Randomized Trials for Endovascular Treatment of Infrainguinal Arterial Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Part 1: Above the Knee)

Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis

AIMS

Optimal endovascular management of intermittent claudication (IC) remains disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety outcomes for balloon angioplasty (BA), bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents, and atherectomy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electronic databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials (RCT) from inception through November 2021. Efficacy outcomes were primary patency, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and quality-of-life (QoL). Safety endpoints were all-cause mortality and major amputation. Outcomes were evaluated at short-term (<1 year), mid-term (1-2 years), and long-term (≥2 years) follow-up. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021292639). Fifty-one RCTs enrolling 8430 patients/lesions were included. In femoropopliteal disease of low-to-intermediate complexity, DCBs were associated with higher likelihood of primary patency [short-term: odds ratio (OR) 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44-4.24; long-term: OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.93-3.16], lower TLR (short-term: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.49; long-term: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29-0.60) and similar all-cause mortality risk, compared with BA. Primary stenting using BMS was associated with improved short-to-mid-term patency and TLR, but similar long-term efficacy compared with provisional stenting. Mid-term patency (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.89-3.03) and TLR (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22-1.11) estimates were comparable for DES vs. BMS. Atherectomy, used independently or adjunctively, was not associated with efficacy benefits compared with drug-coated and uncoated angioplasty, or stenting approaches. Paucity and heterogeneity of data precluded pooled analysis for aortoiliac disease and QoL endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Certain devices may provide benefits in femoropopliteal disease, but comparative data in aortoiliac arteries is lacking. Gaps in evidence quantity and quality impede identification of the optimal endovascular approach to IC.

One-year results of long femoropopliteal lesions stenting with fasciotomy lamina vastoadductoria

OBJECTIVE

Fasciotomy can increase the mobility of the superficial femoral artery and decrease the incidence of stent fractures. This study aimed to compare the long-term patency of drug-eluting nitinol stents with and without fasciotomy in patients with prolonged SFA occlusions.

METHODS

A randomized clinical trial was conducted in 60 (1:1) patients with long femoropopliteal steno-occlusive lesions more than 200 mm. Patients in group 1 (Zilver) underwent recanalization of femoropopliteal artery occlusion with stenting. In group 2 (ZilverFas), the femoropopliteal occlusion was recanalized with stenting and fasciotomy of Gunter's canal. The follow-up assessment of the patency took place after 6, 12 months.

RESULTS

12-month primary patency in Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 51% and 80%, respectively (p = 0.02). The freedom from target revascularization (TLR) in Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 50% and 76%, respectively (p = 0.04). At one-year, primary-assisted and secondary patency for the ZilverFas and Zilver groups were 83% versus 62% (p = 0.07), 86% versus 65% (p = 0.05), respectively. In Zilver and ZilverFas groups, the number of stents fractures was 14 and 7, respectively (p = 0.05). The multivariables Cox regression indicated that the stent fracture and diabetes mellitus were the independent predictors of restenosis and reocclusion. Fasciotomy reduced the risk of reocclusion and restenosis by 2.94 times.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that a decompressing the stented segment with fasciotomy significantly improves the patency of the femoropopliteal segment and significantly reduces the number and severity of stent fractures.

3D printing advances in the development of stents

3D printing technologies have found several applications within the biomedical sector including in the fabrication of medical devices, advanced visualization, diagnosis planning and simulation of surgical procedures. One of the areas in which of 3D printing is anticipated to revolutionised is the manufacturing of implantable bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds (stents). The ability to customize and create personalised tailor-made bioresorbable scaffolds has the potential to help solve many of the challenges associated with stenting, such as inappropriate stent sizing and design, abolish late stent thrombosis and help artery growth; 3D printing offers a rapid prototyping and effective method of producing stents making customization of designs feasible. This review provides an overview of the subjects and summarizes the latest research in the 3D printing technologies employed for the design and fabrication of bioresorbable stents including materials with the required printable and mechanical properties. Finally, we present a regulatory perspective on the development and engineering of 3D printed implantable stents.

[Use of endovascular drug-coated devices in lesions of femoropopliteoltibial arteries]

Endovascular intervention is one of the main methods of treatment in atherosclerotic lesions of the infrainguinal segment in patients with chronic lower limb ischaemia. Recent years have witnessed active use of drug-eluting techniques, significantly improving the long-term outcomes of peripheral reconstructions. This article is a review of publications on the results of using modern drug-eluting balloon catheters and stents in the femoropopliteoltibial position. The accumulated data will help solve the main problems of the classic balloon angioplasty, reducing the incidence of restenosis, improving primary patency, and decreasing the need for repeat interventions in the remote period of follow-up.

Kissing Balloon Technique for Infrapopliteal Angioplasty in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze the technical aspects and follow-up findings regarding patients with critical limb ischemia who underwent the kissing balloon technique (KBT).

METHODS

Thirty patients (34 bifurcations) were enrolled in this retrospective analysis between September 2010 and February 2017. All patients were submitted to infrapopliteal intervention for critical limb ischemia. The KBT is the primary treatment in 3 situations: for cases with >70% stenosis of the main artery located less than 1 cm of the bifurcation, occlusion of one branch with greater than 50% stenosis of the contralateral branch, or greater than 50% bilateral stenosis. Stents were considered in cases of recoil greater than 30% or flow-limiting recoil and were used in 7 of the 34 bifurcations (20.5%).

RESULTS

Primary patency at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years was 100%, 68.1%, and 68.1, respectively. Limb salvage rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years were 100%, 86.6%, and 65.0%, respectively. Wound healing rates at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 7.1%, 34.4%, 44.5%, and 68.7%, respectively. The bifurcations of the V-shape and T-shape groups were compared in terms of wound healing, primary patency, and limb salvage. No differences were observed in wound healing (P = 0.268), primary patency (P = 0.394), and limb salvage (P = 0.755).

CONCLUSIONS

The KBT is a feasible bifurcation approach for infrapopliteal angioplasties to maintain the patency of both branches after ballooning. The comparison between the anterior tibial artery and tibioperoneal trunk bifurcation and the peroneal artery and posterior tibial artery bifurcation revealed no difference in wound healing, primary patency, and limb salvage.

Drug coated balloon supported Supera stent versus Supera stent in intermediate and long-segment lesions of the superficial femoral artery: 2-year results of the RAPID Trial

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of occlusive disease of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) has evolved from plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) through primary stenting strategy to drug eluting technology-based approach. The RAPID Trial investigates the added value of drug coated balloons (DCB, Legflow) in a primary stenting strategy (Supera stent) for intermediate (5-15 cm) and long segment (>15 cm) SFA lesions.

METHODS

In this multicenter, patient-blinded trial, 160 patients with intermittent claudication, ischemic rest pain, or tissue loss due to intermediate or long SFA lesions were randomized (1:1) between Supera + DCB and Supera. Primary endpoint was primary patency at 2 years, defined as freedom from restenosis on duplex ultrasound (peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4).

RESULTS

At 2 years, primary patency was 55.1% (95% CI: 43.1-67.1%) in the Supera + DCB group versus 48.3% (95% CI: 35.6-61.0%) in the Supera group (P=0.957). Per protocol analysis showed a primary patency rate of 60.9% (95% CI: 48.6-73.2%) in the Supera + DCB group versus 49.8% (95% CI: 36.9-62.7%) in the Supera group (P=0.469). The overall mortality rate was 5% in both groups (P=0.975). Sustained functional improvement was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-year results in the current trial of a primary Supera stenting strategy are consistent with other trials reporting on treatment of intermediate and long SFA lesions. A DCB supported Supera stent strategy did not improve patency rate compared to a Supera stent only strategy.

Comparison of Bypass and Endovascular Intervention for Popliteal Occlusion with the Involvement of Trifurcation for Critical Limb Ischemia

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to analyze the technical aspects and outcomes of the treatment of occlusion of the popliteal artery with the involvement of the trifurcation treated with a bypass (open) and endovascular (endo) approach.

METHODS

Overall, 108 consecutive procedures were enrolled retrospectively. Patients were evaluated in 2 groups: the endo group (65 patients) and the open group (43 patients). Primary outcome were MALE (major adverse limb events), amputation-free survival, and early mortality (until 30 days). Secondary outcome was overall survival in 3 years. Inclusion criteria were Rutherford 4 and 5 and occlusion of the popliteal artery with the involvement of trifurcation and, at least, 1 infrapopliteal artery of runoff.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients in the open and 96.9% of patients in the endo group. Freedom from MALE was 73.5% and 68.5% for 1 and 3 years respectively for the endo group, and 84.3% and 77.2% respectively for the open group (P = 0.413). Considering the total number of major reinterventions executed until 3 years, the reinterventions was statistically more performed in the endo compared to the open group (P = 0.0459). Amputation-free survival for the endo group in 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years was 93.7%, 79.3%, and 66.0%, respectively, and the amputation-free survival for the open group was 88.4%, 77.4%, and 64.3% (P = 0.726). Early mortality was 9.3% for the open group and 1.5% for the endo group (P = 0.060). In 3 years, the overall survival was 75.1% in the open group and 84.3% in the endo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In 3 years, follow-up endovascular treatment of occlusion of the popliteal artery with the involvement of the trifurcation has similar time freedom from MALE compared to open approach. Overall and amputation-free survival was not different between the groups besides more reinterventions in patients who underwent endovascular approach.

Endovascular therapy versus femoropopliteal bypass surgery for medium-length TASC II B and C lesions of the superficial femoral artery: An observational propensity-matched analysis

Objectives

This study was designed to compare clinical outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with optional stenting (PTA/s) and femoropopliteal bypass (FPB) surgery as primary invasive treatment in patients with medium-length superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions.

Methods

We performed a single-center retrospective, observational analysis in all consecutive patients who had undergone initial invasive treatment for medium-length, TASC II B and TASC II C, SFA lesions from 2004 to 2015. Primary endpoints were primary and secondary clinical patency. Secondary endpoints were complication rates and number of amputations. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to compare patency rates in the two treatment groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounding variables and propensity score matching analysis was used to balance treatment groups.

Results

A total of 362 patients with a mean observation period of 4.0 years (SD ± 2.6) were analyzed. In this group, 231 patients (64%) underwent PTA/s and 131 patients (36%) FPB surgery. There was no difference in primary clinical patency at one-, three- and five-year follow-up between the PTA/s and FPB group, with rates of 79% vs. 63%, 53% vs. 78% and 71% vs. 66%, respectively ( P = 0.46). Secondary clinical patency estimates were comparable, resulting in one-, three- and five-year secondary clinical patency rates of 88%, 76% and 67% in the PTA/s group versus 88%, 80% and 79% in the bypass group ( P = 0.40). Multivariate analysis revealed no significant differences between the PTA/s and FPB groups in terms of primary clinical patency (HR 1.4; 95% CI 0.9–2.2) and secondary clinical patency (HR 1.7; 95% CI 0.9–2.9). This was confirmed in the propensity score analysis. Hospital stay (4.8 vs. 10.3 days) and complication rate (2.6% vs. 18.3%) were significantly lower in the PTA/s group ( P = 0.00). The number of amputations was comparable ( P = 0.75).

Conclusions

The clinical success of endovascular therapy and surgery for medium-length SFA lesions is comparable. Taking into account the lower morbidity rate, shorter length of hospital stay and the less invasive character of PTA/s compared with bypass surgery, patients with medium-length SFA lesions are ideally treated by an endovascular-first approach.

Drug-delivering endovascular treatment versus angioplasty in artery occlusion diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The best management of patients with femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal artery occlusion disease is not clear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal or infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled trials from 1 January 2000 until 30 June 2016.

RESULTS

Compared with PTA, significant benefits in favor of DCB and DES were found for target lesion revascularization (TLR) (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.66, p = .001 for DCB; OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.81, p < .001 for DES). Primary patency rate was greater with DCB (p = .001) and DES (p < .001) than PTA. Compared with PTA, a significant reduction in mortality was observed in the DCB group (p = .039) but not in the DES group. Subgroup analysis found a lower rate of TLR and a higher rate of primary patency in the active group (DCB and DES) compared with the control group (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal arterial occlusion (p ≤ .016) but not in patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusion (p ≥ .063). Mortality was similar between active replacement and control groups both in the femoropopliteal arterial occlusion and the infrapopliteal arterial occlusion subgroups (all p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly better TLR and primary patency rate were found in the drug-delivering endovascular treatments compared with the PTA group for patients with femoropopliteal arterial occlusion but not for patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusion.

Cost-effectiveness of superficial femoral artery endovascular interventions in the UK and Germany: a modelling study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the lifetime costs and cost-effectiveness of 5 endovascular interventions to treat superficial femoral arterial disease.

DESIGN

A model-based health economic evaluation. An existing decision analytical model was used, with updated effectiveness data taken from the literature, and updated costs based on purchasing prices.

SETTING

UK and German healthcare perspectives were considered.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with intermittent claudication of the femoropopliteal arteries eligible for endovascular treatment.

METHODS

UK and German healthcare perspectives were considered, as were different strategies for re-intervention.

INTERVENTIONS

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with bail-out bare metal stenting (assumed to represent the existing standard of care, and 4 alternatives: primary bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents, drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) and biomimetic stents).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between 2 treatments, defined as the incremental costs divided by the incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

RESULTS

Use of a biomimetic stent, BioMimics 3D, was always estimated to dominate the other interventions, having lower lifetime costs and greater effectiveness, as measured by QALYs. Of the remaining interventions, DEBs were always the most effective, and PTA the least effective. There was uncertainty in the cost-effectiveness results, with key drivers being the costs and effectiveness of the biomimetic stent along with the costs of DEBs.

CONCLUSIONS

All 4 of the alternatives to PTA were more effective, with the biomimetic stent being the most cost-effective. As there was uncertainty in the results, and all of the interventions have different mechanisms of action, all 4 may be considered to be alternatives to PTA.

Open and Endovascular Treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II D Aortoiliac Occlusive Lesions: What Determines the Rate of Restenosis?

Background:

Open surgery is the preferred approach for the treatment of type D lesions according to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II guideline, but endovascular solutions also appear to be a valid option in selected patients. The study aimed to identify the risk factors of restenosis after open and endovascular reconstruction of symptomatic TASC II D aortoiliac occlusive lesions (AIOLs).

Methods:

Fifty-six patients (82 limbs) who underwent open repair and endovascular treatment (ET) for symptomatic TASC ΙΙ D AIOLs between March 2005 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics, preoperative and postoperative imaging, and operation procedure reports were reviewed and analyzed. Restenosis after revascularization was assessed by duplex ultrasound or computed tomography angiogram. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Log-rank test, and multivariate Cox regression were used to evaluate the relevance between risk factors and patency.

Results:

The mean duration of follow-up was 42.8 ± 23.5 months (ranging from 3 to 90 months). Primary patency rates at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year were 93.6%, 89.3%, 87.0%, and 70.3%, respectively. Restenosis after revascularization occurred in 11 limbs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Log-rank test revealed that diabetes, Rutherford classification ≥5^th and concurrent femoropopliteal TASC II type C/D lesions were significantly related to the duration of primary patency. According to the result of Cox regression, diabetes and femoropopliteal TASC ΙΙ type C/D lesions were identified as the risk factors for restenosis after revascularization.

Conclusion:

This study demonstrated that diabetes and femoropopliteal TASC ΙΙ type C/D lesions are risk factors associated with restenosis after open and ET of TASC II D AIOLs.

Percutaneous endovascular treatment of infrainguinal PAOD: Results of the PSI register study in 74 German vascular centers

Background

The percutaneous infrainguinal stent (PSI) register study aimed to collate all percutaneous endovascular procedures for infrainguinal peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) conducted in 74 German vascular centers between September and November 2015 (3 months). In order to obtain representative results all consecutive treatment procedures had to be submitted by the participating trial centers.

Material and methods

This was a prospective, nonrandomized multicenter study design. All patients suffering from intermittent claudication (IC, Fontaine stage II) or critical limb ischemia (CLI, Fontaine stages III and IV) were included. Trial centers with less than 5 cases reported within the 3‑month trial period or centers that could not ensure the submission of all treated patients were excluded.

Results

In the final assessment 2798 treated cases from 74 trial centers were reported of which 65 (87.8 %) centers were under the leadership of a vascular surgeon. Approximately 33 % of the interventions in centers under the leadership of vascular surgeons were conducted by radiologists. Risk factors, especially chronic renal disease, diabetes and cardiac risk factors were significantly different between patients with IC and CLI. Of the patients with Fontaine stage II PAOD 41.3 % had 3 patent crural vessels compared to only 10.8 % of patients with Fontaine stage IV. With respect to peri-interventional complications, percutaneous endovascular treatment of IC was a safe procedure with severe complications in less than 1 % and no fatalities. Only 4.5 % of the procedures were conducted under ambulatory conditions. In the supragenual region self-expanding bare metal stents, standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and drug-coated balloons were the most frequently used procedures. For interventions below the knee, standard PTA was the most commonly employed treatment.

Conclusion

The main aim of the PSI study was to obtain a realistic picture of percutaneous endovascular techniques used to treat suprapopliteal and infrapopliteal PAOD lesions and to describe the treatment procedures used by vascular specialists in Germany. To investigate the change in trends for treatment over time, this study has to be repeated in the future in order to test how quickly the results of randomized studies can be implemented in practice.

Electronic supplementary material

A complete list of the PSI study collaborators is available under doi: 10.1007/s00772-016-0202-2.

Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can lead to disabling ischemia and limb loss. Treatment modalities have included risk factor optimization through life-style modifications and medications, or operative approaches using both open and minimally invasive techniques, such as balloon angioplasty. Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty has emerged as a promising alternative to uncoated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of this difficult disease process. By ballooning and coating the inside of atherosclerotic vessels with cytotoxic agents, such as paclitaxel, cellular mechanisms responsible for atherosclerosis and neointimal hyperplasia are inhibited and its devastating complications are prevented or postponed. DEBs are considerably more expensive than uncoated balloons, and their efficacy in improving patient outcomes is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) compared with uncoated, nonstenting balloon angioplasty in people with symptomatic lower-limb peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Trials Search Co-ordinator (TSC) searched the Specialised Register (last searched December 2015) and Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS) (2015, Issue 11). The TSC searched trial databases for details of ongoing and unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized controlled trials that compared DEBs with uncoated, nonstenting balloon angioplasty for intermittent claudication (IC) or critical limb ischemia (CLI).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (AK, TA) independently selected the appropriate trials and performed data extraction, assessment of trial quality, and data analysis. The senior review author (DKR) adjudicated any disagreements.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials that randomized 1838 participants met the study inclusion criteria. Seven of the trials included femoropopliteal arterial lesions, three included tibial arterial lesions, and one included both. The trials were carried out in Europe and in the USA and all used the taxane drug paclitaxel in the DEB arm. Nine of the 11 trials were industry-sponsored. Four companies manufactured the DEB devices (Bard, Bavaria Medizin, Biotronik, and Medtronic). The trials examined both anatomic and clinical endpoints. There was heterogeneity in the frequency of stent deployment and the type and duration of antiplatelet therapy between trials. Using GRADE assessment criteria, the quality of the evidence presented was moderate for the outcomes of target lesion revascularization and change in Rutherford category, and high for amputation, primary vessel patency, binary restenosis, death, and change in ankle-brachial index (ABI). Most participants were followed up for 12 months, but one trial reported outcomes at five years.There were better outcomes for DEBs for up to two years in primary vessel patency (odds ratio (OR) 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22 to 9.57 at six months; OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.56 at 12 months; OR 3.51, 95% CI 2.26 to 5.46 at two years) and at six months and two years for late lumen loss (mean difference (MD) -0.64 mm, 95% CI -1.00 to -0.28 at six months; MD -0.80 mm, 95% CI -1.44 to -0.16 at two years). DEB were also superior to uncoated balloon angioplasty for up to five years in target lesion revascularization (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.47 at six months; OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.51 at 12 months; OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44 at two years; OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.51 at five years) and binary restenosis rate (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.67 at six months; OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.98 at 12 months; OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.66 at two years; OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.30 at five years). There was no significant difference between DEB and uncoated angioplasty in amputation, death, change in ABI, change in Rutherford category and quality of life (QoL) scores, or functional walking ability, although none of the trials were powered to detect a significant difference in these clinical endpoints. We carried out two subgroup analyses to examine outcomes in femoropopliteal and tibial interventions as well as in people with CLI (4 or greater Rutherford class), and showed no advantage for DEBs in tibial vessels at six and 12 months compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty. There was also no advantage for DEBs in CLI compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty at 12 months.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on a meta-analysis of 11 trials with 1838 participants, there is evidence of an advantage for DEBs compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty in several anatomic endpoints such as primary vessel patency (high-quality evidence), binary restenosis rate (moderate-quality evidence), and target lesion revascularization (low-quality evidence) for up to 12 months. Conversely, there is no evidence of an advantage for DEBs in clinical endpoints such as amputation, death, or change in ABI, or change in Rutherford category during 12 months' follow-up. Well-designed randomized trials with long-term follow-up are needed to compare DEBs with uncoated balloon angioplasties adequately for both anatomic and clinical study endpoints before the widespread use of this expensive technology can be justified.

Midterm Outcome of Femoral Artery Stenting and Factors Affecting Patency

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early and midterm results of superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting with self-expanding nitinol stents and to identify the factors affecting patency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SFA stenting was performed in 165 limbs of 117 patients from January 2009 to December 2013. Patients were followed-up for the first occurrence of occlusion or stenosis based on computed tomography and duplex scan results and a decrease in ankle brachial index of >15%.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period (mean, 15.3±3.2 months), no early thrombotic reocclusions occurred within 30 days, but in-stent restenosis developed in 78 limbs. The primary patency rates at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 78%, 66%, 42%, and 22%, respectively, and the secondary patency rates were 85%, 72%, 58%, and 58%, respectively. TASC II C or D lesions, stent length >8 cm, number of patent tibial arteries and diabetes were significantly associated with reintervention.

CONCLUSION

The midterm results of stenting for SFA occlusive disease were disappointing because the primary and secondary patency rates at two years were 22% and 58%, respectively. Reintervention after SFA stenting remains a major problem, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus or long TASC II C or D lesions.

Meta-analysis of drug-eluting balloon angioplasty and drug-eluting stent placement for infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease

PURPOSE

To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drug-eluting balloon (DEB) angioplasty and drug-eluting stents (DESs) for infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic searches were performed for all relevant RCTs.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs for DEB angioplasty and 12 RCTs for a DES in peripheral arterial disease were identified. Meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant superiority of DEB over plain balloon angioplasty of femoral-popliteal disease for late lumen loss, restenosis, and target lesion revascularization, with no benefit in major amputation or mortality. Statistically significant superiority of DEB over percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was demonstrated for infrapopliteal disease for restenosis and target lesion revascularization. Drug-eluting stents showed statistically significant superiority over bare metal stents (BMSs) of femoral-popliteal disease for late lumen loss and restenosis, with no benefit in mortality or amputation. Drug-eluting stents showed statistically significant superiority over BMSs of infrapopliteal disease restenosis and target lesion revascularization, with no benefit in amputation or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty and DESs demonstrated superior outcomes compared to PTA and BMS, with no difference in amputation or mortality.

Optimal management of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease

Peripheral arterial occlusive disease is becoming a major health problem in Western societies as the population continues to age. In addition to risk of limb loss, the complexity of the disease is magnified by its intimate association with medical comorbidity, especially cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Risk factor modification and antiplatelet therapy are essential to improve long-term survival. Surgical intervention is indicated for intermittent claudication when a patient’s quality of life remains unacceptable after a trial of conservative therapy. Open reconstruction and endovascular revascularization are cornerstone for limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia. Recent advances in catheter-based technology have made endovascular intervention the preferred treatment approach for infrainguinal disease in many cases. Nevertheless, lower extremity bypass remains an important treatment strategy, especially for reasonable risk patients with a suitable bypass conduit. In this review, we present a summary of current knowledge about peripheral arterial disease followed by a review of current, evidence-based medical and surgical therapy for infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease.