1
|
Nana P, Giordano A, Panuccio G, Torrealba JI, Rohlffs F, Kölbel T. Factors Affecting Compression of the Left Subclavian Artery Bridging Stent In Zone 2 Fenestrated Endovascular Arch Repair. J Endovasc Ther 2024:15266028241267753. [PMID: 39097800 DOI: 10.1177/15266028241267753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Left subclavian artery (LSA) preservation during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been related to low morbidity. This study investigated the incidence of LSA stent compression in patients managed with fenestrated endovascular arch repair (f-Arch) and evaluated the impact of anatomic and technical factors on LSA stent outcomes. METHODS A single-center retrospective analysis of patients managed with single-fenestration devices (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) for LSA preservation, between January 1, 2012 and November 30, 2023, was conducted. Anatomic (arch type, bovine arch, distance between the LSA and most proximal bone structure, left common carotid artery and aortic lesion, take-off angle, diameter, thrombus, calcification, dissection, tortuosity) and technical parameters (stent type, diameter, length, relining, post-dilation) were evaluated. Stent compression was any ≥50% stenosis (using center luminal line) of the stent compared with its initial diameter. Clinical outcomes included stroke and upper limb ischemia at 30 days and follow-up. Technical outcomes included stent compression and need for reintervention. RESULTS Fifty-four cases were included. Only balloon-expandable covered stents were used, and relining during the index procedure was performed in 18%. No stroke or arm ischemia was recorded. One stent compression was detected at 30 days. During follow-up, no stroke or arm ischemia was diagnosed. Nine cases (18%) presented stent compression, with a mean time of stent-compression diagnosis at 18 months (interquartile range [IQR]=37, range=1-58 months) after the index procedure. Five (56%) underwent secondary relining. Follow-up after reintervention was uneventful. Lower distance to the nearest bone structure (compression group [CG]: 11.7±8.9 mm vs non-compression group [NCG]: 23.0±7.8 mm, p=0.003) and higher tortuosity index (CG: 1.3±0.4 vs NCG: 1.2±0.1, p=0.03) were associated with LSA stent compression. CONCLUSION LSA stent compression in patients managed with f-Arch affected 1 in 5 cases, without clinical consequences. Distance to the nearest bone structure and higher tortuosity were associated with LSA stent compression. CLINICAL IMPACT Fenestrated endovascular arch repair for the preservation of the left subclavian artery (LSA) in patients needing landing within the aortic arch has been performed with encouraging outcomes. This analysis showed that LSA stent compression is met in 18% of patients, without though any clinical consequence. Pre-operative anatomic parameters, as lower distance to the nearest bone structure and higher tortuosity index affect negatively LSA stent performance while stent parameters seem to have no impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Antonino Giordano
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Panuccio
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - José I Torrealba
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fiona Rohlffs
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nana P, Spanos K, Dakis K, Giannoukas A, Kölbel T, Haulon S. Systematic Review on Customized and Non-customized Device Techniques for the Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch. J Endovasc Ther 2024; 31:505-521. [PMID: 36346051 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221133701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Open repair remains the standard of care for aortic arch pathologies. However, endovascular management became an attractive alternative for high-risk patients. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of the available endovascular techniques for aortic arch pathology management. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search of the English literature (2000-2022) using PubMed, EMBASE, via Ovid, and CENTRAL databases (February 1, 2022) was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies reporting on patients with aortic arch pathologies managed with custom-made devices ([CMDs] fenestrated or branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair [F/BTEVAR]) and non-CMDs (parallel graft or surgeon-modified FTEVAR) were eligible. Studies reporting on hybrid or open repair were excluded. Studies' quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcomes were technical success, 30 day mortality, and cerebrovascular events (CVEs). Secondary outcomes were re-intervention and mortality during follow-up. RESULTS Thirty studies (2135 patients) were included. Treatment indications were mainly dissections (652 cases [48.0%, 652/1358]; 90 type A, 506 type B; 364 acute, 163 chronic) and aneurysms (46.9%, 582/1239). Five studies (211 patients) reported on FTEVAR and 10 (388 patients) on BTEVAR. For FTEVAR, technical success rate was 98.3%. Thirty-day mortality was 3.8% and CVE rate was 12.3%. Ten deaths (9.7%) and 19 re-interventions (9%) were recorded during follow-up (24 months). Regarding BTEVAR, technical success rate was 98.7%, and 30 day mortality and CVE rates were 5.4% and 11.0%, respectively. During follow-up (27 months), 64 deaths (18.7%) and 33 re-interventions (9.6%) were recorded. Parallel graft technique was reported in 11 studies (901 patients). Technical success rate was 76.4%. Thirty-day mortality was 3.9% and 32 (4.3%) CVEs were recorded. Thirty-five deaths (4.4%) and 43 re-interventions (5.5%) were reported during follow-up (27 months). Surgeon-modified FTEVAR was described in 5 studies (635 patients). Technical success rate was 91.6%. At 30 days, 15 deaths (2.3%) and 22 CVEs (3.5%) were recorded. During follow-up (19 months), 26 deaths (4.2%) and 21 re-interventions (3.6%) were detected. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular arch repair presented a variable technical success; >95% for F/BTEVAR; ≤90% for non-CMDs. Acceptable 30 day mortality rates were reported. Cerebrovascular event rates ranged up to 10%. These findings, adjacent to the estimated midterm mortality and re-interventions, set the need for further improvement. CLINICAL IMPACT Endovascular arch repair gains popularity as a valuable alternative, especially in patients considered unfit for open repair. According the available literature, any endovascular technique, including custom-made or off-the-shelf solutions, may be applied successfully, with acceptable early mortality. However, the perio-operative cerebrovascular event rate is still an issue, indicating the need for further advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petroula Nana
- Aortic Centre, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Spanos
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Dakis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Athanasios Giannoukas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Tilo Kölbel
- German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stephan Haulon
- Aortic Centre, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Université Paris Saclay, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gu Y, Wang Y, Xu G, Zhang Z, Xu C, Yu J, Fang C. Safety and Effectiveness of Brachial Artery Preclosure by Purse-String Suture Technique for Left Subclavian Artery Revascularization in Stanford B Aortic Dissection. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2024:15385744241253736. [PMID: 38709191 DOI: 10.1177/15385744241253736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of brachial artery (BA) cutdown with purse-string suture (PSS) for BA preclosure during fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair (f-TEVAR). METHODS We reviewed the consecutive data in our center from January 2022 to May 2023. Clinical data were analyzed retrospectively, including the baseline characteristics, procedural details, complications, and outcomes. Dichotomous data were summarized as absolute values and percentages. Continuous variables were presented as median values and interquartile ranges (IQRs). All patients underwent arterial cutdown with the PSS technique for BA preclosure. The technique was considered successful when complete hemostasis was achieved and confirmed by ultrasonography 24 h postoperatively. The patients were followed up 30 days postoperatively for access-related complications. RESULTS Forty-eight patients who underwent f-TEVAR with 48 BA access sites were included [36 males and 12 females; median age: 62 (IQR: 30-78) years]. The median body mass index was 27.3 (IQR: 21.2-32.7) kg/m2. The median access establishing and closing times were 7.8 (IQR: 6-9.3) min and 3.7 (IQR: 2.5-5) min, respectively. The median operative time and length of stay were 75 (IQR: 63-87) min and 7 (IQR: 5-9) days, respectively. Although the success rate was 100%, partial numbness in the median nerve distribution was noted in 1 patient in the forearm. This resolved spontaneously and no permanent neurological problem was seen. No other access-related complications were noted, and the total complication rate was 2.1% (1/48). CONCLUSIONS BA preclosure with the PSS technique is safe and effective for left subclavian artery revascularization in Stanford B aortic dissection and can be another option for access closure during f-TEVAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiming Gu
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Intervention, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yadan Wang
- Department of Operating Room, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Guoxiong Xu
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Intervention, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Zhixuan Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Intervention, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Chen Xu
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Intervention, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Jingfan Yu
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Intervention, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| | - Changwen Fang
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Intervention, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huang J, Tian H, Chen Z, Teng B, Zhao Y, Li F. Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with physician-manufactured partial micropore stent grafts for aortic arch pathologies. J Vasc Surg 2024; 79:1005-1012. [PMID: 38157994 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.12.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been used extensively in the management of thoracic aortic diseases. Numerous efforts have been made to enhance clinical outcomes through the use of stent grafts. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of physician-manufactured partial micropore stent grafts (PSMGs) in TEVAR. METHODS Between December 2017 and June 2022, data were collected from 56 patients who underwent TEVAR using physician-manufactured PSMGs. The evaluation encompassed technical success, perioperative and follow-up morbidity and mortality, stroke incidence, and branch artery patency. RESULTS In this investigation, 56 patients received treatment with physician-manufactured PSMGs. Of these patients, 46 were male, with a mean age of 62.1 ± 11.2 years. Aortic pathologies comprised aortic dissection (n = 31 [55.4%]), aortic aneurysms (n = 10 [17.9%]), penetrating aortic ulcer (n = 8 [14.3%]), and intramural hematoma (n = 7 [12.5%]). During a median follow-up of 18 months (interquartile range, 13-25 months), the stroke rate, supra-aortic branch patency rate, and endoleak rate were 0%, 100%, and 7.1%, respectively. There were no occurrences of all-cause mortality, stroke, or the necessity for open conversion. CONCLUSIONS TEVAR with physician-manufactured PSMGs is a viable alternative for addressing aortic arch pathologies in proficient medical centers. The approach demonstrates favorable branch patency, a low complication rate, and minimal postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junpu Huang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Hao Tian
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zheng Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Biyun Teng
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yu Zhao
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Fenghe Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Spath P, Marazzi G, Stana J, Peterss S, Fernandez-Prendes C, Rantner B, Pichlmaier MA, Tsilimparis N. Endovascular Repair With Triple Inner-Branch Endograft for Aberrant Subclavian Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report. J Endovasc Ther 2024; 31:318-324. [PMID: 35941824 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221116753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta (TEVAR) is the preferred option for the treatment of the distal arch and descending thoracic aorta. Fenestrated and branched TEVAR have become an option to treat pathologies of the aortic arch, avoiding sternotomy and cardiopulmonary arrest as well as total surgical debranching. We describe here the case of a symptomatic patient with an arteria lusoria aneurysm associated with Kommerel diverticulum who underwent total endovascular repair with a triple-branched TEVAR. CASE REPORT A 66-year-old male patient was treated for a symptomatic arteria lusoria artery associated with a Kommerel diverticulum, resulting in difficulty swallowing and choking. We used a custom-made triple inner-branch endograft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana) following implantation of a right-sided carotid-subclavian (C-S) bypass. The C-S bypass occluded in the interval time between the 2 procedures and required recanalization and stent-graft placement during the aortic arch procedure. The arteria lusoria was embolized with a vascular plug. No complications occurred and postoperative tomography showed exclusion and thrombosis of the Kommerel diverticulum and perfusion of the supra-aortic vessels. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of arteria lusoria aneurysms can be performed with total endovascular arch inner-branch repair, avoiding increased risk of morbidity and mortality caused by open or hybrid procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Spath
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Giulia Marazzi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Vascular Surgery, Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Jan Stana
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Peterss
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Barbara Rantner
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spath P, Campana F, Tsilimparis N, Gallitto E, Pini R, Faggioli G, Caputo S, Gargiulo M. Outcomes of Fenestrated and Branched Endografts for Partial and Total Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 67:106-116. [PMID: 37536517 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.07.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fenestrated and branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (F/B-TEVAR) of the aortic arch is a viable approach in patients unsuitable for open repair. The aim was to summarise the published results of manufactured F/B-TEVAR devices for partial and total repair of the aortic arch, and to compare fenestrated with branched configurations. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Scopus and The Cochrane Library were searched for articles (2018 - 2021) about patients with elective, urgent, or emergency aortic requiring a proximal landing zone in the aortic arch (zone 0 - 1 - 2) and treated by F/B-TEVAR. REVIEW METHODS The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Open repair, supra-aortic trunk (SAT) debranching + standard TEVAR, and in situ physician modified and parallel grafts were excluded. Primary outcomes were technical success and 30 day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were 30 day major adverse events, and overall survival and procedure related endpoints during follow up. RESULTS Of 458 articles screened, 18 articles involving 571 patients were selected. Indications for intervention were chronic dissections (50.1%), degenerative aneurysms (39.6%), penetrating aortic ulcers (7.4%), and pseudoaneurysms (2%). F-TEVAR, B-TEVAR, and F+B-TEVAR were used in 38.4%, 54.1%, and 7.5% of patients, respectively. Overall, technical success was 95.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93 - 0.97; I2 = 0%; p for heterogeneity (Het) = .77) and the 30 day mortality rate was 6.7% (95% CI 0.05 - 0.09; I2 = 0%; p Het = .66). No statistical differences were found comparing fenestrated with branched endografts, except for a higher rate of type I - III endoleaks in F-TEVAR (9.8% vs. 2.6%; p = .034). The overall survival rate and freedom from aortic related death at the one year follow up ranged between 82 - 96.4% and 94 - 94.7%, respectively. Thirteen and five studies were considered at moderate and high risk of bias, respectively. CONCLUSION F/B-TEVAR for the treatment of the aortic arch, according to experience in dedicated centres, now enjoys a satisfactory level of technical success together with a progressively reduced early mortality rate. There are several limitations, and further studies are needed to reach clearer conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Spath
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy; Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital "Infermi" Rimini, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.
| | | | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig-Maximillian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy; Bologna Metropolitan Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Pini
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy; Bologna Metropolitan Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluca Faggioli
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy; Bologna Metropolitan Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefania Caputo
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Bologna, Italy; Bologna Metropolitan Vascular Surgery Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Derycke L, Tomasi J, Desgranges P, Pesteil F, Plissonier D, Pernot M, Millon A, Martinez R, Chakfe N, Alsac JM. Assessment of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Relay Proximal Scallop: Results of a French Prospective Multicentre Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:821-829. [PMID: 37567339 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A proximal scallop design allows aortic arch repair without complex endovascular manipulation in the aortic arch. The aim was to assess the safety and efficacy at one year of the Relay proximal scallop stent graft. METHODS A prospective multicentre study evaluated consecutive patients treated with the Relay proximal scallop stent graft in 10 French aortic centres. All consecutive patients eligible for elective thoracic endovascular repair with proximal scallop in the 10 participating centres between January 2015 and July 2018 were included. Primary endpoints were 30 day mortality, stroke, and spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) rates. Outcomes including safety and efficacy, technical and clinical success, all cause death, neurological events, vessel patency, and device specific complications were analysed. Survival and survival without severe complications were estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS Ten aortic centres treated 40 patients for thoracic aortic aneurysm (45%), penetrating atherosclerotic aneurysm (30%), and dissection (25%). Half of the procedures (50%) targeted zone 0 of the aortic arch (zone 0 in 17.5% and zones 0/1 in 32.5%), 37.5% targeted zone 2 (35% zone 2 alone; 2.5% zones 1/2), and 15% targeted zone 1 (12.5% zone 1 alone). Median follow up was one year. Thirty day mortality, stroke, and SCI rates were 10%, 5%, and 0% respectively. Primary technical success was 95%. Type Ia, Ib, and III endoleaks rates were 5.4%, 0%, and 0% respectively at one month. The overall mortality rate at one year was 17.5%. Aneurysm expansion was > 5 mm in one case at one year associated with type Ia endoleak (3%). There was no supra-aortic trunk thrombosis, one (2%) graft kink, and no migration. CONCLUSION One year outcomes showed that the Relay proximal scallop stent graft is an acceptable answer to thoracic aortic disease to deal with short proximal landing zones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Derycke
- Department of Cardio-Vascular and Vascular Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
| | - Jacques Tomasi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Centre-INSERM LTSI 1099, Rennes, France
| | - Pascal Desgranges
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Francis Pesteil
- Department of Vascular Medicine and Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Didier Plissonier
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Mathieu Pernot
- Department of Cardiology and Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Hopital Cardiologique de Haut-Leveque, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Antoine Millon
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Louis Pradel University Hospital, Bron, France
| | - Robert Martinez
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Nabil Chakfe
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jean-Marc Alsac
- Department of Cardio-Vascular and Vascular Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsilimparis N, Gouveia E Melo R. To Scallop or Not to Scallop in the Arch? Is This the Question? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2023; 66:830-831. [PMID: 37611732 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| | - Ryan Gouveia E Melo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte; Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa; Centro Cardiovascular da Universidade de Lisboa (CCUL@RISE). http://www.twitter.com/gouveia_melo
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mehmedovic A, Tsilimparis N, Stavroulakis K, Rantner B, Fernandez Prendes C, Gouveia E Melo R, Abicht JM, Stana J. Cervical Debranching: Regional versus General Anesthesia for Carotid-Subclavian Bypass. A Single Center Experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2023; 96:132-139. [PMID: 37085013 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report here the first cohort study comparing regional and general anaesthesia for left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization. METHODS A single-centre retrospective cohort study was performed, including all consecutive patients who underwent cervical debranching with carotid-subclavian bypass before aortic repair from February 2018 to May 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of anesthesia: Regional anesthesia (RA) versus general anesthesia (GA). Primary endpoints included the following: 1) technical success of RA and 2) neurological complications (NCs) (stroke and peripheral neurological lesions). Secondary endpoints included postoperative bleeding, wound complications, 30-day reintervention rate, and midterm events. RESULTS Eighty-three patients were included in the study. The mean age was 64 years (interquartile range [IQR]:13.5) and 69% were male. Thirty-seven patients (44.5%) were performed under RA. Technical success of RA was 89.2%. Two minor strokes (2.4%) were observed in the GA group (P = 0.199). Peripheral neurological disorders occurred in 4 patients (4.8%) (RA group n = 1 (2.7%), GA group n = 3 (6.5%), P = 0.491). 30-day complication rate was 27.7% (n = 23, GA: n = 15 (32.6%), RA: n = 8 (21.6%), P = 0.266). 30-day reintervention rate was 14.5% (n = 12) ten bleeding complications (12%) (RA group n = 3 (8.1%), GA group n = 7 (15.2%), P = 0.323), and 2 seroma evacuations (2.4%) in the RA group. The incidence of superficial wound infections was n = 6 (7.2%) (RA group n = 2 (5.4%), GA group n = 4 (8.7%), P = 0.565). Median follow-up time was 22 months (IQR 22 min/max 1-44). CONCLUSIONS In our cohort, RA for carotid subclavian bypass surgery proved to be a feasible and effective anesthetic procedure compared with GA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldin Mehmedovic
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| | | | - Barbara Rantner
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Ryan Gouveia E Melo
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Abicht
- Anesthesiology Department, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Stana
- Vascular Surgery Department, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peterss S, Stana J, Rantner B, Buech J, Radner C, Konstantinou N, Hagl C, Pichlmaier M, Tsilimparis N. Expert opinion: How to treat type IA endoleakage. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2023; 31:604-614. [PMID: 36740844 DOI: 10.1177/02184923231154742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Type Ia endoleaks due to failed sealing or loss of landing zone and the adequate management thereof remain crucial for long-term therapeutic success following TEVAR. This expert opinion summarizes our institutional experience with endovascular, open surgical, and hybrid techniques in the context of recent scientific publications. The rapid turnover of technical innovations, but most importantly outcome data demonstrate the requirement for increasingly patient-tailored treatment strategies and the need for specialized aortic centers. The latter should offer a complete range of treatment options, an adequate perioperative management, and the highest level of multidisciplinary expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Peterss
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Stana
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Barbara Rantner
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Joscha Buech
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Caroline Radner
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Konstantinou
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Hagl
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pichlmaier
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- University Aortic Centre Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cao L, Zhang H, Ge Y, Guo W. Avoiding Stroke in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair: JACC Review Topic of the Week. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82:265-277. [PMID: 37438011 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
As the bottleneck of endovascular aortic arch repair, early postoperative stroke remains a devastating complication in high-risk patients and a critical concern for the development of optimal endovascular techniques and devices. The incidence of early postoperative stroke varies widely among currently available endovascular techniques and devices, with reported rates ranging from 0.0% to 42.9%, and is significantly influenced by the severity of the patient's preexisting aortic atherosclerotic burden, air released from the endovascular device, and a variety of factors leading to cerebral perfusion insufficiency. Currently, preidentification of high-risk patients and careful perioperative management appear to play a critical role in reducing stroke incidence. Specific intraoperative prevention methods are still lacking, but embolic protection devices and carbon dioxide or high-volume saline flushing of endovascular devices appear promising. Detailed preoperative stroke risk stratification and screening for optimal endovascular techniques and devices for aortic arch treatment are unmet clinical needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Cao
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of General Surgery, The 983rd Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of PLA, Tianjin, China
| | - Hongpeng Zhang
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yangyang Ge
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gouveia E Melo R, Fernández Prendes C, Khanafer A, Wanhainen A, Mani K, Rouhani G, Chao V, Tay KH, Chong TT, Adam D, Dias N, Agaev A, Tsilimparis N. Common Designs of Custom-Made Fenestrated Arch Devices and Applicability of an Off-the-Shelf Design. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231179593. [PMID: 37300282 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231179593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze device designs, similarities and overlaps of custom-made fenestrated arch endografts intended for mid/distal arch thoracic endovascular aortic repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicenter cross-sectional study analyzing custom-made anonymized graft plans was performed. Graft plans were included from a cohort of mid/distal aortic arch repairs using custom-made fenestrated aortic endografts treated at 8 centers. Grafts targeting >2 arteries were excluded. No patient/clinical data were analyzed. A descriptive analysis was performed followed by an analysis of overlap of the designs to reach a common design in which the greatest number of grafts would overlap. RESULTS One hundred thirty-one graft plans were included. All grafts were custom-made grafts from the COOK Medical Fenestrated arch platform. Ninety-four (71.8%) had a scallop-and-single-fenestration design, 33 (25.2%) had a single fenestration and 4 (4.3%) a single scallop. For analysis purposes, these latter 4 grafts were excluded. Two main graft plans (Plans 1 and 2) were proposed after analysis with similar configuration (1 scallop with 30 mm width, 20 mm height, 12:00 position; 1 preloaded fenestration with 8 mm diameter, 26 mm from the top of the graft and 12:00 position; tapered, with a 193 mm length and 32 mm distal diameter) but with 2 different proximal diameters of 38 mm (Plan 1) and 44 mm (Plan 2), reaching an overall feasibility of 85.8% (n=109), being 47.2% (n=60) and 38.6% (n=49) for each design, respectively. CONCLUSION The degree of overlap between the studied fenestrated and/or scalloped thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) graft designs was high. Future studies analyzing these designs in a real-world cohort of patients are needed to further address off-the-shelf feasibility. CLINICAL IMPACT In a multicenter study analyzing 127 fenestrated aortic arch endograft plans from 9 aortic centers, we found that the degree of overlap between the studied fenestrated and/or scalloped arch graft designs was high and that 2 proposed graft designs would be theoretically applicable in 85.8% of cases. Future studies analyzing these designs in a real-world cohort of patients are needed to further address off-the-shelf feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Gouveia E Melo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Adib Khanafer
- University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Guido Rouhani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Donald Adam
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nuno Dias
- Vascular Center Malmö, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Arzou Agaev
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Center Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tian C, Chen D, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Luo M, Fang K, Tian C, Sun X, Guo H, Qian X, Shu C. Surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of type B aortic dissection involving the aortic arch. J Vasc Surg 2023; 77:1016-1027.e9. [PMID: 36410607 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In the present report, we have described the outcomes of endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair for type B dissection involving the aortic arch (B1-2, D). METHODS Cases of endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair performed between January 2015 and December 2019 for aortic dissection designated as B1-2, D by the Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons classification were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at follow-up. The secondary end points included early mortality, early morbidities, and aortic-related late events. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to analyze survival from all-cause mortality and freedom from aortic-related late events in the endovascular, hybrid, and open groups. Propensity score matching and stratification (stratified by proximal dissection extension: B1, D and B2, D) were performed as sensitivity analyses to compare the outcomes among the three treatment patterns after controlling for major confounders. RESULTS The present study included 151 patients (men, 79.5%; mean age, 47.3 ± 10.5 years), with 72 (47.7%) in the endovascular group, 46 (30.5%) in the hybrid group, and 33 (21.8%) in the open group. No significant difference was noted in early mortality between the endovascular, hybrid, and open groups (1.4% vs 2.2% vs 3.0%; P = .791). The incidence of early endoleak was significantly greater (33.3% vs 13.0% vs 6.1%; P = .002) and the incidence of renal function deterioration was less (4.2% vs 26.1% vs 24.2%; P = .001) after endovascular repair vs hybrid arch repair and open surgery. After a median follow-up of 40.0 months (range, 0-84.0 months), no significant differences were found in all-cause mortality (5.6% vs 4.3% vs 3.0%; P = 1.0), aortic-related late events (16.7% vs 15.2% vs 12.1%; P = .834), or late endoleak (9.7% vs 4.3% vs 6.1%; P = .630) after endovascular, hybrid, and open surgery. The propensity score matching and stratification analyses displayed consistent outcomes for early mortality, all-cause mortality, and aortic-related late events among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS The mid- to long-term outcomes after endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair for type B dissection involving the aortic arch (B1-2, D) were favorable and comparable in selected patients. Extensive experience and multidisciplinary teamwork are prerequisites for individualized strategies for repair of B1-2, D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Tian
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Chen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiawei Zhao
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yidan Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Mingyao Luo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Fang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chuan Tian
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaogang Sun
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hongwei Guo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangyang Qian
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chang Shu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gouveia e Melo R, Stana J, Prendes CF, Kölbel T, Peterss S, Stavroulakis K, Rantner B, Pichlmaier M, Tsilimparis N. Current state and future directions of endovascular ascending and arch repairs: The motion towards an endovascular Bentall procedure. Semin Vasc Surg 2022; 35:350-363. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
15
|
Xodo A, D’Oria M, Mendes B, Bertoglio L, Mani K, Gargiulo M, Budtz-Lilly J, Antonello M, Veraldi GF, Pilon F, Milite D, Calvagna C, Griselli F, Taglialavoro J, Bassini S, Wanhainen A, Lindstrom D, Gallitto E, Mezzetto L, Mastrorilli D, Lepidi S, DeMartino R. Peri-Operative Management of Patients Undergoing Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Repair for Juxtarenal, Pararenal and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Preventing, Recognizing and Treating Complications to Improve Clinical Outcomes. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071018. [PMID: 35887518 PMCID: PMC9317732 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent and refinement of complex endovascular techniques in the last two decades has revolutionized the field of vascular surgery. This has allowed an effective minimally invasive treatment of extensive disease involving the pararenal and the thoracoabdominal aorta. Fenestrated-branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) now represents a feasible technical solution to address these complex diseases, moving the proximal sealing zone above the renal-visceral vessels take-off and preserving their patency. The aim of this paper was to provide a narrative review on the peri-operative management of patients undergoing F/BEVAR procedures for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA), pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism (TAAA). It will focus on how to prevent, diagnose, and manage the complications ensuing from these complex interventions, in order to improve clinical outcomes. Indeed, F/BEVAR remains a technically, physiologically, and mentally demanding procedure. Intraoperative adverse events often require prolonged or additional procedures and complications may significantly impact a patient's quality of life, health status, and overall cost of care. The presence of standardized preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative pathways of care, together with surgeons and teams with significant experience in aortic surgery, should be considered as crucial points to improve clinical outcomes. Aggressive prevention, prompt diagnosis and timely rescue of any major adverse events following the procedure remain paramount clinical needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Xodo
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, AULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; (A.X.); (F.P.); (D.M.)
| | - Mario D’Oria
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0403994645
| | - Bernardo Mendes
- Gonda Vascular Center, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55902, USA; (B.M.); (R.D.)
| | - Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, “Vita-Salute” San Raffaele University, 58-20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Kevin Mani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; (K.M.); (A.W.); (D.L.)
| | - Mauro Gargiulo
- Vascular Surgery, IRCCS-University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, DIMES-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Jacob Budtz-Lilly
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, 161-8200 Aarhus, Denmark;
| | - Michele Antonello
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Padova, DSCTV-University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy;
| | - Gian Franco Veraldi
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (G.F.V.); (L.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Fabio Pilon
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, AULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; (A.X.); (F.P.); (D.M.)
| | - Domenico Milite
- Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, “San Bortolo” Hospital, AULSS8 Berica, 36100 Vicenza, Italy; (A.X.); (F.P.); (D.M.)
| | - Cristiano Calvagna
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Filippo Griselli
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Jacopo Taglialavoro
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Silvia Bassini
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; (K.M.); (A.W.); (D.L.)
| | - David Lindstrom
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden; (K.M.); (A.W.); (D.L.)
| | - Enrico Gallitto
- Vascular Surgery, IRCCS-University Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola, DIMES-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (M.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Luca Mezzetto
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (G.F.V.); (L.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Davide Mastrorilli
- Unit of Vascular Surgery, Integrated University Hospital of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy; (G.F.V.); (L.M.); (D.M.)
| | - Sandro Lepidi
- Cardiovascular Department, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Trieste University Hospital ASUGI, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (C.C.); (F.G.); (J.T.); (S.B.); (S.L.)
| | - Randall DeMartino
- Gonda Vascular Center, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY 55902, USA; (B.M.); (R.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bertoglio L, Bilman V, Chiesa R. New single-branch stent grafts for the subclavian artery during distal arch endovascular repair should be designed according to morphological studies of supra-aortic trunks. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 61:355-356. [PMID: 34931242 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Bertoglio
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Victor Bilman
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Chiesa
- Division of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|