The value of lymph node ultrasound and whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT in stage IIB/C melanoma patients prior to SLNB

18F-FAPI PET/CT performs better in evaluating mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluorine 18 (18F) labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) in identifying mediastinal and hilar lymph node metastases and to develop a model to quantitatively and repeatedly identify lymph node status.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with 137 lymph nodes were identified by two PET/CT images. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of lymph node status were analyzed, and the optimal cut-off value was identified by ROC analysis.

RESULTS

The SUVmax of metastatic lymph nodes on 18F-FAPI was higher than that on 18F-FDG PET/CT (10.87 ± 7.29 vs 6.08 ± 5.37, p < 0.001). 18F-FAPI presented much greater lymph node detection sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV than 18F-FDG PET/CT (84% vs. 71%; 92% vs. 67%; 90% vs. 69%, 84% vs. 52%, and 92% vs. 83%, respectively). Additionally, the diagnostic effectiveness of 18F-FAPI in small lymph nodes was greater than that of 18F-FDG PET/CT (specificity: 96% vs. 72%; accuracy: 93% vs. 73%; PPV: 77% vs. 33%, respectively). Notably, the optimal cut-off value for specificity and PPV of 18F-FAPI SUVmax was 5.3; the optimal cut-off value for sensitivity and NPV was 2.5.

CONCLUSION

18F-FAPI showed promising diagnostic efficacy in metastatic mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes from lung cancer patients, with a higher SUVmax, especially in small metastatic nodes, compared with 18F-FDG. In addition, this exploratory work recommended optimal SUVmax cutoff values to distinguish between nonmetastatic and metastatic lymph nodes, thereby advancing the development of image-guided radiation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2000036091.

Diagnostic Performance of [18F]F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non-Ophthalmic Malignant Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of More Than 10,000 Melanoma Patients

We described the diagnostic performance of [18F]F-FDG-PET in malignant melanoma by conducting a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature. The study was designed following PRISMA-DTA. Original articles with adequate crude data for meta-analytic calculations that evaluated [18F]F-FDG-PET and compared it with a valid reference standard were considered eligible. The pooled measurements were calculated based on the data level (patient/lesion-based). Regarding sub-groups, diagnostic performances were calculated for local, regional and distant involvement. The bivariate model was employed to calculate sensitivity and specificity. The initial search resulted in 6678 studies. Finally, 100 entered the meta-analysis, containing 82 patient-based (10,403 patients) and 32 lesion-based (6188 lesions) datasets. At patient level, overall, [18F]F-FDG-PET had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 81% (95%CI: 73-87%) and 92% (95%CI: 90-94%), respectively. To detect regional lymph node metastasis, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95%CI: 40-72%) and 97% (95%CI: 94-99%), respectively. To detect distant metastasis, they were 88% (95%CI: 81-93%) and 94% (95%CI: 91-96%), respectively. At lesion level, [18F]F-FDG-PET had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 70% (95%CI: 57-80%) and 94% (95%CI: 88-97%), respectively. Thus, [18F]F-FDG-PET is a valuable diagnostic modality for melanoma assessment. It was accurate in various clinical scenarios. However, despite its high specificity, it showed low sensitivity in detecting regional lymph node metastasis and could not replace lymph node biopsy.

Whole-Body Imaging for the Primary Staging of Melanomas-A Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Melanoma staging at diagnosis predominantly depends on the tumor thickness. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a common tool for primary staging. However, for tumors of >4 mm with ulceration, 3D whole-body imaging and, in particular, Fluor-18-Deoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT), is recommended beforehand. This study aimed to investigate the real-world data of whole-body imaging for initial melanoma staging and its impact on the subsequent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, 94 patients receiving 18F-FDG-PET/CT and six patients with whole-body computed tomography (CT) scans were included. The clinical characteristics, imaging results, and histologic parameters of the primary tumors and metastases were analyzed.

RESULTS

Besides the patients with primary tumors characterized as pT4b (63%), the patients with pT4a tumors and pT3 tumors close to 4 mm in tumor thickness also received initial whole-body imaging. In 42.6% of the patients undergoing 18F-FDG-PET/CT, the imaging results led to a change in the diagnostic or therapeutic procedure following on from this. In 29% of cases, sentinel lymph node biopsy was no longer necessary. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG-PET/CT were 66.0% and 93.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Whole-body imaging as a primary diagnostic tool is highly valuable and influences the subsequent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in a considerable number of patients with a relatively high tumor thickness. It can help avoid the costs and invasiveness of redundant SLNB and simultaneously hasten the staging of patients at the time of diagnosis.

[Conventional ultrasound diagnostics in dermatology]

The imaging of changes to the skin, the subcutis and especially the regional lymph nodes by high-resolution ultrasound is an integral part of routine dermatological diagnostics. This is mainly done with electronic scanners operating at frequencies between 7.5 and 20 MHz (conventional ultrasound diagnostics). In addition, there are very high-frequency ultrasound systems (frequencies up to 100 MHz) that are used for special scientific questions. Ultrasound diagnostics has a number of advantages over other cross-sectional imaging techniques but is more dependent than these on the individual experience of the examiner. Structured training and continuing education are therefore essential for ultrasound diagnostics, also in dermatology. The following overview describes the most important indications for conventional sonography in dermatology in addition to the physical, technical and administrative principles.