Strut Failure in the Body of the Zenith Abdominal Endoprosthesis

Durability of endovascular infrarenal aneurysm repair: when does late failure occur and why?

The first commercially available stent grafts were unable to withstand the hemodynamic forces of the vascular environment. The past 15 years have seen a gradual improvement in long-term stent graft performance as designs evolved through the elimination of features associated with late failure and the replication of features associated with durable success. Clinical experience provides the following principles on which to base device design and implantation techniques. Few patients have an adequate length of non-dilated aorta distal to the aneurysm to allow implantation of an aorto-aortic stent graft; bifurcated stent grafts are usually required for AAA repair. Friction, column strength and tissue ingrowth do not prevent migration of the stent graft from its attachment within the neck into the aneurysm; some form of active fixation is required, usually in the form of barbs. Any movement between the apex of a stent and the overlying graft material will erode the fabric; stents and grafts need to move as a single unit. Nitinol is versatile, but fragile; Nitinol components must be polished to eliminate all surface irregularities and they cannot be subjected to compression loading, or excessive pulsatile movement. The neck of an aneurysm is unstable; it will dilate unless protected by a securely fixed, non-compliant stent graft. The aneurysm does not heal; freedom from risk of rupture depends on durable depressurization of the sac. The sole objective of image-based follow-up is the early detection, and catheter-based correction, of device failure. Once any given design has been in use long enough to identify its failure modes, the frequency of follow-up studies can be adjusted accordingly. However, it takes a long time to identify all the potential forms of late failure, and pre-clinical testing remains an imprecise science. New, or recently modified, devices cannot necessarily be assumed to be as durable as their predecessors.

Is there a benefit of frequent CT follow-up after EVAR?

OBJECTIVE

Imaging follow-up (FU) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is usually performed by periodic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of CT-FU after EVAR.

METHODS

In this study, 279 of 304 consecutive patients (261 male, aged 74 years (interquartile range (IQR): 70-79 years) with a median abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter of 58 mm (IQR: 53-67 mm)) underwent at least one of the yearly CT scans and plain abdominal films after EVAR. All patients received Zenith stent-grafts for non-ruptured AAAs at a single institution. Patients were considered asymptomatic when a re-intervention was done solely due to an imaging FU finding. The data were prospectively entered in a computer database and retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

As a follow-up, 1167 CT scans were performed at a median of 54 months (IQR: 34-74 months) after EVAR. Twenty-seven patients exhibited postoperative AAA expansion (a 5-year expansion-free rate of 88+/-2%), and 57 patients underwent 78 postoperative re-interventions with a 5-year secondary success rate of 91+/-2%. Of the 279 patients, 26 (9.3%) undergoing imaging FU benefitted from the yearly CT scans, since they had re-interventions based on asymptomatic imaging findings: AAA diameter expansion with or without endoleaks (n=18), kink in the stent-graft limbs (n=4), endoleak type III due to stent-graft limb separation without simultaneous AAA expansion (n=2), isolated common iliac artery expansion (n=1) and superior mesenteric artery malperfusion due to partial coverage by the stent-graft fabric (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 10% of the patients benefit from the yearly CT-FU after EVAR. Only one re-intervention due to partial coverage of a branch by the stent-graft would have been delayed if routine FU had been based on simple diameter measurements and plain abdominal radiograph. This suggests that less-frequent CT is sufficient in the majority of patients, which may simplify the FU protocol, reduce radiation exposure and the total costs of EVAR. Contrast-enhanced CT scans continue, nevertheless, to be critical when re-interventions are planned.