Long term outcome after resection of liver metastases from squamous cell carcinoma

Hepatic Metastasectomy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal: A Case Series of a Curative Approach

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is rare. Most cases are diagnosed in a localized setting. Metastatic SCCA is rare, and investigation has been limited in the past for these patients. We believe that hepatic-only metastatic disease could have a unique treatment landscape compared to diseases with diffuse metastatic involvement. Here, we describe cases at our institution.

METHODS

We reviewed eight SCCA cases with hepatic-only metastatic disease (diagnosed February 2018-January 2022). The objectives were to determine the overall survival and disease-free survival with this approach.

RESULTS

The median age was 62 years old (yo). Patients had an ECOG of 0-1. All patients received definitive chemoradiation to their primary anal tumor. A median of three months of neoadjuvant systemic therapy was provided. All patients had a response on their first scan after systemic therapy. Sixty-two percent received carboplatin + paclitaxel. A complete pathologic response was seen in 62% of patients. At their last follow-up, all patients were alive. Three patients had recurrent disease. The estimated 1-year disease-free survival probability was 56.2%.

CONCLUSION

Our report shows the feasibility of a curative-intent approach for patients with hepatic-only metastatic SCCA following the neoadjuvant application of carboplatin + paclitaxel. This approach appears promising in these select patients and warrants further investigation.

Primary squamous cell carcinoma of liver. First case report from Pakistan and South Asia

Introduction and importance

Primary squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) of liver is quite rare and very few cases reported in literature. It has high metastatic rate with poor prognosis. The pathogenesis is unclear, but is generally considered to be correlated with the long-term inflammation or metaplasia of biliary epithelial cells or congenital cyst of the liver. We report here a case of PSCC of liver which mimicked a complex hydatid cyst.

Case presentation

A 25 years male admitted with right hypochondrium pain associated with fever and yellowish discoloration of eyes for 20 days. He was jaundiced with epigastric tenderness and deranged liver function tests. When thoroughly investigated with ultrasound, CT abdomen and MRI liver, he was found to have a large cystic lesion in right lobe of the liver. He underwent right hepatectomy, peri-cystectomy of the cyst and T-tube placement in common bile duct. Histopathology of the resected sample showed primary squamous cell carcinoma of liver. Patient was discharged after 7 days and died after 6 months due to acute liver failure.

Clinical discussion

Because of a very low incidence of hepatic SCC, there is not a single definite therapeutic regime and various different methods of management include surgical resection, generalized chemotherapy, radiotherapy, Hepatic Arterial ChemoEmbolization (HACE) and the combinations of these therapies.

Conclusion

PSCC is a rare condition of the liver and is associated with other benign liver conditions such as non-parasitic and epidermoid cysts. Histopathology with radiological investigations are needed to diagnose and treat this aggressive tumor before it metastasizes.

•

Primary squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare tumor of liver and only 31 cases are reported till date since 1970.

•

PSCC is very aggressive tumor and generally patients present after the tumor metastasize.

•

The pathogenesis is not clear but most of the patients had liver cysts showing chronic inflammation of liver cells.

•

CECT scan of abdomen, MRI and biopsy of the tumor lesion should be done in all cases of liver cyst.

•

In operable cases surgery is usually the treatment of choice followed by chemotherapy

•

Recurrence rate is high and mean survival rate is less than 12 months.

Hepatic metastasis of anal squamous cell carcinoma

A 50-year-old woman was diagnosed with anal squamous cell carcinoma following a colonoscopy performed for positive test from the National Bowel Screening Programme. During the staging imaging, it was discovered to have a liver lesion that was atypical for metastasis. She underwent a segmental liver resection, and histopathology showed the liver lesion as a metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. We aim to discuss the incidence, presentation and management strategies for this rare hepatic metastasis of anal squamous cell carcinoma.

Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus, Unresolved Areas and Future Perspectives for Research: Perspectives of Research Needs in Anal Cancer

Anal cancer is a relatively rare, mostly HPV-related cancer. The curative treatment consists of concurrent chemoradiation delivered with modern radiotherapy techniques. The prognosis for most patients with early localized disease is very favourable; however patients with locally advanced disease and/or HPV negative tumours are at higher risk of locoregional and distant treatment failure. Tailored approaches are presently being investigated to determine the most suitable regimen in terms of radiotherapy dose prescription, target volume selection, normal tissue avoidance, and combination therapy. Metastatic anal cancer is treated with chemotherapy aiming at prolonged survival. The role of immune therapy in the clinical setting is being investigated. There is little knowledge on the biology of anal cancer, and an urgent need for more clinical and translational research dedicated to this disease. In this article, the evidence-base for the current treatment is briefly reviewed, and perspectives on future research needs are high-lighted.

Liver resection and ablation for squamous cell carcinoma liver metastases

Background

Limited evidence exists to guide the management of patients with liver metastases from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this retrospective multicentre cohort study was to describe patterns of disease recurrence after liver resection/ablation for SCC liver metastases and factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Method

Members of the European–African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association were invited to include all consecutive patients undergoing liver resection/ablation for SCC liver metastases between 2002 and 2019. Patient, tumour and perioperative characteristics were analysed with regard to RFS and OS.

Results

Among the 102 patients included from 24 European centres, 56 patients had anal cancer, and 46 patients had SCC from other origin. RFS in patients with anal cancer and non-anal cancer was 16 and 9 months, respectively (P = 0.134). A positive resection margin significantly influenced RFS for both anal cancer and non-anal cancer liver metastases (hazard ratio 6.82, 95 per cent c.i. 2.40 to 19.35, for the entire cohort). Median survival duration and 5-year OS rate among patients with anal cancer and non-anal cancer were 50 months and 45 per cent and 21 months and 25 per cent, respectively. For the entire cohort, only non-radical resection was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 3.21, 95 per cent c.i. 1.24 to 8.30).

Conclusion

Liver resection/ablation of liver metastases from SCC can result in long-term survival. Survival was superior in treated patients with liver metastases from anal versus non-anal cancer. A negative resection margin is paramount for acceptable outcome.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Anal Cancer—Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The number of anal cancer diagnoses has been rising steadily, so that the incidence has doubled in the past 20 years. Almost all anal cancers are induced by persistent infection with human papillomaviruses. Hitherto the care of patients with anal cancer has been heterogeneous and little experience exists with the primary management of anal cancer.

METHODS

The guideline was developed in accordance with the requirements of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. In line with the GRADE approach, the certainty of the evidence was assessed on the outcome level following a systematic literature search. Interdisciplinary working groups were set up to compile suggestions for recommendations, which were discussed and agreed upon in a formal consensus conference.

RESULTS

Ninety-three recommendations and statements were developed. No high-quality evidence was available to support recommendations for or against the treatment of stage I anal cancer with local excision alone as an alternative to chemoradiotherapy. Chemoradiotherapy is the gold standard in the treatment of stages II–III. Among other aspects regarding the timing and extent of response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy, the guideline panel recommended against obtaining a biopsy in the event of complete clinical response. Owing to lack of confidence in the available evidence, only open recommendations were given for treatment of stage IV.

CONCLUSION

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline provides a sound basis for optimizing the interdisciplinary, cross-sector care of anal cancer patients. Among other areas, gaps in research were identified with respect to the care of patients with early-stage or metastatic anal cancer. Approaches such as chemoradiotherapy combined with regional deep hyperthermia require further investigation. The role for immunotherapy in the management of metastasized anal cancer has also been insufficiently explored to date.