Minimum Training Requirement in Ultrasound Imaging of Peripheral Arterial Disease

Validation of an assessment tool for estimation of abdominal aortic aneurysm compression in diagnostic ultrasound

The study investigated ultrasound (US) transducer push, tantamount to applied transducer pressure, during abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) US scanning in a simulated non-clinical setup. During an assessment of maximal AAA diameter on a three-dimensional print-based AAA phantom, US transducer push varied as much as 2000% (range: 0.52-12.45 kPa) amongst 16 experienced sonographers. The mean transducer push was 5.54 ± 3.91 kPa (CV = 0.71). Deformation of a standardized gel-pad allowed for transducer push calculation based on US images; Young's modulus of the gel-pad was estimated to 44,26 N/m2. The method is theoretically validated in a safe and non-clinical environment. Future investigations with the aim of clinical validation of the gel-pad principle on AAA patients are suggested, including the objectification of the magnitude of an eventual transducer push-related error during US AAA diameter measurement.

European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) Certification of Theoretical and Practical Competences in Basic Vascular Ultrasound: Validity Investigation of the Assessment Tools

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to gather validity evidence for the Assessment of basic Vascular Ultrasound Expertise (AVAUSE) tool, and to establish a pass/fail score for each component, to support decisions for certification.

METHODS

A cross sectional validation study performed during the European Society for Vascular Surgery's annual meeting. Validity evidence was sought for the theoretical test and two practical tests based on Messick's framework. The participants were vascular surgeons, vascular surgical trainees, sonographers, and nurses with varying experience levels. Five vascular ultrasound experts developed the theoretical and two practical test components of the AVAUSE tool for each test component. Two stations were set up for carotid examinations and two for superficial venous incompetence (SVI) examinations. Eight raters were assigned in pairs to each station. Three methods were used to set pass/fail scores: contrasting groups' method; rater consensus; and extended Angoff.

RESULTS

Nineteen participants were enrolled. Acceptable internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) for the AVAUSE theoretical (0.93), carotid (0.84), and SVI (0.65) practical test were shown. In the carotid examination, inter-rater reliability (IRR) for the two rater pairs was good: 0.68 and 0.78, respectively. The carotid scores correlated significantly with years of experience (Pearson's r = 0.56, p = .013) but not with number of examinations in the last five years. For SVI, IRR was excellent at 0.81 and 0.87. SVI performance scores did not correlate with years of experience and number of examinations. The pass/fail score set by the contrasting groups' method was 29 points out of 50. The rater set pass/fail scores were 3.0 points for both carotid and SVI examinations and were used to determine successful participants. Ten of 19 participants passed the tests and were certified.

CONCLUSION

Validity evidence was sought and established for the AVAUSE comprehensive tool, including pass/fail standards. AVAUSE can be used to assess competences in basic vascular ultrasound, allowing operators to progress towards independent practice.

Study protocol for a comparative diagnostic accuracy study of bedside tests used to detect arterial disease in diabetes: TEsting for Arterial disease in Diabetes (TrEAD) study

INTRODUCTION

In the UK, over 7000 amputations are performed each year because of diabetes. Up to 80% of these are preceded by a foot ulcer and could therefore be prevented with improvements in ulcer care. Peripheral arterial disease is an important risk factor for the development of diabetic foot ulceration. However, its diagnosis in diabetes is challenging due to the presence of neuropathy and arterial calcification. Commonly used bedside tests either have low sensitivities or little supporting evidence to justify their use. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) has good correlation to angiography findings but a full scan is difficult to learn and time consuming to perform. We have previously demonstrated that a focused DUS of the distal anterior and posterior tibial arteries at the ankle (podiatry ankle duplex scan (PAD-scan)) can be readily learnt by novices and performed rapidly and accurately. The primary aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the PAD-scan and other commonly used bedside tests in detecting arterial disease in diabetes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study will include 305 patients presenting to diabetic foot clinics at two centres. Arterial assessment will be performed using the following index tests: the PAD-scan, pulse palpation, audible handheld Doppler, Ankle Brachial Pressure Index, Toe Brachial Pressure Index and transcutaneous pressure of oxygen. Patients will then undergo a full lower limb arterial DUS by a blinded vascular scientist as a reference test.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval was gained from NRES Committee London (REC reference 17/LO/1447). Findings will be disseminated by various methods including international presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04058626).

Peripheral vascular disease assessment in the lower limb: a review of current and emerging non-invasive diagnostic methods

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, at least 200 million people are affected by peripheral vascular diseases (PVDs), including peripheral arterial disease (PAD), chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The high prevalence and serious consequences of PVDs have led to the development of several diagnostic tools and clinical guidelines to assist timely diagnosis and patient management. Given the increasing number of diagnostic methods available, a comprehensive review of available technologies is timely in order to understand their limitations and direct future development effort.

MAIN BODY

This paper reviews the available diagnostic methods for PAD, CVI, and DVT with a focus on non-invasive modalities. Each method is critically evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, ease of use, procedure time duration, and training requirements where applicable.

CONCLUSION

This review emphasizes the limitations of existing methods, highlighting a latent need for the development of new non-invasive, efficient diagnostic methods. Some newly emerging technologies are identified, in particular wearable sensors, which demonstrate considerable potential to address the need for simple, cost-effective, accurate and timely diagnosis of PVDs.

The impact of a focused vascular lower limb arterial duplex (F-VLAD) scan in management decisions for acute limb ischaemia

OBJECTIVE

To establish the diagnostic accuracy of a 'focused vascular lower limb arterial duplex scan (F-VLAD)' developed to facilitate rapid decision-making for acute limb ischaemia (ALI).

METHODS

Ten cases of ALI were identified from our patient database; clinical details, history and examination findings were extracted from the clinical notes. Original 'full' duplex ultrasound (DUS) pictorial reports were 're-formatted' to include only anatomical segments included in the 'F-VLAD' scan. The series of 10 reports were emailed to 1741 vascular surgeons. Each recipient received a random mixture of full and F-VLAD scans. Participants were asked regarding next step in management and confidence in decision-making (Likert scale; 1 strongly disagree, 5 strongly agree). The cases were again sent out to the same database and respondents were asked as to the cause of ischaemia (embolic or thrombosis).

RESULTS

Eighty-one participants responded to the first survey and 43 participants to the second survey. Participants felt more confident making decisions regarding management using the full duplex report compared to the F-VLAD report (4 (3-4) vs 3 (2-4), median (IQR); p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (differentiating embolus from thrombosis) when comparing the F-VLAD and full DUS reports (85.4% vs 88.3%; p=0.461). F-VLAD and 'full' DUS reports had comparable sensitivity (85.1% vs 86.8%), specificity (85.6% vs 89.2%),positive predictive value (PPV) (80.4% vs 81.9%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (89.2% vs 92.2%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The F-VLAD scan has comparable accuracy to a traditional full DUS in diagnosing the underlying aetiology of ALI. This may facilitate surgeon-performed point-of-care DUS.

Intensive Simulation Training in Lower Limb Arterial Duplex Scanning Leads to Skills Transfer in Real-World Scenario

OBJECTIVES

To train novices to perform an abbreviated duplex lower limb ultrasound scan using simulation training and assess real-world skills transference.

METHODS

Novices undertook 3 days of simulation training. Their progress was assessed using the Duplex Ultrasound Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (DUOSATS) for simulation and Cumulative Imaging Score (CIS). A final assessment day was held to assess DUOSATS for simulation and real patient scanning, CIS, cumulative diagnostic accuracy, and sections A and B of the Society of Vascular Technology examination. MSc students in vascular ultrasound were also assessed for comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 17 novices and 7 MSc students with 3-month training participated. Novices improved DUOSATS for simulation scores between days 1, 3, and 4: 18 (17-19) vs 27 (25-28) vs 30 (28-32), (median [interquartile range], p < 0.001). Novices improved in CIS between days 1 and 3: 10 (10-13) vs 21 (19-21), p < 0.001, with a decline on day 4: 15.3 (11.3-18.3), p < 0.001. On the final assessment day, there were no significant differences between novices and MSc students in: DUOSATS for simulation scores (30 [28-32] vs 31 [6-31.5], p = 0.85); DUOSATS for patient assessment (31 [28.7-33.7] vs 26.7 [24.5-35.7], p = 0.41); CIS (15.3 [11.3-18.7] vs 20.7 [12.3-22.2], p = 0.2), respectively. However, novices performed better in section B of the Society of Vascular Technology examination compared with MSc students (72.9% vs 54.3%, p < 0.001). Novices also demonstrated a higher diagnostic accuracy when compared with MSc students (65.7% of arterial segments correctly assessed vs 47.6%, respectively [p = 0.044]).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive simulation of 3-day training achieved real patient-based assessments that were comparable to MSc students who were 3 months into their traditional training program.

New simple image overlay system using a tablet PC for pinpoint identification of the appropriate site for anastomosis in peripheral arterial reconstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy and utility of a new image overlay system using a tablet PC for patients undergoing peripheral arterial reconstruction.

METHODS

Eleven limbs treated with distal bypass surgery were studied. Three-dimensional images obtained by processing a preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan were superimposed onto the back-camera images of a tablet PC. We used this system to pinpoint a planned distal anastomotic site preoperatively and to make a precise incision directly above it during surgery. We used a branch artery near the distal anastomotic site as a reference point and the accuracy of the system was validated by comparing its results with the intraoperative findings. The precision of the system was also compared with that of a preoperative ultrasonographic examination.

RESULTS

Both the image overlay system and ultrasonography (US) accurately identified the target branch artery in all except one limb. In that limb, which had a very small reference branch artery, preoperative US wrongly identified another branch, whereas the image overlay system located the target branch with an error of 10 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Our image overlay system was easy to use and allowed us to precisely identify a target artery preoperatively. Therefore, this system could be helpful for pinpointing the most accurate incision site during surgery.

The effect of a simulation training package on skill acquisition for duplex arterial stenosis detection

OBJECTIVES

In vascular surgery, duplex ultrasonography is a valuable diagnostic tool in patients with peripheral vascular disease, and there is increasing demand for vascular surgeons to be able to perform duplex scanning. This study evaluates the role of a novel simulation training package on vascular ultrasound (US) skill acquisition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 19 novices measured predefined stenosis in a simulated pulsatile vessel using both peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) and diameter reduction (DR) methods before and after a short period of training using a simulated training package. The training package consisted of a simulated pulsatile vessel phantom, a set of instructional videos, duplex ultrasound objective structured assessment of technical skills (DUOSATS) tool, and a portable US scanner. Quantitative metrics (procedure time, percentage error using PSVR and DR methods, DUOSAT scores, and global rating scores) before and after training were compared.

RESULTS

Subjects spent a median time of 144 mins (IQR: 60-195) training using the simulation package. Subjects exhibited statistically significant improvements when comparing pretraining and posttraining DUOSAT scores (pretraining = 17 [16-19.3] vs posttraining = 30 [27.8-31.8]; p < 0.01), global rating score (pretraining = 1 [1-2] vs posttraining = 4 [3.8-4]; p < 0.01), percentage error using both the DR (pretraining = 12.6% [9-29.6] vs posttraining = 10.3% [8.9-11.1]; p = 0.03) and PSVR (pretraining = 60% [40-60] vs posttraining = 20% [6.7-20]; p < 0.01) methods.

CONCLUSION

In this study, subjects with no previous practical US experience developed the ability to both acquire and interpret arterial duplex images in a pulsatile simulated phantom following a short period of goal direct training using a simulation training package. A simulation training package may be a valuable tool for integration into a vascular training program. However, further work is needed to explore whether these newly attained skills are translated into clinical assessment.

Ten-year technical and clinical outcomes in TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II infrainguinal C/D lesions using duplex ultrasound arterial mapping as the sole imaging modality for critical lower limb ischemia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate duplex ultrasound arterial mapping (DUAM) as the sole imaging modality when planning for bypass surgery (BS) and endovascular revascularization (EvR) in patients with critical limb ischemia for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II C/D infrainguinal lesions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review evaluating the accuracy of DUAM as the sole imaging tool in determining patient suitability for BS vs EvR. Primary outcomes were the sensitivity and specificity of DUAM compared with intraoperative digital subtraction angiography. Secondary outcomes were procedural, hemodynamic, and clinical outcomes, amputation-free survival, and freedom from major adverse clinical events.

RESULTS

From 2002 to 2012, a total of 4783 patients with peripheral arterial disease were referred, of whom 622 critical limb ischemia patients underwent revascularization for TASC C and D lesions (EvR: n = 423; BS: n = 199). Seventy-four percent of EvR and 82% of BS were performed for TASC D (P = .218). The DUAM showed sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 98% in identifying lesions requiring intervention. Of the 520 procedures performed with DUAM alone, there was no difference regarding the number of procedures performed for occlusive or de novo lesions (EvR: 65% and 71%; BS: 87% and 78%; P = .056). Immediate clinical improvement to the Rutherford category ≤3 was 96% for EvR and 97% for BS (P = .78). Hemodynamic success was 79% for EvR and 77% for BS (P = .72). Six-year freedom from binary restenosis was 71.6% for EvR and 67.4% for BS (P = .724). Six-year freedom from target lesion revascularization was 81.1% for EvR and 70.3% for BS (P = .3571). Six-year sustained clinical improvement was 79.5% for EvR and 66.7% for BS (P = .294). Six-year amputation-free survival was 77.2% for EvR and 74.6% for BS (P = .837). There was a significant difference in risk of major adverse clinical events between EvR and BS (51% vs 70%; P = .034). Only 16.4% of patients required magnetic resonance angiography, which tended to overestimate lesions with 84% agreement with intraoperative findings. Six-year binary restenosis was 71% for DUAM procedures compared with 55% for magnetic resonance angiography procedures (P = .001), which was solely based on the prospective modality.

CONCLUSIONS

The DUAM epitomizes a minimally invasive, economically proficient modality for road mapping procedural outcome in BS and EvR. It allows for high patient turnover with procedural and clinical success without compromising hemodynamic outcome. The DUAM is superior to other available modalities as the sole preoperative imaging tool in a successful limb salvage program.

Duplex ultrasound scanning of peripheral arterial disease of the lower limb

OBJECTIVES

To assess the reliability and applicability of duplex ultrasound scanning (DUS) of lower limb arteries, compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA), in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

DESIGN

A prospective, blinded, comparative study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 169 patients were examined by DUS and DSA. Intermittent claudication (IC) was present in 42 (25%) patients and critical limb ischaemia (CLI) in 127 (75%) patients. To allow segment-to-segment comparison, the arterial tree was divided into 15 segments. In total, 2535 segments were examined using kappa (κ) statistics to test the agreement.

RESULTS

The agreement between DUS and DSA was very good (κ>0.8) or good (0.8 ≥ κ>0.6) in most segments, but moderate (0.6 ≥ κ>0.4) in the tibio-peroneal trunk and the peroneal artery. Agreement between the two techniques was significantly better in the supragenicular (κ=0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70-0.80)) than in the infragenicular segments (κ=0.63 (0.59-0.67)) (p<0.001). Similarly, the technical success rate was significantly higher in the supragenicular segments (DUS: 100%; DSA: 99%) than in the infragenicular segments (both 93%) (p<0.001). DUS was the best technique for imaging of the distal crural arteries (92% vs. 97%; p<0.001) and DSA was the best technique for imaging of the proximal crural arteries (95% vs. 91%; p<0.01). Neither the agreement nor the technical success rate was influenced by the severity of PAD, that is, IC versus CLI.

CONCLUSION

The agreement between DUS and DSA was generally good, irrespective of the severity of ischaemia. DUS performed better in the supragenicular arteries than in the infragenicular arteries. However, DUS compared favourably with DSA in both tibial vessels, particularly in the distal part, which makes DUS a useful non-invasive alternative to DSA.