Perioperative chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy strategies in resectable gastric and gastroesophageal cancer: A Markov decision analysis

Staging accuracy in patients with clinical T2N0 gastric cancer: Implications for treatment sequencing

BACKGROUND

Patients with clinical T2N0 (cT2N0) gastric adenocarcinoma are recommended to undergo either perioperative chemotherapy or upfront resection. If T2N0 disease is pathologically confirmed, patients may be observed without chemotherapy. These guidelines create the possibility of both systemic therapy overuse and underuse depending on clinical staging accuracy. Our objectives were to define factors associated with upstaging after upfront resection and describe the association between postoperative chemotherapy and survival.

METHODS

Patients with cT2N0 gastric adenocarcinoma were identified using the National Cancer Database. Factors associated with upstaging were assessed by logistic regression. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS

Of 4,076 patients undergoing upfront resection for cT2N0 gastric cancer, 1,933 (47.4%) were pathologically upstaged. Patients were more likely to be upstaged if they had >3.0-cm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97-2.70; P < .001) or poorly differentiated tumors (aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.89-2.60; P < .001). Patients were less likely to be upstaged if they had distal tumors (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.93; P = .006). Of those pathologically upstaged (n = 1,933), 1,111 (57.4%) received adjuvant chemotherapy that was associated with improved survival (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.47-0.63; P < .001). Among those not upstaged (n = 2,143), 247 (11.5%) received adjuvant chemotherapy that was not associated with improved survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.70-1.21; P = .54).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologic upstaging after upfront resection in patients with cT2N0 gastric cancer is associated with patient and tumor characteristics. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival only in the patients upstaged at surgery. An upfront surgical approach may be preferred in select patients, especially if avoiding chemotherapy is desired.

Evaluating survival outcomes and treatment recommendations in resectable gastric cancer

No consensus exists on the optimal therapy for resectable gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors, including the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy versus perioperative chemotherapy (PC). Our study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) outcomes associated with the recommended treatment modalities for GC and GEJ tumors and evaluate treatment trends from 2010 to 2020. A national registry cohort identified patients with ≥ cT2 nonmetastatic GC and GEJ cancer. Treatment modalities were classified as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCR), PC, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and adjuvant chemoradiation (ACR). Kaplan-Meier curve and multivariable Cox regression models evaluated factors associated with OS. A cohort of 7665 patients were included. Patients who received PC had the highest OS (median 86.80 months, 95% CI 73.40-NE), while chemoradiotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings had worse OS than PC and NC (NCR median 47.15 months, 95% CI 44.58-52.27, and ACR median 52.67 months, 95%CI 42.78-63.93). The Cox proportional hazards model showed that NCR and NC had worse survival than PC (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.50-2.02, p < 0.001 and HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.44, p = 0.0008, respectively). Additionally, the most utilized modality during 2020 was NC (35.8%), followed by PC (28.0%) and NCR (24.9%). The utilization of PC and NC had the most substantial rise between 2010 and 2020, increasing by 11.0%. The study demonstrates the association of PC with improved OS outcomes for nonmetastatic GC and GEJ tumors. Therapies combining radiation with chemotherapy and extended lymph node dissection correlated with a worse prognosis compared to PC and NC. Despite the association with improved outcomes, national data reveals low utilization rates for PC.

Impact of pre-treatment waiting intervals on short-term postoperative outcomes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy: A population-based study using the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) data

INTRODUCTION

The pre-treatment waiting interval of gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) followed by gastrectomy includes pre-nCT (diagnosis to nCT) and preoperative (diagnosis to surgery) waiting intervals. This study aimed to investigate the impact of these two distinct intervals on short-term postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Patients (cT1-4aN0-3M0) who underwent nCT plus gastrectomy were included using the Dutch national DUCA-database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the impact of the two waiting intervals upon short-term postoperative outcomes: pre-nCT waiting intervals (≤5, 5-8 and 8-12 weeks) and preoperative waiting intervals (≤17, 17-22, and >22 weeks).

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2021, 1242 patients were included. Compared to the pre-nCT waiting interval ≤5 weeks, the longer intervals (5-8 and 8-12 weeks) were not associated with worse 30-day mortality (p-value = 0.707; p-value = 0.900), overall complications (p-value = 0.733; p-value = 0.453), pulmonary complications (p-value = 0.250; p-value = 0.238), gastrointestinal complications (p-value = 0.396; p-value = 0.992), re-interventions (p-value = 0.407; p-value = 0.072) and 30-day readmission (p-value = 0.992; p-value = 0.664). Compared to the preoperative waiting interval ≤17 weeks, the longer intervals (17-22 and > 22 weeks) were also not associated with worse 30-day mortality (p-value = 0.926; p-value = 0.732), overall complications (p-value = 0.286; p-value = 0.510), pulmonary complications (p-value = 0.912; p-value = 0.351), gastrointestinal complications (p-value = 0.765; p-value = 0.882), re-interventions (p-value = 0.617; p-value = 0.800) and 30-day readmission (p-value = 0.592; p-value = 0.782).

CONCLUSION

A longer pre-nCT or preoperative waiting interval is not associated with worse short-term postoperative outcomes in Western gastric cancer patients undergoing nCT plus gastrectomy.

Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic approaches to gastrectomy: a National Cancer Database study

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is associated with significant mortality worldwide. Radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is considered the only curative option. Traditionally, these operations are associated with significant morbidity. Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and more recently robotic gastrectomy (RG) techniques have been developed to potentially decrease the perioperative morbidity. We sought to compare oncologic outcomes with laparoscopic and robotic techniques for gastrectomy.

METHODS

Utilizing the National Cancer Database we identified patients who underwent gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Patients were stratified by open, robotic or laparoscopic surgical technique. Open gastrectomy patients were excluded.

RESULTS

We identified 1,301 patients who underwent RG and 4,892 LG with median ages of 65 (20-90) and 66 (18-90) respectively, p = 0.02. The mean number of positive lymph nodes were higher in the LG 2.2 ± 4.4 vs RG 1.9 ± 3.8, p = 0.01. The R0 resections were higher in the RG at 94.5% vs 91.9% in LG, p = 0.001. Conversions to open were 7.1% in the RG and 16% in the LG group, p < 0.001. The median length of hospitalization was 8 (6-11) in both groups. There was no difference in the 30-day readmission (p = 0.65), 30-day mortality (p = 0.85) and 90-day mortality (p = 0.34) between groups. The median and overall 5-year survival was 71.3 mo and 56% in the RG and 66.1 mo and 52% in the LG, p = 0.03. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores, location of gastric cancer, histology grade, pathologic T-stage, pathologic N-stage, surgical margins, and facility volume were all predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic and laparoscopic techniques are both acceptable approaches to gastrectomy. However, conversions to open are higher and R0 resections rates are lower in the laparoscopic group. Additionally, a survival benefit is demonstrated in those undergoing robotic gastrectomy.

The order of surgery and chemotherapy matters: Multimodality therapy and stage-specific differences in survival in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Multimodality treatment improves survival for gastric cancer (GC). However, the effect of treatment sequence by stage remains unclear. We aim to compare outcomes between patients receiving neoadjuvant(neoadj) and adjuvant chemotherapy (adj).

METHODS

Nonmetastatic GC patients with clinical stage ≥ T2N0 who underwent both resection and neoadj or adj were identified using the National Cancer Database (2005-2014). Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed on propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts stratified by stage to compare overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We identified 11 984 patients; 55% stage I (SI), 76% stage II (SII) and 57% stage III (SIII) received neoadj. Unadjusted analysis showed worse survival among SI neoadj patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.195, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.38) and improved survival for SII (HR 0.93 CI 0.87-0.998) and SIII (HR 0.75, CI 0.68-0.84). After PSM, SI patients with neoadj had worse OS with increased risk of death compared to Adj (HR 1.186, CI 1.004-1.402). SII patients had no difference in OS (HR 0.98, CI 0.91-1.07) and SIII patients had improved OS (HR 0.78, CI 0.69-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who received surgery and chemotherapy, the benefit of neoadj was limited to SIII with worse survival for SI. A clinical trial to examine the optimal sequence of chemotherapy is warranted.

The jury is still out on peri-operative vs. adjuvant chemotherapy for distal gastric cancer

Randomized control trials have established systemic therapy as an integral part of treatment for gastric cancer, but the ideal sequence of surgery and chemotherapy is not known. In the West, peri-operative chemotherapy (based on MAGIC and FLOT4 trials) is the standard of care vs. in the East, D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemoradiation (based on ARTIST trial) or adjuvant chemotherapy (based on S-1 and CLASSIC trials) is more common. In this issue, Singh et al. ask if perioperative chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy portends a survival advantage specifically for patients with resectable distal gastric cancer who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy.¹.