1
|
Maes D, McMullan C, Aiyegbusi OL, Ford S. Clinician survey of current global practice for sarcoma surveillance following resection of primary retroperitoneal, abdominal, and pelvic sarcoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107085. [PMID: 37748277 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION - Postoperative surveillance following resection of primary retroperitoneal, abdominal, and pelvic sarcoma (RPS) is standard of care in international sarcoma centres and has rapidly evolved without an evidence base to become highly intensive and prolonged. This clinician survey aims to capture a global, contemporary snapshot of international guidelines used to inform sarcoma surveillance following resection of primary RPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS - Between July 2022 and March 2023, an online, anonymous, clinician survey to assess the current duration, imaging intervals and imaging modalities used for postoperative surveillance following resection of primary RPS was distributed among clinicians working at centres which are members of the TransAtlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Working Group (TARPSWG). RESULTS - Responses were received from 58 different TARPSWG centres. The majority of centres use institutional guidelines to guide surveillance intensity (n = 43, 74%) and the surveillance imaging modality (n = 39, 67%) used. For surveillance intensity and imaging modality, institutional guidelines are partially or entirely based on international guidelines in 81% (n = 47) and 78% (n = 45) of centres, respectively. Commonly used imaging modalities are contrast-enhanced CT abdomen-pelvis (n = 51, 88%) for abdominal surveillance and non-contrast enhanced CT (n = 25, 43%) for chest surveillance. Imaging intervals, timing of de-escalation of imaging frequency and total duration of surveillance for low-grade and high-grade RPS are reported. CONCLUSION - This global survey among TARPSWG members demonstrates the heterogeneity in sarcoma surveillance strategies worldwide and emphasises the need for a randomised controlled trial to provide an evidence base for the optimal surveillance schedule following primary resection of RPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Maes
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Christel McMullan
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) SRMRC, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, UK; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, UK.
| | - Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Samuel Ford
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tirotta F, Fadel MG, Baia M, Parente A, Messina V, Bassett P, Almond LM, Ford SJ, Desai A, van Houdt WJ, Strauss DC. Risk Factors for the Development of Early Recurrence in Patients with Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6875-6883. [PMID: 37423926 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13754-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease recurrence after retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) surgery is common, and resection may offer no benefit for patients who experience recurrence early. This study examined the incidence of early recurrence (EREC) in RPS patients, and the association between EREC and prognosis, aiming to identify the factors associated with EREC. METHODS Patients undergoing surgery for primary RPS from 2008 to 2019 at two tertiary RPS centers were analyzed. The study defined EREC as any evidence of local recurrence and/or distant metastases on the CT scan up to 6 months after surgery. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of EREC. RESULTS Of the 692 patients who underwent surgery during the study period, 657 were included in the analysis. Sixty-five of these patients (9.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-12.4%) developed EREC. Five-year OS was 3% for the patients with EREC versus 76% for those without EREC (p < 0.001). Patient characteristics were compared between the EREC and non-EREC patients, and EREC was found to be significantly associated with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (p = 0.006), tumor histology (p = 0.002), tumor grading (p < 0.001), radiotherapy (p = 0.04), and postoperative complications measured as a comprehensive complications index value (p = 0.003). However, the only significant independent predictor of EREC in the multivariable analysis was grade 3 tumors, with an odds ratio of 14.8 (95% CI, 4.44-49.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Early recurrence is associated with a poor prognosis, and a high tumor grade is an independent predictor for the development of EREC. Patients with EREC may benefit the most from new therapeutic options such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Tirotta
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Michael G Fadel
- Department of Academic Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marco Baia
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Sarcoma Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Parente
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Valentina Messina
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - L Max Almond
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samuel J Ford
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anant Desai
- Department of Sarcoma and General Surgery, Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk C Strauss
- Department of Academic Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baia M, Ford SJ, Dumitra S, Samà L, Naumann DN, Spolverato G, Callegaro D. Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1125-1132. [PMID: 35277304 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2-3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients' anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Baia
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Samuel J Ford
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Laura Samà
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - David N Naumann
- Midlands Abdominal and Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Unit (MARSU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Gaya Spolverato
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Section of Surgery, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Dario Callegaro
- Sarcoma Service, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maes D, McMullan C, Ford SJ, Wilson R, Oppong R, Aiyegbusi OL. Experiences of patients and their relatives of postoperative radiological surveillance and surveillance intensity following primary resection of a soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on their quality of life: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070327. [PMID: 37197810 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postoperative radiological surveillance following primary resection of a soft tissue sarcoma (sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, abdomen, pelvis, trunk or extremities) is standard of care in all international high-volume sarcoma centres in the world. The intensity of postoperative surveillance imaging is highly varied and knowledge of the impact of surveillance and surveillance intensity on patients' quality of life is limited. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the experiences of patients and their relatives/caregivers of postoperative radiological surveillance following resection of a primary soft tissue sarcoma and its impact on their quality of life. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will systematically search MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus and Epistemonikos. Hand searching of reference lists of included studies will be conducted. Further searches will be performed via Google Scholar, to reveal further studies within unpublished 'grey' literature. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts following the eligibility criteria. After retrieval of the full text of the selected studies, the methodological quality will be appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research and the Center for Evidence-Based Management checklist for Critical Appraisal of a Cross-Sectional Study. Data on the study population, relevant themes and conclusions will be extracted from the selected papers, and a narrative synthesis will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The systematic review does not require ethics approval. The findings of the proposed work will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated widely to patients, clinicians and allied health professionals through the Sarcoma UK website, the Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network and the Trans-Atlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group. In addition, the outcomes of this research will be presented at national and international conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022375118.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Maes
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christel McMullan
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre (SRMRC), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samuel J Ford
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Raymond Oppong
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research (CPROR), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma, with propensity to metastasize to locations such as soft tissue and bone. Thus, whole-body MRI should be a consideration as part of staging for patients with a new diagnosis of MLPS since PET and CT may not identify extrapulmonary disease. Surveillance imaging should be tailored, with consideration of more frequent and longer duration of monitoring for large tumors or tumors with round cell component. This review focuses on studies evaluating imaging in MLPS as well as recent publications on survival and prognostic tools in MLPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanh P Ho
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Surveillance Post Surgery for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2781-2791. [PMID: 36975424 PMCID: PMC10047263 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Complete en bloc surgical resection offers the best opportunity for the cure of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The potential for disease recurrence, in the form of both loco-regional recurrence and distant metastases, underpins the rationale for postoperative surveillance. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence underpinning follow-up for RPS patients, and most practice guidelines draw from expert opinion and evidence from soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The available observational retrospective data analysis has failed to demonstrate that high-intensity radiological surveillance improves the overall survival in patients. The lack of a robust evidence base has given rise to variations in approaches to post-operative surveillance strategies adopted by specialist centres managing RPS across the world. More high-quality prospective research is needed and planned to more clearly support surveillance approaches that balance oncologic outcomes, patient-centric care, and health service value. Risk stratification tools exist and are available for use in routine practice. Their use will likely support more individualised post-operative surveillance moving forward. Surveillance will likely be underpinned by serial radiological imaging for the medium term. However, developments in genomics offer hope for biomarkers such as ctDNA to impact patient care positively in the future and further support individualised patient care pathways.
Collapse
|
7
|
Siew CCH, Apte SS, Baia M, Gyorki DE, Ford S, van Houdt WJ. Retroperitoneal and Mesenteric Liposarcomas. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2022; 31:399-417. [PMID: 35715141 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Retroperitoneal liposarcomas are a rare entity and are comprised mostly of the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated subtypes. Eight-year survival ranges from 30% to 80% depending on histologic subtype and grade. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment and compartment resection is the current standard. Mesenteric liposarcomas are extremely rare and comprise more high-grade lesions, with poorer prognosis of 50% 5-year overall survival. They are managed with a similar aggressive surgical approach. This review presents the current management of retroperitoneal and mesenteric liposarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline C H Siew
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands; Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, 308433 Singapore
| | - Sameer S Apte
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000 Australia
| | - Marco Baia
- The Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - David E Gyorki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000 Australia
| | - Samuel Ford
- The Sarcoma Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Winan J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam 1066 CX, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|