1
|
Wen Q, Zhang Y, Wei J, Shen M, Wu G, Du X, Li X, Zhou M. Physician Modified Fenestrated Endografts for Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair in Zone 0. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2024; 68:190-199. [PMID: 38641315 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This multicentre study aimed to assess the early and midterm outcomes of physician modified fenestrated endografts (PMEGs) for endovascular aortic arch repair in zone 0. METHODS Between 2018 and 2022, a retrospective study was conducted in three centres of consecutive patients undergoing endovascular aortic arch repair in zone 0 with PMEGs. Endpoints included technical success, 30 day mortality rate, major adverse events, secondary interventions, stent stability, target vessel patency, and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 54 patients (mean age 63 years; 45 males) with aortic arch pathology were included, comprising aortic dissections (n = 32; 59%) and aortic arch aneurysms (n = 22; 41%). Technical success was 98%. One patient died from stroke within 30 days. Major adverse events included stroke (n = 4; 7%), retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) (n = 3; 6%), and acute kidney injury (n = 2; 4%). During a median follow up of 12 months, there were two deaths (4%) of unknown cause at one month and 1.5 months, and no aortic related death. Type Ia, type Ic, and type IIIc endoleaks were observed in two (4%), three (6%), and two (4%) patients, respectively. No vessel stenosis was observed. Re-intervention was required in 10 patients (19%). Estimates of overall survival, freedom from secondary intervention, and freedom from target vessel instability at one year were 94.2% (standard error [SE] 3.3%), 81.8% (SE 6.0%), and 92.0% (SE 4.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION This study has demonstrated the efficacy of PMEGs for zone 0 endovascular aortic arch repair, with acceptable technical success and mortality rates. Stroke, RTAD, and re-intervention rates remain a concern for endovascular therapy. A larger population and long term outcomes are required to assess the safety and durability of this technique as a beneficial choice for endovascular aortic arch repair in specialised centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinshu Wen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yepeng Zhang
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Wei
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China
| | - Mingyang Shen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Vascular Surgery, the Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Guangyan Wu
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaolong Du
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Li
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Department of Vascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Min Zhou
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China; Department of Vascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spath P, Marazzi G, Stana J, Peterss S, Fernandez-Prendes C, Rantner B, Pichlmaier MA, Tsilimparis N. Endovascular Repair With Triple Inner-Branch Endograft for Aberrant Subclavian Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report. J Endovasc Ther 2024; 31:318-324. [PMID: 35941824 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221116753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta (TEVAR) is the preferred option for the treatment of the distal arch and descending thoracic aorta. Fenestrated and branched TEVAR have become an option to treat pathologies of the aortic arch, avoiding sternotomy and cardiopulmonary arrest as well as total surgical debranching. We describe here the case of a symptomatic patient with an arteria lusoria aneurysm associated with Kommerel diverticulum who underwent total endovascular repair with a triple-branched TEVAR. CASE REPORT A 66-year-old male patient was treated for a symptomatic arteria lusoria artery associated with a Kommerel diverticulum, resulting in difficulty swallowing and choking. We used a custom-made triple inner-branch endograft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Indiana) following implantation of a right-sided carotid-subclavian (C-S) bypass. The C-S bypass occluded in the interval time between the 2 procedures and required recanalization and stent-graft placement during the aortic arch procedure. The arteria lusoria was embolized with a vascular plug. No complications occurred and postoperative tomography showed exclusion and thrombosis of the Kommerel diverticulum and perfusion of the supra-aortic vessels. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of arteria lusoria aneurysms can be performed with total endovascular arch inner-branch repair, avoiding increased risk of morbidity and mortality caused by open or hybrid procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Spath
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Giulia Marazzi
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Vascular Surgery, Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Jan Stana
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Peterss
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Barbara Rantner
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Becker D, Stana J, Prendes CF, Konstantinou N, Öz T, Pichlmaier M, Peterss S, Tsilimparis N. Endovascular arch repair of anastomotic aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm in patients after open repair of the ascending aorta and aortic arch: a case series. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 64:ezad345. [PMID: 37889250 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to investigate the outcomes of branched endovascular arch repair (b-TEVAR) with a custom-made double- or triple-branched arch endograft in patients with distal anastomotic aneurysms after open repair of the ascending aorta or proximal arch replacement. METHODS Retrospective analysis was conducted of all consecutive patients with anastomotic aneurysms after open surgical repair involving the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch treated with b-TEVAR. All patients were treated with a custom-made double or triple inner-branched arch endograft. Study end points were technical success, 30-day and follow-up mortality/morbidity and re-interventions. RESULTS Between 2018 and 2022, 10 patients were treated with custom-made double- or triple-branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair due to anastomotic aneurysms after open ascending aorta and/or proximal aortic arch replacement. Eight patients received a triple and 2 a double arch-branched endograft. Eight cases were performed electively and 2 urgently for contained rupture. Technical success was achieved in 9 cases (90%). All elective patients survived. Two patients treated due to contained ruptures expired. Within 30 postoperative days, 1 transient ischaemic attack occurred. No early endograft-related re-interventions were necessary. The median follow-up was 20 months. One patient died 2 months after discharge due to sepsis caused by pneumonia. No further deaths or endograft-related re-interventions were observed. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular aortic arch repair with double or triple inner-branched arch endograft for anastomotic aneurysms after open ascending and/or proximal arch replacement is technically feasible and a promising alternative in a patient cohort unfit for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Becker
- University Aortic Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Stana
- University Aortic Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Carlota F Prendes
- University Aortic Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Konstantinou
- University Aortic Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Tugce Öz
- University Aortic Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pichlmaier
- University Aortic Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Peterss
- University Aortic Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- University Aortic Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- Department of Vascular Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gouveia E Melo R, Fernández Prendes C, Khanafer A, Wanhainen A, Mani K, Rouhani G, Chao V, Tay KH, Chong TT, Adam D, Dias N, Agaev A, Tsilimparis N. Common Designs of Custom-Made Fenestrated Arch Devices and Applicability of an Off-the-Shelf Design. J Endovasc Ther 2023:15266028231179593. [PMID: 37300282 DOI: 10.1177/15266028231179593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze device designs, similarities and overlaps of custom-made fenestrated arch endografts intended for mid/distal arch thoracic endovascular aortic repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicenter cross-sectional study analyzing custom-made anonymized graft plans was performed. Graft plans were included from a cohort of mid/distal aortic arch repairs using custom-made fenestrated aortic endografts treated at 8 centers. Grafts targeting >2 arteries were excluded. No patient/clinical data were analyzed. A descriptive analysis was performed followed by an analysis of overlap of the designs to reach a common design in which the greatest number of grafts would overlap. RESULTS One hundred thirty-one graft plans were included. All grafts were custom-made grafts from the COOK Medical Fenestrated arch platform. Ninety-four (71.8%) had a scallop-and-single-fenestration design, 33 (25.2%) had a single fenestration and 4 (4.3%) a single scallop. For analysis purposes, these latter 4 grafts were excluded. Two main graft plans (Plans 1 and 2) were proposed after analysis with similar configuration (1 scallop with 30 mm width, 20 mm height, 12:00 position; 1 preloaded fenestration with 8 mm diameter, 26 mm from the top of the graft and 12:00 position; tapered, with a 193 mm length and 32 mm distal diameter) but with 2 different proximal diameters of 38 mm (Plan 1) and 44 mm (Plan 2), reaching an overall feasibility of 85.8% (n=109), being 47.2% (n=60) and 38.6% (n=49) for each design, respectively. CONCLUSION The degree of overlap between the studied fenestrated and/or scalloped thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) graft designs was high. Future studies analyzing these designs in a real-world cohort of patients are needed to further address off-the-shelf feasibility. CLINICAL IMPACT In a multicenter study analyzing 127 fenestrated aortic arch endograft plans from 9 aortic centers, we found that the degree of overlap between the studied fenestrated and/or scalloped arch graft designs was high and that 2 proposed graft designs would be theoretically applicable in 85.8% of cases. Future studies analyzing these designs in a real-world cohort of patients are needed to further address off-the-shelf feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Gouveia E Melo
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Adib Khanafer
- University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Anders Wanhainen
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kevin Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Guido Rouhani
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Donald Adam
- Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nuno Dias
- Vascular Center Malmö, Department of Thoracic Surgery and Vascular Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Arzou Agaev
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular Center Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tsilimparis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Ludwig Maximilian University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gouveia e Melo R, Stana J, Prendes CF, Kölbel T, Peterss S, Stavroulakis K, Rantner B, Pichlmaier M, Tsilimparis N. Current state and future directions of endovascular ascending and arch repairs: The motion towards an endovascular Bentall procedure. Semin Vasc Surg 2022; 35:350-363. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
6
|
A new promising method for cardiac output reduction during TEVAR: is it time to “try this at home”? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 63:827. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|