1
|
Batt M, Camou F, Coffy A, Feugier P, Senneville E, Caillon J, Calvet B, Chidiac C, Laurent F, Revest M, Daures JP. A meta-analysis of outcomes of in-situ reconstruction after total or partial removal of infected abdominal aortic graft. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2019; 61:171-182. [PMID: 30698369 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.19.10669-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is currently a lack of evidence for the relative effectiveness of partial resection (PR) and total resection (TR) before managing abdominal aortic graft infection (AGI). Most authorities agree that TR is mandatory for intracavitary AGI in patients with favorable conditions but there is an increasing number of patients with severe comorbidities for whom this approach is not suitable, resulting in a prohibitive mortality rate. The purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate indication for TR or PR. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A meta-analysis was conducted on the rates of early/late mortality, amputations and reinfection. A meta-regression was performed with eight variables: patient age, male prevalence, presence of virulent or nonvirulent organisms, urgency, omentoplasty and follow-up. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Twenty-one studies and 1052 patients were included. For TR and PR, the rates of early mortality and reinfection were 16.8% and 10.5%, 11% and 27%, respectively. For TR urgency and male gender were associated with increased rate of early mortality and male gender, PDF and virulent organisms were associated with increased risk of reinfection. For PR no statistical correlation was analyzable except for PDF with increased risk of reinfection. CONCLUSIONS Early mortality rates are higher for TR and reinfection rates are higher for PR. For TR early mortality increases in urgent cases and it is suggested that alternative option must be discussed, reinfection decreases in the presence of nonvirulent organisms and TR seems optimal. For TR and PR reinfection increases in presence of PDF and alternative technique may be more appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Batt
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France -
| | - Fabrice Camou
- Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Andre University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Amandine Coffy
- Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France
| | - Patrick Feugier
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Eric Senneville
- Infectious Diseases Department, Gustave Dron Hospital, Lille 2 University, Tourcoing, France
| | | | - Brigitte Calvet
- Anesthosiology Department, Béziers Hospital, Béziers, France
| | - Christian Chidiac
- Infectious Deseases Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon and International Center for Infectiology Research (CIRI), INSERM U1111, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France.,Bacteriology Department, International Center for Infectiology Research (CIRI), INSERM U1111, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Frederic Laurent
- Infectious Diseases, and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou University Hospital, CIC-INSERM 1414, Rennes 1 University, France
| | | | - Jean Pierre Daures
- Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Batt M, Feugier P, Camou F, Coffy A, Senneville E, Caillon J, Calvet B, Chidiac C, Laurent F, Revest M, Daures JP. A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes After In Situ Reconstructions for Aortic Graft Infection. Angiology 2017; 69:370-379. [PMID: 28578619 DOI: 10.1177/0003319717710114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To confirm the advantage of in situ reconstruction (ISR) over extra-anatomic reconstruction (EAR) for aortic graft infection and determine the most appropriate conduit including autogenous veins, cryopreserved allografts, and synthetic prosthesis (standard, rifampicin of silver polyesters). METHODS A meta-analysis was conducted with rate of mortality, graft occlusion, amputation, and reinfection. A meta-regression was performed with 4 factors: patients' age, presence of prosthetic-duodenal fistula (PDF), virulent organisms, or nonvirulent organisms. RESULTS In situ reconstruction over EAR seems to favor all events. For the 5 conduits used for ISR, according to operative mortality, age of the patients looks to have a positive correlation only for silver polyester and no conduit present any advantage in the presence of PDF. Reinfection seems to be not significantly different for the 5 conduits, and only autogenous veins appear to have a positive correlation with infecting organisms. CONCLUSION In situ reconstruction may be considered as first-line treatment. Our results suggest that silver polyesters appear to be most appropriate for older patients, and in order to limit reinfection, autogenous veins are probably the most suitable conduit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Batt
- 1 Department of Vascular Surgery, University Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.,2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France
| | - Patrick Feugier
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.,3 Department of Vascular Surgery, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Fabrice Camou
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.,4 Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Andre University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Amandine Coffy
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France
| | - Eric Senneville
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.,5 Infectious Diseases Department, Gustave Dron Hospital, Lille 2 University, Tourcoing, France
| | - Jocelyne Caillon
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.,6 Bactériology Department, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Brigitte Calvet
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.,7 Anesthesiology Département, Béziers Hospital, Béziers, France
| | - Christian Chidiac
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.,8 Infectious Diseases Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon and Center for Infectiology Research (CIRI), INSERM U1111, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Frederic Laurent
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.,9 Bacteriology Department, International Center for Infectiology Research (CIRI), INSERM U1111, Lyon I University, Lyon, France
| | - Matthieu Revest
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France.,10 Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou University Hospital, CIC-INSERM 1414, Rennes 1 University Rennes, France
| | - Jean Pierre Daures
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France
| | -
- 2 Laboratory of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University Institute for Clinical Research, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|