Which gastric cancer patients could benefit from staging laparoscopy? A GIRCG multicenter cohort study

Diagnostic Efficacy of Staging Laparoscopy Compared to CT and PET-CT in Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance of staging laparoscopy (SL) compared to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) in gastric cancer staging. We evaluated the ability of SL to detect occult peritoneal metastases and influence of SL on survival outcomes across cancer stages and treatment approaches. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 95 patients with gastric cancer underwent preoperative assessment using CT, PET-CT, and SL between 2018 and 2024. Diagnostic performance metrics were calculated for SL, CT, and PET/CT across the local, locally advanced, and metastatic stages. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and comparisons were made using log-rank tests. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model incorporating interaction terms was used to determine the independent prognostic factors affecting survival, focusing on SL findings and cytology results. Results: The cohort comprised 75 males (78.9%) and 20 females (21.1%), with a mean age of 57.4 ± 10.1 years. The tumor location distribution was predominant in the corpus (31.1%) and cardia. Tumor staging revealed that 48.1% were classified as T3 and 28.8% as T4, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy analysis showed that SL outperformed CT and PET-CT in detecting peritoneal metastasis across all stages. Specifically, SL demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 95% for local disease, 92% and 80% for locally advanced disease, and 95% and 99% for metastatic disease, significantly exceeding those of CT and PET-CT. Patients with SL findings had a median overall survival (OS) of 30 months compared with 20 months for those assessed only with CT and PET-CT (p < 0.05). The stage-specific median OS for SL patients was 40 months in the local, 25 months in the locally advanced (p < 0.05), and 15 months in the metastatic disease (p < 0.01) groups, indicating significant survival benefits. Multivariable Cox regression identified SL findings as an independent factor associated with reduced mortality risk (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.90, p < 0.01), while positive cytology findings predicted poorer survival (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.25-2.60, p < 0.01). Interaction terms revealed that SL yielded greater survival benefits in patients with metastatic disease (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60, p < 0.01) and those undergoing systemic therapy (HR: 0.75, p = 0.04). Conclusions: SL provides superior diagnostic accuracy and prognostic information for advanced gastric cancer staging compared with CT and PET-CT. By accurately detecting peritoneal metastasis, SL aids in optimizing treatment plans, particularly in advanced stages, thus potentially improving patient outcomes.

The yield of diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage in gastric adenocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) with peritoneal lavage has been adopted as a standard staging procedure for patients with gastric cancer (GC). Evaluation of the value of DL is important given ongoing improvements in diagnostic imaging and treatment. As contemporary data from European centres are sparse, this retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the yield of DL in patients with potentially curable gastric cancer, and to identify predictive factors for peritoneal metastases.

METHODS

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach, treated between January 2016 and December 2018, were identified from institutional databases of two high volume European Upper-GI centres. Patients who underwent a DL with peritoneal lavage for potentially curable disease after clinical staging with imaging (cT1-4N0-3M0) were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a positive DL, defined as macroscopic metastatic disease, positive peritoneal cytology washings (PC+) or locally irresectable disease.

RESULTS

Some 80 of 327 included patients (24.5%) had a positive DL, excluding these patients from neoadjuvant treatment (66 of 327; 20.2%) and/or surgical resection (76 of 327; 23.2%). In 34 of 327 patients (10.3%), macroscopic metastatic disease was seen, with peritoneal deposits in 30 of these patients. Only 16 of 30 patients with peritoneal disease had positive cytology. Some 41 of 327 patients (12.5%) that underwent DL had PC+ in the absence of macroscopic metastases and five patients (1.5%) had an irresectable primary tumour. Diffuse type carcinoma had the highest risk of peritoneal dissemination, irrespective of cT and cN categories.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic yield of staging laparoscopy is high, changing the management in approximately one quarter of patients. DL should be considered in patients with diffuse type carcinoma irrespective of cT and cN categories.

The Role of Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

A significant proportion of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer is discovered with peritoneal metastases at laparotomy. Despite the continuous improvement in the performance of radiological imaging, the preoperative recognition of such an advanced disease is still challenging during the diagnostic work-up, since the sensitivity of CT scans to peritoneal carcinomatosis is not always adequate. Staging laparoscopy offers the chance to significantly increase the rate of promptly diagnosed peritoneal metastases, thus reducing the number of unnecessary laparotomies and modifying the initial treatment strategy of gastric cancer. The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive summary of the current literature regarding the role of staging laparoscopy in the management of gastric cancer. Indications, techniques, accuracy, advantages, and limitations of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology were discussed. Furthermore, a focus on current evidence regarding the application of artificial intelligence and image-guided surgery in staging laparoscopy was included in order to provide a picture of the future perspectives of this technique and its integration with modern tools in the preoperative management of gastric cancer.

Gastric Cancer (GC) with Peritoneal Metastases (PMs): An Overview of Italian PSM Oncoteam Evidence and Study Purposes

Gastric cancer (GC) continues to be one of the leading types of malignancies worldwide, despite an ongoing decrease in incidence. It is the fifth most frequent type of cancer in the world and the fourth leading cause of cancer death. Peritoneal metastases (PMs) occur in 20-30% of cases during the natural history of the disease. Systemic chemotherapy (SC) is undoubtedly the standard of care for patients with GC and PMs. However, with the development of highly effective regimens (SC combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy), significant tumor shrinkage has been observed in many patients with synchronous GC and PMs, allowing some to undergo curative resection "conversion surgery" with long-term survival. In recent years, there has been growing interest in intraperitoneal chemotherapy for PMs, because the reduced drug clearance associated with the peritoneal/plasma barrier allows for direct and prolonged drug exposure with less systemic toxicity. These procedures, along with other methods used for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs), can be used in GCs with PMs as neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant treatments after radical surgery or as palliative treatments delivered either laparoscopically or-more recently-as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy. The great heterogeneity of patients with stage IV gastric cancer did not allow us to carry out a systemic review; therefore, we limited ourselves to providing readers with an overview to clarify the indications and outcomes of integrated treatments for GCs with PMs by analyzing reports from the international clinical literature and the specific experiences of our oncoteam.

Efficacy Evaluation of 64-Slice Spiral Computed Tomography Images in Laparoscopic-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer under the Reconstruction Algorithm

This study was aimed to analyze the application value of the filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction algorithm of computed tomography (CT) images in laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy. In this study, 56 patients with gastric cancer were selected as research subjects and randomly divided into the control group (CT-guided laparoscopic radical gastrectomy) and the observation group (CT-guided laparoscopic radical gastrectomy with the FBP reconstruction algorithm), with 28 patients in each group. Fourier transform and iterative reconstruction were introduced for comparison, and finally, the postoperative curative effect and adverse events were compared between the two groups. The results showed that the CT image quality score processed by the FBP reconstruction algorithm (4.31 ± 0.31) was significantly higher than that of the iterative reconstruction method (3.5 ± 0.29) and the Fourier transform method (3.97 ± 0.38) (P < 0.05). The incidences of postoperative wound infection and gastric motility disorder (5.88% and 8.16%, respectively) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (8.21% and 10.82%, respectively) (P < 0.05). The levels of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) (280.35 ± 15.08 ng/L) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (144.32 ± 10.32 ng/L) in the observation group after the treatment were significantly lower than those in the control group, which were 399.71 ± 14.19 ng/L and 165.33 ± 10.08 ng/L, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the FBP reconstruction algorithm was better than other algorithms in the processing of gastric cancer CT images. The FBP reconstruction algorithm showed a good reconstruction effect on CT images of gastric cancer; CT images based on this algorithm helped to formulate targeted surgical treatment plans for gastric cancer, showing a high clinical application value.

Conversion Surgery in Gastric Cancer Carcinomatosis

Background

After the REGATTA trial, patients with stage IV gastric cancer could only benefit from chemotherapy (CHT). However, some of these patients may respond extraordinarily to palliative chemotherapy, converting their disease to a radically operable stage. We present a single centre experience in treating peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer.

Methods

All patients with stage IV gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases as a single metastatic site operated at a single centre between 2005 and 2020 were included. Cases were grouped according to the treatment received.

Results

A total of 118 patients were considered, 46 were submitted to palliative gastrectomy (11 were considered M1 because of an unsuspected positive peritoneal cytology), and 20 were submitted to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) because of a <6 Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI). The median overall survival (OS) after surgery plus HIPEC was 46.7 (95% CI 15.8-64.0). Surgery (without HIPEC) after CHT presented a median OS 14.4 (8.2-26.8) and after upfront surgery 14.7 (10.9-21.1). Patients treated with upfront surgery and considered M1 only because of a positive cytology, had a median OS of 29.2 (25.2-29.2). The OS of patients treated with surgery plus HIPEC were 60.4 months (9.2-60.4) in completely regressed cancer after chemotherapy and 31.2 (15.8-64.0) in those partially regressed (p = 0.742).

Conclusions

Conversion surgery for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer was associated with long survival and it should always be taken into consideration in this group of patients.