1
|
Kyriazoglou A, Pagkali A, Kotsantis I, Economopoulou P, Kyrkasiadou M, Moutafi M, Gavrielatou N, Anastasiou M, Boulouta A, Pantazopoulos A, Giannakakou M, Digklia A, Psyrri A. Well-differentiated liposarcomas and dedifferentiated liposarcomas: Systemic treatment options for two sibling neoplasms. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 125:102716. [PMID: 38492514 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
Well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) account for 60 % of all liposarcomas, reflecting the heterogeneity of this type of sarcoma. Genetically, both types of liposarcomas are characterized by the amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 genes, which indicates an important molecular event with diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. In both localized WDLPS and DDLPS of the retroperitoneum and the extremities, between 25 % and 30 % of patients have local or distant recurrence, even when perioperatively treated, with clear margins present. The systemic treatment of WDLPS and DDLPS remains a challenge, with anthracyclines as the gold standard for first-line treatment. Several regimens have been tested with modest results regarding their efficacy. Herein we discuss the systemic treatment options for WDLPS and DDLPS and review their reported clinical efficacy results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kyriazoglou
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - A Pagkali
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - I Kotsantis
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - P Economopoulou
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M Kyrkasiadou
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M Moutafi
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - N Gavrielatou
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M Anastasiou
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - A Boulouta
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - A Pantazopoulos
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M Giannakakou
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - A Digklia
- Sarcoma Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - A Psyrri
- Section of Medical Oncology, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kruiswijk AA, van de Sande MAJ, Haas RL, van den Akker-van Marle EM, Engelhardt EG, Marang-van de Mheen P, van Bodegom-Vos L. (Cost-)effectiveness of an individualised risk prediction tool (PERSARC) on patient's knowledge and decisional conflict among soft-tissue sarcomas patients: protocol for a parallel cluster randomised trial (the VALUE-PERSARC study). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074853. [PMID: 37918933 PMCID: PMC10626817 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current treatment decision-making in high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) care is not informed by individualised risks for different treatment options and patients' preferences. Risk prediction tools may provide patients and professionals insight in personalised risks and benefits for different treatment options and thereby potentially increase patients' knowledge and reduce decisional conflict. The VALUE-PERSARC study aims to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of a personalised risk assessment tool (PERSARC) to increase patients' knowledge about risks and benefits of treatment options and to reduce decisional conflict in comparison with usual care in high-grade extremity STS patients. METHODS The VALUE-PERSARC study is a parallel cluster randomised control trial that aims to include at least 120 primarily diagnosed high-grade extremity STS patients in 6 Dutch hospitals. Eligible patients (≥18 years) are those without a treatment plan and treated with curative intent. Patients with sarcoma subtypes or treatment options not mentioned in PERSARC are unable to participate. Hospitals will be randomised between usual care (control) or care with the use of PERSARC (intervention). In the intervention condition, PERSARC will be used by STS professionals in multidisciplinary tumour boards to guide treatment advice and in patient consultations, where the oncological/orthopaedic surgeon informs the patient about his/her diagnosis and discusses benefits and harms of all relevant treatment options. The primary outcomes are patients' knowledge about risks and benefits of treatment options and decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale) 1 week after the treatment decision has been made. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated using questionnaires, 1 week and 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment decision. Data will be analysed following an intention-to-treat approach using a linear mixed model and taking into account clustering of patients within hospitals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Medical Ethical Committee Leiden-Den Haag-Delft (METC-LDD) approved this protocol (NL76563.058.21). The results of this study will be reported in a peer-review journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL9160, NCT05741944.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk A Kruiswijk
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rick L Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ellen G Engelhardt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Perla Marang-van de Mheen
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Ravensteijn SG, Nederkoorn MJL, Wal TCP, Versleijen-Jonkers YMH, Braam PM, Flucke UE, Bonenkamp JJ, Schreuder BHW, van Herpen CML, de Wilt JHW, Desar IME, de Rooy JWJ. The Prognostic Relevance of MRI Characteristics in Myxofibrosarcoma Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2843. [PMID: 37345181 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15102843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
To improve local control, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) followed by surgery is the standard of care in myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) because of its infiltrative growth pattern. Nevertheless, local recurrence rates are high. Data on prognostic factors for poor clinical outcomes are lacking. This retrospective study thus investigates the prognostic relevance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics before and after nRT in 40 MFS patients, as well as their association with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A vascular pedicle, defined as extra-tumoral vessels at the tumor periphery, was observed in 12 patients (30.0%) pre-nRT and remained present post-nRT in all cases. Patients with a vascular pedicle had worse DFS (HR 5.85; 95% CI 1.56-21.90; p = 0.009) and OS (HR 9.58; 95% CI 1.91-48.00; p = 0.006). An infiltrative growth pattern, referred to as a tail sign, was observed in 22 patients (55.0%) pre-nRT and in 19 patients (47.5%) post-nRT, and was associated with worse DFS post-nRT (HR 6.99; 95% CI 1.39-35.35; p = 0.019). The percentage of tumor necrosis estimated by MRI was increased post-nRT, but was not associated with survival outcomes. The presence of a tail sign or vascular pedicle on MRI could support the identification of patients at risk for poor clinical outcomes after nRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan G van Ravensteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maikel J L Nederkoorn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C P Wal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pètra M Braam
- Department of Radiotherapy, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Uta E Flucke
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes J Bonenkamp
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart H W Schreuder
- Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carla M L van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid M E Desar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jacky W J de Rooy
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clinical analysis of multimodal treatment for localized synovial sarcoma: A multicenter retrospective study. J Orthop Sci 2023; 28:261-266. [PMID: 34756517 DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Several prognostic factors for survival in synovial sarcoma have been proposed, but the role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy is a matter of debate. The study aim was to clarify the effect of high-dose ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with localized synovial sarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five tertiary musculoskeletal oncology hospitals participated in this retrospective study. The records of the patient diagnosed with synovial sarcoma without metastasis at diagnosis from 1990 to 2011 have been collected and reviewed. Overall, distant failure-free, and local failure-free survivals were calculated, and prognostic factors for each survival were evaluated by performing univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS A total of 162 patients were enrolled in this study with a median follow-up period of 67 months (range, 5-267 months) for all surviving patients. The 5-year overall, distant failure-free, and local failure-free survival rates were 79.7%, 66.3%, and 98.4%, respectively. Univariate analyses demonstrated that high-dose ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy was significantly associated with better overall (p = 0.014) and distant failure-free survival (p = 0.0043) than that of low-dose or no ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy if we analyzed only patients with tumors >5 cm in size. Addition of radiotherapy was not a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in the univariate and multivariate analyses, but it did improve the overall survival of the patients with R1 resection (p = 0.053). CONCLUSION Patients with localized synovial sarcoma >5 cm in size had better overall and distant failure-free survival after receiving adjuvant chemotherapy containing high-dose ifosfamide comparing to low-dose or no ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy. The addition of adjuvant radiotherapy was beneficial for the patients who received R1 resection. Alternatively, adjuvant radiotherapy could be avoided for patients who achieved an R0 margin.
Collapse
|
5
|
Andreani L, Ipponi E, Mani O, Bayon G, Ruinato AD, Cosseddu F, D'Arienzo A, Capanna R. Synovial sarcomas: A single surgeon experience of 130 cases. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:793-797. [PMID: 35670050 PMCID: PMC9544735 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Synovial sarcoma is a rare malignant tumor that generally requires a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach. In this study we report the experience of a single surgeon, evaluating surgical and oncological outcomes of the cases he treated through his 30 years carrier. Methods We enrolled patients treated surgically between 1988 and 2018. Surgical and medical treatments, as well as surgical and oncological results, were investigated. Results One hundred and thirty cases were included. Surgical resection was carried out achieving wide margins in 90% of the cases. At their latest follow‐up, 76 patients were continuously disease free, 16 were no evidence of disease, and other 16 were alive with disease. Twenty cases were dead of disease and two dead of other causes. Twenty‐five patients (19%) had local recurrence of synovial sarcoma through their postoperative intercourse. Thirty‐seven patients (28%) were diagnosed with at least a metastasis during their follow‐up. The global survival of our population, at each patient's latest follow‐up, was 82%. Cases with tumor size above 5 cm had a significantly higher risk to develop metastasis (p = 0.002). Conclusions Synovial sarcoma is a threatening disease and represents a challenge for oncological physicians and surgeons. Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary approach are mandatory to limit the spread of synovial sarcomas, maximizing the effectiveness of surgery and the other treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Andreani
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Edoardo Ipponi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Olimpia Mani
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ginevra Bayon
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Cosseddu
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio D'Arienzo
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Capanna
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Qiao J, Mao H, Wen L, Xu L, Zhu Z, Qiu Y, Xiong J, Wang S. Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defect With a Free Vascularized Anterolateral Thigh Flap After Resection of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Extremities. Orthop Surg 2021; 14:215-220. [PMID: 34898047 PMCID: PMC8867411 DOI: 10.1111/os.12840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to determine outcomes and complications in functional reconstruction of soft tissue defects after surgical resection for soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) of extremities. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with STSs of extremities from May 2015 to April 2019 who underwent radical resection of STSs and reconstruction of soft tissue defect with free vascularized anterolateral thigh flap (FVALTP). A minimum 3‐month follow‐up was required for all the patients. Patient demographics and comorbidities, flap characteristics, postoperative complications, and time to heal were recorded. The functional outcomes of the reconstructed limbs were assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society(MSTS) scoring system. Results A total of 11 patients (four males and seven females) were included in the study. The mean age was 62 years (range: 29–84 years). The mean surface area was 151.4 cm2 (range: from 64 cm2 to 418cm2). The mean operation time was 126 min (range: 95–296 min). The mean follow‐up was 17.5 months (range: 6–34 months). The mean score of MSTS at last follow‐up was 26.2 (range: 12–29). Incision healed by first intention in eight patients. Incision healed by second intention in three patients. A patient who had received preoperative radiotherapy experienced delayed union. After debridement, the patient successfully got union. Another two patients experienced marginal necrosis of flap due to vascular crisis. After 3‐week dressing changes, the patients also got satisfactory union. One case suffered from vascular crisis during surgery in which the procedure was changed into skin grafting to cover resection site. Conclusion FVALTP technique can be effectively applied to the reconstruction of soft tissue defect after STSs resection. The short‐term follow‐up indicated satisfactory functional outcome and low incidence of previously known complications. It was necessary to further validate its efficacy in reconstruction of soft tissue defect after malignant extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Qiao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Haijun Mao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Li Wen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Leilei Xu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Zezhang Zhu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Yong Qiu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Jin Xiong
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| | - Shoufeng Wang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kungwengwe G, Clancy R, Vass J, Slade R, Sandhar S, Dobbs TD, Bragg TWH. Preoperative versus Post-operative Radiotherapy for Extremity Soft tissue Sarcoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Long-term Survival. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74:2443-2457. [PMID: 34266806 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of perioperative radiotherapy in the management of resectable extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) is widely recognised for local tumour control, wound complications (WC) and long-term function. However, debate continues regarding its implications on long-term survival. This study aimed to determine whether the timing of perioperative radiotherapy affects long-term survival outcomes in adults with ESTS. METHODS A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane was performed. The primary outcome measure was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) at 95% confidence intervals. Secondary outcomes and subgroup analyses were presented as cumulative odds ratios (OR). A random-effects, generic inverse variance method and sensitivity analysis were performed to minimise heterogeneity. RESULTS Six studies (n = 4192 patients) were identified. Time-to-event analysis demonstrated a statistically significant advantage in post-operative radiotherapy for overall survival (HR 1.15 and p = 0.05). Combined HRs for disease-free (1.25 and p = 0.22) and disease-specific (1.06 and p = 0.43) survival also favoured post-operative radiotherapy but did not achieve statistical significance. Post-operative radiotherapy was shown to confer an overall (OR 1.19 and p = 0.01), disease-free (OR 1.19 and p = 0.01) and disease-specific (OR 1.19 and p = 0.01) survival advantage on subgroup analysis. This survival benefit was best observed at three years in the disease-free survival comparison (OR 1.55 and p = 0.003). Preoperative radiotherapy was associated with more WC (OR 2.74 and p<0.00001). CONCLUSIONS Pooled analysis of published literature suggests that post-operative radiotherapy confers a significant long-term survival advantage with fewer WC. Further large multicentre randomised controlled trials with long-term follow-up are required to determine the optimal perioperative radiotherapy regime in adult ESTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garikai Kungwengwe
- The Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
| | | | - Johanne Vass
- The Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Simarjit Sandhar
- Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas D Dobbs
- The Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK; Reconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine Research Group, Swansea, UK
| | - Thomas W H Bragg
- The Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hall KS, Bruland ØS, Bjerkehagen B, Lidbrink E, Jebsen N, Hagberg H, Papworth K, Hagberg O, Trovik C, Bauer H, Eriksson M. Preoperative accelerated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy in a defined cohort of patients with high risk soft tissue sarcoma: a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group study. Clin Sarcoma Res 2020; 10:22. [PMID: 33292545 PMCID: PMC7672981 DOI: 10.1186/s13569-020-00145-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We recently reported outcomes from a Scandinavian Sarcoma Group adjuvant study (SSG XX group A) conducted on localized and operable high risk soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremities and trunk wall. SSG XX, group B, comprised of patients in a defined cohort with locally advanced STS considered at high risk for intralesional surgery. These patients received preoperative accelerated radiotherapy, together with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Herein we report the results of this group B. Methods Twenty patients with high-grade, locally advanced and deep STS located in lower extremities (n = 12), upper extremities (5) or trunk wall (3) were included. The median age was 59 years and 14 patients were males. The treatment regimen consisted of 6 cycles of doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (6 g/m2), with three cycles given neoadjuvantly, and preoperative radiotherapy (1, 8 Gyx2/daily to 36 Gy) between cycles 2 and 3. After a repeated MRI surgery was then conducted, and the remaining 3 chemotherapy cycles were given postoperatively at 3 weeks intervals. Survival data, local control, toxicity of chemotherapy and postoperative complications are presented. Results Median follow-up time for metastasis-free survival (MFS) was 2.8 years (range 0.3–10.4). The 5-year MFS was 49.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.7–77.4). The median follow-up time was 5.4 years (range 0.3–10.4) for overall survival (OS). The 5-year OS was 64.0% (95% CI 45.8–89.4). The median tumour size was 13 cm, with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 10) and synovial sarcoma (n = 6) diagnosed most frequently. All patients completed surgery. Resection margins were R0 in 19 patients and R1 in 1 patient. No patients had evidence of disease progression preoperatively. Three patients experienced a local recurrence, in 2 after lung metastases had already been diagnosed. Eleven patients (55%) had postoperative wound problems (temporary in 8 and persistent in 3). Conclusions Preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy were associated with temporary wound-healing problems. Survival outcomes, local control and toxicities were deemed satisfactory when considering the locally advanced sarcoma disease status at primary diagnosis. Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00790244 and with European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials No. EUDRACT 2007-001152-39
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Sundby Hall
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Øyvind S Bruland
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bodil Bjerkehagen
- Department of Pathology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabet Lidbrink
- Department of Medical Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nina Jebsen
- Departments of Oncology and Orthopedics, Haukeland University Hospital and Centre for Cancer Biomarkers (CCBIO), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hans Hagberg
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karin Papworth
- Department of Oncology, Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hagberg
- Institution of Translation Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Clement Trovik
- Department Musculo-Skeletal Tumor Service/Orthopedics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Henrik Bauer
- Musculo-Skeletal Tumor Service, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy-Related Wound Morbidity in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Perspectives for Radioprotective Agents. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082258. [PMID: 32806601 PMCID: PMC7465163 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Historically, patients with localized soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities would undergo limb amputation. It was subsequently determined that the addition of radiation therapy (RT) delivered prior to (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) a limb-sparing surgical resection yielded equivalent survival outcomes to amputation in appropriate patients. Generally, neoadjuvant radiation offers decreased volume and dose of high-intensity radiation to normal tissue and increased chance of achieving negative surgical margins-but also increases wound healing complications when compared to adjuvant radiotherapy. This review elaborates on the current neoadjuvant/adjuvant RT approaches, wound healing complications in STS, and the potential application of novel radioprotective agents to minimize radiation-induced normal tissue toxicity.
Collapse
|
10
|
Oncological outcome, functional results and costs after unplanned excision of musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2020; 46:898-904. [PMID: 32037016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 01/05/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) should only be initiated once the diagnosis is fully established. Resection of tumors of unknown nature should be avoided. Nevertheless, specialized centers continue to face numbers of unplanned excisions (UPE) in STS. AIM To compare oncologic and functional outcomes, number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs of UPE versus planned excision (PE) in STS. METHOD A retrospective single tertiary center study was performed on 201 patients. Survival, local and distant recurrence rates were compared between PE (n = 137) and UPE (n = 64). In a subgroup analysis of 60 patients, functional outcome (MSTS and TESS scores), and socio-economic impact (number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs) in "functional planned excision" (fPE) group (n = 30) and "functional unplanned excision" (fUPE) group (n = 29) were compared. RESULTS There was no significant difference in oncological outcome between PE and UPE. In the subgroup analysis, we found a non-significant difference in functional outcome. Patients in the fUPE had significantly more surgeries (3.5 vs. 1.4; p < 0.00001) and costs of their management was 64% higher than fPE (p = 0.048). Hospital stay was longer after fUPE but not statistically significant (18.3 days vs. 11.8 days; p = 0.13). CONCLUSION Even though oncological and functional outcomes are comparable after PE and UPE of STS, the number of surgeries, length of hospital stay and treatment costs were higher in patients with UPE. Our data underscore the importance of specialized STS treatment centers including multidisciplinary management.
Collapse
|
11
|
Duran-Moreno J, Kontogeorgakos V, Koumarianou A. Soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremities: Maximizing treatment opportunities and outcomes. Oncol Lett 2019; 18:2179-2191. [PMID: 31404317 PMCID: PMC6676724 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumors; they do not even equate to 1% of all malignant tumor cases. One-fifth of all STS occur in the upper extremities, where epithelioid sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma and malignant fibrohistiocytoma are the most frequent subtypes. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment. However, accomplishment of optimal oncological and functional results of STS of the upper extremities may represent a challenge for hand surgeons, due to the complex anatomy. In several cases, preoperative therapies are needed to facilitate tumor resection and improve the oncological outcome. Oligometastatic disease may also be a challenging scenario as curative strategies can be applied. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are commonly used for this purpose albeit with conflicting evidence. Novel drug combinations have also been approved in the metastatic setting, further improving the quality of life and survival of eligible patients. Thus, prior to any approach, every case should be individually discussed in sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards. The aim of the present review was to gather the multidisciplinary experiences of the available therapeutic strategies for STS of the upper extremities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Duran-Moreno
- Hematology Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 'Attikon' University General Hospital, Athens 12462, Greece
| | - Vasileios Kontogeorgakos
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 'Attikon' University General Hospital, Athens 12462, Greece
| | - Anna Koumarianou
- Hematology Oncology Unit, Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, 'Attikon' University General Hospital, Athens 12462, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Awad N, Lackman R, McMackin K, Kim TW, Lombardi J, Caputo F. Multidisciplinary Approach to Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcomas Requiring Complex Oncologic Resections. Ann Vasc Surg 2018; 53:212-216. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Revised: 04/14/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
13
|
Roeder F, de Paoli A, Saleh-Ebrahimi L, Alldinger I, Bertola G, Boz G, Navarria F, Cuervo M, Uhl M, Alvarez A, Buechler M, Lehner B, Debus J, Calvo FA, Krempien R. Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy Combined with External Beam Radiation Therapy after Gross Total Resection in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A European Pooled Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3833-3842. [PMID: 30276647 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6787-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We report a pooled analysis evaluating the combination of gross complete limb-sparing surgery, intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT), and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS Individual data of 259 patients (median follow-up 63 months) with extremity STS from three European expert centers were pooled. Median age was 55 years and median tumor size was 8 cm. Eighty percent of patients presented with primary disease, mainly located in the lower limb (81%). Union for International Cancer Control 7th edition stage at presentation was as follows: stage I: 9%; stage II: 47%; stage III: 39%; stage IV: 5%. Most patients showed high-grade lesions (91%), predominantly liposarcoma (31%). Median IOERT dose was 12 Gy, preceeded (17%) or followed (83%) by EBRT, with a median dose of 45 Gy. RESULTS Surgery resulted in R0 resections in 71% of patients and R1 resections in 29% of patients. The 5-year local control (LC) rate was 86%, and significant factors in univariate analysis were disease status and resection margin. Only margin remained significant in multivariate analysis. The 5-year distant control rate was 69%, and significant factors in univariate analysis were histology, grading, resection margin, and metastases prior to/at IOERT. Only grading and metastases remained significant in multivariate analysis. Actuarial 5-year rates of freedom from treatment failure and OS were 61% and 78%, respectively. Significant factors for OS were grading and metastases prior to/at IOERT (univariate, multivariate). Limb preservation and good functional outcome were achieved in 95% and 81% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Our pooled analysis confirmed prior reports of encouraging LC and survival, with excellent rates of preserved limb function with this treatment approach. Resection margin remained the most important factor for LC, while grading and metastases prior to/at IOERT mainly predicted survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. .,CCU Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Antonino de Paoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, CRO, Aviano, Italy
| | | | | | - Giulio Bertola
- Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, CRO, Aviano, Italy
| | - Giovanni Boz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, CRO, Aviano, Italy
| | - Federico Navarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, CRO, Aviano, Italy
| | - Miguel Cuervo
- Musculoskeletal Tumor Unit, University Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ana Alvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Markus Buechler
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Lehner
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,CCU Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felipe A Calvo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert Krempien
- Department of Radiotherapy, Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Müller DA, Beltrami G, Scoccianti G, Cuomo P, Totti F, Capanna R. Allograft Reconstruction of the Extensor Mechanism after Resection of Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Adv Orthop 2018; 2018:6275861. [PMID: 29951320 PMCID: PMC5987318 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6275861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Soft tissue tumors around the knee joint still pose problems for the excision and subsequent reconstruction. METHODS In the 6 included patients the soft tissue sarcoma has its base on the anterior surface of the extensor mechanism and expands towards the skin. The entire extensor apparatus (quadriceps tendon, patella, and patellar tendon) was resected and replaced by a fresh-frozen allograft. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 6.7 years (range: 2-12.4 years). In two patients a local recurrence occurred, resulting in a 5-year local recurrence-free rate of 66.7% (95% CI: 19.5%-90.4%). Distant metastases were found in 4 patients resulting in a 5-year metastasis-free rate of 33.3% (95% CI: 4.6%-67.5%). Two patients underwent at least one revision surgery, including one patient in whom the allograft had to be removed. According to the ISOLS function score 24.7 points (range: 19-28 points) were achieved at the last follow-up. The mean active flexion of the knee joint was 82.5° (range: 25-120°) and a mean extension lag of 10° (range: 0-30°) was observed. CONCLUSIONS The replacement of the extensor mechanism by an allograft is a reasonable option, allowing wide margins and restoration of active extension in most patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The presented study is listed on the ISRCTN registry with trial number ISRCTN63060594.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A. Müller
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Giovanni Beltrami
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Guido Scoccianti
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Cuomo
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Francesca Totti
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Capanna
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Paradisa 2, Cisanello, 56125 Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Haas RL, Gronchi A, van de Sande MA, Baldini EH, Gelderblom H, Messiou C, Wardelmann E, Le Cesne A. Perioperative Management of Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:118-124. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.74.7527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery is potentially curative for primary nonmetastatic extremity soft tissue sarcomas. After surgery alone, patients may remain at risk for local recurrences and/or metastatic disease. To reduce the likelihood of a local relapse, the addition of radiotherapy (RT) to limb-sparing surgery may result in higher local control rates of at least 85%. Generally, it can be stated that local control after both preoperative and postoperative RT is comparable, but that preoperative RT comes with a more favorable toxicity profile after prolonged follow-up, albeit at the cost of a higher wound complication rate. Furthermore, recent data suggest that preoperative RT is more cost effective. To reduce the risk of subsequent metastatic disease, systemic chemotherapy can be introduced early during the primary management of these patients. These systemic chemotherapy regimens can also be applied both preoperatively and postoperatively. Finally, with the aim of increasing the antitumor response of perioperative RT, these agents may even be combined with RT, concurrently and sequentially. While designing new preoperative combination regimens, responses should be carefully monitored by both sophisticated radiologic and pathologic evaluations. This article reviews all these aspects, in addition to limb-sparing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick L. Haas
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Alessandro Gronchi
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Michiel A.J. van de Sande
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Elizabeth H. Baldini
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Christina Messiou
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Eva Wardelmann
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| | - Axel Le Cesne
- Rick L. Haas, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Rick L. Haas, Michiel A.J. van de Sande, and Hans Gelderblom, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands; Alessandro Gronchi, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Elizabeth H. Baldini, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Christina Messiou, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Eva Wardelmann, University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abouarab MH, Salem IL, Degheidy MM, Henn D, Hirche C, Eweida A, Uhl M, Kneser U, Kremer T. Therapeutic options and postoperative wound complications after extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection and postoperative external beam radiotherapy. Int Wound J 2017; 15:148-158. [PMID: 29205902 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas occur most commonly in the lower and upper extremities. The standard treatment is limb salvage surgery combined with radiotherapy. Postoperative radiotherapy is associated with wound complications. This systematic review aims to summarise the available evidence and review the literature of the last 10 years regarding postoperative wound complications in patients who had limb salvage surgical excision followed by direct closure vs flap coverage together with postoperative radiotherapy and to define the optimal timeframe for adjuvant radiotherapy after soft tissue sarcomas resection and flap reconstruction. A literature search was performed using PubMed. The following keywords were searched: limb salvage, limb-sparing, flaps, radiation therapy, radiation, irradiation, adjuvant radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy, radiation effects, wound healing, surgical wound infection, surgical wound dehiscence, wound healing, soft tissue sarcoma and neoplasms. In total, 1045 papers were retrieved. Thirty-seven articles were finally selected after screening of abstracts and applying dates and language filters and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Plastic surgery provides a vast number of reconstructive flap procedures that are directly linked to decreasing wound complications, especially with the expectant postoperative radiotherapy. This adjuvant radiotherapy is better administered in the first 3-6 weeks after reconstruction to allow timely wound healing and avoid local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed H Abouarab
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burns, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt.,Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Iman L Salem
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burns, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Magdy M Degheidy
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burns, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Dominic Henn
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Hirche
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ahmad Eweida
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Head, Neck and Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Kneser
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kremer
- Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Willeumier JJ, Rueten-Budde AJ, Jeys LM, Laitinen M, Pollock R, Aston W, Dijkstra PDS, Ferguson PC, Griffin AM, Wunder JS, Fiocco M, van de Sande MAJ. Individualised risk assessment for local recurrence and distant metastases in a retrospective transatlantic cohort of 687 patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: a multistate model. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e012930. [PMID: 28196946 PMCID: PMC5318556 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigates the effect of surgical margins and radiotherapy, in the presence of individual baseline characteristics, on survival in a large population of high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities using a multistate model. DESIGN A retrospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING 4 tertiary referral centres for orthopaedic oncology. PARTICIPANTS 687 patients with primary, non-disseminated, high-grade sarcoma only, receiving surgical treatment with curative intent between 2000 and 2010 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The risk to progress from 'alive without disease' (ANED) after surgery to 'local recurrence' (LR) or 'distant metastasis (DM)/death'. The effect of surgical margins and (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy on LR and overall survival was evaluated taking patients' and tumour characteristics into account. RESULTS The multistate model underlined that wide surgical margins and the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy decreased the risk of LR but have little effect on survival. The main prognostic risk factors for transition ANED to LR are tumour size (HR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11 (size in cm)) and (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy. The HRs for patients treated with adjuvant or no radiotherapy compared with neoadjuvant radiotherapy are equal to 4.36 (95% CI 1.34 to 14.24) and 14.20 (95% CI 4.14 to 48.75), respectively. Surgical resection margins had a protective effect for the occurrence of LR with HRs equal to 0.61 (95% CI 0.33 to 1.12), and 0.16 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.41) for margins between 0 and 2 mm and wider than 2 mm, respectively. For transition ANED to distant metastases/Death, age (HR 1.64 (95% CI 0.95 to 2.85) and 1.90 (95% CI 1.09 to 3.29) for 25-50 years and >50 years, respectively) and tumour size (1.06 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.08)) were prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS This paper underlined the alternating effect of surgical margins and the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on oncological outcomes between patients with different baseline characteristics. The multistate model incorporates this essential information of a specific patient's history, tumour characteristics and adjuvant treatment modalities and allows a more comprehensive prediction of future events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie J Willeumier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lee M Jeys
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Minna Laitinen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rob Pollock
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | - Will Aston
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK
| | - P D Sander Dijkstra
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter C Ferguson
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anthony M Griffin
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jay S Wunder
- Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Marta Fiocco
- Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|