Margin ACcentuation for resectable Pancreatic cancer using Irreversible Electroporation - Results from the MACPIE-I study

Irreversible electroporation as an intraoperative adjunctive treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: An initial clinical experience

Backgrounds/Aims

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) may have a potential application as either a "back-up therapy" or for margin accentuation during trial dissection of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). The aim of this report was to describe our experience with IRE in terms of its potential applications mentioned above.

Methods

A clinical policy to use IRE in LAPC patients undergoing exploratory surgery after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) was initiated in 2017. If resection was feasible, IRE was used for margin accentuation. If not, then IRE was undertaken as a "back-up therapy" of non-resectable tumor. Data on baseline characteristics, perioperative 90-day morbidity, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were collected.

Results

IRE was successfully performed in 18 (95%) patients. IRE was abandoned in one case for technical reasons. Nine patients who were found to have an unresectable disease underwent IRE as a "back-up therapy" while the remaining patients received IRE for margin accentuation. Complications were recorded in 33% patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. In the group receiving IRE for margin accentuation, the median RFS was 10.0 months (range, 4.5-15.0 months). The median OS of our cohort was 22 months (range, 14.75-27.50 months).

Conclusions

This report shows that in patients with LAPC undergoing exploratory surgery following NAT, IRE seems technically feasible for margin accentuation or as a "back-up therapy". More data are needed to determine procedure-related morbidity, mortality, and any effects of IRE on cancer-related survival.

Irreversible Electroporation Margin Accentuation in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Margin accentuation using irreversible electroporation (MA-IRE) improves recurrence and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer patients; however, there have been limited outcome comparisons to similarly risked patients who did not receive MA-IRE.

METHODS

Patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between 2017 and 2022 were included. Those who did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy for major vessel involvement were excluded. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the MA-IRE group with the corresponding non-MA-IRE control group with similar risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients were included in this study. Seventeen (47.2%) patients who underwent MA-IRE matched with 19 control patients (52.8%) with similar risk factors who did not have MA-IRE. Before matching, OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were comparable between the MA-IRE and non-MA-IRE groups. After matching, the MA-IRE group showed improved OS (746 vs. 509 days, hazard ratio 0.313; p = 0.034) compared with the non-MA-IRE group. DFS (p = 0.768), negative margin status (p = 0.317), and 30-day complication rates (p = 1.000) remained statistically different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MA-IRE in PD results in longer OS but does not impact margin status, DFS, or postoperative complication rates in our cohort. These findings suggest that MA-IRE is safe and potentially promotes immune cell activation rather than upfront margin mitigation.

Pulsed Electric Fields in Oncology: A Snapshot of Current Clinical Practices and Research Directions from the 4th World Congress of Electroporation

The 4th World Congress of Electroporation (Copenhagen, 9-13 October 2022) provided a unique opportunity to convene leading experts in pulsed electric fields (PEF). PEF-based therapies harness electric fields to produce therapeutically useful effects on cancers and represent a valuable option for a variety of patients. As such, irreversible electroporation (IRE), gene electrotransfer (GET), electrochemotherapy (ECT), calcium electroporation (Ca-EP), and tumour-treating fields (TTF) are on the rise. Still, their full therapeutic potential remains underappreciated, and the field faces fragmentation, as shown by parallel maturation and differences in the stages of development and regulatory approval worldwide. This narrative review provides a glimpse of PEF-based techniques, including key mechanisms, clinical indications, and advances in therapy; finally, it offers insights into current research directions. By highlighting a common ground, the authors aim to break silos, strengthen cross-functional collaboration, and pave the way to novel possibilities for intervention. Intriguingly, beyond their peculiar mechanism of action, PEF-based therapies share technical interconnections and multifaceted biological effects (e.g., vascular, immunological) worth exploiting in combinatorial strategies.

Impact of margin accentuation with intraoperative irreversible electroporation on local recurrence in resected pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of local recurrence and margin positivity in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer after pancreatectomy with or without irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation.

METHODS

Prospective data for preoperative stages IIB (borderline resectable) and III were evaluated, with 75 patients undergoing pancreatectomy with irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation compared to 71 patients who underwent pancreatectomy alone from March 2010 to November 2020.

RESULTS

Both irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation and pancreatectomy-alone groups were similar for body mass index, Charleston comorbidity index, and sex. The irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation group had significantly greater preoperative stage III (irreversible electroporation 83% vs pancreatectomy alone 51%; P = .0001), with similar tumor location (head 64% vs 72%) and tumor size (median 2.9 vs 2.8). Neoadjuvant/induction chemotherapy and prior radiation therapy was similar in both groups (irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation 89% vs 72%). Surgical therapy included a greater percentage of pancreaticoduodenectomy in the pancreatectomy-alone group. Despite greater stage and greater percentage of margin positivity (irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation 27% vs 20%; P = not significant), rates of local recurrence were similar. The mean disease-free interval for local recurrence from time of diagnosis was similar (irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation 15.8 vs 16.5 pancreatectomy alone; P = not significant) and time of treatment (irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation 9.4 vs 10.5 months; P = not significant). Overall survival was improved with the irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation group, with a mean of 34.2 months versus 27.9 months in the pancreatectomy-alone group.

CONCLUSION

Irreversible electroporation with margin accentuation is safe and effective in stages IIB and III pancreatic adenocarcinomas that are technically resectable. Despite higher margin positivity rates, the time to local recurrence and the effects of recurrence were the same in the pancreatectomy-alone group.