2008. The correlation between nodal status and survival was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis occurred in 43.4% patients and was an independent predictor for overall survival and cancer-specific survival. No survival benefit was observed for an increasing number of node retrieval in node-positive patients. However, in node-negative patients, ≥13 node dissection was of more survival benefit than 3 ≤ total lymph node count (TLNC) ≤ 12 and TLNC < 3 (5-year overall survival: 52.8% vs 39.7% vs 26.3%, P = 0.001; 5-year cancer-specific survival: 60.6% vs 46.3% vs 30.0%, P = 0.001). No difference in survival between patients with regional and distant node involvement was found. Survival for patients with greater than three positive nodes was significantly worse than that for those with three or less (relative ratio: 1.466, P = 0.001). And patients with LNR > 0.27 also had unfavorable prognosis (relative ratio: 1.376, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We determined that to adequately assess nodal status of this life-threatening disease, 13 or more nodes retrieval should be considered. Number of positive nodes and LNR rather than location of metastatic nodes may be defined as parameters for staging of PHC.

The role of lymph nodes in predicting the prognosis of ampullary carcinoma after curative resection

BACKGROUND

Lymph node involvement is one of the well-demonstrated prognostic factors in ampullary carcinoma. The aim of this study is to clarify the role of lymph nodes in predicting the survival outcome of ampullary carcinoma.

METHODS

A cohort of consecutive curative pancreaticoduodenectomies for ampullary carcinoma from 1999 to 2014 was retrospectively analyzed. The effect of node-associated variables, including lymph node status, positive lymph node number, total harvested lymph node (THLN) number, and lymph node ratio (LNR) was examined using univariate and multivariate analyses for survival outcome prediction.

RESULTS

In 194 evaluable patients, univariate analysis demonstrated that stage, cell differentiation, perineural invasion, and nodal status were significant conventional prognostic factors. Concerning the node-associated variables, positive nodal status, positive lymph node number≥2, THLN number<14, and LNR≥0.15 were significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes, with a 5-year survival rate of 20.3, 38.9, 25.4, and 18%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, nodal status and THLN number were two independent predictors of survival. The most favorable 5-year survival rate was 84.4% in patients with negative nodal involvement and THLN number≥14, compared with the poorest 5-year survival rate of 16.1% in those with positive nodal status and THLN number<14.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor biology reflected by lymph node status is the most important independent prognostic factor; nevertheless, surgical radicality based on THLN number also plays a significant role in the survival outcome for patients with ampullary carcinoma after curative pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Prognostic and predictive values of the immunoscore in patients with rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine whether the tumor immune infiltrate, as recently evaluated with the Immunoscore methodology, could be a useful prognostic marker in patients with rectal cancers.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The influence of the immune infiltrate on patient's outcome was investigated in patients with or without preoperative chemoradiation therapy (pCRT). The density of total (CD3(+)) and cytotoxic (CD8(+)) T lymphocytes was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and quantified by a dedicated image analysis software in surgical specimens of patients with rectal cancer (n = 111) who did not receive pCRT and in tumor biopsies performed before pCRT from additional 55 patients. The results were correlated with tumor recurrence, patient's survival, and response to pCRT.

RESULTS

The densities of CD3(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes and the associated Immunoscore (from I0 to I4) were significantly correlated with differences in disease-free and overall survival (HR, 1.81 and 1.72, respectively; all P < 0.005). Cox multivariate analysis supports the advantage of the Immunoscore compared with the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging in predicting recurrence and survival (all P < 0.001). Lymph node ratio added information in a prognostic model (all P < 0.05). In addition, high infiltration of CD3(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes in tumor biopsies was associated with downstaging of the tumor after pCRT (CD3(+) cells; Fisher exact test P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Immunoscore could be a useful prognostic marker in patients with rectal cancer treated by primary surgery. The determination of the immune infiltrate in biopsies before treatment could be a valuable information for the prediction of response to pCRT.

Does the extent of lymphadenectomy, number of lymph nodes, positive lymph node ratio and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio impact surgical outcome of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) status is an important predictor of survival following resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCCA). Controversies still exist with regard to the prognostic value of optimum extent of lymphadenectomy, total number of nodes removed, LN ratio (LNR) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) following PHCCA resection.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2010, 84 PHCCAs were resected; 78 are included in this analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were studied using log-rank statistics to assess which variables affected OS and DFS. The variables that showed statistical significance (P<0.05) on Kaplan-Meier univariate analysis were subjected to multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Five-year OS for node-positive status (n=45) was 10%, whereas node-negative (n=33) OS was 41% (P<0.001). Similarly, 5-year DFS was worse in the node-positive group (8%) than in the node-negative group (36%, P=0.001). There was no difference in 5-year OS (31 vs. 12%, P=0.135) and DFS (22 vs. 16%, P=0.518) between those with regional lymphadenectomy and those who underwent regional plus para-aortic lymphadenectomy, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients with 20 or more LNs removed had worse 5-year OS (0%) when compared with those with less than 20 LNs removed (29%, P=0.047). Moderate/poor tumour differentiation, distant metastasis and LN involvement were independent predictors of OS. Positive LNR had no effect on OS. Vascular invasion and an LNR of at least 0.37 were independent predictors of DFS. NLR had no effect on OS and DFS.

CONCLUSION

Extended lymphadenectomy patients (≥20 LNs) had worse OS when compared with those with more limited (<20 LNs) resection. An LNR of at least 0.37 is an independent predictor of DFS.

Proposal of new classification for stage III colon cancer based on the lymph node ratio: analysis of 4,172 patients from multi-institutional database in Japan

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively examined the optimal lymph node ratio (LNR) cutoff value and attempted to construct a new classification using the LNR in stage III colon cancer.

METHODS

The clinical and pathological data of 4,172 patients with histologically proven lymph node metastasis who underwent curative surgery for primary colon cancer at multiple institutions between 1995 and 2004 were derived from the multi-institutional database of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR). We determined independent prognostic factors and constructed a new classification using these factors. Finally, we compared the discriminatory ability between the new classification and the TNM seventh edition (TNM 7th) classification.

RESULTS

The optimal LNR cutoff value was 0.18. Multivariate analysis revealed that year of surgery, age, gender, histological type, TNM 7th T category, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, TNM 7th N category, and LNR were found to be significant independent prognostic factors. We attempted to construct a new classification based on the combination of TNM 7th T category and LNR. As a result, the cancer-specific survivals were well stratified (P < .0001). According to the Akaike's information criteria value, the new classification was judged to be superior to the TNM 7th classification with respect to both a better fit and lower complexity.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal LNR cutoff value that was found using the Japanese multi-institutional database and the new classification using LNR are considered to be extremely significant. Therefore, these findings strongly support the application of LNR in the stage classification in stage III colon cancer.

Increased lymph node yield in colorectal cancer is not necessarily associated with a greater number of lymph node positive cancers

The presence of lymph node metastasis is a key prognostic factor in colorectal cancer and lymph node yield is an important parameter in assessing the quality of histopathology reporting of colorectal cancer excision specimens. This study assesses the trend in lymph node evaluation over time in a single institution and the relationship with the identification of lymph node positive tumours. It compares the lymph node yield of a contemporary dataset compiled from the histopathology reports of 2178 patients who underwent surgery for primary colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2012 with that of a historic dataset compiled from the histopathology reports of 1038 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer at 5 yearly intervals from 1975 to 2000. The mean lymph node yield was 14.91 in 2005 rising to 21.38 in 2012. In 2012 92.9% of all cases had at least 12 lymph nodes examined. Comparison of the mean lymph node yield and proportion of Dukes C cases shows a significant increase (Pearson correlation = 0.927, p = 0.001) in lymph node yield while there is no corresponding significant trend in the proportion of Dukes C cases (Pearson correlation =  -0.138, p = 0.745). This study shows that there is increasing yield of lymph nodes from colorectal cancer excision specimens. However, this is not necessarily associated with an increase number of lymph node positive cancers. Further risk stratifying of colorectal cancer requires consideration of other pathological parameters especially the presence of extramural venous invasion and relevant biomarkers.

Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Data have indicated that the lymph node ratio (LNR) may be a better prognostic indicator than lymph node status in pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the value of the LNR in patients undergoing resection for periampullary carcinomas.

METHODS

A cut off value of 0.2 was assigned to the LNR in accordance with published studies. The impact of histopathological factors including a LNR was analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

In total, 551 patients undergoing a resection (January 2000 to December 2010) were analysed. The median lymph node yield was 15, and 198 (34%) patients had a LNR > 0.2. In patients with a LNR of > 0.2, the median overall survival (OS) was 18 versus 33 months in patients with an LNR < 0.2 (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated a LNR > 0.2, T and N stage, vascular or perineural invasion, grade and resection margin status to be significantly associated with OS. On multivariate analysis, only a LNR > 0.2, vascular or perineural invasion and margin positivity remained significant. In N1 disease, a LNR was able to distinguish survival in patients with a similar lymph node burden, and correlated with more aggressive tumour pathological variables.

CONCLUSION

A LNR > 0.2, and not lymph note status, is an independent prognostic factor for OS indicating the LNR should be utilized in outcome stratification.

The prognostic value of lymph node ratio and updated TNM classification in rectal cancer patients with adequate versus inadequate lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to clarify whether the lymph node ratio (LNR) is superior to the updated TNM classification regarding the prognosis of stage III rectal cancer patients who have not undergone neoadjuvant therapy. The TNM system is based on the absolute number of lymph nodes involved, and the LNR takes into account involved and examined nodes.

METHODS

In 237 patients with stage III rectal cancer, we evaluated prognostic factors for 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and risk of distant metastases (DM) using the Kaplan-Meier method, with patients divided based on adequate versus inadequate lymph node dissection (≥12 vs. <12 lymph nodes examined). The updated TNM divides patients into four groups (1, 2-3, 4-6, and ≥7 involved nodes), while LNR divides patients into quartiles. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Among patients with adequate lymph node dissection, the distributions within the two systems were in agreement in 141/178 (79.2 %, kappa 0.721), and the predictive values for OS, DFS, and DM were similar. In patients with inadequate lymph node dissection, the classifications of both systems were concordant in only 13/59 (22 %, kappa 0.021). The pN system significantly under-staged patients, while the LNR classification was a better predictor of OS, DFS, and DM.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with adequate lymph node dissection, LNR staging does not add substantial information to the predictions of updated TNM lymph node staging. However, in patients with inadequate lymph node harvesting, the LNR compensates for the under-staging of the TNM classification and provides a better estimation of prognosis than the updated TNM system.

Prognostic significance of Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) expression in cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic head cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by an aggressive biology and poor prognosis. Experimental evidence has suggested a role for the transcriptional repressor Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) in epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion, and metastasis in PDAC. ZEB1 expression has been observed in cancer cells as well as stromal fibroblasts. Our study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of ZEB1 expression in PDAC tissue.

METHODS

Patient baseline and follow-up data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. After clinicopathologic re-review, serial sliced tissue slides were immunostained for ZEB1, E-cadherin, vimentin, and pan-cytokeratin. ZEB1 expression in cancer cells and adjacent stromal fibroblasts was graded separately and correlated to routine histopathologic parameters and survival after resection.

RESULTS

A total of 117 cases of PDAC were included in the study. High ZEB1 expression in cancer cells and in stromal cancer-associated fibroblasts was associated with poor prognosis. There was also a trend for poor prognosis with a lymph node ratio of greater than 0.10. In line with its role as an inducer of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, ZEB1 expression in cancer cells was positively correlated with Vimentin expression and negatively with E-Cadherin expression. In multivariate analysis, stromal ZEB1 expression grade was the only independent factor of survival after resection.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that ZEB1 expression in cancer cells as well as in stromal fibroblasts are strong prognostic factors in PDAC. Stromal ZEB1 expression is identified for the first time as an independent predictor of survival after resection of PDAC. This observation suggests that therapies targeting ZEB1 and its downstream pathways could hit both cancer cells and supporting cancer-associated fibroblasts.

Comparison of metastatic lymph node ratio staging system with the 7th AJCC system for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prognostic value and staging accuracy of the metastatic lymph node ratio (rN) staging system for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1,127 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery between 2000 and 2011 at our institute were analyzed. Lymph nodes status was assigned according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pN system and rN system. Patients with colon cancer (group 1, n = 652) and rectal cancer (group 2, n = 475) were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

The rN staging system was generated using 0.2 and 0.6 as the cutoff values of lymph node ratio and then compared with AJCC pN stages. Linear regression model revealed that the number of retrieved lymph node was related to number of metastatic lymph nodes. After a median follow-up of 46 months, the 5-year survival rates of patients with more than 12 lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved were better than cases with fewer than 12 LNs, while the differences were not obvious in rN classification.

CONCLUSIONS

The rN category is a better prognostic tool than the AJCC pN category for colorectal cancer patients after curative surgery.

Outcomes of locally advanced breast cancer patients with ≥ 10 positive axillary lymph nodes

Breast cancers with 10 or more positive lymph nodes at the time of diagnosis are staged as pathological N3a (pN3a) and they have poor prognosis. Recent studies showed five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of N3a disease as 43-66 and 58-81 %, respectively. We herein present outcomes of our patients with stage pN3a breast cancer. Among 2,578 patients diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma at Hacettepe University Hospital between 2002 and 2012, 218 patients (8.4 %) had pN3a disease and were included and analyzed retrospectively in this study. Patients with internal mammary, infraclavicular, and supraclavicular node metastasis or distant metastasis at initial diagnosis were excluded. Demographic features, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens, and patient outcomes in terms of DFS and OS were analyzed. Lymph node ratio was defined as the ratio of positive to total removed lymph nodes. The median age was 49. Most common histological subtype was ductal carcinoma (82.1 %). About 82.6 % of patients had stage T2/T3 cancers and 47.7 % (104) had grade III cancers. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were positive in 133 (61 %) and 121 (55.5 %) patients, respectively. HER2 status was known for 213 patients and was positive in 87 (39.9 %) patients. A total of 27 (12.6 %) patients had triple-negative tumors. Lymphovascular invasion, extracapsular extension, and perineural invasion were present in 106 (48.6 %), 105 (48.2 %), 20 (9.2 %) cases, respectively. A total of 18 patients (8.3 %) received neoadjuvant and 200 patients (91.7 %) received adjuvant chemotherapy, mostly with anthracycline- (95 %) and taxane (60 %)-containing regimens. A total of 210 patients (96.3 %) received radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 39.5 months. A total of 96 patients relapsed on follow-up and 64 patients died. Nineteen of the relapses were locoregional and 77 were distant relapses. The 5-year DFS rate was 46.2 % and the OS rate was 69.8 %. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, grade III disease (HR 1.899, 95 % CI 1.196-3.017, P = 0.007), perineural invasion (HR 2.519, 95 % CI 1.341-4.731, P = 0.004), and lymph node ratio (≥ 0.9 vs. <0.9) (HR 2.290, 95 % CI 1.368-3.835, P = 0.002) were significantly associated with DFS, and grade III disease (HR 2.679, 95 % CI 1.500-4.782, P = 0.001) and lymph node ratio (≥ 0.9 vs. <0.9) (HR 2.182, 95 % CI 1.211-3.932, P = 0.009) were significantly associated with OS. Patients with pN3a disease in our cohort have comparable survival rates with other reports in the literature. Within this high risk group of patients, those with grade III disease, perineural invasion, and lymph node ratio ≥ 0.9 seem to confer poorer prognosis.

Clinicopathological features of long-term survivors for advanced biliary tract cancer and impact of the number of lymph nodes involved

BACKGROUND & AIM

To investigate the characteristics of long-term survivors after surgery for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), especially those with local invasion and/or lymph node involvement.

METHODS

We analyzed the features of long-term survivors using a prospectively collected database and verified the results using recent patients' data which have been well-described, especially in relation to lymph node dissection and metastasis. We used classification by the Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery (JSBS).

RESULTS

Among 170 patients with advanced BTC (Stage III or IV in JSBS), 25 (10 bile duct cancer, 9 gall bladder cancer, and 6 cancer of the papilla of Vater) survived for more than 5 years. Twenty-four patients had undergone fCurA/B (R0) surgery in these 25 patients. In comparison with the patients who did not survive for 5 years, the long-term survivors had fewer metastatic lymph nodes, that is, up to three (p = 0.0028). In regard to the impact of lymph node metastasis, the prognostic factor was the number of lymph nodes (3-year overall survival, 0 or 1: 68.1% vs >2: 40.0%, p = 0.0304).

CONCLUSION

For obtaining long-term survival, curative resection would be necessary in patients with no more than one lymph node metastasis.

The prognostic value of lymph node cross-sectional cancer area in node-positive breast cancer: a comparison with N stage and lymph node ratio

The number of positive axillary lymph nodes (LNs) is the only node-related factor for prognostic evaluation of breast cancer recognized by AJCC (TNM staging). However, N staging may not completely reflect LN tumor involvement due to the erroneous count of LNs in the presence of matted LNs and different tumor volume in LNs. Additionally, the positive/total LN ratio (LNR) has been shown to outperform N staging in survival prediction. In our study, to better quantify the tumor involvement of axillary LNs, we measured the cross-sectional cancer area (CSCA) of the positive LNs in 292 breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2000 in our institution and compared its prognostic value to that of number of positive LNs (metLN)/N stage and LNR. Statistical analyses of these three LN-related factors were performed by Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox's regression model. Patients were divided into three groups based on the different LN CSCA (<50, 50–500, and >500 mm²), or LNR (<0.1, 0.1–0.65, and >0.65), or N stage (N1–N3). Multivariate analysis demonstrated LNR was the most significant LN-related survival predictor with hazard ratio (HR) 25.0 (P = 0.001), compared to the metLN (HR 0.09, P = 0.052) and CSCA (HR 2.24, P = 0.323).

Prognostic relevance of number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in resected pancreatic, ampullary, and distal bile duct carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR) may be more useful than nodal (N) status in prognostic subclassification of adenocarcinomas after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ampullary (AC), biliary (DBC), and pancreatic (PC) adenocarcinomas are biologically distinct, and nodal involvement may have different prognostic importance among these separate cancers.

METHODS

We included 179 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies for PC, AC, or DBC, and performed standardized histopathologic evaluation, including prospective registration and retrospective reevaluation of the cancer origin. Associations between histopathologic variables and LNR, N status, and number of metastatic nodes were evaluated. Unadjusted and adjusted survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Overall 5 year survival was 6% for PC (n=72), 26% for DBC (n=46), and 46% for AC (n=61). Lymph node involvement was more frequent in PC (75%) than in AC (48%) and DBC (57%). In PC, N status did not discriminate between prognostic groups (N1 vs. N0; p=0.31). However, increasing LNR was associated with poorer survival in unadjusted analysis, as well as when adjusting for margin involvement, degree of differentiation, and tumor diameter (p=0.032; hazard ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.31). In AC and DBC, N status clearly discriminated between subgroups of patients with different long-term survival in unadjusted and adjusted survival analysis (N1 vs. N0; p<0.001), whereas number of metastatic nodes and LNR did not predict survival among node-positive resections.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive value of nodal involvement depends on the type of cancer within the pancreatic head. In AC and DBC, N status adequately discriminates between good and poor prognosis. In PC, LNR may be more powerful in prognostic subclassification.

Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Overall five year survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma is poor with typical reported rates in the literature of 8-27%. The aim of this study was to identify the histological variables best able to predict long-term survival in these patients.

METHODS

A prospective database of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between April 2002 and June 2009 was analysed to identify patients with histologically proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Patients with ampullary tumours, cholangiocarcinoma, duodenal adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumours were excluded. The histology reports for these patients were reviewed. Uni-variate and multi-variate survival analysis was performed to identify variables useful in predicting long-term outcome.

RESULTS

134 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma during this period. 5 year survival in this series was 18.6%. Uni-variate analysis identified nodal status and the metastatic to resected lymph node ratio as predictors of survival. Using multi-variate Cox Regression analysis a metastatic to lymph node ratio of >15% (p < 0.01) and the presence of perineural invasion (p < 0.05) were identified as independent predictors of patient survival. Metastatic to resected lymph node ratio is better able to stratify prognosis than nodal status alone with 5 year survival of those with N0 disease being 55.6% and 12.9% for N1 disease. However for those with <15% of resected nodes positive, 5 year survival was 21.7% and in those with >15% nodes positive it was 5.2% (p = 0.0017).

CONCLUSION

The metastatic to resected lymph node ratio can provide significant prognostic information in those patients with node positive disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.