Evolution of the nosography of post-traumatic psychological injuries of war: From dissociation to clinical principles

Treatment of post-traumatic psychiatric disorders: A continuum of immediate, post-immediate and follow-up care mediated by specific psychotherapeutic principles. Clinical experience in French-speaking countries

BACKGROUND

People who witness a horrific event are at risk of suffering from acute psychological disorders, potentially leading to chronic post-traumatic symptoms and severe medico-psycho-social complications. Traumatised individuals suffer from psychological damage that is initially indescribable: they are often unable to ask for care in the immediate aftermath of an event. Afterwards, traumatic events and their post-traumatic consequences are still often hidden or minimised by patients for reasons linked to the disorder itself (inexpressibility, shame, depressive thoughts, fear of stigmatisation, etc.). The provision of the initial stage of care has a major impact on the long-term prognosis. Although official French recommendations remain vague, and scientific studies lack power, there is a developing professional consensus on practices, and developments in neurobiology are opening up new opportunities to validate them.

OBJECTIVE

Drawing upon our clinical experience and clinical principles provided by our mentors, our aim is to clarify the phases of psychotherapeutic treatment, and we describe three practices: immediate care ("defusing"), post-immediate care ("French debriefing" or "post-immediate psychotherapeutic intervention") and follow-up care ("deferred debriefing" and psychotherapy). Although the international literature considers these phases as separate, here we describe a continuity of talking therapies that support long-term remission.

RESULTS

The effectiveness of the combination of immediate, post-immediate and follow-up care has been confirmed by events surrounding the recent Paris and Nice attacks. Specific psychotherapeutic principles are unrelated to a particular school of psychotherapy (notably cognitive and behavioural therapies, analytical therapies, various forms of hypnosis, and eye-movement therapies, etc.). Instead, they refer to specific principles that are effective in the treatment of post-traumatic psychiatric disorders. By helping the individual to verbalise their experience, talking re-establishes dissociated psychological functions. A process of reconsolidation enables sensory memory to be integrated into verbal memory. Supported by psychotherapy, language can be used to discover, or construct, a new sense of meaning for the individual.

CONCLUSION

A single session of post-immediate or deferred debriefing has been found to have a miraculous effect on post-traumatic symptoms, confirmed by follow-up. When disorders are chronic and complex, however, treatment can last several months or years. In each case, although certain therapeutic principles are key, other psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatments should be adapted to the individual's clinical situation, and the symptoms they present.

Post-traumatic psychiatric disorders: PTSD is not the only diagnosis

Traumatic events and their consequences are often hidden or minimised by patients for reasons linked to the post-traumatic stress disorder itself (inexpressibility, shame, depressive thoughts, fear of stigmatisation, etc.). Although post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) remains the most widely known disorder, chronic post-traumatic psychiatric disorders are many and varied. After a trauma, the practitioner has to check for the different clinical forms of post-traumatic psychological consequences: PTSD is not the only diagnosis. Based on our own clinical experience compared to the international literature, we think necessary to build a didactic classification describing chronic post-traumatic symptoms and syndromes. Post traumatic depressions and bereavement lead to high risk of suicidal crisis and self-harm behaviours. Re-experiencing are felt with anxiety, hyper arousal increases anxious reactivity, and avoidance strategies increase anticipatory anxiety, indicating post-traumatic anxiety disorders (agoraphobia, specific phobia, obsessive compulsive disorder, separation anxiety, social phobia). Characterising an often-severe clinical picture, the co-occurrence of post-traumatic and chronic psychotic symptoms is not unusual (post-traumatic schizophrenia, post-traumatic depression with mood-congruent psychotic features, non-schizophrenic post-traumatic psychotic disorder, and bipolar reaction to trauma). A physical injury occurring at the same time as a traumatic exposure increases the risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder later which, in turn, afflicts the subjective perception of the physical health (development of somatoform and psychosomatic disorders, comorbidity with a post-concussion syndrome). The trauma may cause a rupture in the biography of a person, also in his/her internal physiological functioning as in his/her social activities (impacts of instinctive functions and behaviours, personality changes, and adjustment difficulties on professional and personal life). Although a nomenclature is necessary for semiological descriptions, a thorough analysis of the patient's general psychological functioning must also be conducted.