Cryopreserved Arterial Allografts in the Treatment of Prosthetic Graft Infections

Cryopreserved arterial allografts vs autologous vein for arterial reconstruction in infected fields

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral arterial infections are rare and difficult to treat when an in situ reconstruction is required. Autologous vein (AV) is the conduit of choice in many scenarios. However, cryopreserved arterial allografts (CAAs) are an alternative. We aimed to assess our experience with CAAs and AVs for reconstruction in primary and secondary peripheral arterial infections.

METHODS

Data from patients with peripheral arterial infections undergoing reconstruction with CAA or AV from January 2002 through August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with aortic- or iliac-based infections were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients (28 CAA, 14 AV) with a mean age of 65 and 69 years, respectively, were identified. Infections were secondary in 31 patients (74%) and primary in 11 (26%). Secondary infections included 10 femoral-femoral grafts, 10 femoropopliteal or femoral-distal grafts, five femoral patches, four carotid-subclavian grafts, one carotid-carotid graft, and one infected carotid patch. Primary infection locations included six femoral, three popliteal, and two subclavian arteries. In patients with lower extremity infections, associated groin infections were present in 19 (56%). Preoperative blood cultures were positive in 17 patients (41%). AVs included saphenous vein in eight and femoral vein in six. Intraoperative cultures were negative in nine patients (23%), polymicrobial in eight (21%), and monomicrobial in 22 (56%). Thirty-day mortality occurred in four patients (10%), two due to multisystem organ failure, one due to graft rupture causing acute blood loss and myocardial infarction, and one due to an unknown cause post-discharge. Median follow-up was 20 months and 46 months in the CAA and AV group, respectively. Graft-related reintervention was performed in six patients in the CAA group (21%) and one patient in the AV group (7%). Freedom from graft-related reintervention rates at 3 years were 82% and 92% in the CAA and AV group, respectively (P = .12). Survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 85% and 65% in the CAA group and 92% and 84% in the AV group (P = .13). Freedom from loss of primary patency was similar with 3-year rates of 77% and 83% in the CAA and AV group, respectively (P = .25). No patients in either group were diagnosed with reinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

CAAs are an alternative conduit for peripheral arterial reconstructions when AV is not available. Although there was a trend towards higher graft-related reintervention rates in the CAA group, patency is similar and reinfection is rare.

Results of cryopreserved arterial allograft replacement for thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic infections

BACKGROUND

Primary and secondary thoracic aortic infections are rare but associated with high morbidity and mortality. There is currently no consensus on their optimal treatment. Arterial allografts have been shown to be resistant to bacterial colonization. Complete excision of infected material, especially synthetic grafts, combined with in situ aortic repair is considered the best treatment of abdominal aortic infections. The aim of this study was to assess the management of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic infections using arterial allografts.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2017, all patients with thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic native or graft infections underwent complete excision of infected material and in situ arterial allografting. The end points were the early mortality and morbidity rates and early and late rates of reinfection, graft degeneration, and graft-related morbidity.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 65.6 ± 9.2 years were included. Twenty-one (60%) cases experienced graft infections and 14 (40%) experienced native aortic infections. Eight (22.8%) patients had visceral fistulas: 5 (14.4%) prosthetic-esophageal, 1 (2.8%) prosthetic-bronchial, 1 (2.8%) prosthetic-duodenal, and 1 (2.8%) native aortobronchial. In 12 (34.3%) cases, only the descending thoracic aorta was involved; in 23 (65.7%) cases, the thoracoabdominal aorta was involved. Fifteen (42.8%) patients died during the first month or before discharge: 5 of hemorrhage, 4 of multiorgan failure, 3 of ischemic colitis, 2 of pneumonia, and 1 of anastomotic disruption. Eleven (31.5%) patients required early revision surgery: 6 (17.1%) for nongraft-related hemorrhage, 3 (8.6%) for colectomy, 1 (2.9%) for proximal anastomotic disruption, and 1 (2.9%) for tamponade. One (2.9%) patient who died before discharge experienced paraplegia. One (2.9%) patient experienced stroke. Six (17.1%) patients required postoperative dialysis. Among them, four died before discharge. The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 11 ± 10.5 days; the mean length of hospital stay was 32 ± 14 days. During a mean follow-up of 32.3 ± 23.7 months, three allograft-related complications occurred in survivors (15% of late survivors): one proximal and one distal false aneurysm with no evidence of reinfection and one allograft-enteric fistula. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 49.3% and 42.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rare, aortic infections are highly challenging. Surgical management includes complete excision of infected tissues or grafts. Allografts offer a promising solution to aortic graft infection because they appear to resist reinfection; however, the grafts must be observed indefinitely because of the risk of late graft complications.

Short and Mid Term Outcomes of Cryopreserved Abdominal Aortic Allografts Used as a Substitute for Infected Prosthetic Grafts in 200 Patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the use of cryopreserved arterial allografts (CAA) as a substitute for infected infrarenal aortic prostheses, and its outcomes.

METHODS

A single centre retrospective study of consecutive patients receiving an abdominal aortic CAA after removal of an infected graft was conducted between January 1997 and December 2013. The primary outcome was the rate of allograft related revision surgery. Secondary outcomes were the 30 day mortality rate, survival, primary patency, limb salvage, and infection recurrence. Allograft ruptures secondary to infection and risk factors for allograft failure were also investigated.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients (mean age 64.2 ± 9.4 years) were included. In 56 (28%) cases, infection was related to an enteric fistula. The mean follow up duration was 4.1 years. The 30 day mortality rate was 11%. Early revision surgery was needed in 59 patients (29.5%). Among them, 15 (7.5%) were allograft related and led to the death of three patients (1.5%), corresponding to a 7.5% 30 day allograft related revision surgery rate. During the first six months, 17 (8.5%) patients experienced 21 events with complete or partial rupture (pseudo-aneurysm) of the allograft responsible for five (2.5%) deaths, corresponding to a re-infection rate of 8.5%. The multivariable analysis showed that diabetes and pseudo-aneurysm of the native aorta on presentation were predictive factors for short term allograft rupture. After six months, 25 (12.5%) patients experienced long term allograft complications (rupture, n = 2, 1%; pseudo-aneurysm, n = 6, 3%; aneurysm, n = 2, 1%; thrombosis, n = 11, 5.5%; stenosis, n = 4, 2%;) requiring revision surgery resulting in one death. The five year rates of survival, allograft related revision surgery, limb salvage, primary patency, and infection recurrence were 56%, 30%, 89%, 80%, and 12%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CAAs provide acceptable results to treat aortic graft infection with few early graft related fatal complications. Long term allograft related complications are quite common but are associated with low mortality and amputation rates.

Surgical and medical interventions for abdominal aortic graft infections

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic graft infections are a major complication following abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, with high morbidity and mortality rates. They can be treated surgically or conservatively using medical management. The two most common surgical techniques are in situ replacement of the graft and extra-anatomical bypass. Medical management most commonly consists of a course of long-term antibiotics. There is currently no consensus on which intervention (extra-anatomical bypass, in situ replacement, or medical) is the most effective in managing abdominal aortic graft infections. Whilst in emergency or complex situations such as graft rupture surgical management is the only option, in non-emergency situations it is often personal preference that influences the clinician's decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the effects of surgical and medical interventions for abdominal aortic graft infections.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL databases and WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 2 December 2019. We also reviewed the bibliographies of the studies identified by the search and contacted specialists in the field and study authors to request information on any possible unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We aimed to include all randomised controlled trials that used surgical or medical interventions to treat abdominal aortic graft infections. The definitions of abdominal aortic graft infections were accepted as presented in the individual studies, and included secondary infection due to aortoenteric fistula. We excluded studies presenting data on prosthetic graft infections in general, unless data specific to abdominal aortic graft infections could be isolated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed all studies identified by the search. We planned to independently assess risk of bias of the included trials and to evaluate the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. Our main outcomes were overall mortality, amputation, graft re-infection, overall graft-related complications, graft-related mortality, acute limb ischaemia, and re-intervention.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified no randomised controlled trials to conduct meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence to draw conclusions to support any treatment over the other. Multicentre clinical trials are required to compare different treatments for the condition.

Results of the Proliferative Activity’s Analysis of Bifidobacterium Exometabolites in Regard to Hospital Isolates from Patients after Vascular Synthetic Prosthetics Implantation

Problems ofdevelopment of purulent septic complications in vascular surgery during the usage of synthetic prosthetics for shunting and arterial prosthetics are described in this work.Leading factors of development of prosthetic infection are described. Specialties of diagnostics and bacteriological researches wound discharge of wound’s discharge are shown. Tactics of complex treatment of patients with prosthetic infection are presented. This work is dedicated to the experimental researchof proliferative activityof the most encountered opportunistic microorganisms found from the patients of vascular surgery profile with purulent septical complications under the influence of bifidobacteriumbifidium’sexometabolites. Presented results proof the submission of proliferative activity of the most widespread antibiotic-resistant hospital’s isolates under the influence of bifidobacteriumbifidium’sexometabolites.Evaluation during the experiment in vitro of the influence of bifidobacteriumbifidium’sexometabolites on proliferative activityof opportunistic microorganisms.

[Surgical policy in treatment of patients with infected aortofemoral bifurcation allografts]

Described in the article are the results of treating a total of 44 patients who endured repeat operations for infection of aortofemoral bifurcation allografts over the period between 2001 and 2018. These patients had previously undergone reconstructive operations using various synthetic grafts for lower limb ischaemia on the background of lower-limb artery atherosclerosis and infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Infection of synthetic vascular allografts in these patients was observed both in the immediate and remote postoperative periods. The dominating infection in 70% of patients was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The main objective risk factors for infection of bifurcation grafts were found to be as follows: stage III-IV chronic lower limb ischaemia (according to the Fontaine-Pokrovsky classification), diabetes mellitus, and prior operations on lower-limb arteries. Two of the 44 patients were operated on for reinfection after repeat aortofemoral bypass grafting. 30% of patients underwent repeat surgery with symptoms of sepsis. After meticulous additional examination and preoperative preparation the patients were subjected to secondary simultaneous operation, i.e., removal of the synthetic aortofemoral bifurcation prosthesis and aortofemoral bifurcation autovenous repeat reconstruction (repeat bypass grafting) in situ. Aortofemoral bifurcation grafts were formed using superficial femoral veins from both legs. Four patients died in the immediate postoperative period. Other short-term complications included arrosive bleeding with or without sepsis, amputation of one leg due to graft limb thrombosis, and development of peritonitis resulting from perforation of the jejunum. In the remote period, patency of autovenous grafts was confirmed in 37 patients. Of long-term complications, mention should be made of the following: formation of aneurysms of distal anastomoses and thrombosis of one of the limbs of the autovenous graft. The patients were successfully operated on now using synthetic grafts in infection-free conditions. Hence, a method of surgical decision-making in patients with infected aortofemoral bifurcation grafts is the use of the technique of complete removal of the infected synthetic graft with simultaneous in situ replacement using autovenous grafts from superficial femoral veins, active pre- and postoperative antibiotic therapy. Such policy made it possible to decrease the mortality rate to 9%, with a limb-salvage rate of 97.5% and long-term graft patency rate amounting to 92.5%.

Systematic Review and Meta: Analysis of Aortic Graft Infections following Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Introduction. Aortic graft infection (AGI) is a rare complication following AAA repair and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Management is variable, and there are no evidence-based guidelines. The aim of this study was to systematically review and analyse management options for AGI.

Editor's Choice - Cryopreserved Allografts for Arterial Reconstruction after Aorto-Iliac Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Native and aortic graft infections are rare, but they represent one of the most life threatening complications of vascular surgery. Several materials and surgical approaches have been developed so far. Among them, cryopreserved allografts have been proposed as a treatment option. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the role of cryopreserved allografts for arterial reconstruction after aorto-iliac infection.

METHODS

The current meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Patient baseline characteristics were investigated, along with 30 outcomes after use of cryopreserved arterial allografts for reconstruction after aorto-iliac infection. Pooled proportions with 95% CIs of outcome rates were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies, including 1,377 patients, finally participated in the meta-analysis. Among the early outcomes, 30 day mortality was 14.91% (95% CI 11.78-18.31). Peri-anastomotic rupture/allograft disruption rate was 5.90% (95% CI 2.77-9.88), while pooled aneurysmal degeneration/allograft dilatation was 4.99% (95% CI 1.60-9.68). A pooled rate of 3.11% (95% CI 1.60-4.98) was estimated for pseudoaneurysm formation after the use of cryopreserved arterial allografts, while the allograft thrombotic/stenotic complication rate and peri-anastomotic infection were 12.19% (95% CI 7.90-17.15) and 3.32% (95% CI 1.90-5.03), respectively. Mortality during follow up was 19.24% (95% CI 11.97-27.58), while allograft related mortality during follow up was 3.58% (95% CI 1.56-6.15). A pooled allograft related re-operation rate was estimated at 24.87% (95% CI 17.89-32.51).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cryopreserved allograft seems to be a safe and durable option with acceptable outcomes for treatment of aorto-iliac infection.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Management of Open Abdominal Aortic Graft Infections

OBJECTIVE

Aortic graft infection (AGI) is a disastrous complication with an incidence of 0.2-6% in operated patients. With little or no high quality evidence, the best treatment option remains unclear. Therefore, the literature on the management of open abdominal AGI was systematically reviewed to determine optimal treatment.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted for AGI. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomised Studies (MINORS) score. Primary outcomes were 30 day mortality and one year survival. Secondary outcomes were survival, infection recurrence, limb salvage, and graft patency.

RESULTS

Of 1574 studies identified, 32 papers were included in the study. The overall quality of the studies was moderate, with an average MINORS score of 11.9. Pooled overall 30 day mortality and one year survival were 13.5% (95% CI 10.5-16.4) and 73.6% (95% CI 68.8-78.4), respectively. The lowest 30 day mortality and highest one year survival were found for in situ repair compared with extra-anatomic repair and for prosthetic grafts compared with venous grafts or arterial allografts. The infection recurrence rate was highest for prosthetic grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of well designed, qualitative comparative studies making conclusive recommendations impossible. The current best available data suggests that partial graft removal should be avoided and the lowest 30 day mortality and best one year survival are achieved with in situ repair using prosthetic grafts. Initiatives such as the MAGIC database to collaboratively collect prospective data are an important step forward in obtaining more solid answers on this topic.

A meta-analysis of outcomes of in-situ reconstruction after total or partial removal of infected abdominal aortic graft

INTRODUCTION

There is currently a lack of evidence for the relative effectiveness of partial resection (PR) and total resection (TR) before managing abdominal aortic graft infection (AGI). Most authorities agree that TR is mandatory for intracavitary AGI in patients with favorable conditions but there is an increasing number of patients with severe comorbidities for whom this approach is not suitable, resulting in a prohibitive mortality rate. The purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate indication for TR or PR.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A meta-analysis was conducted on the rates of early/late mortality, amputations and reinfection. A meta-regression was performed with eight variables: patient age, male prevalence, presence of virulent or nonvirulent organisms, urgency, omentoplasty and follow-up.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twenty-one studies and 1052 patients were included. For TR and PR, the rates of early mortality and reinfection were 16.8% and 10.5%, 11% and 27%, respectively. For TR urgency and male gender were associated with increased rate of early mortality and male gender, PDF and virulent organisms were associated with increased risk of reinfection. For PR no statistical correlation was analyzable except for PDF with increased risk of reinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

Early mortality rates are higher for TR and reinfection rates are higher for PR. For TR early mortality increases in urgent cases and it is suggested that alternative option must be discussed, reinfection decreases in the presence of nonvirulent organisms and TR seems optimal. For TR and PR reinfection increases in presence of PDF and alternative technique may be more appropriate.

A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes After In Situ Reconstructions for Aortic Graft Infection

OBJECTIVE

To confirm the advantage of in situ reconstruction (ISR) over extra-anatomic reconstruction (EAR) for aortic graft infection and determine the most appropriate conduit including autogenous veins, cryopreserved allografts, and synthetic prosthesis (standard, rifampicin of silver polyesters).

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted with rate of mortality, graft occlusion, amputation, and reinfection. A meta-regression was performed with 4 factors: patients' age, presence of prosthetic-duodenal fistula (PDF), virulent organisms, or nonvirulent organisms.

RESULTS

In situ reconstruction over EAR seems to favor all events. For the 5 conduits used for ISR, according to operative mortality, age of the patients looks to have a positive correlation only for silver polyester and no conduit present any advantage in the presence of PDF. Reinfection seems to be not significantly different for the 5 conduits, and only autogenous veins appear to have a positive correlation with infecting organisms.

CONCLUSION

In situ reconstruction may be considered as first-line treatment. Our results suggest that silver polyesters appear to be most appropriate for older patients, and in order to limit reinfection, autogenous veins are probably the most suitable conduit.

Cryopreserved Human Allografts for the Reconstruction of Aortic and Peripheral Prosthetic Graft Infection

Background: This study aimed to present cases with cryopreserved human allografts (CHAs) for vascular reconstruction in both aortic and peripheral infected prosthetic grafts.

Materials and Methods: This is a single center, observational descriptive study with retrospective analysis. In all cases, the infected prosthetic graft material was completely removed. At discharge, patients were administered anticoagulants. Follow-up examinations included clinical visits, echo-color-Doppler ultrasounds, or computed tomography angiography within 30 days and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment, and then twice per year.

Results: We treated 21 patients (90% men, n=19) with the mean age of 71±12 years and mean interval between the initial operation and replacement with CHA of 30 months [range, 1–216; interquartile range (IQR), 2–36]. In-hospital mortality was 14% (n=3); no CHA-related complication led to death. Limb salvage was 100%. No patient was lost at the median follow-up of 14 months (range, 2–61; IQR, 6–39). No rupture, aneurysmal degeneration, or re-infection occurred. Estimated freedom from CHA-related adverse events (95% confidence interval, 43–63) was 95% at 3 years.

Conclusion: In our experience, CHAs are a viable option for prosthetic graft infections and provide satisfactory clinical results and favorable stability because of a very low rate of CHA-related adverse events during follow-up.

Editor's Choice - Management of Secondary Aorto-enteric and Other Abdominal Arterio-enteric Fistulas: A Review and Pooled Data Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare management strategies for secondary abdominal arterio-enteric fistulas (AEFs).

METHODS

This study is a review and pooled data analysis. Medline and Scopus databases were searched for studies published between 1999 and 2015. Particular emphasis was given to short- and long-term outcomes in relation to AEF repair type.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixteen publications were retrieved, reporting on 823 patients. In-hospital mortality was 30.7%. Open surgery had higher in-hospital mortality (246/725, 33.9%), than endovascular methods (7/98, 7.1%, p < .001, OR 6.7, 95% CI 3-14.7, including staged endovascular to open surgery, 0/13, 0%). In-hospital mortality after graft removal/extra-anatomical bypass grafting was 31.2% (66/226), graft removal/in situ repair 34% (137/403), primary closure of the arterial defect 62.5% (10/16), and for miscellaneous open procedures 41.3% (33/80), p = .019. Among the subgroups of in situ repair, homografts were associated with a higher mortality than impregnated prosthetic grafts (p = .047). There was no difference in recurrent AEF-free rates between open and endovascular procedures. Extra-anatomical bypass/graft removal and in situ repair had a lower AEF recurrence rate than primary closure and homografts. Late sepsis occurred more often after endovascular surgery (2-year rates 42% vs. 19% for open, p = .001). The early survival benefit of endovascular surgery was blunted during follow-up, although it remained significant (p < .001). Within the in situ repair group, impregnated prosthetic grafts were associated with the worst overall and AEF related mortality free rates and vein grafts with the best. No recurrence, sepsis, or mortality was reported following staged endograft placement to open repair after a mean follow-up of 16.8 months (p = .18, p = .22, and p = .006, respectively, compared with patients in other groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular surgery, where appropriate, is associated with better early survival than open surgery for secondary AEFs. Most of this benefit is lost during long-term follow-up, implying that a staged approach with early conversion to in situ vein grafting may achieve the best results in selected patients.

Medical treatment of prosthetic vascular graft infections: Review of the literature and proposals of a Working Group

More than 400000 vascular grafts are inserted annually in the USA. Graft insertion is complicated by infection in 0.5-4% of cases. Vascular graft infections (VGIs) are becoming one of the most frequent prosthesis-related infections and are associated with considerable mortality, ranging from 10 to 25% within 30 days following the diagnosis. Treatment of VGI is based on urgent surgical removal of the infected graft followed by prolonged antibiotherapy. Data regarding the best antibiotherapy to use are lacking since no well designed trial to study antimicrobial treatment of VGI exists. Moreover, since VGIs demonstrate very specific pathophysiology, guidelines on other material-related infections or infective endocarditis treatment cannot be entirely applied to VGI. A French multidisciplinary group gathering infectious diseases specialists, anaesthesiologists, intensivists, microbiologists, radiologists and vascular surgeons was created to review the literature dealing with VGI and to make some proposals regarding empirical and documented antibiotic therapy for these infections. This article reveals these proposals.

FDA approved guidance conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve injury: a review of materials and efficacy

Several nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) and nerve protectant wraps are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use in peripheral nerve repair. These devices cover a wide range of natural and synthetic materials, which may or may not be resorbable. This review consolidates the data pertaining to all FDA approved materials into a single reference, which emphasizes material composition alongside pre-clinical and clinical safety and efficacy (where possible). This article also summarizes the key advantages and limitations for each material as noted in the literature (with respect to the indication considered). In this context, this review provides a comprehensive reference for clinicians which may facilitate optimal material/device selection for peripheral nerve repair. For materials scientists, this review highlights predicate devices and evaluation methodologies, offering an insight into current deficiencies associated with state-of-the-art materials and may help direct new technology developments and evaluation methodologies thereof.

Preclinical evaluation of ice-free cryopreserved arteries: structural integrity and hemocompatibility

OBJECTIVE

Arterial allografts are routinely employed for reconstruction of infected prosthetic grafts. Usually, banked cryopreserved arteries are used; however, existing conventional freezing cryopreservation techniques applied to arteries are expensive. In contrast, a new ice-free cryopreservation technique results in processing, storage and shipping methods that are technically simpler and potentially less costly. The objective of this study was to determine whether or not ice-free cryopreservation causes tissue changes that might preclude clinical use.

METHODS

Conventionally frozen cryopreserved porcine arteries were compared with ice-free cryopreserved arteries and untreated fresh controls using morphological (light, scanning electron and laser scanning microscopy), viability (alamarBlue assay) and hemocompatibility methods (blood cell adhesion, thrombin/antithrombin-III-complex, polymorphonuclear neutrophil-elastase, β-thromboglobulin and terminal complement complex SC5b-9).

RESULTS

No statistically significant structural or hemocompatibility differences between ice-free cryopreserved and frozen tissues were detectable. There were no quantitative differences observed for either autofluorescence (elastin) or second harmonic generation (collagen) measured by laser scanning microscopy. Cell viability in ice-free cryopreserved arteries was significantly reduced compared to fresh and frozen tissues (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The formation of ice in aortic artery preservation did not make a difference in histology, structure or thrombogenicity, but significantly increased viability compared with a preservation method that precludes ice formation. Reduced cell viability should not reduce in vivo performance. Therefore, ice-free cryopreservation is a potentially safe and cost-effective technique for the cryopreservation of blood vessel allografts.

The seven-year' secondary patency of a fresh arterial allograft in the femorocrural position in a heart transplant recipient

Critical limb ischemia in patients with diabetes at the organ complication stage represents a considerable challenge in vascular medicine. Because of the complexity of the disease and the often symmetric involvement of both lower limbs, a discrepancy between suitable vascular conduit availability and the actual requirement can occur: notably, the prevalence of multilevel and diffuse arterial disease often limits the possibilities of endovascular treatment, and, in surgical cases, frequently prohibits the effective use of prosthetic material. In our patient with bilateral critical limb ischemia and previous coronary artery bypass graft followed by cardiac transplantation, only one great saphenous vein remained available. That was used in its entirety to salvage one limb as a sequential femorocrural bypass. A similar surgical procedure with a fresh arterial allograft retrieved from a deceased donor was performed on the other extremity . ABO compatibility as well as the chronic immunosuppressive therapy in a heart transplant recipient may have contributed to the favorable long-term clinical outcome of the allogeneic arterial reconstruction.

Uruguayan experience with cryopreserved arterial homografts

INTRODUCTION

We analyzed the Uruguayan experience with cryopreserved arterial homografts. We studied 55 medical records in the period from June 9, 2000 to April 7, 2007, including 41 from males and 14 from females, ranging from 36-78 years of age. The clinical indications were as follows: Group 1, revascularization of infrainguinal atherosclerotic occlusive disease by bypass due to the lack of availability of a suitable vein (n = 35); Group 2, substitution of an infected prosthetic grafts (n = 15); and Group 3, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) after failure of previous prosthetic loops by repeated thrombosis and/or infection in the absence of a vein (n = 5).

RESULTS

Among Group 1, primary and secondary patency rates were 61% and 71%, respectively at 1 year with 15 complications, 3 infections, 8 thromboses, 2 aneurysms, 1 homograft degradation, and 1 death related to surgery. Among Group 2, the primary and secondary patency rates were 71% and 79%, respectively, at 1 year with 6 patients experiencing complications. Group 3 did not have complications with a primary patency rate of 67% at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of cryopreserved arterial homografts is a valid, accessible, and safe alternative in complicated vascular situations. In our country, it is a technology to consider for patients with critical limb ischemia, when the risk of a major amputation is high and it is not possible to have a suitable vein or prosthetic bypass. It can be an excellent alternative for the substitution of infected synthetic bypasses, especially to substitute in situ for an infected aortic graft.

Arterial Allograft Allows In-line Reconstruction of Prosthetic Graft Infection with Low Recurrence Rate and Mortality

Surgical management of infected prosthetic vascular grafts is associated with a significant risk of recurrent infection, limb loss, and mortality. Treatment options include graft excision with extra-anatomic bypass and in-line repair with prosthetic graft, vein, or artery. We hypothesized that inline reconstruction using cryopreserved arterial allografts would be associated with a lower recurrent infection rate, limb loss, and mortality than other alternatives. We reviewed all cases where adults underwent surgical management of infected prosthetic aortic, iliac, or femoral bypass grafts with cryopreserved arterial allograft at our medical center from 2001 to 2008. Cryopreserved arterial allografts were used in 21 patients. There were nearly equal number of men (n = 11, 52%) and women (n = 10, 48%). The median age was 63 years and median time since cryoartery repair was 4 years. There have been no deaths in the follow-up period. Complications (19%) included colon perforation (n = 1), lower extremity compartment syndrome (n = 1), limb ischemia (n = 1), and reinfection with pseudoaneurysm and subsequent limb amputation (n = 1). These positive findings of low morbidity and absence of mortality in high risk patients have resulted in a shift at our institution to the preferential use of cryopreserved arterial allograft with in-line reconstruction for infected prosthetic grafts.

Surgical strategy in aortoesophageal fistulae: endovascular stentgrafts and in situ repair of the aorta with cryopreserved homografts

OBJECTIVE

The surgical treatment of aortoesophageal fistulae (AEF) has a high morbidity and mortality rate. We report our experience with the sequential use of endovascular thoracic stentgrafts and cryopreserved aortic homografts for in situ repair of the descending thoracic aorta.

METHODS

In a 7-year period, 6 patients with AEF were treated at our center. After primary endovascular repair in all cases, 4 patients subsequently underwent in situ repair of the descending thoracic aorta with cryopreserved homografts. Long-term antibiotic therapy was given in all cases. Recent clinical status and radiologic findings on follow-up studies of each patient were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 35 months (range, 2-76).

RESULTS

Endovascular stentgraft repair was technically successful in all cases. Two patients were not candidates for open surgical repair because of their medical condition; they both died within 8 weeks after discharge from the hospital, 1 from recurrent septic episodes, and the other from upper gastrointestinal bleeding. One of 4 patients who had undergone open surgical repair died 1 year later from upper gastrointestinal bleeding that occurred presumably due to an infectious degeneration of the homograft after secondary infection with a methacillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus. In 1 case persistent paraplegia and in another case persistent renal failure occurred.

CONCLUSION

The use of cryopreserved homografts is a valuable alternative to in situ repair with prosthetic vascular grafts or extra-anatomic reconstructions in the surgical treatment of AEF. Endovascular stentgraft placement plays a role as a bridging procedure in emergency situations.

[Repair of secondary aortoenteric fistulas. A systematic review]

We performed a systematic review of the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of secondary aortoenteric fistulas (AEF). A MEDLINE search was performed of articles published in English or Spanish between January 1991 and August 2006. Diagnostic methods, treatment modalities and the results of surgical treatment were analyzed. The most frequent first aortic surgery associated with AEF was repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (54.31%). The most common form of presentation was gastrointestinal bleeding. Repair through in situ prosthetic replacement had the lowest early mortality rates (8-13.3%) compared with graft excision and extraanatomic revascularization (18.2-44%). AEF is a serious entity and diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion based on clinical findings and indirect data from imaging techniques (computed tomography). The most appropriate therapeutic option continues to be controversial.

Delayed administration of FK 506 is sufficient to suppress acute rejection changes after aortal transplantation in rats

Arterial allografts are used now-a-days as a modality in the treatment of vascular prosthesis infections. Prolonged administration of immunosuppressive drugs seemed to be essential for long-time patency rates of alloarterial vascular reconstructions. Nevertheless, the use of immunosuppressives if there exist an acute infection is controversial. The experimental work described herein studied effects of a delayed low-dose FK 506 administration on the development of acute rejection changes 30 days after aortal transplantation in rats. The response of the recipient's immune system to aortal wall antigens of the donor in the field of no immunosuppression resulted in an intimal proliferation and its infiltration by immunocompetent cells of the recipient, necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells, including deposition of immunoglobulins, and a massive adventitial infiltration of CD4 and CD8 positive cells. On the other hand, all the principal histological signs of rejection listed above were suppressed by FK 506 administration, no matter whether the immunosuppressive was administered on day 0 or day 7 after the transplantation.

Fresh Arterial Grafts as Conduits for Vascular Reconstructions in Transplanted Patients

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcome of arterial allografts in patients receiving organ transplantation.

DESIGN

From October 1997 to June 2005, we used fresh arterial allografts as vascular conduits in 21 patients for the treatment of claudications (10), abdominal aortic aneurysm (6), complicated renal transplantation (2), acute lower extremity ischemia (2) and gangrene (1). At the time of the vascular procedure, ten of the patients (Group A) had already undergone organ transplantation. The mean follow up period was 32 months for renal and 37 months for heart recipients, respectively. In 11 patients (Group B), the vascular reconstruction was undertaken simultaneously with the renal transplantation. The mean follow up period was 49 months.

RESULTS

There was no arterial allograft related deaths. No signs of arterial graft infection or requirement for secondary intervention (angioplasty and/or thrombolysis) were observed during the follow up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience suggests that it is possible to use fresh arterial allografts in the treatment of arterial occlusive disease or abdominal aortic aneurysm, both in already transplanted patients and simultaneously with organ transplantation, with good results.

The “in situ” expression of Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I antigens is not altered by cryopreservation in human arterial allografts

This study was aimed to establish whether the cryopreservation procedure we currently use in clinics can modify arterial homograft antigenicity. To this purpose, we performed an immunohistochemical study on fresh and cryopreserved human arterial homografts to visualize the expression of HLA class I heavy and light chains "in situ" by using the HC-10 and Namb-1 monoclonal antibodies. Human femoral arteries and thoracic aortas were harvested from 18 heart-beating donors and sampled before and after cryopreservation. Arterial segments were frozen in liquid nitrogen vapors in a controlled rate freezing system. After thawing, samples were processed for routine immunohistochemistry. To standardize immunostaining, flow-cytometry indirect immunofluorescence analysis was performed on HUVEC; immunohistochemistry of human ovarian cortical vessels was performed as an additional positive control. Negative controls were performed by omitting tissue incubation with primary antibodies. HLA-class I antigens were markedly expressed by endothelial cells lining surface intima and adventitial vasa vasorum; a moderate expression was found in medial smooth muscle cells. Except for the surface unreactivity caused by loss of endothelium, results from cryopreserved arterial allografts were strictly comparable to those observed in fresh, unfrozen tissues. These results support the view that cryopreserved arterial allografts are immunogenic as their fresh counterparts; apart from smooth muscle cells which retained a moderate expression of HLA class I antigens following cryopreservation, our study suggests that the highly HC-10 positive endothelial cells we found to line the rich adventitial network of vasa vasorum are expected to be one of the major targets of the serological response in the recipient.

The Influence of Cryopreservation on Changes in Diameter and Compliance of Allografts in an Animal Experimental Model

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of cryopreservation on changes in diameter and compliance of allografts.

METHODS

Sixty aortic allografts implanted in situ in rats were analyzed. The animals were divided into four groups that received fresh or cryopreserved isogenic (Lewis to Lewis) grafts, or fresh or cryopreserved allogenic (Lewis to DA) grafts, respectively. The diameter and compliance of the grafts were then visually evaluated with the digital video camera recorder after 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 days.

RESULTS

Gradual increase in diameter and decrease in compliance in case of all allogenic and cryopreserved isogenic grafts were observed. The observed changes in cryopreserved grafts were smaller when compared with fresh grafts, however, the differences did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Cryo preservation does not protect allografts from stiffening and dilatation.

Limitations in the management of aortic graft infections

The use of aortic allografts has emerged as a management option in patients with aortic graft infections. We present a patient with a history of Takayasu's disease whose aortic graft infection was controlled with replacement of the excised infected aortic graft with an allograft. However, the patient died 9 months later after the rupture of a large anastomotic aortic aneurysm. Our report emphasizes the limitations in the management of aortic graft infections in patients with extensive vascular disease such as Takayasu's disease. This is the result of difficulties in performing extra-anatomical bypass as well as a possibly increased risk of formation of anastomotic aneurysms in these patients.

The Structural and Cellular Viability in Cryopreserved Rabbit Carotid Arteries

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the histological and mechanical changes in addition to viable cellular recovery in cryopreserved blood vessels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rabbit carotids were cryopreserved in a cryoprotective medium containing 1.5 M of 1,2-propanediol (PD) and then were thawed slowly in an ice bag that had been precooled in liquid nitrogen. Fresh carotids were used as the control. The fresh and freeze-thawed arteries were cultured for the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). The freeze-thawed arterial tissues were perfused in vitro for 6, 12, or 24 h, respectively, to assess the integrity of carotid walls and the mechanical properties.

RESULTS

The results showed that it took almost the same time (24 approximately 36 h) for the VSMCs of the PD-cryopreserved arteries to regenerate as those from the fresh arteries. Their growing speeds also were similar. On the contrary, Me2SO-cryopreserved (1.5 M) arteries were unable to regenerate VSMCs in culture. After freeze-thawing, the mechanical properties decreased significantly (P < 0.003 for elastic modulus and P < 0.001 for fracture strength). After in vitro perfusion of the freeze-thawed carotid arteries, all of the survived endothelial cells fell off, and some of the VSMCs denaturalized or necrosed. The internal elastic fibers and collagen showed various degrees of cracking. The mechanical properties were decreased (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that the PD-containing cryoprotective medium can preserve regenerative capacity of VSMCs, which makes it a useful technique for viable VSMC recovery. However, the freeze-thawing process and the in vitro perfusion caused serious disruption in the arterial mechanical properties, rendering the cryopreserved blood vessels less useful for vessel reconstruction.

Efficacy of Vancomycin, Teicoplanin and Fusidic Acid as Prophylactic Agents in Prevention of Vascular Graft Infection: An Experimental Study in Rat

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of a single prophylactic dose of intra-peritoneal vancomycin and teicoplanin with anti-biotic treated Dacron grafts (vancomycin, teicoplanin, 10 or 40% fusidic acid-soaked grafts) in preventing vascular graft infections in a rat model.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled animal study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The graft infections were established in the subcutaneous tissues of 80 female Sprague-Dawley rats by the implantation of Dacron prostheses followed by the topical inoculation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The study groups were as follows: (1) uncontaminated control group, (2) untreated contaminated group, (3) contaminated group with intra-peritoneal vancomycin, (4) contaminated group with intra-peritoneal teicoplanin, (5) contaminated group received vancomycin-soaked Dacron graft, (6) contaminated group received teicoplanin-soaked Dacron graft, (7) contaminated group received 40% fusidic acid-soaked Dacron graft, and (8) contaminated group received 10% fusidic acid-soaked Dacron graft prophylaxis. The grafts were removed after 7 days and evaluated by a quantitative culture analysis.

RESULTS

No infection was detected in controls. The untreated contaminated group had a high bacteria count (6.0 x 10(4) CFU/cm2 Dacron graft). Groups that received intra-peritoneal vancomycin or teicoplanin had less bacterial growth (4.8 x 10(3) and 3.9 x 10(3)CFU/cm2 Dacron graft, respectively). Similarly, the group that received 10% fusidic acid-soaked graft showed less bacterial growth (3.6 x 10(3) CFU/cm2 Dacron graft). The groups with vancomycin-, teicoplanin- and 40% fusidic acid-soaked grafts showed no evidence of infection. Statistical analyses demonstrated that intra-peritoneal prophylactic antibiotic treatment was less effective in inhibiting bacterial growth than high concentration antimicrobial-soaking of grafts.

CONCLUSION

The use of vancomycin-, teicoplanin- and 40% fusidic acid-soaked grafts was effective in preventing primary prosthetic vascular graft infection.

Aortic graft infections: treatment with arterial allograft

Since its reintroduction by Kieffer in 1991, many authors have used arterial allografts for surgical management of vascular prosthetic graft infection. During a decade, 25 patients with aortic graft infection were treated using in situ revascularization with arterial allograft. There were 23 male and 2 female patients of mean age of 65.7 +/- 8.8 years (range, 43-78). Antibiotic therapy was administered for a mean time of 26 +/- 5 days (range, 21-45) in the postoperative period. The mean follow-up time was 2.3 +/- 3 years (range, 22 days-8.7 years). The mean in-hospital postoperative stay was 29.6 +/- 14 days (range, 9-68). An aorto-enteric fistula (AEF) was present in 11 patients (44%), producing gastrointestinal bleeding. The overall mortality rate was 13 of 23 (56.5%) patients. The allograft-related mortality rate was 5 of 23 (22%). The overall allograft-complicated patient rate was 15 of 23 (65%); we observed 18 allograft ruptures in 12 patients and 8 allograft thromboses in 6 patients. The overall amputation rate was 8.7% (2 of 23). Age of the recipient older than 69 years (P = .02), positive preoperative marked-leukocyte scanning (P = .04), and persistent postoperative leukocytosis (P = .03) were significant variables associated with an increased risk of allograft-related complications. The use of arterial allografts for aortic graft infections represents an interesting alternative for the treatment of graft infection. Nevertheless, there are some problems related to the durability of this type of graft, which can still be considered as a "bridge transplant."

Effects of cryopreservation on the immunogenicity of porcine arterial allografts in early stages of transplant vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

The number of revascularization procedures including coronary and lower extremity bypass, have increased greatly in the last decade. It suggests a growing need for vascular grafts. Cryopreserved allografts could represent a viable alternative but their immunologic reactivity remains controversial.

METHODS

71 pigs (40 recipients and 31 donors) were used. Two femoral grafts per recipient animal were implanted for 3, 7, and 30 days. Types of grafts: fresh autograft as a control graft (n=19), fresh allograft (n=31) and cryopreserved allograft (n=30). Histological and immunohistochemical studies were performed.

RESULTS

Fresh allografts compared to autografts showed intimal inflammatory infiltration at 3 days (328 vs. 0 macrophages/mm2; P<0.05) and 7 days (962 vs. 139 T lymphocytes/mm2; P<0.05) post-transplantation. At 30 days, there was a loss of endothelial cells, presence of luminal thrombus and aneurismal lesions (total area=15.8 vs. 8.4 mm2; P<0.05). Cryopreservation did not reduce these lesions nor modify endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression nor modify the number of animals that developed anti-SLA antibodies. Moreover, at 7 days, cryopreserved allografts compared to fresh allografts showed a higher expression of P-selectin (5 out of 5 vs. 1 out of 5; P<0.05) and, at 30 days, a greater inflammatory reactivity (2692 vs. 1107 T lymphocytes/mm2 in media; P<0.05) with a trend towards a higher presence of multinucleated giant cells than in the fresh ones.

CONCLUSIONS

The cryopreservation method used maintained immunogenicity of allografts and increased the inflammatory reactivity found in fresh allografts up to 30 days of vascular transplantation.

Thoracofemoral bypass using spliced femoral vein with removal of an infected axillobifemoral bypass graft

A 63-year-old male underwent emergency repair of a ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysm via a transabdominal approach using an aorto-bi-iliac Dacron graft. This became infected. A right axillobifemoral bypass was placed and the infected graft was removed with oversewing of the aorta. The patient was re-admitted 8 months later with an infected axillobifemoral prosthesis. We harvested both femoral veins (FV) and spliced them to perform a left thoracobifemoral bypass with simultaneous explantation of the infected graft. The patient remains well with a patent graft 20 months post-operatively.