1
|
Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Murad MH, Arcelus JI, Dager WE, Dunn AS, Fargo RA, Levy JH, Samama CM, Shah SH, Sherwood MW, Tafur AJ, Tang LV, Moores LK. Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Chest 2022; 162:e207-e243. [PMID: 35964704 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline on the Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy addresses 43 Patients-Interventions-Comparators-Outcomes (PICO) questions related to the perioperative management of patients who are receiving long-term oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and require an elective surgery/procedure. This guideline is separated into four broad categories, encompassing the management of patients who are receiving: (1) a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), mainly warfarin; (2) if receiving a VKA, the use of perioperative heparin bridging, typically with a low-molecular-weight heparin; (3) a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC); and (4) an antiplatelet drug. METHODS Strong or conditional practice recommendations are generated based on high, moderate, low, and very low certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology for clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS A multidisciplinary panel generated 44 guideline recommendations for the perioperative management of VKAs, heparin bridging, DOACs, and antiplatelet drugs, of which two are strong recommendations: (1) against the use of heparin bridging in patients with atrial fibrillation; and (2) continuation of VKA therapy in patients having a pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator implantation. There are separate recommendations on the perioperative management of patients who are undergoing minor procedures, comprising dental, dermatologic, ophthalmologic, pacemaker/internal cardiac defibrillator implantation, and GI (endoscopic) procedures. CONCLUSIONS Substantial new evidence has emerged since the 2012 iteration of these guidelines, especially to inform best practices for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a VKA and may require heparin bridging, for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a DOAC, and for patients who are receiving one or more antiplatelet drugs. Despite this new knowledge, uncertainty remains as to best practices for the majority of perioperative management questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Douketis
- Department of Medicine, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | - Alex C Spyropoulos
- Department of Medicine, Northwell Health at Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY; Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY; Institute of Health Systems Science at The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY
| | - M Hassan Murad
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN
| | - Juan I Arcelus
- Department of Surgery, Facultad de Medicina, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - William E Dager
- Department of Pharmacy, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Andrew S Dunn
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mt. Sinai Health System, New York, NY
| | - Ramiz A Fargo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA; Department of Internal Medicine, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA
| | - Jerrold H Levy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Surgery (Cardiothoracic), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - C Marc Samama
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, GHU AP-HP, Centre-Université Paris-Cité-Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sahrish H Shah
- Mayo Clinic Evidence-Based Practice Center, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Alfonso J Tafur
- Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Liang V Tang
- Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong, University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lisa K Moores
- F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Perioperative Management of Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2022; 6:564-573. [PMID: 36304523 PMCID: PMC9594114 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the available evidence about the perioperative management of patients who are receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy and require elective surgery/procedures. METHODS This systematic review supports the development of the American College of Chest Physicians guideline on the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy. A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was conducted from each database's inception to July 16, 2020. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible. RESULTS In patients receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy and undergoing elective noncardiac surgery, the available evidence did not show a significant difference in major bleeding between a shorter vs longer antiplatelet interruption, with low certainty of evidence (COE). Compared with patients who received placebo perioperatively, aspirin continuation was associated with increased risk of major bleeding (relative risk [RR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.15-1.50; high COE) and lower risk of major thromboembolism (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.94; moderate COE). During antiplatelet interruption, bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin was associated with increased risk of major bleeding compared with no bridging (RR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.24-2.79; very low COE). Continuation of antiplatelets during minor dental and ophthalmologic procedures was not associated with a statistically significant difference in the risk of major bleeding (very low COE). CONCLUSION This systematic review summarizes the current evidence about the perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy and highlights the urgent need for further research, particularly with the increasing prevalence of patients taking 1 or more antiplatelet agents.
Collapse
Key Words
- ACCP/CHEST, American College of Chest Physicians
- ASA, acetylsalicylic acid
- ATE, arterial thromboembolism
- CABG, coronary artery bypass graft
- COE, certainty of evidence
- CV, cardiovascular
- DES, drug-eluting stent
- LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin
- MI, myocardial infarction
- PE, pulmonary embolism
- PICO, patients–interventions–comparators–outcomes
- PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
- RCT, randomized clinical trial
- RR, relative risk
Collapse
|
3
|
Kolkert JLP, Groenwold RHH, Leijdekkers VJ, Ter Haar J, Zeebregts CJ, Vahl A. Cost-Effectiveness of Two Decision Strategies for Shunt Use During Carotid Endarterectomy. World J Surg 2017. [PMID: 28623598 PMCID: PMC5643400 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4085-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Arterial shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is essential in some patients because of insufficient cerebral perfusion during cross-clamping. However, the optimal diagnostic modality identifying these patients is still debated. None of the currently used modalities has been proved superior to another. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of two modalities, stump pressure measurement (SPM) versus electroencephalography (EEG) combined with transcranial Doppler (TCD) during CEA. Methods Two retrospective cohorts of consecutive patients undergoing CEA with different intraoperative neuromonitoring strategies (SPM vs. EEG/TCD) were analyzed. Clinical data were collected from patient hospital records. Primary clinical outcome was in-hospital stroke or death. Total admission costs were calculated based on volumes of healthcare resources. Analyses of effects and costs were adjusted for clinical differences between patients by means of a propensity score, and cost-effectiveness was estimated. Results A total of 503 (239 SPM; 264 EEG/TCD) patients were included, of whom 19 sustained a stroke or died during admission (3.3 vs. 4.2%, respectively, adjusted risk difference 1.3% (95% CI −2.3–4.8%)). Median total costs were €4946 (IQR 4424–6173) in the SPM group versus €7447 (IQR 6890–8675) in the EEG/TCD group. Costs for neurophysiologic assessments were the main determinant for the difference. Conclusions Given the evidence provided by this small retrospective study, SPM would be the favored strategy for intraoperative neuromonitoring if cost-effectiveness was taken into account when deciding which strategy to adopt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe L P Kolkert
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, P.O. Box 95500, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Rolf H H Groenwold
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vanessa J Leijdekkers
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, P.O. Box 95500, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joep Ter Haar
- Department of Surgery, Sint Lucas Andreas Ziekenhuis, P.O. Box 9243, 1006 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clark J Zeebregts
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anco Vahl
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, P.O. Box 95500, 1090 HM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Franco AS, Iuamoto LR, Pereira RMR. Perioperative management of drugs commonly used in patients with rheumatic diseases: a review. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2017; 72:386-390. [PMID: 28658439 PMCID: PMC5463249 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017(06)09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Rheumatic diseases are very prevalent, affecting about 7 million people in North America; they affect the musculoskeletal system, often with systemic involvement and potential for serious consequences and limitation on quality of life. Clinical treatment is usually long-term and includes drugs that are considered either simple or complex and are occasionally unknown to many health professionals who do not know how to manage these patients in emergency units and surgical wards. Thus, it is important for clinicians, surgeons and anesthesiologists who are involved with rheumatic patients undergoing surgery to know the basic principles of therapy and perioperative management. This study aims to do a review of the perioperative management of the most commonly used drugs in rheumatologic patients. Manuscripts used in this review were identified by surveying MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases and included studies containing i) the perioperative management of commonly used drugs in patients with rheumatic diseases: and ii) rheumatic diseases. They are didactically discussed according to the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics; and perioperative management. In total, 259 articles related to the topic were identified. Every medical professional should be aware of the types of drugs that are appropriate for continuous use and should know the various effects of these drugs before indicating surgery or assisting a rheumatic patient postoperatively. This information could prevent possible complications that could affect a wide range of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Silva Franco
- Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BR
| | - Leandro Ryuchi Iuamoto
- Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BR
| | - Rosa Maria Rodrigues Pereira
- Rheumatology Division, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BR
- *Corresponding author. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Best L, Webb A, Gurusamy K, Cheng S, Richards T. Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound Detection of Microemboli as a Predictor of Cerebral Events in Patients with Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; 52:565-580. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2015] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
6
|
Is preoperative withdrawal of aspirin necessary in patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair? Surg Endosc 2016; 30:5542-5549. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4926-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
7
|
Letter. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014; 39:454. [PMID: 24573076 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
8
|
Douketis JD, Spyropoulos AC, Spencer FA, Mayr M, Jaffer AK, Eckman MH, Dunn AS, Kunz R. Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 2012; 141:e326S-e350S. [PMID: 22315266 DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-2298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1042] [Impact Index Per Article: 86.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This guideline addresses the management of patients who are receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and require an elective surgery or procedure. METHODS The methods herein follow those discussed in the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines. Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines article of this supplement. RESULTS In patients requiring vitamin K antagonist (VKA) interruption before surgery, we recommend stopping VKAs 5 days before surgery instead of a shorter time before surgery (Grade 1B). In patients with a mechanical heart valve, atrial fibrillation, or VTE at high risk for thromboembolism, we suggest bridging anticoagulation instead of no bridging during VKA interruption (Grade 2C); in patients at low risk, we suggest no bridging instead of bridging (Grade 2C). In patients who require a dental procedure, we suggest continuing VKAs with an oral prohemostatic agent or stopping VKAs 2 to 3 days before the procedure instead of alternative strategies (Grade 2C). In moderate- to high-risk patients who are receiving acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and require noncardiac surgery, we suggest continuing ASA around the time of surgery instead of stopping ASA 7 to 10 days before surgery (Grade 2C). In patients with a coronary stent who require surgery, we recommend deferring surgery > 6 weeks after bare-metal stent placement and > 6 months after drug-eluting stent placement instead of undertaking surgery within these time periods (Grade 1C); in patients requiring surgery within 6 weeks of bare-metal stent placement or within 6 months of drug-eluting stent placement, we suggest continuing antiplatelet therapy perioperatively instead of stopping therapy 7 to 10 days before surgery (Grade 2C). CONCLUSIONS Perioperative antithrombotic management is based on risk assessment for thromboembolism and bleeding, and recommended approaches aim to simplify patient management and minimize adverse clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Douketis
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Michael Mayr
- Medical Outpatient Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Amir K Jaffer
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Mark H Eckman
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Center for Clinical Effectiveness, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Andrew S Dunn
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Regina Kunz
- Academy of Swiss Insurance Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jaipersad TS, Saedon M, Tiivas C, Marshall C, Higman DJ, Imray CHE. Perioperative transorbital Doppler flow imaging offers an alternative to transcranial Doppler monitoring in those patients without a temporal bone acoustic window. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2011; 37:719-722. [PMID: 21458149 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2010] [Revised: 01/13/2011] [Accepted: 01/27/2011] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Transcranial Doppler has been used to identify microembolic signals before, during and after carotid endarterectomy, but 10% to 15% of patients are reported not to have suitable temporal bone window. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of transorbital Doppler monitoring of patients with absent temporal bone acoustic window. Between 2005 and 2008, those patients with absent temporal bone acoustic window were assessed for a transorbital acoustic window. During the study period, 318 carotid endarterectomy were performed. In the 29 (9.1%) with absent temporal bone acoustic window, 25 (86%) had satisfactory transorbital acoustic windows, consequently only four (1.2%) of patients could not be monitored postoperatively. One patient required postoperative transorbital acoustic windows directed glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist infusion due to excessive carotid microembolisation to prevent stroke. This is the first description of the use of transorbital flow imaging to determine postoperative cerebral blood flow, microembolic load and to direct the use of intravenous antiplatelet agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tony S Jaipersad
- Coventry and Warwickshire County Vascular Unit, Warwick Medical School, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
King A, Markus HS. Doppler Embolic Signals in Cerebrovascular Disease and Prediction of Stroke Risk. Stroke 2009; 40:3711-7. [DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.109.563056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alice King
- From Clinical Neuroscience, St. George’s University of London, London UK
| | - Hugh S. Markus
- From Clinical Neuroscience, St. George’s University of London, London UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gortler D, Maloney S, Rutland R, Westvik T, Muto A, Kudo FA, Dardik A. Adjunctive pharmacologic use in carotid endarterectomy: a review. Vascular 2006; 14:93-102. [PMID: 16956478 DOI: 10.2310/6670.2006.00020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Although carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is now widely accepted as the surgical therapy for carotid stenosis, the role of and indications and evidence for many pharmacologic agents that are used adjunctively in the perioperative setting have not been conclusively established. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is the pharmaceutical agent that has been studied most extensively in conjunction with CEA; other than aspirin and dextran, the use of many agents before, during, and after CEA has not been standardized. Prospective randomized trials are still needed to demonstrate efficacy, predict outcome, and determine the optimal use of these medications in their adjunctive use during CEA to improve patient care and obtain optimal surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Gortler
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|