1
|
Oliny A, Vasseur MA, Frisch N, Alimi Y, Omnes V, Ducasse E, Albertini JN, Millon A. Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair of Complex Aneurysm Using the Anaconda Fenestrated Device: 1-Year Results From the French Multicenter Registry. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241284034. [PMID: 39323372 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241284034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the fenestrated Anaconda device for the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms over 1 year in daily clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who received the graft between October 2019 and October 2020 were prospectively enrolled in an observational, multicenter national registry. The primary endpoint was the aneurysm-related 1-year mortality rate. Secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, technical success, device-related adverse events (AEs) and major complications, secondary reinterventions, endoleaks, target vessel (TV) outcomes, and a center-volume analysis comparing mortality and secondary reintervention rate between expert centers (>15 F/BEVAR per year) and nonexpert centers (≤15 F/BEVAR per year). RESULTS Ninety-seven patients from 28 centers were treated. Aneurysms types included juxta-renal and short neck (84.6%), pararenal (5.2%), paravisceral (3.1%), and type IV thoracoabdominal (2.5%). Configurations with 1, 2, 3, and 4 fenestrations were used in 2, 12, 18, and 65 cases, respectively, totaling 350 TVs. Technical success was 98.0%, with 1 type Ic and 1 type IIIc endoleak. Mean follow-up was 468 days. Ten patients died, with 8 deaths (8.2%) due to non-aortic causes and 2 deaths (2.1%) from unknown causes. The estimated 1-year survival rate was 92.7% (95% CI: 87.8-98.1%). The reintervention rate at 30 days was 11.3% and the estimated reintervention rate at 1 year was 21.6% (95% CI: 12.7-29.6%). No type Ia endoleak occurred during follow-up. Three type III endoleaks occurred and required reintervention. Three TV occlusion occurred, yielding a 1-year TVI-free rate of 92.4% (95% CI: 89.4-99.3). No device-related major complication was recorded, and 3 device-related AEs occurred: 1 limb migration, 1 limb kinking and 1 limb thrombosis. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality and survival without reintervention between expert and nonexpert centers (Log rank p=0.52 and p=0.16, respectively). CONCLUSION The fenestrated Anaconda device demonstrated acceptable early and at 1-year safety and efficacy for treating primarily juxta-renal and short-neck aortic aneurysms, in centers with varying levels of experience. CLINICAL IMPACT The Anaconda Fenestrated, as the second commercially available custom-made device for complex endovascular aortic surgery, might adress some anatomical challenges. Following market authorization, this registry presents the 1-year outcomes of real-world device usage in a large number of centers, including small clinics. The results indicate that the device provided adequate efficacy and safety for treating mostly juxta-renal and short neck aneurysms, with notable improvement in technical success rate compared to older reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Oliny
- Vascular Surgery Department, Hopital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| | | | | | - Yves Alimi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Virgile Omnes
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Eric Ducasse
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jean-Noël Albertini
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | - Antoine Millon
- Vascular Surgery Department, Hopital Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jubouri M, Surkhi AO, Tan SZCP, Bailey DM, Williams IM. Patient longevity and survival with custom-made endovascular solutions: The Fenestrated Anaconda TM approach. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2023; 31:615-623. [PMID: 36803010 DOI: 10.1177/02184923231158579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the mainstay treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms and is associated with excellent clinical outcomes. However, there remains a risk of complications requiring reintervention. Several EVAR devices exist commercially, yet, the Terumo Aortic Fenestrated Anaconda™ has demonstrated outstanding results. The main scope of this study is to evaluate survival/longevity, target vessel patency (TVP), endograft migration and reintervention following Fenestrated Anaconda™ implantation and discuss relevant literature. METHODS The current study represents a 9-year cross-sectional international analysis of custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda™ device. For the statistical analysis, SPSS 28 for Windows and R was utilised. Pearson Chi-Square analysis was used to assess differences in cumulative distribution frequencies between variables. Statistical significance for all two-tailed tests was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 5058 patients received the Fenestrated Anaconda™ endograft. The Fenestrated Anaconda™ was indicated either due to complex anatomy for competitor devices (n = 3891, 76.9%) or based on surgeon preference (n = 1167, 23.1%). Both survival and TVP were 100% during the first 6 postoperative years but dropped to 77.1% and 81% thereafter. In the complex anatomy indication group, cumulative survival and TVP were both 100% until year 7 post-EVAR when they decreased to 82.8% and 75.7%. In the other indication group, survival and TVP were also 100% during the first 6 years but plateaued at 58.1% and 98.8% in years 7-9 of follow-up. No cases of endograft migration and reintervention were recorded. CONCLUSION The Fenestrated Anaconda™ has been proven across the literature to be a highly effective EVAR endograft, as it has demonstrated excellent survival/longevity and TVP as well as minimal endograft migration and reintervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Jubouri
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Sven Z C P Tan
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Damian M Bailey
- Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ian M Williams
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jubouri M, Surkhi AO, Tan SZ, Bailey DM, Williams IM, Bashir M. Correlative effect between sac regression and patient longevity following endovascular solution for abdominal aortic aneurysms: an international analysis. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2023; 31:557-564. [PMID: 36168205 DOI: 10.1177/02184923221129983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since the introduction of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) it has become the mainstay treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Several EVAR devices exist commercially, yet, the Terumo Aortic Fenestrated Anaconda™ endograft has demonstrated outstanding results. Evidence in the literature suggests that sac regression could be linked to patient survival and longevity. The main scope of this study is to evaluate sac regression and survival achieved using the Fenestrated Anaconda™ endograft and to discuss relevant literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS The current study represents a nine-year cross-sectional international analysis of custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda™ device. For the statistical analysis, SPSS 28 for Windows and R were utilised. Pearson chi-square analysis was used to assess differences in cumulative distribution frequencies between select variables. Statistical significance for all two-tailed tests was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 5,058 patients received the Fenestrated Anaconda™ in this study, either due to unsuitable/complex anatomy for competitor devices (n = 3,891) or based on surgeon preference (n = 1,167). A sac regression of 0-30% was observed in 4,772 (94.3%) over the first four years post-EVAR. Here, 99.6% of patients receiving the Fenestrated Anaconda™ due to unsuitable/complex anatomy for competitor devices and 76.8% based on surgeon preference had 0-30% sac regression. During years 5-9 of follow-up, all patients had 20-45% sac regression. Patient survival during the first six years post-EVAR was 100% but dropped to 77.1% in years 7-9. Survival differed between categorical patient subsets based on the indication. DISCUSSION The Fenestrated Anaconda™ has been proven to be a highly effective EVAR endograft. Evidence in the literature clearly demonstrates that sac regression is an accurate prognostic factor for patient survival and longevity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Jubouri
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Sven Zcp Tan
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Damian M Bailey
- Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Wales, UK
| | - Ian M Williams
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mohamad Bashir
- Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Wales, UK
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Velindre University NHS Trust, Health Education and Improvement Wales (HEIW), Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jubouri M, Hussain K, Saha P, Alkhadire ZM, Tan SZ, Bailey DM, Williams IM, Bashir M. Endovascular solutions for abdominal aortic aneurysms: A comparative review of clinical outcomes with custom-made endografts. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2023; 31:565-576. [PMID: 36299237 DOI: 10.1177/02184923221133956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of endovascular aortic repair has revolutionised the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms, replacing open surgical repair for the majority of elective cases due to its optimal morbidity and mortality. Several endovascular aortic repair stent grafts exist commercially, one of which is the Fenestrated Anaconda™ by Terumo Aortic which benefits from a very innovative design, unique custom-made approach and highly favourable results. AIMS The main scope of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive overview of endovascular aortic repair clinical outcomes using the Fenestrated Anaconda™ stent-graft and comparing these with its market competitor, Zenith. This review will also examine the evidence in the literature on the Anaconda™'s custom-made approach. METHODS A comprehensive literature was conducted on several search engines including PubMed, Google Scholar, Ovid, Scopus and Embase to collate the evidence in the literature on clinical outcomes achieved with the Fenestrated Anaconda™ and Zenith including, but not limited to, survival, technical success, target vessel patency, endoleak, reintervention and aneurysm sac regression. RESULTS The Fenestrated Anaconda™ is associated with excellent results, including highly favourable survival, technical and clinical success and target vessel patency rates, very low need for reintervention or conversion, and minimal incidence of complications such as endoleak and endograft migration. The Fenestrated Anaconda™ also drives significant sac regression and aortic remodelling. In addition, its unique custom-made approach enables it to treat highly complex aortic anatomy as well as to 'rescue' failed competitor grafts. CONCLUSION The Fenestrated Anaconda™ has proven that it is a very safe, highly applicable and extremely effective device used for complex aortic and/or iliac pathology based on its novel design and outstanding track record of clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Jubouri
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Kamran Hussain
- East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackburn, UK
| | - Priyanshu Saha
- School of Medicine, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Sven Zcp Tan
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Damian M Bailey
- Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
| | - Ian M Williams
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mohamad Bashir
- Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Velindre University NHS Trust, Health Education & Improvement Wales (HEIW), Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rehman ZU. Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Narrative Review. THE ARAB JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractEndovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has evolved as minimally invasive method of treating infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with perioperatively mortality of less than 1% compared with 5% with open AAA repair as suggested by many randomized control trials. Computed tomography angiography is the imaging of choice for appropriate selection of a patient with EVAR. For patients with unsuitable anatomy, advanced EVARs techniques, such as fenestrated, branch, and chimney EVARs, are also increasingly being offered to patients with equal success. Patients with ruptured AAA are treated with this minimally invasive procedure. Percutaneous EVAR emerged with less of wound-related complications. Endoleaks are the most common complications peculiar to this procedure, and most are preventable by preoperative planning. They are detected on completion angiogram or on the surveillance imaging. This review discusses indications of EVAR, its selection criteria, procedural steps, and common complications associated with this procedure and advanced EVARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zia Ur Rehman
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Leeuwerke SJG, de Niet A, Geelkerken RH, Reijnen MMPJ, Zeebregts CJ. Incidence and predictive factors for endograft limb patency of the Fenestrated Anaconda™ endograft used for complex endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2021; 75:1512-1520.e1. [PMID: 34921964 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of treatment for limb occlusion in patients treated for complex (thoraco-)abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) with the Fenestrated Anaconda™. METHODS Between June 2010 and May 2018, 335 patients underwent elective fenestrated aortic aneurysm repair in 11 participating centers using the Fenestrated Anaconda™ with a median follow-up of 14.3 months (IQR 27.4). The primary outcome measure was freedom-from-limb-occlusion. Secondary outcome measures were freedom-from-limb-related-reintervention, secondary patency, and risk factors associated with limb occlusion. RESULTS Thirty (9.0%) patients presented with limb occlusion during follow-up with freedom-from-limb-occlusion of 98.5%, 91.2%, and 81.7% at 30-days, 1 and 5 years, respectively. In 87% of cases, no obvious cause for limb occlusion was documented. Primary occlusion occurred within 30-days in 36.7% and within 1 year in 80.0%. Twenty-three (6.9%) patients underwent an occlusion-related reintervention; seven (23.3%) patients were treated conservatively. Freedom-from-limb-occlusion-related-reintervention at 30-days, one and five years was 97.8%, 93.2% and 88.6%, respectively. Secondary patency was 91.3% after 1-month and 86.2% after 1 and 5 years, respectively. Female sex (OR 3.27 - 95% CI 1.28 to 8.34, P = .01) was a statistically significant predictor for limb occlusion. A higher percentage of thrombus in the aneurysm sac appeared to be protective for limb occlusion (0% compared to <25%: OR 0.22 - 95% CI 0.07 to 0.63, P = .01; 0% compared to 25-50%: OR 0.20 - 95% CI 0.07 to 0.57, P = .00 and 0% compared to >50%: OR 0.08 - 95% CI 0.02 to 0.38, P = .00), as did iliac angulation (OR 0.99 - 95% CI 0.98 to 1.00, P = .04). CONCLUSION Limb occlusion remains a significant impediment of endograft durability in patients treated with the Fenestrated Anaconda™, especially in female patients. Controversially, a high aneurysmal thrombus load and a high degree of iliac angulation appeared to be protective for limb occlusion, for which no obvious cause could be identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J G Leeuwerke
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - A de Niet
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R H Geelkerken
- Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - M M P J Reijnen
- Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Rijnstate, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - C J Zeebregts
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Karaolanis GI, Antonopoulos CN, Scali S, Koutsias SG, Kotelis D, Donas KP. Systematic review with pooled data analysis reveals the need for a standardized reporting protocol including the visceral vessels during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). Vascular 2021; 30:405-417. [PMID: 34074168 DOI: 10.1177/17085381211019148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To collect and analyse the available evidence in the outcomes of patients treated with fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR) technique focusing specifically on visceral vessel outcomes. METHODS The current meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All the studies reporting the f-EVAR technique for the management of degenerative pararenal and/or type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) were considered eligible for inclusion in the study. The main study outcomes (technical success, type I endoleaks, fracture or occlusion of the bridging stents, overall aneurysm-related mortality, and the reintervention rate) were subsequently expressed as proportions and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Fourteen studies with a total of 1804 patients were included in a pooled analysis. The technical success of the procedure was 95.97% (95%CI = 92.35-98.60). Intraoperatively, the pooled proportion of reported type I endoleak was 7.6% (95%CI = 2.52-14.60) while during a median follow-up of 41 months (range 11-96) follow-up period the pooled rate of fracture and occlusion of the bridging stents was 2.79% (95%CI = 0.00-8.52) and 4.46% (95%CI = 1.93-7.77), respectively. The overall aneurysm-related mortality was detected to be 0.63% (95%CI = 0.04-1.63), and the pooled estimate for re-intervention rate was 15.69%. CONCLUSIONS Fenestrated endovascular repair for p-AAA is an effective and safe treatment. Target vessel complications and endoleaks remain the two most important concerns for fenestrated endovascular procedures, contributing to most of the secondary interventions. The lack of computed tomography angiography follow-up evaluation does not allow us to draw robust conclusions about the complication rates for the superior mesenteric artery during f-EVAR. Due to the potential implications of SMA complications on aneurysm-related mortality, standardized reporting of short- and long-term target visceral vessel outcomes is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios I Karaolanis
- Vascular Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Ioannina, and of School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Constantine N Antonopoulos
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery Department, General Hospital of Athens "Evangelismos", Athens, Greece
| | - Salvatore Scali
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Stylianos G Koutsias
- Vascular Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Ioannina, and of School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Drosos Kotelis
- European Vascular Center Aachen-Maastricht, Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Konstantinos P Donas
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Research Vascular Centre, Asclepios Clinic Langen, University of Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kyriakou F, Maclean C, Dempster W, Nash D. Efficiently Simulating an Endograft Deployment: A Methodology for Detailed CFD Analyses. Ann Biomed Eng 2020; 48:2449-2465. [PMID: 32394221 PMCID: PMC7505889 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-020-02519-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Numerical models of endografts for the simulation of endovascular aneurysm repair are increasingly important in the improvement of device designs and patient outcomes. Nevertheless, current finite element analysis (FEA) models of complete endograft devices come at a high computational cost, requiring days of runtime, therefore restricting their applicability. In the current study, an efficient FEA model of the Anaconda™ endograft (Terumo Aortic, UK) was developed, able to yield results in just over 4 h, an order of magnitude less than similar models found in the literature. The model was used to replicate a physical device that was deployed in a 3D printed aorta and comparison of the two shapes illustrated a less than 5 mm placement error of the model in the regions of interest, consistent with other more computationally intensive models in the literature. Furthermore, the final goal of the study was to utilize the deployed fabric model in a hemodynamic analysis that would incorporate realistic fabric folds, a feature that is almost always omitted in similar simulations. By successfully exporting the deployed graft geometry into a flow analysis, it was illustrated that the inclusion of fabric wrinkles enabled clinically significant flow patterns such as flow stagnation and recirculation to be detected, paving the way for this modelling methodology to be used in future for stent design optimisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faidon Kyriakou
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow, G1 1XJ, UK.
| | | | - William Dempster
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow, G1 1XJ, UK
| | - David Nash
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Strathclyde, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow, G1 1XJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pini R, Giordano J, Ferri M, Palmieri B, Solcia M, Michelagnoli S, Chisci E, Fadda Gian F, Cappiello P, Talarico F, Licata S, Frigatti P, Ronchey S, Mangialardi N, Pratesi C, Salvini M, Milite D, Pilon F, Perkmann R, Stringari C, Pulli R, Faggioli G, Gargiulo M. The Italian Multicentre Registry of Fenestrated Anaconda™ Endografts for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 60:181-191. [PMID: 32709467 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim was to describe the outcomes of the Anaconda™ Fenestrated endograft Italian Registry for complex aortic aneurysms (AAAs), unsuitable for standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS Between 2012 and 2018 patients with a proximal neck unsuitable for standard EVAR, treated with the fenestrated Anaconda™ endograft, were prospectively enrolled in a dedicated database. Endpoints were peri-operative technical success (TS) and evaluation of type Ia/b or 3 endoleaks (T1/3 EL), target visceral vessel (TVV) occlusion, re-interventions, and AAA related mortality at 30 days, six months, and later follow up. RESULTS One hundred twenty seven patients (74 ± 7 years, American Society Anesthesiology (ASA) II/III/IV: 12/85/30) were included in the study in 49 Italian Vascular Surgery Units (83 juxta/para-renal AAA, 13 type IV thoraco-abdominal AAA, 16 T1aEL post EVAR, and 15 short neck AAA). Configurations with one, two, three, and four fenestrations were used in 5, 56, 39, and 27 cases, respectively, for a total of 342 visceral vessels. One hundred and eight (85%) bifurcated and 19 (15%) tube endografts were implanted. In 35% (44/127) of cases the endograft was repositioned during the procedure, and 37% (128/342) of TVV were cannulated from brachial access. TS was 87% (111/127): five T1EL, six T3EL (between fenestration and vessel stent), and six loss of visceral vessels (one patient with a Type Ia EL had also a TVV loss) occurred. Thirty day mortality was 4% (5/127). Two of the five T1EL resolved spontaneously at 30 days. The overall median follow up was 21 ± 16 months; one T1EL (5%) occurred at six months and one T3EL (4%) at the three year follow up. Another two (3%) TVV occlusions occurred at six months and five (3%) at three years. The re-intervention rate at the 30 days, six months, and three year follow up was 5%, 7%, and 18 ± 5%, respectively. CONCLUSION The fenestrated Anaconda™ endograft is effective in the treatment of complex AAA. Some structure properties, such as the re-positionability and the possibility of cannulation from above, are specific characteristics helpful for the treatment of some complex anatomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodolfo Pini
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Jacopo Giordano
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Palmieri
- Dipartimento Cardiotoracovascolare, Ospedale Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Solcia
- Dipartimento Cardiotoracovascolare, Ospedale Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Emiliano Chisci
- Dipartimento Chirurgico, Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Silvio Licata
- Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
| | - Paolo Frigatti
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | - Sonia Ronchey
- Dipartimento delle Specialità Chirurgiche, Azienda Ospedaliera San Filippo Neri, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Mangialardi
- Dipartimento delle Specialità Chirurgiche, Azienda Ospedaliera San Filippo Neri, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Pratesi
- Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Ospedale Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Salvini
- Dipartimento Chirurgico, Ospedale Civile, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Domenico Milite
- Dipartimento Strutturale Area Chirurgia Maggiore, Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Fabio Pilon
- Dipartimento Strutturale Area Chirurgia Maggiore, Ospedale San Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
| | | | | | - Raffaele Pulli
- Dipartimento dell'Emergenza e dei Trapianti di Organi, Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Gianluca Faggioli
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Končar IB, Jovanović AL, Dučič SM. The role of fEVAR, chEVAR and open repair in treatment of juxtarenal aneurysms: a systematic review. THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY 2020; 61:24-36. [PMID: 32079378 DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.19.11187-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Open repair (OR), fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (fEVAR) and endovascular exclusion using parallel graft (chEVAR) are complementary procedures used for treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (jrAAA). The aim of our study was to assess available literature and analyze dispersion of OR, fEVAR and chEVAR procedures among reported papers related to treatment of jrAAA. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The PubMed database was systematically searched using predefined strategy and key words related to treatment of jrAAA on September 28th, 2019. Studies were assessed for eligibility using the inclusion and exclusion criteria with at least five patients treated with at least one of the procedures while systematic reviews, meta-analysis, reviews, comments, editorials and letters were excluded as well as studies without clear classification of the location of the aneurysm, studies not specifying the number of patients treated with each of the techniques or not discriminated between aortic pathologies (juxtarenal, paravisceral and thoracoabdominal), hybrid procedures, endoanchors or with branched stent-graft. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 1533 papers were identified while papers that met inclusion criteria were either representing experience of single institution (87 papers) or from multicenter studies (6 papers), national or international registries (18 papers). In the period between January 1977 and December 2017, treatment of 5664 patients with jrAAA was reported in 87 papers as a single institution report. Out of them 2531 (45%) were treated with OR, 2592 (46%) with fEVAR and 541 (9%) with chEVAR. Out of 29 institutions reporting OR, there were 11 (37.9%) with more than 100 treated patients while 21 (41.1%) out of 51 institutions that reported more than 50 jrAAA treated with fEVAR. Only four institutions reported results of all three treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results reported in the literature, regardless of its complexity and costs, fEVAR for jrAAA has been accepted in substantial number of hospitals worldwide, while number of reported procedures is reaching OR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor B Končar
- Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Serbian Clinical Center, Belgrade, Serbia - .,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia -
| | - Aleksa L Jovanović
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.,Institute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Stefan M Dučič
- Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Serbian Clinical Center, Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Falkensammer J, Taher F, Plimon M, Kliewer M, Walter C, Pelanek E, Assadian A. Assessment of Pull-out Forces in TEVAR and ANACONDA FEVAR Combination and Early Clinical Results: Creation of a Proximal Landing Zone for FEVAR in Patients with Extent I and Extent IV TAAAs. Ann Vasc Surg 2020; 66:160-170. [PMID: 31978487 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although recent data on the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are promising, in some cases, the paravisceral segment of the aorta may not be suitable for a branched endograft due to space restrictions. A combination of a fenestrated aneurysm repair (FEVAR) with a thoracic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) may represent a feasible treatment option. The current investigation was performed to assess the stability of a fenestrated Anaconda device implanted into a set of thoracic endografts from different manufacturers. We then assessed our clinical results with the FEVAR/TEVAR combination. METHODS Pull-out forces were measured in vitro after docking a fenestrated Anaconda graft within the distal end of different TEVAR devices. Anaconda devices were implanted in 28- or 30-mm thoracic tube grafts (oversizing of at least 2 mm: 13.3-21.4; minimum overlap of 15 mm). Continuously increasing longitudinal pull forces of up to 100 N were applied on an Instron Tensile Tester. Initial break point and damage to the endografts were documented. Clinical results of patients treated with such an FEVAR/TEVAR combination at our institution are presented as a second part of this study. RESULTS Median pull-out forces ranged from 2.38 N to 55.0 N. The highest stability was achieved with 34-mm Anaconda devices in 28-mm thoracic tube grafts. Grafts with either thinner Dacron material or those featuring a polytetrafluorethylene membrane seemed especially vulnerable to punctures and tears caused by the downward-looking hooks of the Anaconda device. Between April 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018, in 28 of 172 patients treated with a fenestrated Anaconda device, prior implantation of a thoracic tube graft was necessary to create a sufficient proximal landing zone. In 25 cases (89.3%), the aneurysm was successfully treated. Although the 30-day reintervention rate in this subgroup was relatively high at 28.6%, none of these was due to a failure of the FEVAR/TEVAR combination. Upon an average follow-up of 15 months, no failure of the graft connection and no type III endoleak due to membrane damage were observed. CONCLUSIONS The combination of a thoracic tube graft and a fenestrated Anaconda device is a viable option for the treatment of patients with Extent I or IV TAAAs with no adequate landing zone above the celiac trunk. Although pull-out testing has shown good stability with most assessed grafts, the thoracic devices with thicker Dacron membranes seemed to be especially suitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Falkensammer
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria; Sigmund Freud Private University, Medical School, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Fadi Taher
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Plimon
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Miriam Kliewer
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Corinna Walter
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Pelanek
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Afshin Assadian
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Wilhelminenhospital, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liang NL, Mohapatra A, Avgerinos ED, Katsargyris A. Acute Kidney Injury after Complex Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Curr Pharm Des 2020; 25:4686-4694. [DOI: 10.2174/1381612825666191129095829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background:
Complex endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm carries higher perioperative
morbidity than standard infrarenal endovascular repair.
Objective:
This study reviews the incidence and associated factors of acute kidney injury in complex aortic endovascular
repair of juxtarenal, pararenal, and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.
Methods:
A literature review was performed for all studies on the endovascular repair of juxtarenal, pararenal,
and thoracoabdominal aneurysms that evaluated rates of acute kidney injury as an outcome. Outcomes were further
analyzed by the level of anatomic complexity and method of repair.
Results:
52 studies met inclusion criteria, with a total of 5454 individuals undergoing repair from 2004 to 2017.
The overall rate of acute kidney injury ranged widely from 0 to 41%, with a rate of hemodialysis from 0 to 19%
(temporary) and 0 to 14% (permanent). Increasing anatomic complexity was associated with higher rates of acute
kidney injury. Mode of endovascular repair, learning curve effect, and preoperative chronic renal insufficiency
did not demonstrate any associations with the outcome.
Conclusion:
Published rates of acute kidney injury in complex aortic aneurysm repair vary widely with few definitively
associated factors other than increasing anatomic complexity and operative time. Further study is
needed for the identification of predictors related to postoperative acute kidney injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan L. Liang
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA, Penn, United States
| | - Abhisekh Mohapatra
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA, Penn, United States
| | - Efthymios D. Avgerinos
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA, Penn, United States
| | - Athanasios Katsargyris
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Current status of endovascular treatment for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Surg Today 2019; 50:1343-1352. [PMID: 31776776 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01917-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Open surgical repair (OSR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) is maximally invasive and associated with high rates of operative mortality and perioperative complications including spinal cord ischemia (SCI), despite improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Elderly patients, patients with a history of aortic surgery, and patients with severe comorbidities are often considered ineligible for this surgery and endovascular treatment may be their only treatment option. Total endovascular aneurysm repair (t-EVAR) without debranching surgery does not require thoracotomy and laparotomy and could improve the outcomes of these patients. t-EVAR includes fenestrated EVAR (f-EVAR), multi-branched EVAR (b-EVAR), and physician-modified fenestration endograft (PMFG). Although these techniques have achieved lower mortality rates than OSR, there are concerns about perioperative complications including limb ischemia, SCI, and long-term outcomes such as endograft migration and endoleaks (ELs). This article provides an overview of available endovascular devices for TAAAs and reviews the short and mid-term results of t-EVAR, as well as alternative options.
Collapse
|
14
|
de Niet A, Reijnen MMPJ, Zeebregts CJ. Early results with the custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda aortic cuff in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2018; 69:348-356. [PMID: 30104097 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a specific custom-made fenestrated aortic cuff in the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS Between 2013 and 2016, a total of 57 custom-made Fenestrated Anaconda (Vascutek, Inchinnan, Scotland, UK) aortic cuffs were placed in 38 centers worldwide. All centers were invited to participate in this retrospective analysis. Postoperative and follow-up data included the presence of adverse events, necessity for reintervention, and renal function. RESULTS Fifteen clinics participated, leading to 29 cases. Median age at operation was 74 years (interquartile range [IQR], 71-78 years); five patients were female. Two patients were treated for a para-anastomotic AAA after open AAA repair, 19 patients were treated because of a complicated course after primary endovascular AAA repair, and 8 cases were primary procedures for AAA. A total of 76 fenestrations (mean, 2.6 per case) were used. Four patients needed seven adjunctive procedures. Two patients underwent conversion, one because of a dissection of the superior mesenteric artery and one because of perforation of a renal artery. Median operation time was 225 minutes (IQR, 150-260 minutes); median blood loss, 200 mL (IQR, 100-500 mL); and median contrast volume, 150 mL (IQR, 92-260 mL). Primary technical success was achieved in 86% and secondary technical success in 93%. The 30-day morbidity was 7 of 29 with a mortality rate of 4 of 29. Estimated glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged before and after surgery (76 to 77 mL/min/m2). Between preoperative and median follow-up of 11 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate was reduced statistically significantly (76 to 63 mL/min/m2). During follow-up, 9 cases had an increase in aneurysm sac diameter (5 cases >5 mm); 14 cases had a stable or decreased aneurysm sac diameter; and in 2 cases, no aneurysm size was reported. No type I endoleak was reported, and two cases with a type III endoleak were treated by endovascular means during follow-up. Survival, reintervention-free survival, and target vessel patency at 1 year were 81% ± 8%, 75% ± 9%, and 99% ± 1%, respectively. After 2 years, these numbers were 81% ± 8%, 67% ± 11%, and 88% ± 6%, respectively. During follow-up, the two patients with a type III endoleak needed endograft-related reinterventions. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with this specific custom-made fenestrated aortic cuff is feasible after complicated previous (endovascular) aortic repair or in complex AAAs. The complexity of certain AAA cases is underlined in this study, and the Fenestrated Anaconda aortic cuff is a valid option in selected cases in which few treatment options are left.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne de Niet
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Clark J Zeebregts
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lucatelli P, Cini M, Benvenuti A, Saba L, Tommasino G, Guaccio G, Munneke G, Neri E, Ricci C. Custom-Made Endograft for Endovascular Repair of Thoraco-Abdominal Aneurysm and Type B Dissection: Single-Centre Experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41:1174-1183. [PMID: 29725810 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-018-1975-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To report a series of patients treated with the Jotec custom-made endograft for thoraco-abdominal aneurysms and dissections and identify predictive factors for re-intervention. METHODS We retrospectively analysed 49 patients unsuitable for surgery, treated between 2011 and 2017 (71.3 ± 9.5 years; 15 females). Indications included Crawford type 4 aneurysm in 25 patients, type 3 in 13, type 2 in 4, type 1 in 2 and chronic aneurysmal dilatation of the false lumen following dissection in 5 cases. Mean aneurysm diameter was 58.7 ± 8.4 mm. The study aims were to assess procedural success, complications rate, mortality and long-term follow-up. We also analysed factors that predicted the need for re-intervention. RESULTS The endograft was successfully deployed in all patients, catheterization of the fenestration and/or branches was achieved in 152/156 (97.4%) vessels. Early complications occurred in 10 patients (3 paraplegia, 3 haemorrhages, pancreatitis, aortic rupture, iliac artery rupture, 2 strokes). Thirty-day mortality was 10.2% and 180-day mortality 14.3%; two non procedure related deaths occurred. Mean follow-up was 23.6 ± 29.9 months [range 1-80]. No patients needed surgical explantation or developed significant renal impairment. Endoleak rate was 34.6% and re-intervention rate 9.7%. The aneurysm sac reduced or was stable in 36/49, and enlarged in 9/49 patients prompting re-intervention. Primary, primary-assisted and secondary patency of fenestrations/branches at 80 months was 90, 96 and 100%. Re-intervention was required more frequently in braches than in fenestrations, most commonly the external type branches. CONCLUSIONS The results of the Jotec endograft are comparable to other devices, with acceptable complication and re-intervention rates. Fenestration and inner-branch should be preferred due to lower re-intervention rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierleone Lucatelli
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Viale Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena, Italy. .,Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
| | - Marco Cini
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Viale Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena, Italy
| | - Antonio Benvenuti
- Cardiac and Great Vessels Surgery Unit, University of "Siena", Viale Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena, Italy
| | - Luca Saba
- Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU), di Cagliari - Polo di Monserrato s.s. 554, 09045, Monserrato (Cagliari), Italy
| | - Giulio Tommasino
- Cardiac and Great Vessels Surgery Unit, University of "Siena", Viale Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena, Italy
| | - Giulia Guaccio
- Cardiac and Great Vessels Surgery Unit, University of "Siena", Viale Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena, Italy
| | | | - Eugenio Neri
- Cardiac and Great Vessels Surgery Unit, University of "Siena", Viale Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena, Italy
| | - Carmelo Ricci
- Vascular and Interventional Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Viale Mario Bracci, 16, 53100, Siena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Colgan FE, Bungay PM, Burfitt N, Hatrick A, Clarke MJ, Davies AH, Jenkins M, Gerrard D, Quarmby JW, Williams R. Operative and 1-Year Outcomes of the Custom-Made Fenestrated Anaconda Aortic Stent Graft—A UK Multicenter Study. Ann Vasc Surg 2018; 46:257-264. [DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2017] [Revised: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
17
|
Ragusi MAAD, van der Meer RW, Joemai RMS, van Schaik J, van Rijswijk CSP. Evaluation of CT Angiography Image Quality Acquired with Single-Energy Metal Artifact Reduction (SEMAR) Algorithm in Patients After Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 41:323-329. [PMID: 29086057 PMCID: PMC5758681 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1812-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the value of single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm on image quality in patients after complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with fenestrated and branched devices. Methods Routine follow-up computed tomography angiography (CTA) examinations were performed between February 2016 and May 2017 in 18 patients who underwent a complex EVAR procedure at our institution. Objective analysis was performed by measuring the standard deviation (SD) of attenuation (Hounsfield Units), and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in regions of interests in the stented visceral arteries. Subjective analysis of the degree of artifacts and stent visualization was performed independently by two interventional radiologists, blinded to the image reconstruction. Results The SD of attenuation was significantly lower in all target visceral arteries (p < .001), the celiac artery (p = .002), the superior mesenteric artery (SMA; p = .043), and renal arteries (p < .001) in the CT images with SEMAR reconstruction. The CNR significantly increased in all SEMAR-reconstructed target visceral arteries (overall: p < .001, celiac artery: p = .009; SMA: p = .003; renal arteries: p < .001). The reviewers rated a significantly lower artifact degree in all target vessels (overall: p < .001, celiac artery: p = .001; SMA: p = .008; renal arteries: p < .001) and a significantly improved visualization of the stent patency in all target vessels (overall: p < .001, celiac artery: p = .031; SMA: p = .047; renal arteries: p < .001) in the SEMAR images. Overall preference of both reviewers was in favor of the SEMAR reconstruction in 15/18 cases (83%). Conclusion Reconstruction with SEMAR algorithm significantly improves CTA image quality in patients after complex EVAR. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A A D Ragusi
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - R W van der Meer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - R M S Joemai
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J van Schaik
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C S P van Rijswijk
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gray D, Shahverdyan R, Reifferscheid V, Gawenda M, Brunkwall J. EVAR with Flared Iliac Limbs has a High Risk of Late Type 1b Endoleak. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 54:170-176. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
19
|
Results of the French Multicentric Study of ANACONDA™ Fenestrated Endografts in the Treatment of Complex Aortic Pathologies (EFEFA Registry). Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 43:151-165. [PMID: 28495540 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.03.171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2016] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most of the experience on fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair involves the custom-made Zenith® endograft (Cook). The fenestrated Anaconda® endograft (Vascutek) was introduced with the potential advantages of complete repositioning and lack of stent material on the main aortic body for more versatility. However, few data are available. Our objective was to assess its mid-term results in the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. METHODS Consecutive patients treated with the custom-made fenestrated Anaconda endograft in France and the Principality of Monaco, from December 2010 to October 2015, were included. RESULTS Eighty-six patients were included over 16 centers (82 men, mean age 73.4 ± 8.1 years, 16 (18.6%) symptomatic aneurysms). The repositioning system was used in 68 cases (79.1%). Two hundred ninety-two visceral/renal vessels were targeted, with a mean number of 3.4 ± 0.6 target vessels/patient and a successful reconstruction in 99.3% of the cases (290/292 vessels). Perioperative technical success was achieved in 86.0% (74/86 patients). In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 3.5% (3 patients) and 7.0% (6 patients), respectively. At 12 and 24 months, estimated overall survival rate was 88.3% and 85.2%, target vessel's patency rate was 97.2% and 96.3%, and freedom from aneurysm-related reintervention rate was 96.3% and 88.0%, respectively. At 24 months, there were 7 type II endoleaks (12.7%) and a significant reduction in aneurysm maximum transverse diameter in 70.4%. Five limb occlusions occurred at 1-year and 1 at 2-year follow-up (7.0%). CONCLUSIONS The fenestrated Anaconda stent-graft system offers acceptable technical success rates, mid-term efficacy, and durability with respect to aneurysm sac regression, target vessel patency, overall mortality, and reintervention rates. Long-term results are still awaited, until then, the rate of graft limb occlusion is of concern and should be further investigated, especially in case of particularly complex aortic anatomies.
Collapse
|