The oncologic safety of left colectomy with modified complete mesocolic excision for distal transverse colon cancer: Comparison with descending colon cancer

Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for left-sided colon cancer: a multicentre study with propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

Robotic surgery for right-sided colon and rectal cancer has rapidly increased; however, there is limited evidence in the literature of advantages of robotic left colectomy (RLC) for left-sided colon cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of RLC versus laparoscopic left colectomy (LLC) with complete mesocolic excision (CME) for left-sided colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients who had RLC or LLC with CME for left-sided colon cancer at five hospitals in China between January 2014 and April 2022 were included. A one-to-one propensity score matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was postoperative complications occurring within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival, overall survival and the number of harvested lymph nodes.

RESULTS

A total of 292 patients (187 male; median age 61.0 [20.0-85.0] years) were eligible for this study, and propensity score matching yielded 102 patients in each group. The clinicopathological characteristics were well-matched between groups. The two groups did not differ in estimated blood loss, conversion to open rate, time to first flatus, reoperation rate, or postoperative length of hospital stay (p > 0.05). RLC was associated with a longer operation time (192.9 ± 53.2 vs. 168.9 ± 52.8 min, p = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications did not differ between the RLC and LLC groups (18.6% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.856). The total number of lymph nodes harvested in the RLC group was higher than that in the LLC group (15.7 ± 8.3 vs. 12.1 ± 5.9, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in 3-year and 5-year overall survival or 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Compared to laparoscopic surgery, RLC with CME for left-sided colon cancer was found to be associated with higher numbers of lymph nodes harvested and similar postoperative complications and long-term survival outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of rCCK96-104PE38 Targeted Drug in the General Surgical Treatment of Colon Cancer

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the rCCK96-104PE38 targeted drug in patients with colon cancer in general surgery, data of 80 patients with colon cancer who were admitted to the hospital from April 2019 to July 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group, with 40 cases in each group. Patients in the treatment group were treated with the rCCK96-104PE38 targeted drug, and those in the control group were treated with oxaliplatin. The treatment efficiency and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The inverse cholecystokinin (CCK96-104) was fused with pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin (PE38 toxin) through the gene amplification technique to construct a prokaryotic expression vector. Then, the rCCK96-104PE38 was purified by Ni-nitrilotriacetate (Ni-NTA) affinity chromatography, and the antitumor activity of rCCK96-104PE38 was verified. The results showed that the amplified rCCK96-104PE38 sequence was correct and the pET-28a prokaryotic expression system was adopted to successfully achieve active expression. The purified recombinant protein could induce the apoptosis of colon cancer cells in vitro and inhibit tumor growth in vivo. The total effective rate in the treatment group (80%, 32/40) was higher than that in the control group (60%, 24/40) (P < 0.05). To sum up, the recombinant toxin rCCK96-104PE38 could not only specifically adsorb the colon cancer cells with high expression of CCK2R but also effectively inhibit tumor tissue growth and proliferation. Besides, the rCCK96-104PE38 protein had a good anticancer effect that helped effectively reduce the incidence of adverse reactions in patients, which was worthy of promoting.

Surgical outcomes of various surgical approaches for transverse colon cancer

The transverse colon has anatomical peculiarities in the middle position between the foregut and the midgut. Because the transverse colon harbors a flexure at both ends, mobilization of the transverse colon can be especially challenging compared with other colons. Although transverse colon cancer is relatively uncommon, an optimal surgical management for transverse colon cancer must be established. In transverse colon cancer, proximity to the pancreas and variation in arterial and venous anatomy make radical resection more difficult. Dissection of lymph nodes around the middle colic vessels is a critical step in transverse colon cancer resection. The proximity of the middle colic vessels to the superior mesenteric vessels contributes to the complexity of this step, making it challenging for less-trained surgeons. For these reasons, patients with transverse colon cancer were not included in most landmark studies that compared laparoscopic surgery with open surgery. More radical operations, such as subtotal colectomy or extended right or left hemicolectomy, can be performed for transverse colon cancer to secure an adequate lymphadenectomy. Such cancers have also been treated with limited segmental colectomies, such as right, transverse, or left colectomy. Currently, there is still a lack of standardized definitions and procedures. Therefore, it is time to discuss and establish optimal surgical treatments for transverse colon cancer.