Both Small and Large Infrarenal Aortic Size is Associated with an Increased Prevalence of Ischaemic Heart Disease

Abdominal aortic calcium and geometry in patients with essential hypertension

PURPOSE

Abdominal aorta calcium (AAC) burden and dilatation are associated with an increased risk of mortality. The purpose of this study was to investigate determinants of AAC and abdominal aorta size in patients with essential hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension who had undergone non-enhanced abdominal CT to rule out secondary hypertension in addition to biological test were recruited between 2010 and 2018. A semi-automatic system was designed to estimate the aortic size (diameter, length, volume) and quantify the AAC from mesenteric artery to bifurcation using the Agatston score. Determinants of aortic size and those related to AAC were searched for using uni- and multivariables analyses.

RESULTS

Among 293 randomly selected patients with hypertension (age 52 ± 11 [SD] years) included, 23% had resistant hypertension. Mean abdominal aorta diameter was 20.1 ± 2.1 (SD) mm. Eight (3%) patients had abdominal aorta aneurysm ≥ 30 mm and 58 (20%) had dilated abdominal aorta ≥ 27 mm. Median AAC score was 38 and calcifications were detected in the infra- and supra-renal abdominal aortic portions in 59% and 26% of the patients, respectively. After adjustment for age, male sex and body surface area, abdominal aorta diameter was positively associated with diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.0019). Smoking was the single variable associated with calcified abdominal aorta (P < 0.001) after adjustment for cofactors. In patients with calcifications of abdominal aorta, the score increased with smoking history (P < 0.001), statins treatment (P < 0.01), greater number of anti-hypertensive drugs (P < 0.01), larger abdominal aorta (P < 0.05) and greater systolic blood pressure (P < 0.05). Patients with resistant hypertension had more AAC in the supra-renal abdominal aorta portion than those without resistant hypertension (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In patients with essential hypertension, abdominal aorta dilation is related with diastolic blood pressure while AAC is associated with smoking history and resistant hypertension when located to the supra-renal abdominal aorta portion.

Editor's Choice - Cohort Study Examining the Association Between Abdominal Aortic Size and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Aortic and Peripheral Occlusive and Aneurysmal Disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine whether there were independent associations between abdominal aortic diameter, size index, and height index and the risk of major adverse events in patients referred for treatment of various types of aortic and peripheral occlusive and aneurysmal disease (APOAD).

METHODS

In total, 1 752 participants with a variety of APOADs were prospectively recruited between 2002 and 2020 and had a maximum abdominal aortic diameter, aortic size index (aortic diameter relative to body surface area), and aortic height index (aortic diameter relative to height) measured by ultrasound at recruitment. Participants were followed for a median of 4.6 years (interquartile range 2.0 - 8.0 years) to record outcome events, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), peripheral artery surgery, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) events (rupture or repair), and all cause mortality. The association between aortic size and events was assessed using Cox proportional hazard analysis. The ability of aortic size to improve risk of events classification was assessed using the net reclassification index (NRI).

RESULTS

After adjusting for other risk factors, larger aortic diameter was associated with an increased risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05 - 1.31), requirement for peripheral artery surgery (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.90 - 2.22), AAA events (HR 3.01, 95% CI 2.77 - 3.26), and all cause mortality (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08 - 1.32). Findings were similar for aortic size and aortic height indices. According to the NRI, all three aortic size measures significantly improved classification of risk of peripheral artery surgery and AAA events but not MACE. Aortic size index, but not aortic diameter or aortic height index, significantly improved the classification of all cause mortality risk.

CONCLUSION

Larger abdominal aortic diameter, size index, and height index are all independently associated with an increased risk of major adverse events in patients with established vascular disease.