1
|
Monrabal Lezama M, Murdoch Duncan NS, Bertona S, Schlottmann F. Current standards of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1751-1758. [PMID: 37358724 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01576-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer remains the 5th most common cancer and the 3rd most common cause of cancer mortality. Most patients diagnosed with gastric cancer still have a poor prognosis due to its advanced presentation at diagnosis, even in countries with developed screening programs. Surgery is the cornerstone of the treatment for gastric cancer, often combined with perioperative chemotherapy. Lymph node dissection is a crucial component of the surgical treatment of gastric cancer. D1 lymphadenectomy is currently recommended for early stage tumors. The extent of lymphadenectomy in advanced gastric cancer, however, is still a matter of debate between Eastern and Western surgeons. Although a D2 dissection is the current standard recommended by most guidelines, there might be a place for more limited dissections such as D1 + in selected cases. This evidence-based review will help defining the optimal lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sofia Bertona
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ji H, Hu C, Yang X, Liu Y, Ji G, Ge S, Wang X, Wang M. Lymph node metastasis in cancer progression: molecular mechanisms, clinical significance and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8:367. [PMID: 37752146 PMCID: PMC10522642 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01576-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Lymph nodes (LNs) are important hubs for metastatic cell arrest and growth, immune modulation, and secondary dissemination to distant sites through a series of mechanisms, and it has been proved that lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an essential prognostic indicator in many different types of cancer. Therefore, it is important for oncologists to understand the mechanisms of tumor cells to metastasize to LNs, as well as how LNM affects the prognosis and therapy of patients with cancer in order to provide patients with accurate disease assessment and effective treatment strategies. In recent years, with the updates in both basic and clinical studies on LNM and the application of advanced medical technologies, much progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanisms of LNM and the strategies for diagnosis and treatment of LNM. In this review, current knowledge of the anatomical and physiological characteristics of LNs, as well as the molecular mechanisms of LNM, are described. The clinical significance of LNM in different anatomical sites is summarized, including the roles of LNM playing in staging, prognostic prediction, and treatment selection for patients with various types of cancers. And the novel exploration and academic disputes of strategies for recognition, diagnosis, and therapeutic interventions of metastatic LNs are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoran Ji
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Chuang Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Xuhui Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Yuanhao Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Guangyu Ji
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Shengfang Ge
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orbital Diseases and Ocular Oncology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Xiansong Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
| | - Mingsong Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dinescu VC, Gheorman V, Georgescu EF, Paitici Ș, Bică M, Pătrașcu Ș, Bunescu MG, Popa R, Berceanu MC, Pătrașcu AM, Gheorman LM, Dinescu SN, Udriștoiu I, Gheorman V, Forțofoiu MC, Cojan TȘȚ. Uncovering the Impact of Lymphadenectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1769. [PMID: 37629625 PMCID: PMC10455758 DOI: 10.3390/life13081769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is a significant health concern worldwide, and lymphadenectomy plays a crucial role in its treatment. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal approach-D1 or D2 lymphadenectomy. This paper aims to synthesize the available evidence by conducting a comprehensive literature review and comparing the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. The analysis includes studies, clinical trials, and systematic reviews that assess survival outcomes, morbidity, and quality of life. The selected studies revealed different outcomes associated with D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy, including lymph node harvest, disease control, recurrence rates, and overall survival. Postoperative complications also varied between the two techniques. These findings highlight the complex considerations involved in selecting the most suitable lymphadenectomy approach for individual patients. Therefore, the decision requires an individualized assessment that considers the potential benefits and risks of D1 and D2 techniques. A collaborative approach involving interdisciplinary teams is crucial for developing personalized treatment plans that optimize both oncological outcomes and postoperative quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venera-Cristina Dinescu
- Department of Health Promotion and Occupational Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Veronica Gheorman
- Department of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Eugen Florin Georgescu
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| | - Ștefan Paitici
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| | - Marius Bică
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| | - Ștefan Pătrașcu
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| | - Marius Gabriel Bunescu
- Occupational Medicine Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Romeo Popa
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Mihaela Corina Berceanu
- Department of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Ana Maria Pătrașcu
- Hematology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Lavinia Maria Gheorman
- Department of Diabetology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Sorin Nicolae Dinescu
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Ion Udriștoiu
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania; (I.U.); (V.G.)
| | - Victor Gheorman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania; (I.U.); (V.G.)
| | - Mircea Cătălin Forțofoiu
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Filantropia Hospital of Craiova, 200143 Craiova, Romania;
| | - Tiberiu-Ștefăniță Țenea Cojan
- Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200642 Craiova, Romania; (E.F.G.); (M.B.); (Ș.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martiniuc A, Dumitrascu T, Ionescu M, Tudor S, Lacatus M, Herlea V, Vasilescu C. Pancreatic Fistula after D1+/D2 Radical Gastrectomy according to the Updated International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Criteria: Risk Factors and Clinical Consequences. Experience of Surgeons with High Caseloads in a Single Surgical Center in Eastern Europe. J Gastric Cancer 2021; 21:16-29. [PMID: 33854810 PMCID: PMC8020004 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 12/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Incidence, risk factors, and clinical consequences of pancreatic fistula (POPF) after D1+/D2 radical gastrectomy have not been well investigated in Western patients, particularly those from Eastern Europe. Materials and Methods A total of 358 D1+/D2 radical gastrectomies were performed by surgeons with high caseloads in a single surgical center from 2002 to 2017. A retrospective analysis of data that were prospectively gathered in an electronic database was performed. POPF was defined and graded according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) criteria. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of POPF. Additionally, the impact of POPF on early complications and long-term outcomes were investigated. Results POPF was observed in 20 patients (5.6%), according to the updated ISGPS grading system. Cardiovascular comorbidities emerged as the single independent predictor of POPF formation (risk ratio, 3.051; 95% confidence interval, 1.161–8.019; P=0.024). POPF occurrence was associated with statistically significant increased rates of postoperative hemorrhage requiring re-laparotomy (P=0.029), anastomotic leak (P=0.002), 90-day mortality (P=0.036), and prolonged hospital stay (P<0.001). The long-term survival of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma was not affected by POPF (P=0.661). Conclusions In this large series of Eastern European patients, the clinically relevant rate of POPF after D1+/D2 radical gastrectomy was low. The presence of co-existing cardiovascular disease favored the occurrence of POPF and was associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding, anastomotic leak, 90-day mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. POPF was not found to affect the long-term survival of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandru Martiniuc
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Traian Dumitrascu
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mihnea Ionescu
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Stefan Tudor
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Monica Lacatus
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vlad Herlea
- Department of Pathology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Pathology, Titu Maiorescu University, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catalin Vasilescu
- Department of General Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Surgery, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|