Editor's Choice – Endovascular Repair Versus Surgical Repair for Japanese Patients With Ruptured Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Nationwide Study

A protocol-based treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm contributed to improving aorta-related mortality: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines state that improving the survival rate of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) requires a protocol or algorithm for the emergency management of these patients. We aimed to investigate whether introducing a protocol treatment for rAAA improves clinical outcomes compared with the pre-protocol strategy.

METHODS

At our institution, 92 patients treated for rAAA between June 2008 and August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. In 2014, the protocol-based treatment was introduced comprising a transfer algorithm to shorten the time to proximal control, use of an endovascular occlusion balloon, strict indications for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) or open surgical repair, and perioperative care, including for abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Clinical outcomes were compared between the protocol and pre-protocol group, including operative status, all-cause mortality, and rAAA-related death at 30-day, in-hospital, and 1-year postoperative follow-ups.

RESULTS

Overall, 52 and 40 patients received the protocol-based and pre-protocol treatments, respectively. EVAR was more frequently performed in the protocol group. The rate of achieving time to proximal control was significantly faster, and the transfusion volume was lower in the protocol group. ACS occurred more frequently in the protocol group with a higher EVAR. No difference was found in all-cause mortality between the two groups. The protocol group exhibited fewer rAAA-related deaths than the pre-protocol group during the following time points: 30 days (9.6% vs. 22.5%), during the hospital stay (11.5% vs. 30.0%), and 1 year (14.5% vs. 31.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The protocol-based treatment improved the survival rate of patients with rAAA.

Endovascular versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: a claims-based data analysis in Japan

Objectives

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) evolved through competition with open aortic repair (OAR) as a safe and effective treatment option for appropriately selected patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Although endoleaks are the most common reason for post-EVAR reintervention, compliance with lifelong regular follow-up imaging remains a challenge.

Design

Retrospective data analysis.

Setting

The Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC), a claims database with anonymous data linkage across hospitals, consists of corporate employees and their families of ≤75 years of age.

Participants

The analysis included participants in the JMDC who underwent EVAR or OAR for intact (iAAA) or ruptured (rAAA) AAA. Patients with less than 6 months of records before the aortic repair were excluded.

Main outcome measures

Overall survival and reintervention rates.

Results

We identified 986 cases (837 iAAA and 149 rAAA) from JMDC with first aortic repairs between January 2015 and December 2020. The number of patients, median age (years (IQR)), follow-up (months) and post-procedure CT scan (times per year) were as follows: iAAA (OAR: n=593, 62.0 (57.0–67.0), 26.0, 1.6, EVAR: n=244, 65.0 (31.0–69.0), 17.0, 2.2), rAAA (OAR: n=110, 59.0 (53.0–59.0), 16.0, 2.1, EVAR: n=39, 62.0 (31.0–67.0), 18.0, 2.4). Reintervention rate was significantly higher among EVAR than OAR in rAAA (15.4% vs 8.2%, p=0.04). In iAAA, there were no group difference after 5 years (7.8% vs 11.0%, p=0.28), even though EVAR had initial advantage. There were no differences in mortality rate between EVAR and OAR for either rAAA or iAAA.

Conclusions

Claims-based analysis in Japan showed no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival rates of the OAR and EVAR groups. However, the reintervention rate of EVAR in rAAA was significantly higher, suggesting the need for regular post-EVAR follow-up with imaging. Therefore, international collaborations for long-term outcome studies with real-world data are warranted.

Epidemiology of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Brazil from 2008 to 2019 and Comprehensive Review of Nationwide Statistics Across the World

INTRODUCTION

Studying epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms repairs is essential to prevent related deaths. Although outcomes are influenced by socioeconomic factors, there are no nationwide studies on these statistics in low-and-middle income countries. Therefore, we designed this study to evaluate abdominal aortic aneurysms repair rates, trends, costs, and in-hospital mortality in the Brazilian Public Health System, which exclusively insures over 160 million Brazilians.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional population-based analysis of publicly available data referring to all abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs performed between 2008 and 2019 in Brazilian public hospitals.

RESULTS

We observed a total of 13,506 abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, of which 32% were emergency endovascular repairs, 20% emergency open repairs, 32% elective endovascular repairs and 16% elective open repairs. There has been a downward trend in total abdominal aortic aneurysms repairs and an increasing predominance of endovascular repair. Elective and endovascular repairs were significantly associated with lower in-hospital mortality. For ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, we observed mortality rates of 13.8% after endovascular repair and 52.1% after open repair. For intact abdominal aortic aneurysms, we observed mortalities of 3.8% after endovascular repair and 18.6% after open repair. Procedure and mortality rates varied significantly among the Brazilian regions.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a low and decreasing rate of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Most repairs were emergency and endovascular and there was an increasing predominance of endovascular repair. Endovascular and elective repairs were associated with lower mortality.

Extensive Organ Necrosis After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: A Report of the Usefulness of Laparoscopic Indocyanine Green Intraoperative Blood Flow Assessment

An 85-year-old man underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for a thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). The day after TEVAR, the patient complained of abdominal pain. Blood tests showed lactic acidosis. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen showed emphysema and poor contrast areas in the lower esophagus, total stomach, and duodenum. The left lobe of the liver also showed a poorly contrasted area. Indocyanine green (ICG) intraoperative blood flow evaluation was performed by laparoscopy to evaluate how organ ischemia is and whether resection of necrotic organs is possible. It was judged that resection of the poor perfusion area would not improve prognosis because of the extensive area of poor perfusion in the ICG intraoperative perfusion evaluation. In TEVAR for TAA, embolization of the celiac artery (CA) can be performed if collateral blood flow is demonstrated. However, in this case, extensive organ necrosis happened. We discuss the cause of this case and the usefulness of ICG intraoperative blood flow assessment when ischemia is suspected.

Effectiveness of endovascular versus open surgical repair for thoracic aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Since the approval, the TEVAR is widely used for the repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm. However, the long-term mortality and re-intervention rates compared to OSR are unclear. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of the thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with open surgical repair (OSR) specifically for thoracic aortic aneurysms.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a comprehensive search in MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PROSPERO, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, and the Cochrane Library up to November 2020. The main outcomes were early mortality, mid-to-long-term survival, and re-intervention. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology. All analyses were performed using RevMan with the random effect model and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

One systematic review and 15 individual studies were included. Pooled analysis showed that 30-day mortality, stroke, renal failure, and pulmonary complications were significantly lower in TEVAR vs. open surgery. The pooled rate of re-intervention significantly favored the OSR. The long-term survival and mortality favored TEVAR and OSR in one and two studies, respectively, but was non-significant in 7 analyzes.

CONCLUSIONS

Early clinical outcomes including the 30-day mortality, stroke, renal failure, and pulmonary complications significantly favored the TEVAR. However, the mid-to-long-term re-intervention rate favored the OSR and long-term survival was inconsistent among the studies. The quality of evidence was very low. More studies with longer follow-ups are needed. The use of TEVAR should be decided by taking into account other factors including patient characteristics and preferences, cost, and surgeon expertise.

Towards a Core Outcome Set for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review of Outcomes Reported Following Intact and Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

To encompass the needs of all stakeholders and allow effective data synthesis from trials, registries, and other studies; a core outcome set for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is needed. In this first stage, the aim was to report the range, frequency, and time of pre-specified outcomes reported following AAA repair.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases 2010 - 2019 were searched using ProQuest Dialog™.

REVIEW METHODS

The systematic review was reported to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA), PROSPERO registration CRD42019130119. Outcomes were coded using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy and presented separately for intact and rupture repairs, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open repair, and time from repair (acute < 90 days vs. ≥ 1 year) (COMET Initiative 1582).

RESULTS

For intact AAA and rupture repair, a total of 231 and 70 reports with 589 255 and 177 465 patients respectively were included: only 98 and 19 respectively provided ≥ 1 year outcomes. Most studies were retrospective, with 13 randomised trials of intact AAA repair and five randomised trials of ruptured AAA repair. For intact AAA, the most common pre-specified COMET taxonomy outcomes were mortality (181), vascular complications (137), and re-intervention (52). EVAR studies dominated the vascular outcomes in acute and later time periods: excluding 47 reports from device registries, reduced vascular outcomes to 83. For ruptured AAA, the three most common outcomes were mortality (64), vascular (11), and hospital stay (10). The range of outcomes reported was wide with functioning outcomes reported from most randomised trials but few retrospective studies.

CONCLUSION

This review identifies the paucity of long term data and the disproportionate attention paid to vascular complications vs. patient functioning outcomes, this skew being accentuated by reporting from EVAR device registries. These data will inform focus groups, prior to a pan-European Delphi consensus, involving clinicians, patients, carers and providers, for developing core outcomes for repair of intact and ruptured AAA.

Validation of Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure Diagnoses in Hospitalized Patients With the Nationwide Claim-Based JROAD-DPC Database

Background: Big data systems such as diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) datasets have recently been used for research purposes. However, there have been few validation studies to determine the accuracy of diagnoses. The aim of this study was to validate and evaluate 2 diagnoses, namely acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF), using International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) codes in the Japanese Registry Of All cardiac and vascular Disease (JROAD)-DPC database.

Methods and Results: ICD-10 codes I21.0–I21.9 and I50.0–I50.9 were used to identify AMI and HF, respectively, in the JROAD-DPC database. Diagnoses of AMI and HF were validated in clinical datasets assessing sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Over 1–2 years, 742 patients hospitalized for AMI and 1,368 patients hospitalized for HF were identified in the DPC dataset. Sensitivity and PPV for AMI were 78.9% and 78.8%, respectively. When emergency hospitalization was included as a criterion, PPV increased to 84.9%. For HF, sensitivity and PPV were 84.7% and 57.0%, respectively. When emergency hospitalization and acute HF were included as criteria, PPV increased to 83.0%.

Conclusions: Using ICD-10 codes for AMI and HF diagnoses among hospitalized patients, the DPC dataset showed acceptable concordance with clinical datasets. PPV increased when any conditions of hospitalization were included, especially in HF.

Meta-analysis of outcomes after intentional coverage of celiac artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of intentional coverage of the celiac artery (CA) during thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting coverage of CA during TEVAR. The methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed using the Moga score and Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A random effects model was used to pool the estimates. A meta-analysis was performed with investigation of the following outcomes: visceral ischemia, spinal cord ischemia (SCI), stroke, endoleak, reintervention, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies with 171 patients were included. The summary estimate rate of visceral ischemia events was 4.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-8.9%; I² = 4.1%). The incidence of stroke and SCI was 0.2% (95% CI, 0%-3.4%; I² = 0%) and 3% (95% CI, 0.3%-7.4%; I² = 6.1%). The rate of endoleak during the follow-up period was 24.1% (95% CI, 14.3%-35.1%; I² = 20.0%). The reintervention rate was 13.6% (95% CI, 4.4%-25.7%; I² = 66.0%). The 30-day and 1-year mortality were 2.9% (95% CI, 0.3%-7.2%; I² = 6.2%) and 15.2% (95% CI, 7.8%-23.9%; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the patients with complex thoracic aortic pathologies deemed at high risk for open reconstruction, TEVAR with intentional coverage of the CA is a safe and feasible option to extend the distal sealing zone with acceptable rates of visceral ischemia, SCI, type II endoleak from the CA, and 30-day mortality.

Impact of structural and process quality indicators on the outcomes of acute aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

The mortality of acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains high, and evidence-to-practice gaps exist in real-world treatment. We explored the first quality indicators (QIs) for AAD management and evaluated the associations between the achievement of these QIs and the outcome in a nationwide administrative database.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to establish initial index items for QIs. An evaluation was performed through an expert consensus meeting using the Delphi method. We studied 18 348 patients who had AAD (type A: 10 131; type B: 8217) in the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases database between April 2012 and May 2015. The associations between the achievement of QIs [categorized into tertiles (low, middle and high)] and in-hospital mortality were determined by multivariable mixed logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

We developed a total of 9 QIs (5 structural and 4 process). Lower achievement rates of QIs were significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality in both types [type A = middle: odds ratio (OR) 4.03; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.301-4.90; P < 0.001; low: OR 15.68; 95% CI 11.67-21.06; P < 0.001 vs high; type B = middle: OR 3.48; 95% CI 2.19-5.53; P < 0.001; low: OR 7.79; 95% CI 4.65-13.06; P < 0.001 vs high]. Various sensitivity analyses showed consistent results. High achievement rates of QIs were significantly associated with reduced in-hospital mortality. Evaluating each hospital's management using QIs would help to equalize treatment quality and demonstrate the evidence-to-practice gaps in real-world treatments for AAD.

Aneurysms and dissections - What is new in the literature of 2019/2020 - a European Society of Vascular Medicine annual review

More than 6,000 publications were found in PubMed concerning aneurysms and dissections, including those Epub ahead of print in 2019, printed in 2020. Among those publications 327 were selected and considered of particular interest.

Elongation of the Aorta after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A longitudinal study

Aortic morphology is associated with age, with the diameter being larger in older people. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a treatment for aortic diseases, such as aortic dissection. When evaluating patients, aortic elongation could interfere with the classification of TEVAR complications. The longitudinal change in aortic length has not been studied in detail. In patients receiving thoracic endovascular aortic repair between 2007 and 2013, we determined the aortic length between the sinotubular junction, left common carotid artery, subclavian artery, and celiac artery on their first five annual follow-up computed tomography (CT) exams. Using the immediate post-TEVAR follow-up CT as the comparison reference and a lengthening of the aortic segment by 10 mm or more as the definition of elongation, 16 of 41 (39%) showed elongation between the innominate artery and celiac artery. When compared with the immediate follow-up CT, a higher proportion of patients showed elongation at the fifth year’s follow-up CT than the first year’s follow-up CT (p < 0.01), and the average lengthening per year was 1.7 mm. There was progressive lengthening of the aorta after TEVAR.

Sex differences in Japanese patients with ruptured aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the sex differences in clinical presentation and outcomes of Japanese patients with ruptured aortic aneurysm (rAA) using a large nationwide claims-based database in Japan.

METHODS

We identified patients hospitalized in certified teaching hospitals in Japan with rAA between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2015. Patients' characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between men and women. The Barthel index was used for evaluating functional status at discharge by examining the ability to perform basic daily activities.

RESULTS

Of 7086 eligible patients, 32.3% (2291/7086) were women. Women were older than men (81.9 years vs 76.1 years; P < .001), had higher prevalence of coma at admission (33.2% vs 25.2%; P < .001), and were less likely to undergo emergency operation including endovascular aneurysm repair (35.7% vs 51.1%; P < .001). The unadjusted mortality rate (62.5% vs 52.0%; P < .001) and Barthel index at discharge (78.7 vs 86.1; P < .001) were significantly worse in women than in men. However, multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression analyses showed that female sex itself was not an independent predictor for in-hospital death (odds ratio [OR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.04; P = .17). Older age, coma at admission, and vasopressor use were detected as independent predictors for in-hospital death. The same results were confirmed for each rupture site. Stratified analyses showed that older women (threshold, 80 years; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-0.98; P = .028) and those who underwent emergency operation (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.93; P = .009) showed significantly better outcomes than men.

CONCLUSIONS

In a univariate analysis, female patients with rAA showed worse mortality than men because of their older age, more severe clinical presentation, and low emergency operation rate. However, after adjustment for covariates, female sex itself was not associated with increased mortality.