Influence of presentation on outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Preoperative investigations for elective surgical patients in a resource limited setting: Systematic review

Background

Preoperative investigation for surgical patients is important to check for conditions that may affect surgical outcome. It helps the anesthetist and surgeon to plan perioperative anesthesia and surgical management appropriately. However, 60-70% of laboratory tests before surgery are not really required. This review was conducted to develop evidence-based recommendations on preoperative investigations for patients waiting for surgery in a resource limited setting.

Methods

After formulating the key questions, scope, and eligibility criteria for the articles to be included, advanced search strategy of electronic sources from data bases and websites was conducted. Duplication of literatures was avoided by endnote. Screening of literatures was conducted with proper appraisal. This review was reported in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 statement.

Results

A total of 553 articles were identified from data bases and websites using an electronic search. 75 articles were removed for duplication and 223 studies were excluded after reviewing titles and abstracts. At the screening stage, 82 articles were retrieved and evaluated for eligibility. Finally, 46 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review.

Conclusion

and recommendation: Selective laboratory ordering reduces the number and cost of investigations. Preoperative tests should be guided by the patient's clinical history, co-morbidities, and physical examination. Patients with signs or symptoms of certain types of disease should be evaluated with appropriate testing. Therefore, adherence to recommendations of guidelines on preoperative investigation is important for good surgical outcome and patient satisfaction.

Novel biomarkers of abdominal aortic aneurysm disease: identifying gaps and dispelling misperceptions

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a prevalent and potentially life-threatening disease. Early detection by screening programs and subsequent surveillance has been shown to be effective at reducing the risk of mortality due to aneurysm rupture. The aim of this review is to summarize the developments in the literature concerning the latest biomarkers (from 2008 to date) and their potential screening and therapeutic values. Our search included human studies in English and found numerous novel biomarkers under research, which were categorized in 6 groups. Most of these studies are either experimental or hampered by their low numbers of patients. We concluded that currently no specific laboratory markers allow screeing for the disease and monitoring its progression or the results of treatment. Further studies and studies in larger patient groups are required in order to validate biomarkers as cost-effective tools in the AAA disease.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in southern Saskatchewan: a 10-year mortality review

The Regina Qu'Appelle Health Region (RQHR) provides all tertiary vascular care for southern Saskatchewan and portions of southwestern Manitoba. The present study was undertaken to determine the regional mortality rates following rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm and to compare these rates with the published literature. A retrospective chart review was undertaken on all cases of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) presenting to the RQHR between March 1, 1996, and February 28, 2006. The demographic data and clinical outcomes were collected from hospital charts by a single reviewer. Over the 10-year study period, 101 cases of rAAA were presented to the RQHR. Patient demographics and comorbidities were comparable to other studies in the published literature. Thirty-seven percent of patients presented with systolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg, and 7% had no recordable blood pressure. The overall mortality was 25%. Mortality risk was not statistically different between patients presenting within Regina (30%) and those referred from a distance of more than 35 km (21%, P = .353). Seven patients were treated palliatively, and 94 proceeded to open surgical repair. Within the group of patients undergoing surgery, there was a 19% mortality rate. The data show a low observed mortality rate for rAAA presenting to the RQHR. The favorable outcome of the patients is not associated with preselection bias of patients transported long distances to specialist vascular care.