Adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival after TME surgery in mucinous carcinoma of the rectum

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves long-term survival in pathologic stage III rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma after pre-operative chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

The benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy remain debated rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC). Our study aims to delve into the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic stage III rectal MC by a large population-based database.

METHODS

The Chi-square test was performed to examine the parameters between treatment groups. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of treatment groups were conducted by using the Kaplan-Meier method. The impact of factors on survival was assessed using Cox regression analyses. To balance the covariates and reduce the selection bias, we employed propensity score matching (PSM) to narrow the differences between treatment groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time for overall patients was 80 months. In the pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (pre-CRT) group, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had significantly better 5-year OS and CSS. Multivariate analyses found that adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better OS (p < 0.001, HR (95% CI): 0.66 (0.51-0.86)) and CSS (p = 0.012, HR (95% CI): 0.71 (0.54-0.93)). However, adjuvant chemotherapy was not an independent prognosis factor in both OS (p = 0.149, HR (95% CI): 0.76 (0.53-1.1); Supplement Table 1) and CSS (p = 0.183, HR (95% CI): 0.74 (0.48-1.15)) in patients who did not receive pre-CRT. After PSM, similar results were found in the pre-CRT and the no pre-CRT groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our population-based retrospective cohort study indicates that the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with the pre-CRT status in patients with stage III rectal MC. In patients who underwent pre-CRT, the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better survival outcomes. Conversely, adjuvant chemotherapy does not seem to confer significant survival benefits to patients without pre-CRT.

The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in mucinous and non-mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma patients after TME surgery

INTRODUCTION

The value of adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients is debated and varies in different subgroups. One such subgroup is mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC), which is more treatment resistant compared to non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC). To date, mucinous histology is not taken into account when deciding on adjuvant treatment strategy. This is the first study to exclusively include patients with rectal cancer, then separate MAC and NMAC and compare the survival in patients that had or did not have adjuvant chemotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included retrospective register data from 365 Swedish patients with stage II-IV rectal adenocarcinoma, 56 patients with MAC and 309 patients with NMAC. All patients were considered curative, had surgery with total mesorectal excision in 2004-2013, and were followed up until death or 2021.

RESULTS

Patients with MAC that had adjuvant chemotherapy had better overall survival (OS, HR 0.42; CI 95%: 0.19-0.93; p = 0.032) and a trend towards better cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR 0.41 CI 95%: 0.17-1.03; p = 0.057) compared to patients without chemotherapy (HR 0.42; CI 95%: 0.19-0.93; p = 0.032). The difference in OS was still significant even after adjusting for sex, age, stage, differentiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative radiotherapy (HR 0.40; CI 95%: 0.17-0.92; p = 0.031). There was no such difference in the NMAC patients except in the stage-by-stage subgroup analyses where patients in stage IV had better survival after adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There may be a difference in treatment response to adjuvant chemotherapy between MAC and NMAC patients. Patients with MAC could possibly benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in stages II-IV. Further studies are however needed to confirm these results.

Construction of Novel Prognostic Nomogram for Mucinous and Signet Ring Cell Colorectal Cancer Patients with a Survival Longer Than 5 Years

Purpose

Patients and Methods

Results

Conclusion

Mucinous adenocarcinoma: A unique clinicopathological subtype in colorectal cancer

Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a unique clinicopathological subtype of colorectal cancer, which is characterized by extracellular mucinous components that comprise at least 50% of the tumor tissue. The clinical characteristics, molecular features, response to chemo-/radiotherapy, and prognosis of MAC are different from that of non-MAC (NMAC). MAC is more common in the proximal colon, with larger volume, higher T-stage, a higher proportion of positive lymph nodes, poorer tumor differentiation, and a higher proportion of peritoneal implants compared to NMAC. Although biopsy is the main diagnostic method for MAC, magnetic resonance imaging is superior in accuracy, especially for rectal carcinoma. The aberrant expression of mucins, including MUC1, MUC2 and MUC5AC, is a notable feature of MAC, which may be related to tumor invasion, metastasis, inhibition of apoptosis, and chemo-/radiotherapy resistance. The genetic origin of MAC is mainly related to BRAF mutation, microsatellite instability, and the CpG island methylator phenotype pathway. In addition, the poor prognosis of rectal MAC has been confirmed by various studies, and that of colonic MAC is still controversial. In this review, we summarize the epidemiology, clinicopathological characteristics, molecular features, methods of diagnosis, and treatments of MAC in order to provide references for further fundamental and clinical research.

Prognostic significance of mucinous component in hilar cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection

BACKGROUND

The presence of mucinous component has been indicated to have a prognostic value in adenocarcinoma. However, little is known regarding the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) with mucinous component (HCM).

METHODS

Between January 1996 and December 2014, a total of 61 HCM patients who underwent curative-intent resection at West China Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological characteristics and survival of these patients were compared with a large cohort of 217 surgically resected conventional HC patients during the same period.

RESULTS

The clinicopathological characteristics of HCM were distinct from conventional HC, including higher CA19-9 levels, larger tumor sizes, less differentiation, and a high frequency of liver parenchyma invasion, portal vein invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. HCM patients showed significantly worse recurrence-free survival (13.4 vs 23.9 months; P = .011) and overall survival (18.2 vs 32.1 months; P = .019) compared with conventional HC patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed liver parenchyma invasion, N stage, surgical margin, and histological grade as independent prognostic factors influencing overall survival in HCM patients.

CONCLUSION

HCM showed distinct clinicopathological features, more aggressive biological behaviors, and poor prognosis in comparison with conventional HC. Therefore, the mucinous component is an adverse prognostic factor for HC.

Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma: clinical pathology and treatment options

Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma is a distinct subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC) characterized by the presence of abundant extracellular mucin which accounts for at least 50% of the tumor volume. Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma is found in 10%–20% of CRC patients and occurs more commonly in female and younger patients. Moreover, mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma is more frequently located in the proximal colon and diagnosed at an advanced stage. Based on its molecular context, mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma is associated with the overexpression of mucin 2 (MUC2) and mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) proteins. At the same time, it shows higher mutation rates in the fundamental genes of the RAS/MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways. Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma also shows higher rates of microsatellite instability (MSI) than non-mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma which might correlate it with Lynch syndrome and the CpG island methylator phenotype. The prognosis of mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma as to non-mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma is debatable. Further, the impaired responses of mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma to palliative or adjuvant chemotherapy warrant more studies to be performed for a specialized treatment for these patients. In this review, we discuss the molecular background and histopathology of mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma, and provide an update on its prognosis and therapeutics from recent literatures.

Mucinous Rectal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated with a Poor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mucinous adenocarcinoma represents a potentially poor prognostic subgroup of rectal cancer. A consensus on the effect of mucinous cancer on outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative resection for rectal cancer has not been reached.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the current study is to use meta-analytical techniques to assess the association between mucinous histology and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library was performed.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies examining the effect of mucinous histology on chemotherapeutic response in rectal cancer were included.

INTERVENTIONS

No direct interventions were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes of mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma were compared with nonmucinous tumors by using random-effects methods to analyze data. Data are presented as ORs with 95% CIs. The main outcomes measured were the rates of pathological complete response, tumor and nodal downstaging, positive resection margin rate, local recurrence, and overall mortality.

RESULTS

Eight comparative series describing outcomes in 1724 patients were identified, 241 had mucinous tumors (14%). Mucinous tumors had a reduced rate of pathological complete response (OR, 0.078; 95% CI, 0.015-0.397; p = 0.002) and tumor downstaging (OR, 0.318; 95% CI, 0.185-0.547; p < 0.001) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with an increased rate of positive resection margin (OR, 5.018; 95% CI, 3.224-7.810; p < 0.001) and poorer overall survival (OR, 1.526; 95% CI, 1.060-2.198; p = 0.023) following resection. Mucin expression did not significantly affect nodal downstaging (OR, 0.706; 95% CI, 0.295-1.693; p = 0.435) or local recurrence (OR, 1.856; 95% CI, 0.933-3.693; p = 0.078). There was no across-study heterogeneity for any end point.

LIMITATIONS

Most studies were retrospectively designed, and there were variations in patient populations and duration of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucinous rectal adenocarcinoma represents a biomarker for poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy and is an adverse prognostic indicator.

Primary enteric-type mucinous adenocarcinoma of the renal pelvis masquerading as cystic renal cell carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the renal pelvis is easily misdiagnosed and it was rarely reported in the literature. We describe in this study a case of 40-year-old male patient presented with right lumbar pain of one year duration and elevated level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). After a series of imaging examinations, the initial impression was a cystic renal cell carcinoma. Right radical nephrectomy was performed on the patient. The postoperative pathological examination indicated a primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of enteric type of the renal pelvis. After surgical removal of the tumor, an immunotherapy was administrated to prevent recurrence. The patient survives upon this report. A review of pertinent literature is also presented.

Advances in the care of patients with mucinous colorectal cancer

The majority of colorectal cancers (CRCs) are classified as adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (AC). Mucinous carcinoma (MC) is a distinct form of CRC and is found in 10-15% of patients with CRC. MC differs from AC in terms of both clinical and histopathological characteristics, and has long been associated with an inferior response to treatment compared with AC. The debate concerning the prognostic implications of MC in patients with CRC is ongoing and MC is still considered an unfavourable and unfamiliar subtype of the disease. Nevertheless, in the past few years epidemiological and clinical studies have shed new light on the treatment and management of patients with MC. Use of a multidisciplinary approach, including input from surgeons, pathologists, oncologists and radiologists, is beginning to lead to more-tailored approaches to patient management, on an individualized basis. In this Review, the authors provide insight into advances that have been made in the care of patients with MC. The prognostic implications for patients with colon or rectal MC are described separately; moreover, the predictive implications of MC regarding responses to commonly used therapies for CRC, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, and the potential for, and severity of, metastasis are also described.

Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery

PURPOSE

After curative rectal cancer surgery, local recurrences manifest in 2.4-10% and distant metastases in 20-50% of patients. The effectiveness of different surveillance regimens is not well established. We evaluated the pattern of recurrence and the utility of different surveillance instruments. Risk factors for recurrence were also recorded.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprises 580 consecutive rectal cancer patients operated on at Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, during 2005-2011. Data were collected from patient records. After exclusions, 481 patients treated with curative intent remained. Patients were followed up according to an intensive surveillance program.

RESULTS

Rectal cancer recurrence was observed in 124 patients (25.8%). Local recurrence manifested in 40 patients (8.3%) and distant metastases in 112 patients (23.3%). Recurrences were observed a median of 1.3 years after surgery. Twelve patients had to be followed up to find one local recurrence and four patients to find one distant metastasis. Recurrences detected during regular follow-up visits were discovered on average earlier than those detected in additional visits arranged because of patient symptoms (p = 0.023 for local recurrence, p = 0.001 for distant metastases). All surveillance instruments were similarly useful in finding recurrence. Curative treatment was possible in 51 (41.1%) of 124 patients with disease recurrence. Follow-up led to a 10.0% chance of detecting recurrence that could be treated with curative intent.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal cancer recurrences are detected earlier within a surveillance program than by symptoms alone. The most intensive follow-up should be focused on patients with known risk factors for recurrence.