Significance of intraoperative radiation therapy and high cumulative radiation doses in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

Emerging innovations and advancements in the treatment of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas

In this special edition update on soft tissue sarcomas (STS), we cover classifications, emerging technologies, prognostic tools, radiation schemas, and treatment disparities in extremity and truncal STS. We discuss the importance of enhancing local control and reducing complications, including the role of innovative imaging, surgical guidance, and hypofractionated radiation. We review advancements in systemic and immunotherapeutic treatments and introduce disparities seen in this vulnerable population that must be considered to improve overall patient care.

A century of retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma research: From single center experience to precision oncology? A bibliometric analysis of past, present, and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Increasing publication numbers in the biomedical field led to an improvement of patient care in many aspects but are challenging for scientists when integratively processing data of their fields. Using bibliometric analyses, the present study assesses the productivity and predominant topics in retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma (RPS) research across the past 122 years, thereby identifying crucial questions to address in future RPS research.

METHODS

Using the Web of Science Core Collection, 1018 RPS-associated publications from 1900 to 2022 were identified and analyzed regarding key bibliometric variables using the Bibliometrix R package and the VOSviewer software.

RESULTS

A continuous increase in RPS-associated publication numbers can be noticed over the time, which is strongly pronounced from 2005 onwards, and is characterized by a multinationally driven collaborative clinical research focus. The research primarily reflects progression regarding surgical techniques, histology-based therapy, radiotherapy regimens, and identification of prognostic clinicopathological factors. This progression is accompanied with improved overall survival of RPS patients. However, a paucity of RPS-specific basic/translational research indicates that such research might be additionally needed to better understand the pathophysiology of RPS and with that to enable the development of personalized therapies and to further improve patient outcome.

CONCLUSION

Increasing publication numbers of multinationally driven clinical RPS research are accompanied with improved overall survival of RPS patients, highlighting the importance of international collaborations to facilitate future clinical trials. However, this bibliometric analysis reveals a lack of RPS-specific basic/translational research which is needed to further improve patient outcome in the context of precision oncology.

IOeRT in retroperitoneal sarcoma: Towards more organ preservation with comparable oncological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) present a surgical challenge with high rates of local recurrence (LR). We investigated the role of intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOeRT) in reducing LR after surgical resection of RPS.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection for RPS between 2014 and 2021 at a tertiary academic referral center (n = 172). Patients included underwent surgical resection of their RPS and received IOeRT (n = 36) and were compared by case control matching to patients with similar tumor characteristics (recurrence status and tumor grade) that did not receive IOeRT (n = 36).

RESULTS

The median length of hospitalization was 8 days (range, 4-34) in the IOeRT group and 10 days (range, 2-42) in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.25). The mean operating room (OR) time was 4h (±1.3) and 4h (±1.9) in the IOeRT and non-IOeRT groups respectively, (p = 0.37). Complete resection with R0 margins was achieved in 30 patients (83.3%) and 24 patients (66.6%) in the IOeRT and non-IOeRT groups, respectively (p = 0.1). R1 resection was achieved in 6 patients (16.6%) and 12 patients (33.3%) respectively, (p = 0.1). The resected organ weighted score was significantly different between the groups; score 0 observed in 19 (52.7%) patients in the IOeRT group and 3 (8.3%) in the non-IOeRT group (p < 0.001), score 1 observed in 7 (19.4%) in the IOeRT group and 17 (47.2%) in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.012). The rate of severe complications (CD score>3) did not differ between the groups, 5 (13.8%) patients in the IOeRT group and 9 (25%) patients in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.23). No radiation associated complications were noted. The 2-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS) was 75.9% in the IOeRT group and 60.3% in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.4). The 2-year IOeRT field recurrent free survival (IRFS) was 88.4% in the IOeRT group and 60.3% in the non-IOeRT group (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of IOeRT did not increase the rate of surgical complications and was associated with superior local control in the radiation field, improved organ preservation without an impact on overall survival.

Evaluation of the efficacy of CT-guided 3D template-assisted 125I seed implantation in the treatment of unresectable STS: a multicenter retrospective study

To observe the safety and efficacy of CT-guided 3D template-assisted radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation in the treatment of unresectable advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Sixty-two patients who underwent continuous 3D template-assisted radioactive ¹²⁵I seed implantation for the treatment of unresectable advanced STS from August 2017 to August 2018 were selected from four tumor treatment centers for retrospective analysis. The postoperative adverse reactions and tumor response were recorded, and the postoperative complications were observed and treated at the same time. The overall survival (OS) rate was determined. All patients successfully completed ¹²⁵I seed implantation. In practice, the median number of puncture needles used during the operation was 20, and the median number of ¹²⁵I particles was 88. There were no statistical differences in the relative dosimetry parameters before and after the operation (P > 0.05). Tumor evaluation was performed 6 months after the operation. The effective rate was 61.3%, and the local control rate was 93.5%. As of March 2020, the 1-year survival rate was 85.2%, and the 2-year survival rate was 49.0%. The OS was 23 months. CT-guided 3D template-assisted ¹²⁵I seed implantation for the treatment of unresectable STS has a high local control rate, thereby further prolonging the OS of patients with unresectable STS.

[Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: surgical management]

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogeneous tumors with high recurrence rates that require a multimodal treatment approach and a surgical resection strategy adapted to tumor localization and histological subtype.

OBJECTIVE

Based on current scientific data this article intends to provide an overview on subtype-specific features, prognostic factors and operative techniques in the surgical management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A review of the literature addressing surgical management of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas was performed. Current evidence and recommendations were summarized.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Macroscopically complete tumor resection represents the sole curative treatment option for both primary and recurrent retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. To minimize the probability of tumor-infiltrated resection margins, compartmental resection has become a standard treatment for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas. This approach includes resection of all organs and structures adjacent to the tumor. Multivisceral resection is often associated with this approach and it is acceptable in terms of morbidity and mortality if performed at a center with experience in retroperitoneal sarcoma surgery. Histologic subtype, tumor grading, and quality of initial surgical treatment are major prognostic factors for oncologic overall survival.

Aggressive and frequent resection of recurrences in retroperitoneal sarcoma contributes to long-term survival

PURPOSE

Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis and is often undetected until it is significantly enlarged. While surgical resection remains the primary treatment, there is little research on its benefits, especially that concerning the reoperation of recurrent disease. This study investigated the impact of surgical procedures, especially reoperation of recurrent RPS, on prognosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 51 patients who underwent radical resection surgery (R0 status) for primary or recurrent RPS without distant metastasis. Patient outcomes and prognosis were defined in terms of the clinicopathologic factors and surgical techniques performed.

RESULTS

In all cases, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 28.2%, 5-year overall survival rate was 89.9%, and 5-year no residual liposarcoma rate was 54.3% after operation and re-reoperation. There was a statistically significant difference between the 5-year DFS rate and 5-year no residual liposarcoma rate due to frequent re-reoperation (p = 0.011). On univariate analysis of primary and recurrent lesions, the histological type and the number of organs involved were identified as statistically significant prognostic factors. Patients with well-differentiated liposarcomas had a statistically better prognosis than those with other cancer types (primary RPS, p = 0.028; recurrence, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive and frequent resection of recurrent RPS with combined resection of adjacent organs contributes to long-term survival. The establishment of a surgical strategy for RPS will require a prospective study.

Perioperative strategy and outcome in giant retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma-results of a retrospective cohort study

Background and objectives

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) are common soft tissue sarcomas of adulthood. The aim of this study is to show resectability of even giant liposarcomas and to identify factors associated with recurrence and survival in primary retroperitoneal liposarcomas.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Out of these 10 patients with primary giant, dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcomas were operated with en bloc compartment resection with intention of radical resection. Treatment consisted of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and surgical resection or surgical resection.

Results

In 6 patients, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was performed; 3 patients were treated with surgical resection alone and 1 patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median diameter of tumor size was 360 mm (300 to 440 mm). Operative outcome showed complete resection in all 10 patients. Local tumor free survival was in median 19 month. Tumor recurrence was seen in 3 of 4 patients (75%) without neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, and in 2 of 6 patients (33%) after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in 2 years follow-up.

Conclusion

Even in case of giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma, complete resection is possible and remains the principal treatment. The rate of recurrence was improved in patients with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.