Development of a risk-scoring system to evaluate the serosal invasion for macroscopic serosal invasion positive gastric cancer patients

Reliability of the Lymph Node Ratio in the Prediction of Gastric Cancer Survival

Background. Lymph node metastasis is the major determinant factor in the prognosis of gastric cancer. There is still no definite consensus on the lymph node number that should be harvested during gastric cancer surgery. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) is defined as the ratio of metastatic nodes to the total number of pathologically examined lymph nodes. LNR has been proposed to be a sensitive prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. In this study the reliability of the LNR is tested for being a prognostic factor in gastric cancer survival. Methods. Medical records of 244 patients, with neither distant metastases nor neoadjuvant treatment underwent curative gastrectomy, were analyzed retrospectively in terms of survival according to the lymph node ratio (LNR). Patients were divided in two groups by using LNR cut-off value. Results. LNR of 0.4 was proved to be the best cut-off value to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that age over 65 (p < 0.001), and LNR ≥ 0.4 (p = 0.02) were independent factors in gastric cancer survival. Patients with LNR ≥ 0.4 presented with worse outcomes regarding other prognostic parameters (tumor differentiation, tumor diameter, lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion), despite similar numbers of lymph nodes being harvested in both groups during surgery. Conclusion. Lymph node ratio is a reliable parameter to predict the survival in gastric cancer.

The prognostic impact of macroscopic serosal change on resectable advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Advanced gastric cancer sometimes causes macroscopic serosal change (MSC) due to direct invasion or inflammation. However, the prognostic significance of MSC remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 1410 patients who had been diagnosed with deeper-than-pathological-T2 gastric cancer and undergone R0 gastrectomy with lymph node dissection at the National Cancer Center Hospital during January 2000 and December 2012 were restrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

MSC was not found in 108 of the 506 patients with pathological T4a (21.3%), whereas it was detected in 250 of the 904 patients with pathological T2-T3 (27.7%). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for diagnosing pathological serosa exposed (SE) by MSC were 78.7, 72.3 and 74.6%, respectively. The MSC-positive cases had a worse 5-year overall survival (OS) than the MSC-negative cases in pT3 (72.9% vs. 84.3%, p = 0.001), pT4a (56.2% vs. 73.4%, p = 0.001), pStageIIB (76.0% vs. 88.4%, p = 0.005), pStageIIIA (63.4% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.019), pStageIIIB (53.6% vs. 69.2%, p = 0.029) and pStage IIIC (27.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.062). A multivariate analysis showed that MSC was a significant independent predictor for the OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.587, 95%CI 1.209-2.083, p = 0.001) along with the tumor depth (HR: 7.742, 95%CI: 2.935-20.421, p < 0.001), nodal status (HR:5.783, 95% CI 3.985-8.391, p < 0.001) and age (HR:2.382, 95%CI: 1.918-2.957, p < 0.001). Peritoneal recurrence rates were higher in the MSC-positive cases than in the MSC-negative cases at each pT stage.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the MSC was one of the independent prognostic factors in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer.

Radiologic serosal invasion sign as a new criterion of T4a gastric cancer on computed tomography: diagnostic performance and prognostic significance in patients with advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic performance and prognostic significance of a new criterion for radiologic T4a staging on computed tomography (CT) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

METHODS

Between January 2010 and April 2019, 101 patients with pathologically confirmed gastric cancer were collected. Among them, 53 patients with pathologic T3 and T4a cancers were included in this study. Three reviewers assessed preoperative CT scans for radiologic T staging in two sessions, independently and in consensus at a 2-week interval, while blinded about the pathologic T stage. The radiologic serosal invasion sign was defined as a nodular extension from the outer gastric wall reaching beyond the perigastric vascular plane and adopted as a new CT criterion for T4a cancer. We evaluated the diagnostic performance, interobserver agreement, and prognostic significance of this sign for the postoperative recurrence.

RESULTS

There were 46 pathologic T3 cancers (86.7%) and seven pathologic T4a cancers (13.2%). The diagnostic performance of the radiologic serosal invasion sign in the differentiation between T3 and T4a cancers was as follows: sensitivity, 91.3%; specificity, 71.43%; and accuracy, 88.68% for R1 and sensitivity, 78.26%; specificity, 85.71%; and accuracy, 79.25% for R2. The k-value was 0.64. Among the clinical and pathologic variables, radiologic T4a sign [hazard ratio (HR): 7.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.36-26.86, p = 0.001], pathologic T4a (HR 9.82, 95% CI 2.35-40.95, p = 0.002), tumor size (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.35, p = 0.026), and lymphovascular invasion (HR 6.39, 95% CI 1.42-28.75, p = 0.015) were the significant factors for postoperative recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiologic serosal invasion sign is reliable as a new CT criterion for T4a cancer staging in patients with advanced gastric cancer, demonstrating 80% to 88% accuracy. Radiologic serosal invasion sign can also serve as a prognostic factor for postoperative recurrence as well as pathologic T4a stage.

Clinical and pathological staging of gastric cancer: Current perspectives and implications

Accurate categorization of invasive depth and lymph node metastasis or optimization of TNM categories is fundamentally critical for prognostic assessment and decision making regarding subsequent therapies after surgery for gastric cancer. Improving the precision of the TNM staging is the ongoing goal. The evolution of the staging system indicates that there is no "ideal staging". Every update has criticized the lack of a standard approach for the stages to date. T staging depends on the accurate determination of the depth of infiltration based on pathological continuous sections. N staging is susceptible to the influence of lymph node detection, and insufficient lymph node detection can lead to N staging migration. M staging is required to improve the detection rate of peritoneal positive free cancer cells to determine the high risk factors of peritoneal metastasis. At present, the quality of standardized pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer requires improvement. Based on a review of the literature and experience from multiple gastric cancer centers, we present a new development in TNM staging and a way to improve clinical and pathological quality control of gastric cancer.

Association Between Lymph Node Ratio and Survival in Patients with Pathological Stage II/III Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lymph node ratio (LNR), defined as the ratio of metastatic nodes to the total number of examined lymph nodes, has been proposed as a sensitive prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer (GC). We investigate its association with survival in pathological stage (pStage) II/III GC and explore whether this is a prognostic factor in each Union for International Cancer Control pStage (7th edition).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 838 patients with pStage II/III GC who underwent curative gastrectomy between June 2000 and December 2018. Patients were classified into low-LNR (L-LNR), middle-LNR (M-LNR), and high-LNR (H-LNR) groups according to adjusted X-tile cutoff values of 0.1 and 0.25 for LNR, and their clinicopathological characteristics and survival rates were compared.

RESULTS

The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates postsurgery showed significant differences among the groups (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that LNR was a significant predictor of poor RFS [M-LNR: hazard ratio (HR) 3.128, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.254-4.342, P < 0.001; H-LNR: HR 5.148, 95% CI 3.546-7.474, P < 0.001] and OS (M-LNR: HR 2.749, 95% CI 2.038-3.708, P < 0.001; H-LNR: HR 4.654, 95% CI 3.288-6.588, P < 0.001). On subset analysis stratified by pStage, significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the RFS curves of pStage II and III GC (P < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively) and OS curves of pStage II and III GC (P = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

High LNR is a predictor of worse prognosis in pStage II/III GC, including each substage.