Regional Versus Local Anaesthesia for Haemodialysis Arteriovenous Fistula Formation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Association of anesthetic modality and other variables on 1-year functional patency of cephalic-based arteriovenous fistulae

OBJECTIVE

Some studies suggest that regional anesthesia provides better patency for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis access as compared to local and general anesthesia. This study evaluates the impact of anesthetic modality on long term fistula function at 12 months.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing cephalic vein-based hemodialysis access in consecutive cases between 2014 and 2019 was conducted from five safety net hospitals. The primary endpoint was functional patency at 12 months. Subset analysis individually evaluated cephalic-based lower forearm and wrist vs upper arm AVFs. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models evaluated the relationship between anesthetic modality and fistula function at 12 months.

RESULTS

There were 818 cephalic-based fistulas created during the study period. The overall 12-month functional patency rate was 78.7%, including an 81.3% patency for upper arm AVF and 73.3% for wrist AVF (P = .009). There was no statistically significant difference among patients with functional and nonfunctional AVFs at 12 months with respect to anesthetic modality when comparing regional, local, and general anesthesia (P = .343). Multivariate regression analysis identified that history of AVF/arteriovenous graft (odds ratio [OR], 0.24; P = .007), receiving intraoperative systemic anticoagulation (OR, 2.49; P < .001), and vein diameter (OR, 1.85; P = .039) as independently associated with AVF functional patency at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no association between anesthetic modality and functional patency of cephalic-based AVFs at 12 months. Further studies are needed to better define which patients may benefit from regional anesthesia.

Similar outcomes of arteriovenous fistulae created under general or regional anesthesia

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that type of anesthesia can significantly change vascular access surgery outcomes. Still, there is limited evidence on the impact of regional anesthesia (RA) on patency and failure rates compared to general anesthesia (GA). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RA and GA in patients who underwent vascular access creation at our center.

METHODS

Data collected in our prospectively maintained database of patients with chronic renal dysfunction requiring hemodialysis were analyzed, 464 patients were included. Outcome parameters such as maturation, primary failure, postoperative flow measurements, patency rates, and survival outcomes were compared between RA and GA groups.

RESULTS

In this study 489 vascular access procedures were performed in 464 patients, 318 included in the RA group and 171 in the GA group. Median follow-up time was 29.9 (IQR 37.3) months in the RA group versus 33.0 (IQR 40.7) in the GA group (p = 0.252). Anesthesia type did not significantly affect patient survival (HR, 1.01; CI, 0.70-1.45; p = 0.976). No significant differences were found in vascular access flow volume, primary failure, or time to cannulation between the RA and GA groups for both radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae and brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulae. Anesthesia type did not significantly change patency outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, both RA and GA demonstrate similar results regarding patient survival, maturation, failure, or patency after vascular access creation. Still, patient-specific factors for each type of anesthesia as well as patient preference should be considered.

Guidelines on vascular access for hemodialysis from the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery

Chronic kidney disease is a worldwide public health problem, and end-stage renal disease requires dialysis. Most patients requiring renal replacement therapy have to undergo hemodialysis. Therefore, vascular access is extremely important for the dialysis population, directly affecting the quality of life and the morbidity and mortality of this patient population. Since making, managing and salvaging of vascular accesses falls within the purview of the vascular surgeon, developing guideline to help specialists better manage vascular accesses for hemodialysis if of great importance. Thus, the objective of this guideline is to present a set of recommendations to guide decisions involved in the referral, evaluation, choice, surveillance and management of complications of vascular accesses for hemodialysis.

Small Caliber Distal Cephalic Veins Undergo Significant Dilation under Anesthesia and Can Successfully Be Used for Arteriovenous Fistula Creation

BACKGROUND

Successful arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation and use for dialysis is highly dependent on preoperative diameter. Small veins (<2 mm) exhibit high failure rates and are typically avoided. This study investigates the effects of anesthesia on the distal cephalic vein diameter as compared to preoperative outpatient vein mapping for the purpose of hemodialysis access creation.

METHODS

One hundred eight consecutive procedures for dialysis access placement met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. All patients received preoperative venous mapping and postanesthesia ultrasound mapping (PAUS). All patients received either regional and/or general anesthesia. A multiple regression was conducted to determine predictors of venous dilatation. The independent variables included both demographical and operative-specific variables such as the type of anesthesia. Outcomes of fistula maturation (successful cannulation and dialysis) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In this cohort, the mean preoperative vein diameter was 1.85 mm and the mean PAUS diameter was 3.45 mm, a 2.21× increase, with only 2 patient veins failing to increase in diameter. Smaller veins (<2 mm) exhibited significantly more dilation than larger veins after anesthesia (2.73 vs. 1.47×, P < 0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, smaller vein diameter was correlated with a significantly greater degree of dilation (P < 0.001). The degree of venous dilation was not affected by patient demographic-specific factors or by the type of anesthesia (regional block versus general) in the multiple regression analysis. 6 month follow-up data for fistula maturation was available for 75 of 108 patients. Small veins (<2 mm) on preoperative ultrasound matured at a similar rate as larger veins (90% vs. 91.4%, P = 0.833).

CONCLUSIONS

Small caliber distal cephalic veins experience a significant degree of dilation under regional and general anesthesia and can successfully be used for AVF creation. Consideration should be made to perform a postanesthesia vein mapping for all patients undergoing access placement despite preoperative venous mapping results.

Regional Anesthesia for Vascular Surgery and Pain Management

Patients undergoing vascular surgery tend to have significant systemic comorbidities. Vascular surgery itself is also associated with greater cardiac morbidity and overall mortality than other types of noncardiac surgery. Regional anesthesia is amenable as the primary anesthetic technique for vascular surgery or as an adjunct to general anesthesia. When used as the primary anesthetic, regional anesthesia techniques avoid complications associated with general anesthesia in this challenging patient population. In this article, the authors describe regional anesthetic techniques for carotid endarterectomy, arteriovenous fistula creation, lower extremity bypass surgery, and amputation.

The Effects of Vasodilation Induced by Brachial Plexus Block on the Development of Postoperative Thrombosis of the Arteriovenous Access in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Retrospective Study

Although brachial plexus block (BPB)-induced vasodilation reduces the incidence of arteriovenous access (AC) thrombosis, BPB cannot completely prevent its development. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the factors affecting BPB-induced vasodilation and their effects on AC thrombosis development. Ninety-five patients undergoing AC surgery under BPB were analyzed. Vessel diameters were measured before and 20 min after BPB. The surgery abandoned before the BPB placement was performed when the BPB-induced increases in vessel diameters met its indications. Complete occlusive access thrombosis (COAT) was defined as loss of pulse, thrill, or bruit. Fourteen patients (14.7%) developed COAT. The outflow vein was more dilated by BPB than the inflow artery (0.6 versus 0.1 mm in median, p < 0.001). The original surgery plan was changed for seven patients (7.4%). Diabetes mellitus (DM) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) decreased the extent of increases in the inflow artery by -0.183 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.301, -0.065], p = 0.003) and outflow vein diameters by -0.402 mm (95% CI [-0.781, -0.024], p = 0.038), respectively. However, DM, IHD, and changes in the vessel diameters had insignificant effects on the development of COAT. In conclusion, although DM and IHD attenuate the vasodilating effects of BPB, they do not contribute to the development of COAT.

Demography and Outcomes of Arteriovenous Fistula: Challenges and Future Directions

The incidence and prevalence rates of treated end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are on the rise worldwide. Hemodialysis remains the main modality of providing renal replacement therapy for the ESKD patients, and the preferred vascular access is an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The objective is to assess the patency rates and primary failures of the AVF. All patients who attended the Royal Hospital in Muscat, Oman, from January 2010 to December 2014 for AVF creation were included in this study. Data were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical record system where data are entered prospectively. During the period of study from 2010 to 2014, 465 primary fistulae were created in 427 patients. The mean age of the patient was 58 years. Only 6% needed general anesthesia, while the rest were done under regional or local anesthesia. Fifty-one percent of the patients were diabetic. Preemptive AVF was constructed in only 12% of patients. Most cases (47%) had left brachiocephalic (BC) fistulae. The left radiocephalic (RC) fistulae constituted 25.7% and the left brachiobasilic fistulae 9.9%. The remaining were constructed in the right upper limb. The total patency was achieved in 80% of fistulae and the failure rate was 20% at 6 months. Whereas, at 12 months, the total patency rate was 71% and the failure rate was 29%. Thus, we can conclude that more than 50% of patients, half of them being females, were diabetics. This resulted in more fistulae being constructed in the arm, namely left BC fistulae and left RC fistulae. Furthermore, it is important to note that only a very small percentage of patients had an established preemptive AVF. These factors may be responsible for a failure rate of 20% and 29% of the AVFs at 6 months and 12 months, respectively.

Anaesthesia Choice for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula (ACCess) study protocol : a randomised controlled trial comparing primary unassisted patency at 1 year of primary arteriovenous fistulae created under regional compared to local anaesthesia

INTRODUCTION

Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are the 'gold standard' vascular access for haemodialysis. Universal usage is limited, however, by a high early failure rate. Several small, single-centre studies have demonstrated better early patency rates for AVF created under regional anaesthesia (RA) compared with local anaesthesia (LA). The mechanistic hypothesis is that the sympathetic blockade associated with RA causes vasodilatation and increased blood flow through the new AVF. Despite this, considerable variation in practice exists in the UK. A high-quality, adequately powered, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is required to definitively inform practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Anaesthesia Choice for Creation of Arteriovenous Fistula (ACCess) study is a multicentre, observer-blinded RCT comparing primary radiocephalic/brachiocephalic AVF created under regional versus LA. The primary outcome is primary unassisted AVF patency at 1 year. Access-specific (eg, stenosis/thrombosis), patient-specific (including health-related quality of life) and safety secondary outcomes will be evaluated. Health economic analysis will also be undertaken.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ACCess study has been approved by the West of Scotland Research and ethics committee number 3 (20/WS/0178). Results will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journals within 12 months of completion of the trial. We will also present our findings at key national and international renal and anaesthetic meetings, and support dissemination of trial outcomes via renal patient groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN14153938.

SPONSOR

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde GN19RE456, Protocol V.1.3 (8 May 2021), REC/IRAS ID: 290482.

Expert consensus on the establishment and maintenance of native arteriovenous fistula

Vascular access is the lifeline of hemodialysis patients. There are great differences in the establishment and use of vascular access in different countries and regions around the world. We believe that on the basis of good evaluation and planning, it is recommended that hemodialysis patients choose native arteriovenous fistula first. In view of the new progress of vascular access views domestic and international at home and abroad in recent years, we organized experts to recommend the establishment and maintenance of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for the Chinese population, including preoperative evaluation and planning of the establishment of AVF, AVF surgery, perioperative drug intervention measures and postoperative maintenance, and put forward suggestions for future research directions. The recommendations in this consensus are general and clinicians need to make treatment decisions based on the actual situation.

Long-Term Functional Patency and Cost-Effectiveness of Arteriovenous Fistula Creation under Regional Anesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthesia improves short-term blood flow through arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). We previously demonstrated that, compared with local anesthesia, regional anesthesia improves primary AVF patency at 3 months.

METHODS

To study the effects of regional versus local anesthesia on longer-term AVF patency, we performed an observer-blinded randomized controlled trial at three university hospitals in Glasgow, United Kingdom. We randomly assigned 126 patients undergoing primary radiocephalic or brachiocephalic AVF creation to receive regional anesthesia (brachial plexus block; 0.5% L-bupivacaine and 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine) or local anesthesia (0.5% L-bupivacaine and 1% lidocaine). This report includes findings on primary, functional, and secondary patency at 12 months; reinterventions; and additional access procedures (primary outcome measures were previously reported). We analyzed data by intention to treat, and also performed cost-effectiveness analyses.

RESULTS

At 12 months, we found higher primary patency among patients receiving regional versus local anesthesia (50 of 63 [79%] versus 37 of 63 [59%] patients; odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.6 to 3.8; P=0.02) as well as higher functional patency (43 of 63 [68%] versus 31 of 63 [49%] patients; OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.5 to 2.7; P=0.008). In 12 months, 21 revisional procedures, 53 new AVFs, and 50 temporary dialysis catheters were required. Regional anesthesia resulted in net savings of £195.10 (US$237.36) per patient at 1 year, and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of approximately £12,900 (US$15,694.20) per quality-adjusted life years over a 5-year time horizon. Results were robust after extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with local anesthesia, regional anesthesia significantly improved both primary and functional AVF patency at 1 year and is cost-effective.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Local Anaesthesia versus Regional Block for Arteriovenous Fistulae, NCT01706354.

Regional anaesthesia practice for arteriovenous fistula formation surgery

We conducted a survey and semi‐structured qualitative interviews to investigate current anaesthetic practice for arteriovenous fistula formation surgery in the UK. Responses were received from 39 out of 59 vascular centres where arteriovenous access surgery is performed, a response rate of 66%. Thirty‐five centres reported routine use of brachial plexus blocks, but variation in anaesthetic skill‐mix and practice were observed. Interviews were conducted with 19 clinicians from 10 NHS Trusts including anaesthetists, vascular access and renal nurses, surgeons and nephrologists. Thematic analysis identified five key findings: (1) current anaesthetic practice showed that centres could be classified as ‘regional anaesthesia dominant’ or ‘local anaesthesia/mixed’; (2) decision making around mode of anaesthesia highlighted the key role of surgeons as frontline decision makers across both centre types; (3) perceived barriers and facilitators of regional block use included clinicians’ beliefs and preferences, resource considerations and patients’ treatment preferences; (4) anaesthetists’ preference for supraclavicular blocks emerged, alongside acknowledgement of varied practice; (5) there was widespread support for a future randomised controlled trial, although clinician equipoise issues and logistical/resource‐related concerns were viewed as potential challenges. The use of regional anaesthesia for arteriovenous fistula formation in the UK is varied and influenced by a multitude of factors. Despite the availability of anaesthetists capable of performing regional blocks, there are other limiting factors that influence the routine use of this technique. The study also highlighted the perceived need for a large multicentre, randomised controlled trial to provide an evidence base to inform current practice.

Regional anesthesia for vascular surgery: does the anesthetic choice influence outcome?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Outcomes following surgery are of major importance to clinicians, institutions and most importantly patients. This review examines whether regional anesthesia and analgesia influence outcome after vascular surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large database analyses of contemporary practice suggest that utilizing regional anesthesia for both open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, lower limb revascularization and carotid endarterectomy reduces morbidity, length of stay and possibly even mortality. Results from such analyses are limited by an inherent risk of bias but are nevertheless important given the number of patients required in randomized trials to detect differences in rare outcomes. There is minimal evidence that regional anesthesia influences longer term outcomes except for arteriovenous fistula surgery where brachial plexus blocks appear to improve 3-month fistula patency.

SUMMARY

Patients undergoing vascular surgery often have multiple comorbidities and it is important to be able to outline both benefits and risks of regional anesthesia techniques. Regional anesthesia in vascular surgery allows avoidance of general anesthesia and does provide short-term benefits beyond superior analgesia. Evidence of long-term benefits is lacking in most procedures. Further work is required on newer patient centered outcomes.

Unconsciousness After Regional Anesthesia for Arteriovenous Fistula Revision in a Patient with End-stage Renal Disease

Chronic kidney disease can lead to different chronic complications. We describe a case where a patient with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) became unresponsive during transportation to the recovery room, following finishing an arteriovenous fistula revision. The patient had received supraclavicular block ninety minutes prior to the incident and surgery was finished under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). After five minutes of chest compression and intubation, monitoring showed normal sinus rhythm and the return of spontaneous circulation. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit and extubated two days later while she was alert, oriented and hemodynamically stable. CT pulmonary angiogram showed no evidence of pulmonary emboli and echocardiogram did not show any further cardiac event comparing to preoperative status. Ruling out other differential diagnoses for patient's unconsciousness, we have discussed the possibility of neuraxial anesthesia after upper extremity block in this patient.

Use of a temporary shunt to preserve the patency of a hemodialysis graft while performing ipsilateral axillo-femoral bypass

Increased blood flow in the subclavian artery feeding a vascular access for hemodialysis can rarely induce steal phenomena in the vertebral and internal mammary artery leading to potentially life-threatening conditions. On the contrary, transient interruption of blood flow in the subclavian artery feeding a dialysis arteriovenous fistula can theoretically induce access thrombosis. Here, we describe a technical maneuver preserving continuous ipsilateral upper arm access flow when constructing a unilateral axillo-femoral polytetrafluoroethylene bypass operation for critical limb ischemia in a hemodialysis patient.

Adding a PECS II block for proximal arm arteriovenous access - a randomised study

BACKGROUND

Brachial plexus block is often utilised for proximal arm arteriovenous access creation. However, the medial upper arm and axilla are often inadequately anaesthetised, requiring repeated, intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation, or conversion into general anaesthesia. We hypothesised that the addition of a PECS II block would improve anaesthesia and analgesia for proximal arm arteriovenous access surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blinded, randomised proof-of-concept study, 36 consenting adults with end-stage renal disease aged between 21 and 90 years received either a combined supraclavicular and PECS II block (Group PECS, n = 18), or combined supraclavicular and sham block (Group SCB, n = 18) for proximal arm arteriovenous access surgery. Primary outcome was whether patients required intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation by the surgeon.

RESULTS

In Group PECS, 33.3% (6/18) needed local anaesthetic supplementation vs. 100% (18/18) in Group SCB. Group SCB had three times (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.6-5.8; P < 0.001) the risk of requiring intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation. Group PECS required lower volume of supplemental local anaesthetic compared to Group SCB (0.0 ml, IQR 0.0-6.3 ml vs. 15.0 ml, IQR 7.4-17.8 ml; P < 0.001). Group SCB had twice [RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.4; (P = 0.019)] the risk of needing additional sedation or analgesia. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to postoperative visual analogue scale pain scores, time to first rescue analgesia or patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that adding a PECS II block to a supraclavicular block improves regional anaesthesia for patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing proximal arm arteriovenous access surgery.