Improvement of survival after surgical resection of pancreatic cancer independent of adjuvant chemotherapy in the past two decades – A meta-regression

EPI-X4, a CXCR4 antagonist inhibits tumor growth in pancreatic cancer and lymphoma models

Endogenous peptide inhibitor for CXCR4 (EPI-X4) is a CXCR4 antagonist with potential for cancer therapy. It is a processed fragment of serum albumin from the hemofiltrate of dialysis patients. This study reports the efficacy of fifteen EPI-X4 derivatives in pancreatic cancer and lymphoma models. In vitro, the peptides were investigated for antiproliferation (cytotoxicity) by MTT assay. The mRNA expression for CXCR4 and CXCL12 was determined by RT-PCR, chip array and RNA sequencing. Chip array analysis yielded 634 genes associated with CXCR4/CXCL12 signaling. About 21% of these genes correlated with metastasis in the context of cell motility, proliferation, and survival. Expression levels of these genes were altered in pancreatic cancer (36%), lymphoma models (53%) and in patients' data (58%). EPI-X4 derivatives failed to inhibit cell proliferation due to low expression of CXCR4 in vitro, but inhibited tumor growth in the bioassays with significant efficacy. In the pancreatic cancer model, EPI-X4a, f and k inhibited mean tumor growth by > 50% and even caused complete remissions. In the lymphoma model, EPI-X4b, n and p inhibited mean tumor growth by > 70% and caused stable disease. Given the non-toxic and non-immunogenic properties of EPI-X4, these findings underscore its status as a promising therapy of pancreatic cancer and lymphoma and warrant further studies. SIMPLE SUMMARY: This study examined the value of chemokine receptor CXCR4 as an antineoplastic target for the endogenous peptide inhibitor of CXCR4 (EPI-X4), a 12-meric peptide derived from serum albumin. EPI-X4 inhibits CXCR4 interaction with its natural ligand, CXCL12 (SDF1). Therefore, malignancies (including pancreatic cancer and lymphoma) that depend on the CXCR4/CXCL12 pathway for progression can be targeted with EPI-X4. Of 634 genes that were linked to the CXCR4/CXCL12 pathway, 21% were associated with metastasis. In cultured human Suit2-007 pancreatic cancer cells, CXCR4 showed low to undetectable expression, which was why EPI-X4 did not inhibit pancreatic cancer cell proliferation. These findings were different in vivo, where CXCR4 was highly expressed and EPI-X4 inhibited tumor growth in rodents harboring pancreatic cancer or lymphoma. In the pancreatic cancer model, EPI-X4 derivatives a, f and k caused complete remissions, while in lymphomas EPI-X4 derivatives b, n and p caused stable disease.

A dynamic analysis of empirical survival outcomes after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Survival outcomes after pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma may be biased by right-censoring. We herein analyzed a large dataset with no censored events for up to 5 years and dynamically investigated the impact of known prognostic factors, accounting for unobserved tumor characteristics.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing pancreatectomy from 2000 to July 2015 were included. The 1- to 5-year empirical survival rates were calculated, and factors associated with long-term survival (≥5 years) were analyzed using multivariable models. Dynamic analyses of survival and recurrence were conducted through landmarking, and the contribution of unobserved heterogeneity was estimated using frailty models.

RESULTS

The study population included 1,048 patients. The median follow-up was 30.4 months in the whole cohort and 97.2 months in survivors. The median survival was 30.4 months, with empirical 1- to 5-year rates of 85.5%, 59.6%, 43.2%, 32.1%, and 27.5%. A favorable pathological profile was associated with 5-year survival, albeit 25.7% of long-survivors received an R1 resection, and 28.8% had N2 disease. The median recurrence-free survival was 17.2 months. At landmark analyses, baseline prognostic lost strength over time, with no independent predictors of survival being identified in the sets of patients alive at 4 and 5 years. There was a significant amount of unobserved heterogeneity in the early postoperative period.

CONCLUSION

The 5-year post-pancreatectomy empirical survival was 27.5%. Dynamic analyses showed a time-varying structure of prognostic variables and a substantial impact of unobserved tumor characteristics that may drive the disease course under the selective pressure of surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Comparison of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matching analysis of long-term survival

BACKGROUND

Many studies have shown the short-term feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) are comparable to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). However, the long-term oncological safety of LPD in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains to be elucidated.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LPD or OPD between July 2014 and July 2018 at our institution were identified, and those with resectable, pathologically diagnosed PDAC were analyzed. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed to balance the baseline characteristics between groups. Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to determine independent predictors of OS.

RESULTS

The original cohort consisted of 64 LPD and 80 OPD cases, in which, the laparoscopic group had a significantly longer median OS (25 vs. 17 months; P = 0.034). A higher proportion of laparoscopic patients received adjuvant therapy (51.6 vs. 32.5%; P = 0.021). PSM analysis identified 47 patient pairs. No significant differences in OS (21 vs. 17 months; P = 0.220) or adjuvant therapy utilization (53.2 vs. 38.3%; P = 0.248) were observed between the matched groups. Multivariate Cox analyses showed that receiving adjuvant therapy (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.28-0.68), histopathological differentiation (poor vs. moderate-to-well differentiation; HR = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.26-2.95), and sex (female vs. male, HR = 0.47, 95% CI, 0.30-0.75) were independent predictors of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

LPD can be comparable to OPD in terms of long-term safety for patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma when performed in a high-volume center.

Clinical Trials of Systemic Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Review

Importance

Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) based on level 1 evidence, but some studies suggest that a neoadjuvant approach (which is standard for borderline resectable PDAC) may be preferable for upfront resectable PDAC. An in-depth review was conducted of all randomized clinical trials that investigated neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of patients with resectable or resected PDAC, focusing on trial design, characteristics of enrolled population, and long-term outcomes.

Observations

The existing resectable PDAC trials have good internal validity but variable applicability because of their restrictive eligibility criteria. In these trials, overall survival is the criterion standard end point, but disease-free survival is more feasible, proximate, and specific to the assigned intervention (at the cost of subjective outcome assessment) and thus an acceptable end point in certain contexts. The prolonged survival in the PRODIGE 24 trial highlights both the success of mFOLFIRINOX (modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) and the importance of patient selection. Neoadjuvant and perioperative trials have shown promising preliminary results; however, the number of patients who are not subsequently eligible for surgery reflects the limitations of this approach. Head-to-head comparisons of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments are limited to date in Western countries. Precision oncology with genomic and somatic testing for actionable mutations has promising preliminary results and may refine the management of PDAC, although the implications for early-stage disease and neoadjuvant therapy are unknown.

Conclusions and Relevance

This review found that adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX is currently the standard of care in fit patients with resected PDAC; however, the role of neoadjuvant treatment is expanding. Precision oncology may help individualize the treatment regimen and sequence and improve outcomes. Enrollment of patients with resectable PDAC in clinical trials is strongly encouraged.

Complete circumferential lymphadenectomy around the superior mesenteric artery with preservation of nerve plexus reduces locoregional recurrence after pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of recurrence pattern and risk factors for recurrence are essential for good rates of survival after upfront pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 167 consecutive patients who underwent upfront PD for resectable PDAC between 2000 and 2018. Postoperative recurrences were classified into three patterns according to initial recurrence site: isolated locoregional, isolated distant, and simultaneous locoregional and distant recurrences.

RESULTS

This study found 114 patients who developed postoperative recurrence (68.3%), including 37 patients with isolated locoregional recurrence (32.5%), 67 patients with isolated distant recurrence (58.8%), and 10 patients with simultaneous locoregional and distant recurrences (6.0%). When locoregional recurrence was classified based on the location of recurrent lesions, locoregional recurrence most commonly occurred around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) (70.2%), followed by around the hepatic artery (25.5%) and in the paraaortic region (14.9%). Multivariate analyses showed that complete circumferential lymphadenectomy around the SMA, including not only the right side, but also the left side, was an independent factor for reduction of locoregional recurrence (P = 0.019, odds ratio [OR]: 2.217). Lymph node metastasis was an independent risk factor for both locoregional (P < 0.001, OR: 3.686) and distant recurrences (P < 0.001, OR: 4.315). Non-completion of postoperative adjuvant therapy was a risk factor for distant recurrence (P < 0.001, OR: 3.748).

CONCLUSION

Based on our data, complete circumferential lymphadenectomy around the SMA might contribute to local control, and multidisciplinary treatment including neoadjuvant therapy might be needed for resectable PDAC with high risk for recurrence.

European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Pancreatic Cancer

European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC) are written by experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care in Europe. They give patients, health professionals, managers and policymakers a guide to essential care throughout the patient journey. Pancreatic cancer is an increasing cause of cancer mortality and has wide variation in treatment and care in Europe. It is a major healthcare burden and has complex diagnosis and treatment challenges. Care must be carried out only in pancreatic cancer units or centres that have a core multidisciplinary team (MDT) and an extended team of health professionals detailed here. Such units are far from universal in European countries. To meet European aspirations for comprehensive cancer control, healthcare organisations must consider the requirements in this paper, paying particular attention to multidisciplinarity and patient-centred pathways from diagnosis, to treatment, to survivorship.