Home-management of malignant pleural effusion with an indwelling pleural catheter: Ten years experience

Assessing Factors That May Impact Physician-based Decisions for Placing Indwelling Pleural Catheters

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural effusion is a common finding in patients with advanced cancer and is a frequent cause of dyspnea. Current guidelines indicate thoracentesis for symptomatic patients, while indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) are recommended for patients who develop pleural fluid re-accumulation. IPC maintenance, however, requires a significant level of financial and social support. This study aims to analyze potential influencing factors that may play a role in the decision for placing IPCs in patients with recurrent malignant pleural effusions.

METHODS

This study retrospectively collected baseline sociodemographic and laboratory data in patients who underwent thoracentesis for malignant pleural effusion from August 2016 to October 2021, and selected patients who presented with re-accumulation of pleural fluid within 30 days or had a pulmonary physician's note documenting that IPC is a potential management option. Of these selected patients (IPC candidates), we stratified patients who underwent IPC placement and those who did not, and performed statistical analysis between these 2 groups.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-six patients who underwent thoracentesis were regarded as IPC candidates. Almost all baseline sociodemographic characteristics, including ethnicity ( P =0.637), sex ( P =0.655), and marital status ( P =0.773) were similar between the 2 groups, but significantly higher ECOG scores ( P =0.049) were noted in the IPC group. No statistically significant differences were noted in age, body mass index, platelet, PTT, international normalized ratio, creatinine, white blood cell, red blood cells, fluid protein, or fluid lactate dehydrogenase. Fluid albumin ( P =0.057) and serum neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio ( P =0.003) were significantly higher in patients without IPC placement.

CONCLUSION

This study did not recognize any baseline sociodemographic factors that may contribute to the decision to place IPCs.

Permanent indwelling catheter for the management of refractory malignant pericardial effusion

In this case report, we describe the novel use of a permanent indwelling catheter (PiC) in the management of refractory malignant pericardial effusion (PE). The patient had disseminated lung cancer and was hospitalised repeatedly with circulatory collapse due to malignant PE despite treatments with pericardiocentesis (PCC) and a pericardial window (PW). The PiC was inserted as a last resort with no complications and was a mediator of pericardiodesis (PCD), resulting in the cease of PE. The PiC could subsequently be removed, and there was no relapse of PE.

Incidence of complications from indwelling pleural catheter for pleural effusion: A meta-analysis

Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) is widely used in patients with pleural effusion (PE). This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively summarize the clinical complication from IPC. We searched four large electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library) for potentially relevant studies and assessed the included studies' quality using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies' criteria. Extracted data were used to pool rates, and to conduct subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Forty-one studies involving a cumulative 4983 patients with 5650 IPCs were included in this meta-analysis. The overall incidence of IPC complications was 20.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.0-26.3). The top four complications were: overall infection incidence 5.7% (95% CI: 0.7-2.4); overall catheter abnormality incidence 4.4% (95% CI: 2.8-6.3); pain incidence 1.2% (95% CI: 0.4-2.4); and overall loculation incidence 0.9% (95% CI: 0.1-2.1). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses for overall complications and infections by country, PE site, and PE type demonstrated these factors did not contribute significantly to heterogeneity. Further subgroup analyses for infection of benign PE showed that the overall infection incidence (12.6% [95% CI: 8.1-17.8] vs 0.7% [95% CI: 0.0-4.5]) and empyema incidence (9.1% [95% CI: 5.3-13.8] vs 0.0% [95% CI: 0.0-2.3]) of patients with liver-related PE were significantly higher than that of patients with heart-related PE. Our meta-analysis showed reliable pooled incidences of IPC-related complications, with infection being the most common. These results serve to remind clinicians about the incidence of IPC-related complications and emphasize the importance of taking corresponding preventive and therapeutic steps.

Silver Nitrate-Coated Versus Standard Indwelling Pleural Catheter for Malignant Effusions: The SWIFT Randomized Trial

RATIONALE

Tunneled, indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) have been demonstrated to be an effective method of managing malignant pleural effusions. However, they allow pleurodesis and can therefore be removed in only a subset of patients. A novel, silver-nitrate coated IPC was developed with the intention of creating a rapid, effective chemical pleurodesis to allow more frequent and earlier catheter removal. This study represent the pivotal clinical trial evaluating that catheter vs the standard IPC.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of a novel silver nitrate-eluting indwelling pleural catheter (SNCIPC) with that of a standard, uncoated catheter.

METHODS

The SWIFT trial was a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, patient-blind trial. Central randomisation occurred following a computer-generated schedule, stratified by site. Recruitment was from 17 secondary or tertiary-care hospitals in the USA and 3 in the UK and included adult patients with malignant pleural effusion needing drainage, without evidence of lung entrapment or significant loculation. The intervention group underwent insertion of a SNCIPC with maximal fluid drainage, followed by a tapering drainage schedule. The control group received a standard, uncoated catheter. Follow up was until 90 days. The primary outcome measure was pleurodesis efficacy, measured by fluid drainage, at 30 days.

RESULTS

119 patients were randomised. 5 withdrew before receiving treatment, leaving 114 (77 SNCIPC, 37 standard IPC) for intention-to-treat analysis. Mean age was 66 years (SD 11). More patients in the SNCIPC group were in-patients (39% vs 14%, p=0.009). For the primary outcome, pleurodesis rates were 12/37 (32%) in the control group and 17/77 (22%) in the SNCIPC group (rate difference -0.10, 95% CI -0.30-0.09). Median time to pleurodesis was 11 days (IQR 9-23) in the control group and 4 days (IQR 2-15) in the SNCIPC group. No significant difference in treatment-related adverse event rates was noted between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The SNCIPC did not improve pleurodesis efficacy compared to a standard indwelling pleural catheter. This study does not support the wider use of the SNCIPC device. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02649894).

Quality of life in patients with malignant pleural effusion treated with an indwelling pleural catheter in an emerging country

BACKGROUND

The use of Indwelling Pleural Catheter (IPC) in the care of patients with Malignant Pleural Effusion (MPE) is well established, however studies involving public health systems of low and middle-income countries are still lacking. This study aimed to determine the effect of IPC on the respiratory symptoms and Quality of Life (QoL) of patients with MPE in the setting of a Brazilian public health system.

METHODS

From August 2015 to November 2019, patients with MPE underwent IPC placement and were prospectively followed. QoL and respiratory symptoms were assessed by the EORTC questionnaires (QLQ-30; LC13) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), respectively, at pre-treatment, 30 , and 60 days after IPC placement.

RESULTS

56 patients were enrolled with 57 catheters inserted. The mean age was 63 (23‒88) years, of which 17 (30%) were men and 39 (70%) were women. Breast 24 (42%) and lung 21 (37%) were the main primary neoplasms. Cellulitis was the most common complication and all patients recovered with appropriate antimicrobial therapy. QoL did not change significantly over time, however, the VAS showed a significant improvement in dyspnea (+1.2: -0.5; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

IPC relieves respiratory symptoms without compromising the QoL, with a low complication rate. It represents a suitable option for patients with MPE and short LE in an emerging country.

Tract metastasis in patients with long-term pleural catheter-computed tomography diagnosis and longitudinal assessment

OBJECTIVES

Long-term indwelling pleural catheters (IPC), used for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), may lead to catheter tract metastasis (CTM). While computed tomography (CT) is valuable for diagnosis, no studies have assessed CT manifestations of CTM. Our goal is to describe the incidence, CT appearances, and temporal evolution of CTM in MPM.

METHODS

A retrospective review of CT of 90 consecutive patients with MPM and IPC. In patients with CTM, a longitudinal assessment was performed for CT appearance at diagnosis and over time, interval from insertion to diagnosis and rate of progression.

RESULTS

The incidence of CTM was 26% (23/90), in 22 men (54-83 years, mean 73 years). CTM manifested with focal lesion (3 to 60 mm, mean 25 mm) in the subcutaneous tissue at the insertion site. Abnormalities of sub-adjacent skin and fat stranding were present in 16/24 (66%) and 11/24 (46%), respectively, enlargement of chest wall musculature in 11/24 (46%), and dilated subcutaneous vessels in 4/24 (17%) patients. On follow-up, 53% had enlargement of focal lesion. The average rate of progression was 3.5 mm/month, compared to 0.79 mm/month for pleural thickening (p = 0.03). The time between IPC insertion and CTM diagnosis varied from 58 to 1375 days (median 408 days); 83% occurred after IPC removal. Reporting radiologists described focal abnormality at the insertion site in only 9/23 (39%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CTM is commonly overlooked and underreported by radiologists. CT invariably demonstrates focal subcutaneous lesion in the procedure tract, most commonly after IPC removal. Ancillary findings, notably serratus or latissimus dorsi muscle enlargement, are novel finding that can assist in CT detection and diagnosis.

KEY POINTS

• Catheter tract metastasis (CTM), resulting from indwelling pleural catheter to manage malignant pleural mesothelioma, invariably manifested on CT as a focal subcutaneous lesion at the site of insertion, more commonly after catheter removal. • Ipsilateral muscle enlargement is a newly described CT finding that can assist in the detection and diagnosis. • Catheter tract metastasis was commonly overlooked by radiologists, reported in only 39% of cases.

The Role of a Nurse Specialist in Palliative Care: An Israeli Experience

Given the severe shortage of physicians in Israel, the Ministry of Health issued a decree that offered advanced authority and responsibilities to experienced nurses; thus, the status of the nurse specialist (NS) was created. The role of NS in Israel is truly varied, incorporating many different facets that range from stabilizing to changing the existing palliative care (PC) orders, including those involving dosages and methods of care provision, issuing of repeat prescriptions, suspending drug treatment, and prescribing new drugs for a patient according to a protocol issued by a physician. The NS is also authorized to perform many clinical duties that frequently involve direct patient care. According to the different needs of the patients, he/she coordinates with the different members of the interdisciplinary team, who may be suitable to offer further help and support to the client and/or his/her significant others. His/her work keeps him/her in a constant dialogue with other health-care professionals, and as questions arise, he/she answers them and offers support to staff, patients, and family members. In the Middle East, the whole issue of PC is relatively new, and due to cultures, traditions, and religions, a number of difficulties have to be resolved.

Indwelling Pleural Catheters: A Clinical Option in Trapped Lung

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) symptoms have a real impact on quality of life. Surgical approach through video-assisted thoracic surgery provides a first step in palliation. In patients unfit for general anesthesia, awake pleuroscopy represents an alternative. Sclerosing agents can be administered at the bedside through a chest tube. Ideal treatment of MPE should include adequate long-term symptom relief, minimize hospitalization, and reduce adverse effects. Indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) allows outpatient management of MPE through periodic ambulatory fluid drainage. IPC offers advantages over pleurodesis in patients with poor functional status who cannot tolerate pleurodesis or in patients with trapped lungs.

Management of malignant pleural effusions in patients with trapped lung with indwelling pleural catheter: how to do it

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a well-known sign of an end-stage cancer and affects the quality of life of these patients. The primary goal in the management of MPE should be a soothing treatment with the palliation of symptoms. Pleurodesis may be accomplished with chemical irritation of the pleura and represents the commonest treatment of MPE with palliative intent. Pleurodesis may be achieved through a chest drainage placement or a video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedure. The uniportal VATS talc poudrage is considered the gold standard of care for fit patients, while talc slurry (through the chest drainage) is reserved to those patients with important comorbidities not tolerating a surgical procedure. However, if the lung remains trapped after fluid evacuation or if the daily fluid output after chest tube insertion is major than 300 mL/day, the talc pleurodesis is likely to fail. Therefore, in those patients who are unfit for pleurodesis (low performance status or comorbidity), or with a recurrent MPE after chemical pleurodesis, or with trapped lung, the outpatient intermittent drainage through a subcutaneous tunnelled indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) effectively relieved dyspnoea without complications. The treatment of recurrent MPE with an IPC reduces symptoms and improves quality of life in patients with end-stage cancers. The complication rate is low; therefore, the IPC can be easily managed at home. The IPC is safe, easy to place and effective for the palliation of MPE. It could help the clinical need of the thoracic surgeons and the other members of a multidisciplinary cancer team.

Complications of indwelling pleural catheter use and their management

The growing utilisation of indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) has put forward a new era in the management of recurrent symptomatic pleural effusions. IPC use is safe compared to talc pleurodesis, though complications can occur. Pleural infection affects <5% of patients, and is usually responsive to antibiotic treatment without requiring catheter removal or surgery. Pleural loculations develop over time, limiting drainage in 10% of patients, which can be improved with intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy. Catheter tract metastasis can occur with most tumours but is more common in mesothelioma. The metastases usually respond to analgaesics and/or external radiotherapy. Long-term intermittent drainage of exudative effusions or chylothorax can potentially lead to loss of nutrients, though no data exist on any clinical impact. Fibrin clots within the catheter lumen can result in blockage. Chest pain following IPC insertion is often mild, and adjustments in analgaesics and drainage practice are usually all that are required. As clinical experience with the use of IPC accumulates, the profile and natural course of complications are increasingly described. We aim to summarise the available literature on IPC-related complications and the evidence to support specific strategies.

Interventions to treat malignant pleural effusions

Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) are common complications that occur with advanced stages of cancer. In general, they indicate a poor prognosis and greatly affect quality of life (QOL). The treatment goal of MPEs is to provide relief of symptoms. The standard treatment for MPEs is talc pleurodesis; however, indwelling pleural catheters have become more frequently used. This article focuses on current management strategies for MPEs and assesses their influence on QOL.At a GlanceSymptoms of malignant pleural effusions (MPEs), which involve the accumulation of fluid in the pleural space, include dyspnea, shortness of breath, chest pain, and other issues that decrease functional status.Treatment for MPEs should be palliative, achieving immediate symptom relief and improved quality of life.The optimal treatment strategy for MPEs should have minimal side effects, require minimal or no hospitalization, and have low rates of recurrence.

Indwelling pleural catheters

Indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) are now established as one of the major tools for the management of recurrent pleural effusions. Their traditional role, which saw them only as second line treatment for malignant effusions, has now expanded. Recent evidence has not only suggested that they may be effectively employed as first-line therapy in some malignant cases, but that there is a wider spectrum of diseases which may be managed by their use. The majority of patients are likely to experience symptomatic benefit and some may also go on to achieve pleurodesis. IPCs are relatively simple to insert and maintain, and theoretically allow patients to be managed entirely as an outpatient, meaning that they are likely to be cost-effective in the longer term. They can also dramatically improve the quality of life in patients who have typically needed lengthy hospital admissions or who have terminal malignant disease.

Quality-of-Life assessment in malignant pleural effusion treated with indwelling pleural catheter: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural effusion is a clinical problem that impairs Quality of Life in patients with advanced malignancies. An indwelling pleural catheter is an alternative treatment to palliate some of the symptoms.

AIM

To evaluate the Quality of Life of outpatients with malignant pleural effusion who were treated with an indwelling pleural catheter. Questionnaire compliance, catheter patency time, and survival were analyzed.

DESIGN

A multicenter observational study was conducted across five hospitals in Spain. Quality of Life was assessed at three different time points (before catheter placement and at 30 and 60 days post-placement) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire QLQ-C30. For lung cancer patients, the QLQ-LC13 was also used.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with recurrent malignant pleural effusion treated with an indwelling pleural catheter.

RESULTS

A total of 51 outpatients completed the baseline QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Of these, 28 completed the questionnaire at 30 days. Of these 28 patients, 13 completed the questionnaire at 60 days. Scores showed a significant improvement in symptoms scales at 30 days (p = 0.03). Global health status and functional scales showed a non-significant trend to improvement at 30 and 60 days. A total of 27 lung cancer patients completed the QLQ-LC13 questionnaire. Items assessing dyspnea showed a significant improvement following catheter placement (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Indwelling pleural catheter is useful for palliative management of recurrent malignant pleural effusion in that it benefits Quality of Life in outpatients with advanced malignancies. In lung cancer patients, scores indicated that indwelling pleural catheter also provides significant relief of dyspnea.

The treatment of pleural carcinosis with malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Pleural carcinosis is caused by tumors of the chest (e.g., lung and breast cancer) or elsewhere in the body (e.g., ovarian carcinoma) that metastasize to the visceral and/or parietal pleura. Recurrent malignant pleural effusion due to pleural carcinosis is one of the most common findings in oncology. It affects about 56 000 patients per year in Germany alone.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search of the Medline database (key words: malignant pleural effusion, pleural carcinosis) and on the authors' clinical experience.

RESULTS

Although many retrospective studies have been published, there has been only one randomized controlled trial of treatment, in which permanent pleural catheters were compared with talcum pleurodesis. Patients with pleural carcinosis have a median survival of less than 12 months. Many are suffering from progression of their underlying disease, with generalized tumor involvement; thus, the symptomatic treatment of pain and dyspnea is often the main therapeutic issue. The underlying tumor, usually an adenocarcinoma, can be diagnosed either by histology or by cytology. The main complication is progressive respiratory failure. The treatment is palliative, rather than curative. The main approaches are drainage of the effusion (by thoracocentesis or with permanent pleural catheters) and pleurodesis (obliteration of the pleural space by causing the visceral and parietal pleura to adhere to each other).

CONCLUSION

Pleural carcinosis with symptomatic malignant pleural effusion is treated palliatively. The appropriate treatment in each case should be determined through discussion with the patient, with the goal of improving the patient's quality of life.