Optimal follow-up strategies after aorto-iliac prosthetic reconstruction: a decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis

Cost-effective diagnostic cardiovascular imaging: when does it provide good value for the money?

To summarize the results of all original cost-utility analyses (CUAs) in diagnostic cardiovascular imaging (CVI) and characterize those technologies by estimates of their cost-effectiveness. We systematically searched the literature for original CVI CUAs published between 2000 and 2008. Studies were classified according to several variables including anatomy of interest (e.g. cerebrovascular, aorta, peripheral) and imaging modality under study (e.g. angiography, ultrasound). The results of each study, expressed as cost of the intervention to number of quality-adjusted life years saved ratio (cost/QALY) were additionally classified as favorable or not using $20,000, $50,000, and $100,000 per QALY thresholds. The distribution of results was assessed with Chi Square or Fisher exact test, as indicated. Sixty-nine percent of all cardiovascular imaging CUAs were published between 2000 and 2008. Thirty-two studies reporting 82 cost/QALY ratios were included in the final sample. The most common vascular areas studied were cerebrovascular (n = 9) and cardiac (n = 8). Sixty-six percent (21/32) of studies focused on sonography, followed by conventional angiography and CT (25%, n = 8, each). Twenty-nine (35.4%), 42 (51.2%), and 53 (64.6%) ratios were favorable at WTP $20,000/QALY, $50,000/QALY, and $100,000/QALY, respectively. Thirty (36.6%) ratios compared one imaging test versus medical or surgical interventions; 26 (31.7%) ratios compared imaging to a different imaging test and another 26 (31.7%) to no intervention. Imaging interventions were more likely (P < 0.01) to be favorable when compared to observation, medical treatment or non-intervention than when compared to a different imaging test at WTP $100,000/QALY. The diagnostic cardiovascular imaging literature has growth substantially. The studies available have, in general, favorable cost-effectiveness profiles with major determinants relating to being compared against observation, medical or no intervention instead of other imaging tests.

Long-term cardiovascular outcome after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the incidence of late cardiovascular events and mortality after elective infra-/juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm open repair (AAA-OR).

METHODS

We included patients who survived AAA-OR in our center in 1988-2006. We registered late cardiac, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular events, as well as all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. We calculated patient survival and freedom from cardiovascular events (Kaplan-Meier) and evaluated risk factors (multivariate analysis).

RESULTS

We studied 297 patients: 292 (98.3%) men, aged 67 +/- 7 (44-83) years, 143 (48.1%) bifurcated grafts. In a mean follow-up of 78.7 +/- 52.9 months, we registered 203 cardiovascular events in 123 (41.4%) patients, at a rate of 0.16 cardiovascular events/patient-year. Eleven (3.7%) patients suffered graft-related complications. Freedom from cardiovascular events was 94.2%, 67.2%, 45.7%, and 27.6% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Survival was 96.6%, 74.7%, 50.7%, and 31.5%, respectively. The main cause of death was cardiovascular disease (n = 54, 18.2%), followed by cancer (n = 43, 14.5%). Only four (1.3%) deaths were graft-related. Coronary artery disease and chronic renal failure were predictive of cardiovascular mortality (p = 0.033 and 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Although long-term survival is similar to that in the general population, successful AAA-OR patients remain at increased risk of cardiovascular events throughout their lifetime. Graft-related complications are rare, confirming the durability of the procedure.

Predicting changes in blood flow in patient-specific operative plans for treating aortoiliac occlusive disease

Traditionally, a surgeon will select a procedure for a particular patient on the basis of past experience with patients with a similar state of disease. The experience gained from this patient will be selectively used when treating the next patient with similar symptoms. This article describes a surgical planning system that was developed to enable a vascular surgeon to create and test alternative operative plans prior to surgery for a given patient. One-dimensional and three-dimensional hemodynamic (i.e., blood flow) simulations were performed for rest and exercise for operative plans for two aorto-femoral bypass patients and compared with actual postoperative data. The information obtained from one-dimensional (volume flow distribution and pressure losses) and three-dimensional (flow, pressure, and wall shear stress) hemodynamic simulations may be clinically relevant to vascular surgeons planning interventions.