What is the clinical relevance of discordance between radioisotope alone and indocynanine green in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer?

Indocyanine green combined with methylene blue versus methylene blue alone for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging using Indocyanine green (ICG) may improve the efficiency of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the combination of ICG and methylene blue (MB) in breast cancer patients undergoing SLNB.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We evaluated ICG plus MB (ICG + MB) identification effectiveness with MB alone using retrospective analysis. From 2016 to 2020, we collected data on 300 eligible breast cancer patients who got SLNB treatment in our institution by ICG + MB or MB alone. By comparing the distribution of clinicopathological characteristics, the detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and metastatic SLNs, as well as the total number of SLNs in the two groups, we were able to assess the imaging efficiency.

RESULTS

Fluorescence imaging allowed 131 out of 136 patients in the ICG + MB group to find SLNs. ICG + MB group and MB group had detection rates of 98.5% and 91.5% (P = 0.007, χ² = 7.352), respectively. Besides, the ICG + MB approach was able to produce improved recognition outcomes. What's more, compared with the MB group, the ICG + MB group can identify more lymph nodes (LNs) (3.1 to 2.6, P = 0.000, t = 4.447). Additionally, in the ICG + MB group, ICG could identify more LNs than MB (3.1 vs 2.6, P = 0.004, t = 2.884).

CONCLUSION

ICG has high detection effectiveness for SLNs, and when paired with MB, the detection efficiency can be increased even further. Furthermore, the ICG + MB tracing mode does not involve radioisotopes, which has a lot of promise for clinical use and can take the place of conventional standard detection methods.

Indocyanine Green Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Radioisotope in Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy regardless of Patient Body Mass Index

INTRODUCTION

A recent meta-analysis [Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:908-909] has confirmed high sensitivity of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence mapping for sentinel node detection in early breast cancer. Concerns have previously been raised regarding the efficacy in patients with high body mass index (BMI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNBs) for early breast cancer in NHS Tayside were included in a prospective audit of surgical and pathology findings. All patients included in the study received dual injection of patent blue dye and ICG. Approval was obtained from the local Caldicott guardian for collection and use of personal data.

RESULTS

Of 239 cases, all were female patients of mean age 62 years (range 27-93). In 4.2% (10/239) of cases, neither blue dye nor ICG was present in the axilla. Of the remaining 229 SLNB cases in this series, surgeons documented retrieval of 451 nodes, with a mean surgical nodal count per case of 1.97 (range 1-5) and pathological nodal count of 2.15 (range 0-7). Eighty three cases were performed in patients with BMI 30-39.9 and 21 cases with BMI ≥40, with nodal detection rates of 96.4% (80/83) and 95.2% (20/21), respectively, in these groups of patients. Twenty percent (48/229) of cases had nodal metastases on histopathology.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a large single-center study which demonstrates the safety and accuracy of the combined ICG and blue dye technique for SLNB in breast cancer. This is represented by nodal detection rates and node positivity rates which are comparable to previous multicenter studies of standard SLNB regardless of BMI.

Comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy guided by indocyanine green, blue dye, and their combination in breast cancer patients: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies show that near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) has the potential to improve the performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping. The current cohort study was designed to assess the value of the combination of ICG and methylene blue (MB) dye in patients undergoing SLN biopsy.

METHODS

A prospective self-controlled trial was designed to detect the difference in the detection efficacies of ICG, MB, and combined ICG and MB (ICG + MB) navigation methods. Between 2010 and 2013, 198 consecutive early breast cancer patients eligible for sentinel lymph node biopsy were enrolled and 200 biopsy procedures were performed by injection of both ICG and MB. SLNs were searched and removed under the guidance of fluorescence and/or blue dye. The mapping characteristics, the detection rate of SLNs and positive SLNs, and the number of SLNs of ICG, MB, and ICG + MB were compared. Injection safety of ICG and MB was evaluated.

RESULTS

Fluorescence imaging of lymphatic flow, which is helpful to locate the incision site, could be seen in 184 of 200 procedures. The nodal detection rate of ICG, MB, and ICG + MB samples was 97, 89, and 99.5% (χ 2 = 26.2, p < 0.001), respectively, with the combination method yielding a superior identification result. The addition of ICG to the MB method resulted in the identification of more lymph nodes (median 3 versus 2) and more positive axillas (22.7% involved axillas were discovered by fluorescence only) than either method alone. No acute or chronic allergic reaction was observed in this study. However, 23 patients (23/82) who received breast-conserving therapy reported temporary skin staining, and 5 patients had permanent tattooing. Palpable subcutaneous nodules at the injection sites were reported in nine patients. There were no reports of skin necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The lymphatic navigation by ICG fluorescence detects SLNs at a high detection rate and improves the mapping performance when added to the MB method. The novel ICG + MB dual tracing modality, without involvement of radioactive isotopes, exhibits great potential as an alternative to traditional standard mapping methods.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12612000109808 . Retrospectively registered on 23 January 2012.