Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: From clinicopathological features to surgical outcomes

The value of a nomogram model based on CT imaging features in differentiating duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors from pancreatic head neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVE

To construct a nomogram model based on multi-slice spiral CT imaging features to predict and differentiate between duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and pancreatic head neuroendocrine tumors (NENs), providing imaging evidence for clinical treatment decisions.

METHODS

A retrospective collection of clinical information, pathological results, and imaging data was conducted on 115 cases of duodenal GISTs and 76 cases of pancreatic head NENs confirmed by surgical pathology at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University from November 2013 to November 2022. Comparative analysis was performed on the tumor's maximum diameter, shortest diameter, long diameter/short diameter ratio, tumor morphology, tumor border, central position of the lesion, lesion long-axis direction, the relationship between tumor and common bile duct (CBD), duodenal side ulceration of the lesion, calcification, cystic and solid proportion within the tumor, thickened feeding arteries, tumor neovascularization, distant metastasis, and CT values during plain and enhanced scans in arterial and venous phases. Statistical analysis was conducted using t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and χ2 tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors for differentiating duodenal GISTs from pancreatic head NENs. Based on these independent predictors, a nomogram model was constructed, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the model. The nomogram was validated using a calibration curve, and decision curve analysis was applied to assess the clinical application value of the nomogram.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the duodenal GISTs group and the pancreatic head NENs group in terms of longest diameter (P < 0.001), shortest diameter (P < 0.001), plain CT value (P < 0.001), arterial phase CT value (P < 0.001), venous phase CT value (P = 0.002), lesion long-axis direction (P < 0.001), central position of the lesion (P < 0.001), the relationship between tumor and CBD(< 0.001), border (P = 0.004), calcification (P = 0.017), and distant metastasis (P = 0.018). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified uncertain location (OR 0.040, 95% CI 0.003-0.549), near the duodenum (OR 0, 95% CI 0-0.009), with the lesion long-axis direction along the pancreas as a reference, along the duodenum (OR 0.106, 95% CI 0.010-1.156) or no significant difference (OR 4.946, 95% CI 0.453-54.017), and the relationship between tumor and CBD (OR 0.013, 95% CI 0.001-0.180), shortest diameter (OR 0.705, 95% CI 0.546-0.909), and calcification (OR 18.638, 95% CI 1.316-263.878) as independent risk factors for differentiating between duodenal GISTs and pancreatic head NENs (all P values < 0.05). The combined diagnostic model's AUC values based on central position of the lesion, calcification, lesion long axis orientation, the relationship between tumor and CBD, shortest diameter, and the joint diagnostic model were 0.937 (0.902-0.972), 0.700(0.624-0.776), 0.717(0.631-0.802), 0.559 (0.473-0.644), 0.680 (0.603-0.758), and 0.991(0.982-0.999), respectively, with a sensitivity of 97.3% and a specificity of 93.0% for the joint diagnostic model. The nomogram model's AUC value was 0.985(0.973-0.996), with a sensitivity and specificity of 94.7% and 93.9%, respectively. The calibration curve indicated good agreement between predicted and actual risks. Decision curve analysis verified the clinical application value of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram model based on CT imaging features effectively differentiates between duodenal GISTs and pancreatic head NENs, aiding in more precise clinical treatment decisions.

Groove pancreatitis: From enigma to future directions-A comprehensive review

Groove pancreatitis (GP) is a rare and clinically distinct form of chronic pancreatitis affecting the pancreaticoduodenal groove comprising the head of the pancreas, duodenum, and the common bile duct. It is more prevalent in individuals in their 4-5th decade of life and disproportionately affects men compared with women. Excessive alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, pancreatic ductal stones, pancreatic divisum, annular pancreas, ectopic pancreas, duodenal wall thickening, and peptic ulcers are significant risk factors implicated in the development of GP. The usual presenting symptoms include severe abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weight loss, and jaundice. Establishing a diagnosis of GP is often challenging due to significant clinical and radiological overlap with numerous benign and malignant conditions affecting the same anatomical location. This can lead to a delay in initiation of treatment leading to increasing morbidity, mortality, and complication rates. Promising research in artificial intelligence (AI) has garnered immense interest in recent years. Due to its widespread application in diagnostic imaging with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity, AI has the potential of becoming a vital tool in differentiating GP from pancreatic malignancies, thereby preventing a missed or delayed diagnosis. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of GP, covering the etiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, radiological and endoscopic evaluation, management strategies, and future directions. This article also aims to increase awareness about this lesser known and often-misdiagnosed clinical entity amongst clinicians to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Endoscopic resection for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Few studies on endoscopic resection (ER) for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal (GI) stromal tumors (GISTs) have been conducted, and most have been case reports or case series. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ER for non-gastric GISTs.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2022, 329 patients who were diagnosed with GISTs underwent ER. After excluding 302 patients with gastric GISTs, we retrospectively assessed the data of 27 patients with non-gastric GISTs. The main outcome measures were en bloc resection, complete resection, residual disease, recurrence, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 15(55.6%) females and 12(44.4%) males with a mean age of 53.8 ± 11.0 years were assessed. There were 19 (70.4%) GISTs in the esophagus, 2 (7.4%) in the duodenum, 3 (11.1%) in the colon and 3 (11.1%) in the rectum. The median tumor size was 12.0 mm (range 4.0-35.0 mm). Most of the GISTs (20, 74.1%) were very low risk, and the remaining 7(25.9%) were low risk. Both en bloc resection and complete resection were achieved in 25(92.6%) patients. Piecemeal resection mainly resulted from a larger tumor size, an irregular shape, and an extraluminal growth pattern. No residual disease or recurrence was noted during the follow-up period. The median operation time was 23 min (range 2-125 min). After excluding the operation time of EER, the operation time was prolonged to 37 min (range 12-125 min). Only one patient experienced mild abdominal pain, leading to a complication rate of 3.7%. No severe complications requiring for surgical interventions occurred.

CONCLUSION

ER was an effective and safe method for non-gastric GISTs in selected cases. GISTs of a small size and regular shape with an intraluminal growth pattern require complete resection.

Current surgical management of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (D-GISTs) are uncommon mesenchymal tumors and are managed differently to common duodenal epithelial tumors. They may pose surgical challenges due to their unique but complex pancreaticoduodenal location of the gastrointestinal tract near the ampulla of Vater, pancreas, mesenteric blood vessels, biliary and pancreatic ducts. The surgical management of D-GISTs can be performed safely with good oncological outcomes provided an adequate resection margin can be achieved. The current surgical options of resectable primary D-GISTs varies with increasing complexity depending on the location, size and involvement of surrounding structures such as wedge resection with primary closure, segmental resection with small bowel anastomosis or radical pancreaticoduodenectomy. Laparoscopic approaches have been shown to be feasible and safe with good oncological outcomes in experienced hands. The minimally invasive techniques including robotic-assisted approach will likely increase in the future. D-GISTs have a prognosis comparable to gastric and other small bowel GISTs. However, the heterogeneity of different studies and the limited use of systemic tyrosine kinase inhibitor in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings may influence the overall survival of resected D-GISTs. The use of limited resection when condition allows is recommended due to lower surgical morbidity, less postoperative complications and better oncologic outcomes.

Investigation of the factors influencing surgical treatment of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (DGIST) is a rare tumor with a specific anatomic site and biological characteristics. As the incidence of lymph node metastasis is very low, the main treatment method is surgery. Two main surgical techniques (local resection and Whipple) are performed in patients with DGISTs. The critical question is which surgical technique to choose.

AIM

To identify factors influencing the choice of surgery for DGISTs.

METHODS

The clinicopathological data of patients with DGISTs who underwent surgery between January 1999 and January 2021 were analyzed. We used the Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test and the χ² test or Fisher’s exact test to determine the differences between the two groups of patients. Furthermore, we used logistic analysis to identify the relevant factors and independent factors related to the type of surgery. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the patient’s survival information and Cox regression analysis was performed to determine prognostic risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 86 patients were analyzed, including 43 men (50%) and 43 women (50%). We divided the patients into two groups based on surgical technique (local resection or Whipple surgery). There were no differences in the age, mitotic figures, and complications between the two groups; however, the tumor size, tumor location, risk grade, postoperative hospital stay, and abdominal drainage time were significantly different. Based on univariate logistic analysis, the Whipple procedure was chosen if the tumor size was ≥ 5.0 cm, the tumor was located in the descending part of the duodenum, or the risk grade was medium or high. In our research, the five-year overall survival rate of patients was more than 90%. We also describe two DGIST patients with liver metastases at first diagnosis and analyzed their management in order to provide advice on complicated cases.

CONCLUSION

The Whipple procedure was performed if the primary tumor was in the descending part of the duodenum, tumor size was ≥ 5.0 cm, or the tumor risk grade was medium or high.

Robotic resection of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumour: Preliminary experience from a single centre

BACKGROUND

Experience in minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (DGISTs) is accumulating, but there is no consensus on the choice of surgical method.

AIM

To summarize the technique and feasibility of robotic resection of DGISTs.

METHODS

The perioperative and demographic outcomes of a consecutive series of patients who underwent robotic resection and open resection of DGISTs between May 1, 2010 and May 1, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the open surgery group and the robotic surgery group. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or limited resection was performed based on the location of the tumour and the distance between the tumour and duodenal papilla. Age, sex, tumour location, tumour size, operation time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hospital stay (PHS), tumour mitosis, postoperative risk classification, postoperative recurrence and recurrence-free survival were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 28 patients included, 19 were male and 9 were female aged 51.3 ± 13.1 years. Limited resection was performed in 17 patients, and PD was performed in 11 patients. Eleven patients underwent open surgery, and 17 patients underwent robotic surgery. Two patients in the robotic surgery group underwent conversion to open surgery. All the tumours were R0 resected, and there was no significant difference in age, sex, tumour size, operation mode, PHS, tumour mitosis, incidence of postoperative complications, risk classification, postoperative targeted drug therapy or postoperative recurrence between the two groups (P > 0.05). OT and EBL in the robotic group were significantly different to those in the open surgery group (P < 0.05). All the patients survived during the follow-up period, and 4 patients had recurrence and metastasis. No significant difference in recurrence-free survival was noted between the open surgery group and the robotic surgery group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Robotic resection is safe and feasible for patients with DGISTs, and its therapeutic effect is equivalent to open surgery.

Laparoscopic vs Open Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) from Gastric Origin: different approaches for different diseases

BACKGROUND

Although minimally invasive techniques are currently recognized as effective and validated treatment for small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), the role of laparoscopy is not yet established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic treatment of gastric GISTs compared to the results obtained in a group of patients treated with conventional surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed, using a prospectively maintained comprehensive database of 100 patients treated for gastric GIST in the period from 2000 to 2015. Thirty-six patients were treated laparoscopically and 64 patients underwent conventional surgery. The analyzed medical data included clinical and pathological features of removed tumors, perioperative parameters as well as short and long-term results of surgical treatment.

RESULTS

Histopathological examination confirmed radical resection for all patients. No deaths were reported in the 90-day post-operative period. Patients in laparoscopic group had significantly shorter length of hospital stay (5.5 vs. 7 days, p<0.0001), fewer extended and combined surgical procedures (11.2% vs 34.4% and 2.8% vs 39%; p=0.02 and p<0.001, respectively), and a smaller tumor size compared to laparotomic group (3 vs 6 cm, p<0.0001). The median post-operative follow-up for the entire study population was 42 months. During this period, 11 patients died and 4 of them developed a tumor recurrence. None of them was in the laparoscopic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy in the treatment of gastric GISTs has unquestionable advantages, but its choice is strictly related to tumor features.

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective study based on a 13 years experience of a single center in China

AIM

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) constitute a small rare subset. This study aims to analyze the prognostic differences between duodenal and jejunoileal GISTs and evaluate the clinical treatment and prognostic characteristics of patients with duodenal GISTs.

METHODS

Data of patients with primary duodenal or jejunoileal GISTs were collected. Patients were matched through propensity score matching (PSM). Perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with duodenal GISTs were compared based on surgical approach.

RESULTS

Altogether, 101 duodenal and 219 jejunoileal GISTs were identified. In patients with duodenal GISTs, 79 (78%) underwent local resection (LR) and 22 (22%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Patients undergoing PD had a longer postoperation stay (18.5 vs 13 days, P = 0.001) and more complications (Clavien-Dindo I-II complications for PD vs LR, 31.8 vs 15.2%; Clavien-Dindo III-V complications for PD vs LR, 22.7 vs. 2.5%; P < 0.001). There was no difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.8) or overall survival (OS) (P = 0.9) when comparing patients who underwent LR versus PD. Multivariable analysis showed that tumor size >5 cm was the only independent predictor of shorter RFS (P = 0.004) and OS (P = 0.012). After matching, there was no significant difference in RFS and OS between patients with duodenal versus jejunoileal GISTs (both P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of duodenal and jejunoileal GISTs are similar. Recurrence and OS of duodenal GISTs primarily depend on tumor size. For duodenal GISTs, LR is associated with comparable long-term survival when compared to PD, but with superior short-term outcomes.

Impact of Surgical Modalities on Long-term Survival Outcomes of Patients with Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical modality for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains undefined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term survival outcomes of patients who underwent radical resection (RR) or limited resection (LR) of duodenal GIST.

METHODS

A total of 325 patients identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database who underwent surgery for duodenal GIST between 1986 and 2016 were classified into a LR group and a RR group based on the type of surgery received. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the selection bias in comparisons. Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were observed, and factors affecting the survival outcome were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, 105 patients (32.3%) underwent RR and 220 (67.7%) received LR. Both the 5-year OS and DSS in RR group were significantly better than those in LR group (71.0% vs. 54.1%, P = 0.014; 66.6% vs. 49.1%, P = 0.025). PSM resulted in 95 pairs of patients, with long-term outcomes being comparable between the two groups. After adjusting covariates in the propensity matched cohort, the type of surgery still showed no significant impact on OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.160; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.662-2.033) and DSS (HR 1.208; 95% CI 0.686-2.128).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical modalities do not seem to have a significant impact on long-term survival outcomes of patients with duodenal GIST and should mainly depend on the tumor size and location.

Comparative clinical features and short-term outcomes of gastric and small intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a retrospective study

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Recent research has shown that small intestinal GISTs exhibit more aggressive features than gastric GISTs. To compare the clinical features of gastric and small intestinal GISTs for the further prediction of different prognoses, we conducted a retrospective study. 43 patients in the small intestine group and 97 in the gastric group were collected between January 2016 and December 2017. Data on demographics, preoperative lab results, clinicopathological results and surgical management were compared between groups. Significant elements were subsequently included in logistic regression analysis for further identification. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to calculate the relapse-free survival (RFS) rate and cumulative survival rate. Univariable analysis demonstrated that underlying disease, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, lymphocyte count, haemoglobin (Hb), albumin (ALB), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), thrombin time (TT), National Institutes of Health (NIH) category, Dog1, surgical procedure types and postoperative hospitalization were different between the two groups. Among these factors, logistic regression analysis identified that patients in small intestinal group exhibited significantly higher GI bleeding rate (p = 0.022), NIH category (p = 0.031), longer postoperative hospitalization time (p = 0.001) with lower TT value (p = 0.030) than those in gastric group. The log-rank test indicated that the location of the GIST (p = 0.022), GIST with GI bleeding (p = 0.027) and NIH category (p = 0.031) were independent prognostic predictors for poor outcome regarding RFS. Regarding cumulative survival, only the location of the GIST (p = 0.027) was an independent prognostic predictor for poor outcome. Thus, we concluded that small intestine GISTs were associated with lower TT, recurrent GI bleeding, advanced NIH category and extended postoperative hospitalization. Nevertheless, future multicentre prospective study are expected to validate our results.

Surgery for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy versus local resection

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for survival of patients with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or local resection (LR). PubMed database was searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.3 software. Twenty-seven observational studies involving 1103 patients were included in the review. The overall morbidity and 30-day mortality was 27% and 0.5% respectively. The median (range) 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 87% (60-100%) and 71% (44-100%) respectively. In meta-analyses, factors associated with shorter DFS included male sex, mitotic index >5/50 high-power fields, high risk, tumor size >5 cm, and the PD procedure. Factors associated with shorter OS included mitotic index >5/50 high-power fields and tumor size >5 cm. Patients in PD group had a higher incidence of mitotic index >5/50 HPF, a higher incidence of high-risk classification, a higher incidence of tumors in the second portion of the duodenum, a larger tumor size, a longer duration of operation, more intraoperative blood loss, a greater blood transfusion requirement, a higher morbidity rate, a longer hospital stay, and an increased recurrence rate than those in LR group. In conclusion, the current literature review demonstrates that the postoperative prognosis of duodenal GIST is promising and mainly affected by tumor factors. The choice of the surgical approach should depend on the anatomical location and tumor size.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Optimal Surgical Treatment of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathologic characteristics of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) were unclear and the optimal surgical procedure for duodenal GIST remains poorly defined. We aimed to analyze clinicopathological characteristics, survival outcomes based on the surgical procedure, and recommend optimal surgical treatment for duodenal GIST.

METHODS

From July 2000 to April 2017, 118 patients with localized duodenal GIST underwent curative surgical resection at a single institution. We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 94.9 and 79.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the mitotic count was a statistically significant prognostic factor for DFS. Limited resection (LR) was performed in 20 patients with GIST in the first or fourth portion of the duodenum. Both LR and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) were performed in 98 patients with GIST in second or third portion of the duodenum. The patients in the LR group had less late complications than in the PD group and no postoperative newly developed diabetes mellitus. The minimally invasive LR (MI-LR) group had a shorter duration of surgery and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

LR is a feasible and effective surgical treatment for patients with small-sized and antimesenteric-sided duodenal GIST in terms of late complications and postoperative diabetic complications. MI-LR has better perioperative outcomes than open LR. Therefore, we should consider MI-LR as an optimal surgical treatment for selected patients with duodenal GIST.

[Diagnosis and surgical treatment of duodenal tumors]

AIM

To present the experience in diagnosis and surgical treatment of duodenal tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 27 patients with different duodenal tumors: adenocarcinoma (AC, n=8), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST, n=13), neuroendocrine tumor (NET, n=6). The examination included computed tomography (in 27 patients), magnetic resonance imaging (12), transcutaneous ultrasound (14), endosonography (16), esophagogastroduodenoscopy (16). All patients were operated. Conventional (18), laparoscopic (4), robot-assisted (4), endoscopic endoluminal (1) surgical interventions were performed. 17 patients were followed up from 8 months to 10 years (median 26 months).

RESULTS

According to the instrumental diagnostic methods, duodenal tumors were verified in 19 cases. Five patients with AC underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure), 2 - palliative operations (bypass gastroenteroanastomosis), 1 - explorative laparotomy. Patients with GIST underwent 3 pancreaticoduodenectomies and 10 duodenectomies: traditional (4), laparoscopic (4) and robot-assisted (2) approaches. In case of NET 3 interventions via traditional approach (pancreaticoduodenectomy, duodenal resection, tumor enucleation), 1 endoscopic endoluminal operation, 2 robot-assisted operations (duodenal resection and duodenopancreatectomy, splenectomy, distal gastrectomy) were performed. Postoperative complications occurred in 10 (37%) patients. Postoperative mortality was absent. Long-term results were analyzed in 17 patients. All patients with GIST and NET are alive without disease progression. Two AC patients are alive from those who are available.

CONCLUSION

Duodenal tumors are relatively rare. Radical surgical intervention in accordance with oncological principles is preferred for these patients. Organ-preserving procedures may be applied depending on morphological type of tumor. Examination and treatment of patients with duodenal tumors should be carried out in specialized surgical departments.

Malignant triton tumor of the duodenum: report of a case

We report a case of malignant triton tumor of the duodenum, which is extremely rare. A submucosal malignant tumor was detected in the duodenum of a 49-year-old woman. The tumor was completely resected by performing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pathological examination revealed that the lesion was a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor with rhabdomyoblastic differentiation, i.e., a malignant triton tumor. Long-term survival has been achieved with no recurrence at 8.5 years after surgery.

Prognostic Analysis of Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

AIM

This study aims to analyze factors possibly related to the prognosis of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (DGISTs).

METHODS

We collected and retrospectively analyzed clinical and pathological data of 62 patients with primary DGISTs. All the patients were hospitalized and received complete surgical resection at Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from September 2003 to April 2015. We followed up the patients to determine survival outcomes. We also analyzed the effect of clinical and pathological factors on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier univariate survival analysis demonstrated that tumor size, mitotic index, Ki-67 index, and pathological risk were correlated with the DFS and OS of the patients (DFS P = 0.039, 0.001, <0.001, and 0.005, resp.; OS P = 0.027, 0.007, <0.001, and 0.012, resp.). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that Ki-67 index was an independent prognostic factor affecting DFS and OS (P = 0.007 and 0.028, resp.). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that imatinib treatment for patients with recurrence was correlated with prolonged OS (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Prognosis for DGIST treated by R0 resection is favorable. High level of Ki-67 can be an independent risk factor of DGIST prognosis. Adjuvant imatinib therapy for patients with tumor recurrence could probably lead to prolonged survival.

Role of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in detecting distal duodenal lesions: A single-center pilot study in Southern China

OBJECTIVE

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a standard instrument for detecting upper gastrointestinal lesions. However, the distal duodenum is often missed. This study aimed to clarify the diagnostic role of EGD in the distal duodenum.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled patients with distal duodenal lesions who underwent EGD between January 2004 and July 2016 at our center. The rate of missed diagnosis using EGD examination was calculated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with the missed diagnoses.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were included in the study. The overall diagnostic rate of distal duodenal lesions on EGD was 58.7%. After excluding the patients in whom the EGD did not reach the distal duodenum, this rate rose to 82.2%. In univariate analysis, intravenous sedation (26.8% vs 68.2%, odds ratio [OR] 0.171, P = 0.002), signs of lesions adjacent to the stomach (19.4% vs 62.5%, OR 0.099, P = 0.001), prior enteroscopy experience (15.0% vs 87.0%, OR 0.026, P < 0.001), and endoscopists with experiences of over 10 years (13.8% vs 64.7%, OR 0.087, P = 0.000) were associated with a decreased risk of missed diagnosis. In multivariate analysis, signs of lesions adjacent to the stomach (OR 0.167, P = 0.039) and prior enteroscopy experience (OR 0.035, P < 0.001) were significant independent protective factors.

CONCLUSION

EGD may be important in diagnosing distal duodenal lesions. Patients with gastric retention, blood in the stomach or erosion in the proximal duodenum may benefit from the deep insertion of EGD.

Paraduodenal pancreatitis: benign and malignant mimics at MRI

Paraduodenal pancreatitis, also known as groove pancreatitis, is a rare form of chronic pancreatitis that masquerades as pancreatic adenocarcinoma affecting the pancreaticoduodenal groove, a potential space between the head of the pancreas, duodenum, and common bile duct. Two forms of groove pancreatitis have been described. The segmental form involves the pancreatic head with development of scar tissue within the groove, whereas the pure form affects the groove only, sparing the pancreatic head. Imaging findings of groove pancreatitis often overlap with primary duodenal, ampullary, or pancreatic neoplasms, which often results in a diagnostic challenge. In addition, paraduodenal pancreatitis can be mistaken for cystic pancreatic lesions, especially when there is involvement of the duodenal wall. Preoperative recognition of this entity is very important in order to avoid unnecessary procedures, although surgery, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy, may still be required to relieve obstructive symptoms. In this article, the pathophysiology and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of paraduodenal pancreatitis and important benign and malignant mimics are discussed.

Surgery for Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are an extremely rare subset of GISTs. The optimal surgical procedure remains not well defined.

AIMS

We assessed the surgical approach and long-term outcomes of patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent limited resection (LR) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

From November 2005 to January 2016, 64 consecutive patients with duodenal GISTs in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and perioperative outcomes were analyzed according to the different surgical type.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients (64.1%) underwent LR, while 23 patients (35.9%) underwent PD. All patients had negative surgical margins (R0). Median tumor size was larger for PD (6 cm) versus LR (4 cm) (P = 0.041). PD also had more complications than LR (PD, 69.6 vs. LR, 31.7%) (P = 0.002). The 3-year and 5-year RFS was 62.9 and 44.3%, respectively. The 3-year and 5-year OS was 85.7 and 59.5%, respectively. The multivariate analysis demonstrated the only unfavorable predictive factor was tumor size >5 cm for RFS and OS. Although the complication rate in the PD group was higher than in the LR group, OS and RFS were not affected by the complication (P = 0.492 for OS, P = 0.512 for RFS). PD versus LR was not associated with RFS and OS. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate (IM) did not improve the survival of the patients after operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival of duodenal GISTs is mainly dependent on tumor biology rather than surgical procedure. LR should be the surgical procedure of choice for duodenal GISTs when technically feasible and no anatomical constrains. LR shows comparable survival and lower risk of postoperative complications compared by PD. The administration of IM both as adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for duodenal GISTs needs large population and prospective study to evaluate its effect.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Duodenal GIST: A Case Report

The principal treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is surgical; and complete excision is important, but cannot always be achieved. For such cases, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with imatinib mesylate (IM) has been recommended. A case of a GIST of the second portion of the duodenum for which pancreatoduodenectomy was indicated, and for which partial resection was made possible as a result of cytoreduction by IM NAC, is reported. A 64-year-old man with pancytopenia due to hepatic cirrhosis caused by hepatitis C infection received repeated blood transfusions because of anemia of unknown origin starting 2 years earlier. Most recently, the patient had melena with hemoglobin of 5.1 mg/dL. Diagnostic imaging showed a solid tumor, 55 × 48 × 65 mm3, in the second portion of the duodenum showing mainly extramural development. Endoscopic aspiration biopsy showed proliferation of KIT-positive spindle-shaped heterotypic cells. GIST was diagnosed, and an exon 11 KIT mutation was found. Because of the exon 11 mutation, neoadjuvant IM was started at 400 mg/day and then eventually maintained at 300 mg/day for 10 months. Regular CT examinations showed gradual tumor shrinkage. At surgery, a tumor with strong extramural growth was found on the outer side of the duodenum that invaded the retroperitoneum. The tumor was excised as a mass, and the duodenum was resected partially. There has been no recurrence at 9 years postoperatively. Evaluating KIT exon mutations and predicting the effectiveness of NAC appear useful for determining the treatment policy for advanced GISTs.