Textbook outcome, chemotherapy compliance, and prognosis after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A large sample analysis

Optimizing Surgical Outcomes in Gastric Cancer: A Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of the laparoscopic approach for total gastrectomy(TG) in Western countries remains under discussion. Recently, Textbook Outcome(TO) has gained recognition as a comprehensive measure of care quality in upper gastrointestinal surgery. Although predictive factors for TO after TG are well-documented, the influence of the surgical approach requires further analysis. This study aimed to compare the TO completion rate following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer between the open(OTG) and laparoscopic(LTG) approaches.

METHODS

TO was defined by ten criteria: (a)absence of intraoperative complications, (b)macroscopically complete resection, (c)R0 margin, (d)retrieval of ≥ 15 lymph nodes, (e)absence of postoperative complications with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2, (f)no surgical reintervention within 30 days, (g)no unplanned ICU admission within 30 days, (h)no mortality within 30 days, (i)length of stay ≤ 21 days, and (j)no readmission within 30 days. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for potential selection bias. Predictive factors associated with TO were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Among the 188 patients, 34 underwent LTG. TO was achieved in 46.8% of cases, with no significant difference between OTG and LTG (45.5% vs 52.9%, p=0.43). After propensity score matching, similar outcomes were observed (44.1% vs 52.9%, p=0.47). However, LTG was associated with fewer postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 (p=0.049), particularly pulmonary complications(p=0.041).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for cancer. The laparoscopic approach yields a TO completion rate comparable to that of the open approach while reducing postoperative complications.

Textbook oncological outcome of locally advanced gastric cancer patients with preoperative sarcopenia: a multicenter clinical study

BACKGROUND

The impact of postoperative sarcopenia on the Textbook Oncological Outcome (TOO) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remains uncertain. This study investigates the relationship between sarcopenia and TOO, explores its long-term prognostic value, and develops a prognostic model incorporating sarcopenia and TOO for survival prediction.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical and pathological data from patients with LAGC who underwent radical surgery at two Chinese tertiary referral hospitals. Sarcopenia was defined as an SMI < 36.4 cm2/m2 in males and < 28.4 cm2/m2 in females. TOO was defined as the addition of perioperative chemotherapy to the textbook outcomes (TO). A nomogram was developed to predict postoperative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in LAGC patients.

RESULTS

The study included 972 patients with LAGC. The overall TOO achievement rate was 67.1%. The TOO achievement rate was significantly higher in patients non-sarcopenia compared to those with sarcopenia (68.9% vs. 61.1%, P = 0.031). Logistic regression revealed that age ≥ 65, high ASA score, and sarcopenia were independent risk factors for TOO failure. Cox regression analysis identified TOO, sarcopenia, tumor size, differentiation, vascular invasion, pT stage, and pN stage as independent predictors of OS and RFS. Nomogram models based on sarcopenia and TOO accurately predicted the 3-year and 5-year OS and RFS.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative sarcopenia was an independent predictor of TOO implementation. A prognostic prediction model that integrates preoperative sarcopenia and TOO, which outperforms the current staging system, can aid clinicians in effectively assessing the prognosis of patients with LAGC.

Association between textbook outcome and long-term survival among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A single metric does not sufficiently capture the multidimensional and complex perioperative nature of treatment for patients with gastric cancer. There is a newly developed composite indicator, called textbook outcome, that reflects the "ideal" surgical outcome. However, limited evidence exists for the long-term prognosis of textbook outcome in patients with gastric cancer. Thus, this study was aimed at assessing the association between textbook outcome and long-term oncologic prognosis after gastrectomy.

METHODS

In total, 2,658 consecutive patients who underwent gastrectomy between January 2004 and December 2017 were included. The primary endpoint was 5-year conditional survival (if the patient survived the first 30 days after surgery). Textbook outcome was defined as retrieved ≥15 lymph nodes, pR0 resection, complete-potentially curative resection during operation, hospitalization ≤21 days, no reinterventions, no severe postoperative complications, no hospital readmission ≤30 days after discharge, no unplanned intensive care unit treatment, and no 30-day postoperative mortality. Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the adjusted predictors of textbook outcome. A Cox regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between achieving textbook outcome parameters and long-term oncologic prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 1,770 (66.6%) of the 2,658 patients achieved all textbook outcome metrics in this study. The textbook outcome group displayed a greater 5-year conditional overall survival than the nontextbook outcome group (64.7% vs 40.2%, P < .001). The 5-year conditional disease-free survival of the patients with textbook outcomes was strongly superior to that of the patients without textbook outcomes (63.1% vs 37.6%, P < .001). Textbook outcome was independently associated with longer 5-year conditional overall survival and disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0.494 [0.439-0.557] and hazard ratio 0.487 [0.433-0.547], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Attaining textbook outcome is strongly related to an improved long-term oncologic prognosis for patients with gastric cancer, underscoring the need for continued efforts to enhance surgical care quality.

Developing a modified textbook outcome for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a multi-center study

OBJECTIVE

Textbook outcome (TO) is widely recognized as a comprehensive prognostic indication for patients with gastric cancer (GC). This study aims to develop a modified TO (mTO) for elderly patients with GC.

METHODS

Data from the elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) in two Chinese tertiary referral hospitals were analyzed. 1389 patients from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital were assigned as the training cohort and 185 patients from Affiliated Hospital of Putian University as the validation cohort. Nomogram was developed by the independent prognostic factors of Overall Survival (OS) based on Cox regression.

RESULTS

In the training cohort, laparoscopic surgery was significantly correlated with higher TO rate (P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that surgical approach was also an independent factor of OS (P < 0.001), distinct from the traditional TO. In light of these findings, TO parameters were enhanced by the inclusion of surgical approach, rendering a modified TO (mTO). Further analysis showed that mTO, tumor size, pTNM staging, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors associated with OS (all P < 0.05). Additionally, the nomogram incorporating these four indicators accurately predicted 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in the training cohort, with AUC values of 0.793, 0.814, and 0.807, respectively, and exhibited outstanding predictive performance within the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

mTO holds a robust association with the prognosis of elderly patients with GC, meriting intensified attention in efforts aimed at enhancing surgical quality. Furthermore, the predictive model incorporating mTO demonstrates excellent predictive performance for elderly patients with GC.

How to measure quality of surgery as a component of multimodality treatment of gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequent reasons for cancer-related death worldwide. The multimodal therapeutic strategies are now pragmatically tailored to each patient, especially in advanced GC. A radical but safe gastrectomy remains the cornerstone of the GC treatment. Moreover, the quality-of-life (QoL) outcome measures are now routinely utilized in order to select optimal type of gastrectomy, as well as reconstruction method. Postoperative complications are frequent, and effective diagnosis and treatment of complications is crucial to lower the mortality rates. The postoperative complications prolong hospital stay and may result in poor QoL, thus eliminating the completion of perioperative adjuvant therapy. Therefore, avoiding morbidity is not only relevant for the immediate postoperative course, but can also affect long-term oncological outcome. Measuring outcome enables surgeons to: monitor their own results; compare quality of treatment between centres; facilitate improvement both for surgery alone and combined treatment; select optimal procedure for an individual patient. Textbook oncological outcome is a composite quality measure representing the ideal hospitalization for gastrectomy, as well as stage-appropriate (perioperative) adjuvant chemotherapy. Standardized system for recording complications and adherence to multimodality treatment guidelines are crucial for achieving the ultimate goal of surgical quality-improvement that can benefit patients QoL and long-term outcomes after fast and uneventful hospitalization for gastrectomy.

Textbook outcome in low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Post hoc analysis of the LASRE randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcome has been incorporated into quality assessment measures in various oncological settings; however, it has not been applied to patients with low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study aimed to examine the prevalence and predictors of achieving a textbook outcome in patients undergoing surgical resection of low rectal cancer after nCRT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a post hoc subgroup analysis of the prospective multicentric LASRE trial, which specifically enrolled patients with rectal cancer located within 5 cm from the dentate line at diagnosis, tumors with diameters less than 6 cm, and patients who underwent radical laparoscopic or open resection. A total of 597 patients who had clinically staged cT3-4aN0-2M0 tumors with diameters less than 6 cm and who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical resection were included.

RESULTS

Textbook outcome was achieved in 60.0 % of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that body mass index >25 kg/m2 (OR = 0.594, P = 0.01), tumor distance from the anal verge >40 mm (OR = 5.518, P < 0.001), operative time >202 min (OR = 0.675, P = 0.04), and laparoscopic approach (OR = 1.497, P = 0.04) were independently predictive factors for the achievement of a textbook outcome in low rectal cancer patients undergoing nCRT and radical resection. A predictive nomogram for achieving a textbook outcome was constructed, yielding a C-index of 0.727.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection exhibited promising potential in improving the probability of achieving a textbook outcome.

Textbook outcome as indicator of surgical quality in a single Western center: results from 300 consecutive gastrectomies

Textbook outcome (TO) has been proposed as a tool to evaluate surgical quality. Textbook oncological outcome (TOO) adds chemotherapeutic compliance to TO. This study was conducted to analyze the TO and TOO of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at our center. Data from a prospective database of patients operated on for gastric adenocarcinoma between September 2018 and September 2022 were analyzed. Postoperative management followed Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guidelines. The Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit group defined TO as a multidimensional measure (10 items). TOO also considers guideline-accordant chemotherapeutic compliance. Three hundred patients underwent surgery during the study period (167 men, 133 women). One hundred seventy-six (58.7%) reached TO. Achieving TO was influenced by patients' comorbidities, calculated via the Charlson Comorbidity Score (3 vs. 4; p = 0.002) and surgery type (subtotal gastrectomy; p < 0.001), but not by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.057) or surgical approach (laparoscopic vs. open; p = 0.208). The analysis of TOO included 213 patients. Of these, 71 (33%) underwent complete adequate systemic treatment. Compared with the non-TOO group, patients who achieved TOO had a lower median age (64 vs. 73 years; p < 0.001) and lower ASA score (p < 0.001) and more frequently underwent preoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Our results represent the experience of a single team at a high-volume Western institute. Patients' comorbidities and surgery type influenced whether TO was achieved. Conversely, younger age, lower ASA score and preoperative chemotherapy were associated with TOO.

Predictors of textbook outcome following oesophagogastric cancer surgery

Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure representing an ideal perioperative course, which has been utilized to assess the quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) surgery. We aim to determine TO rates among OGC patients in a UK tertiary center, investigate predictors of TO attainment, and evaluate the relationship between TO and survival. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected departmental database between 2006 and 2021 was conducted. Patients that underwent radical OGC surgery with curative intent were included. TO attainment required margin-negative resection, adequate lymphadenectomy, uncomplicated postoperative course, and no hospital readmission. Predictors of TO were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. The association between TO and survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression modeling. In sum, 667 esophageal cancer and 312 gastric cancer patients were included. TO was achieved in 35.1% of esophagectomy patients and 51.3% of gastrectomy patients. Several factors were independently associated with a low likelihood of TO attainment: T3 stage (odds ratio (OR): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.22-0.79], p = 0.008) and T4 stage (OR:0.26, 95% CI [0.08-0.72], p = 0.013) in the esophagectomy cohort and high BMI (OR:0.93, 95% CI [0.88-0.98], p = 0.011) in the gastrectomy cohort. TO attainment was associated with greater overall survival and recurrence-free survival in esophagectomy and gastrectomy cohorts. TO is a relevant quality metric that can be utilized to compare surgical performance between centers and investigate patients at risk of TO failure. Enhancement of preoperative care measures can improve TO rates and, subsequently, long-term survival.

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy among malnourished patients with gastric cancer based on textbook outcome

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcome (TO) has been widely employed as a comprehensive indicator to assess the short-term prognosis of patients with cancer. Preoperative malnutrition is a potential risk factor for adverse surgical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to compare the TO between robotic-assisted gastrectomy (RAG) and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) in malnourished patients with GC.

METHODS

According to the diagnostic consensus of malnutrition proposed by Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) and Nutrition Risk Index (NRI), 895 malnourished patients with GC who underwent RAG (n = 115) or LAG (n = 780) at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2016 and May 2021 were included in the propensity score matching (PSM, 1:2) analysis.

RESULTS

After PSM, no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics were observed between the RAG (n = 97) and LAG (n = 194) groups. The RAG group had significantly higher operative time and lymph nodes harvested, as well as significantly lower blood loss and hospital stay time compared to the LAG group. More patients in the RAG achieved TO. Logistic regression analysis revealed that RAG was an independent protective factor for achieving TO. There were more adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) cycles in the RAG group than in the LAG group. After one year of surgery, a higher percentage of patients (36.7% vs. 22.8%; P < 0.05) in the RAG group recovered from malnutrition compared to the LAG group.

CONCLUSIONS

For malnourished patients with GC, RAG performed by experienced surgeons can achieved a higher rate of TO than those of LAG, which directly contributed to better AC compliance and a faster restoration of nutritional status.

Evaluation of factors influencing long-term and textbook outcomes in laparoscopic gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcome (TO) in gastric cancer surgery is a multidimensional measure of surgical quality. However, its impact on long-term survival after laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is unclear. This study aims to evaluate TO in LG, assess its hospital-level relevance, and examine its association with long-term survival.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 2278 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) from January 2004 to December 2017. We determined TO achievement rates, compared preoperative and intraoperative variables between TO and non-TO groups, identified independent predictors of TO, and assessed long-term oncologic outcomes using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 1540 LG patients were analyzed, with 994 (64.5%) achieving TO. The least frequently achieved metric was 'hospital stays ≤21 days' (83.4%), followed by 'lymph nodes retrieved ≥15' (84.0%). Factors independently associated with reduced TO likelihood included age ≥65 years, BMI ≥25, ASA III, conversion to open surgery, operation time ≥260 min, and estimated blood loss ≥150 ml. Furthermore, TO was independently linked to improved 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.519 [0.443-0.609] and HR 0.517 [0.443-0.604], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Implementing the TO concept in LG provides a benchmark for achieving improved prognoses and empowers surgeons to devise strategies for enhancing surgical care quality.

Does surgeon specialization add value to surgeon volume in gastric cancer surgery?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the combined impact of surgeon specialization and surgeon volume on both short- and long-term outcomes in patients underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients with cStage1-3 gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative-intent surgery between January 2010 and December 2020 were evaluated. The impact of surgeon specialization and surgeon volume on clinical outcomes was scrutinized, both individually and in combination. For the purpose of assessing the combined effect, surgeons were classified into three groups: Non-specialized low-volume (NS-low), non-specialized high-volume (NS-high), and specialized high-volume (S-high). Postoperative outcomes and survival were evaluated. The adjusted effect sizes were expressed as odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Total of 537 patients operated by twelve surgeons were included in the analysis. For all cohort, the 30d-, in-hospital and 90d-mortality were 3.5%, 3%, and 6.3%, respectively. High surgeon volume alone had a significant impact (OR: 0.31 [0.10-0.82, p = 0.023]) on 30-day mortality. However, upon evaluating the combined effects of the parameters, while the most favorable 30-day mortality rate was observed in the S-high group, neither the NS-low group (OR: 3.82 [1.10-18.17, p = 0.054]) nor the NS-high group (OR: 1.37 [0.23-8.37, p = 0.724]) demonstrated a statistically significant difference when compared to the S-high group. The NS-low group showed poor results for several types of postoperative outcomes. In terms of overall survival, the S-high group outperformed, while the NS-low and NS-high groups presented with notably worse outcomes (HRs: 2.04 [1.51-2.75, p < 0.001], and 1.75 [1.25-2.44, p = 0.001], respectively).

CONCLUSION

The primary factor influencing short-term outcomes for patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery was found to be surgeon volume, while specialization provided a limited additional value. However, specialization emerges as an independent factor with a greater contribution to long-term survival than the impact attributed to high-volume.

Textbook Oncological Outcome in European GASTRODATA

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rate of textbook outcome (TO) and textbook oncological outcome (TOO) in the European population based on the GASTRODATA registry.

BACKGROUND

TO is a composite parameter assessing surgical quality and strongly correlates with improved overall survival. Following the standard of treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer, TOO was proposed as a quality and optimal multimodal treatment parameter.

METHODS

TO was achieved when all the following criteria were met: no intraoperative complications, radical resection according to the surgeon, pR0 resection, retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes, no severe postoperative complications, no reintervention, no admission to the intensive care unit, no prolonged length of stay, no postoperative mortality and no hospital readmission. TOO was defined as TO with the addition of perioperative chemotherapy compliance.

RESULTS

Of the 2558 patients, 1700 were included in the analysis. TO was achieved in 1164 (68.5%) patients. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.70] and D2 or D2+ lymphadenectomy (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.10) had a positive impact on TO achievement. Older age (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.94), pT3/4 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99), ASA 3/4 (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.86) and total gastrectomy (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45-0.70), had a negative impact on TO achievement. TOO was achieved in 388 (22.8%) patients. Older age (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.53), pT3 or pT4 (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.69), and ASA 3 or 4 (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.79) had a negative impact on TOO achievement.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite successively improved surgical outcomes, stage-appropriate chemotherapy in adherence to the current guidelines for multimodal treatment of gastric cancer remains poor. Further implementation of oncologic quality metrics should include greater emphasis on perioperative chemotherapy and adequate lymphadenectomy.

Textbook outcome in gallbladder carcinoma after curative-intent resection: a 10-year retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcome (TO) can guide decision-making among patients and clinicians during preoperative patient selection and postoperative quality improvement. We explored the factors associated with achieving a TO for gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) after curative-intent resection and analyzed the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) on TO and non-TO patients.

METHODS

A total of 540 patients who underwent curative-intent resection for GBC at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate the factors associated with TO.

RESULTS

Among 540 patients with GBC who underwent curative-intent resection, 223 patients (41.3%) achieved a TO. The incidence of TO ranged from 19.0% to 51.0% across the study period, with a slightly increasing trend over the study period. The multivariate analysis showed that non-TO was an independent risk factor for prognosis among GBC patients after resection (P =0.003). Age ≤60 years (P =0.016), total bilirubin (TBIL) level ≤34.1 μmol/L (P <0.001), well-differentiated tumor (P =0.008), no liver involvement (P <0.001), and T1-2 stage disease (P =0.006) were independently associated with achieving a TO for GBC after resection. Before and after propensity score matching (PSM), the overall survival outcomes of non-TO GBC patients who received ACT and those who did not were statistically significant; ACT improved the prognosis of patients in the non-TO group (P <0.050).

CONCLUSION

Achieving a TO is associated with a better long-term prognosis among GBC patients after curative-intent resection, and ACT can improve the prognosis of those with non-TO.

The Impact of Reoperations Following Bariatric Surgery on Mid-term Outcomes

PURPOSE

With the obesity epidemic, the number of bariatric procedures is increasing, and although considered relatively safe, major postoperative complications still occur. In cancer surgery, major complications such as reoperations have been associated with deteriorated mid/long-term outcomes. In obesity surgery, the effects of reoperations on postoperative weight loss and associated comorbidities remain unclear. The aim of this study was to assess mid-term weight loss and comorbidities following early reoperations in obesity surgery.

METHODS

A population-based cohort study was performed within the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity (DATO), including all patients that underwent a primary gastric bypass procedure or sleeve gastrectomy. Follow-up data was collected up until 5 years postoperatively on percentage total weight loss (%TWL) and comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 40,640 patients underwent a gastric bypass procedure or sleeve gastrectomy between 2015 and 2018. Within this cohort, 709 patients (1.7%) suffered a major complication requiring reoperation within 30 days. %TWL at 24 months was 33.1 ± 9.2 in the overall population, versus 32.9 ± 8.7 in the patients who underwent a reoperation (p=0.813). Both analysis per year and Cox regression techniques revealed no differences in long-term follow-up regarding percentage TLW, and weight loss success rates (%TWL>20%) in patients who underwent a reoperation compared to patients without reoperation. At 5 years, the availability of follow-up data was low. No differences were observed in the remission of comorbidities.

DISCUSSION

Major complications requiring reoperation within 30 days of gastric bypass surgery or sleeve gastrectomy did not affect long-term outcomes with regard to weight loss or remission of comorbidities.

MAGEA11 as a STAD Prognostic Biomarker Associated with Immune Infiltration

Expression of MAGE family member A11 (MAGEA11) is upregulated in different tumors. However, in gastric cancer, the prognostic significance of MAGEA11 and its relationship with immune infiltration remain largely unknown. The expression of MAGEA11 in pan-cancer and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and survival impact of gastric cancer were evaluated by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Whether MAGEA11 was an independent risk factor was assessed by Cox analysis. Nomograms were constructed from MAGEA11 and clinical variables. Gene functional pathway enrichment was obtained based on MAGEA11 differential analysis. The relationship between MAGEA11 and immune infiltration was determined by the Tumor Immunity Estimation Resource (TIMER) and the Tumor Immune System Interaction Database (TISIDB). Finally, MAGEA11-sensitive drugs were predicted based on the CellMiner database. The results showed that the expression of MAGEA11 mRNA in gastric cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in normal tissues. The ROC curve indicated an AUC value of 0.667. Survival analysis showed that patients with high MAGEA11 had poor prognosis (HR = 1.43, p = 0.034). In correlation analysis, MAGEA11 mRNA expression was found to be associated with tumor purity and immune invasion. Finally, drug sensitivity analysis found that the expression of MAGEA11 was correlated with seven drugs. Our study found that upregulated MAGEA11 in gastric cancer was significantly associated with lower survival and invasion by immune infiltration. It is suggested that MAGEA11 may be a potential biomarker and immunotherapy target for gastric cancer.