Mechanical Performance Assessment of Physician Modified Aortic Stent Graft

Comparison of the Snare Loop Technique and the Hungaroring Reinforcement for Physician-Modified Endograft Fenestrations-An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

We conducted an in vitro comparison of the snare loop reinforcement against a closed-loop reinforcement (Hungaroring) for physician-modified endograft (PMEG) fenestrations regarding preparation time and stability during flaring balloon dilatation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The time to complete a PMEG fenestration with reinforcement was measured and compared between the Hungaroring and snare loop groups. The number of stitches was counted. Each fenestration was dilated using a 10 mm high-pressure, non-compliant balloon up to 21 atm in pressure, and fluoroscopic images were taken. The presence of indentation on the oversized balloon at the level of the reinforcement was evaluated at each fenestration.

RESULTS

Five fenestrations were created in each group (n = 5) for a total of ten pieces. The completion time in the snare loop group was 1070 s (IQR:1010-1090) compared to 760 s (IQR:685-784) in the Hungaroring group (p = 0.008). Faster completion time was achieved by faster stitching (23.2 s/stitch (IQR 22.8-27.3) for the snare loop group and 17.3 s/stitch (IQR 17.3-20.1) for the Hungaroring group (p = 0.016). None of the fluoroscopic images of the snare loop reinforcement showed an indentation on the balloon during the overexpansion; on the contrary, the Hungaroring showed indentation in every case, even at 21 atm.

CONCLUSION

Fenestrations reinforced with Hungaroring can be completed significantly faster. Furthermore, the Hungaroring resists over-dilation even at high pressures, while snare loop reinforcements dilate at nominal pressure.

Utilizing physician modified fenestration on the castor branched stent technique for reconstruction of an isolated left vertebral artery on the aortic arch

The study aimed to provide physician modified fenestration (PMF) on a single-branched stent for the aortic arch (Castor) to protect the isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Patients who underwent TEVAR involving ILVA reconstruction through PMF performing on the Castor branched stent were included in a retrospective, multi-centre study from June 2018 to December 2022. In these patients, all proximal landing zones of "Castor" were positioned in Ishimaru zone 2a. A total of twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria and the achievement rate showed 25/25 (100%) success in them. The twenty-five patients had a median follow-up length of 28.5 ± 14.6 months. One patient (4.0%) suffered from postoperative ischemic stroke before discharge. One patient (4.0%) died from a hemodialysis-related brain hemorrhage before discharge on the 29th day after the procedure. One patient died of advanced liver cancer in the 33th month after discharge. Aortic rupture, stroke or spinal cord injury did not occur throughout the follow-up period after discharge. Two patients (8.0%) experienced endoleak at the fenestration, however, resulting in only one's necessity for reintervention. Notably, the procedure effectively maintained ILVAs patency for all patients during follow up. According to our preliminary findings, performing a TEVAR under local anaesthesia using PMF on a Castor branched stent for ILVA preservation appeared practical, secure, and effective.

Off-the-Shelf Single-Fenestrated Endograft for Emergent Juxtarenal and Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular solutions to emergent juxtarenal and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are complicated. Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with in situ laser fenestration (ISLF) is promising but requires a period of visceral ischemia. With an off-the-shelf, single superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-fenestrated device mesenteric ischemia is avoided and renal ischemia decreased. The aim was to develop an optimized design of such an endograft suitable for >90% of juxtarenal and pararenal AAAs.

METHODS

Single-center analysis on 44 consecutive preoperative CTs for previously elective fenestrated EVARs for juxtarenal and pararenal aneurysms. Anatomical characteristics were analyzed to define: (1) shortest aortic coverage above SMA fenestration to achieve ≥4 cm seal; (2) feasibility of a scallop for the celiac artery; (3) shortest distance between the SMA and lowest renal, to facilitate renal ISLF in a straight endograft; (4) distance from the lowest renal to the aortic bifurcation, to allow an overlapping zone >40 mm with a bifurcated stent graft; (5) aortic diameter in the sealing zone, for optimal proximal stent graft diameter with 10% to 30% oversizing; (6) the final design was then tested on individual level.

RESULTS

(1) The stent graft needs to start 40 mm above the SMA fenestration to achieve a 4 cm sealing zone in >90% of cases. (2) A proximal sealing zone of 40 mm without a scallop covers 77% of celiac arteries. With an addition of a 20 mm deep, 20 mm wide scallop at 12:30, the stent graft still covers 27% of celiacs. This suggests that a scallop would not be practically feasible. (3) In >90% of cases, the lowest renal was <31 mm from the SMA, suggesting that the tapering should start 30 mm below the SMA. (4) The distance from the lowest renal to the aortic bifurcation ranged from 82 to 166 mm. This allows for a 20 mm tapering and 50 mm straight part in all cases. (5) The 5th and 95th percentile of the aortic diameter in the sealing zone was 22 and 31 mm, respectively. Thus, 2 different stent graft diameters (28 and 34 mm) would fit >90% of cases. (6) The final design was suitable in 91% cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Two sizes of a single-fenestrated aortic stent graft without scallop cover >90% of juxtarenal and pararenal anatomies.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Emergent juxta- and pararenal aortic aneurysms is a difficult clinical scenario that continuously challenges physicians. An endovascular option is in situ laser fenestrated endografts. One risk with these is the complete visceral ischemia occurring before the fenestrations are completed. An off-the-shelf single-fenestrated stent graft facilitates the treatment by removing the ischemia time for the SMA and reducing the ischemia time for the celiac and renal arteries thus decreasing the risk of visceral ischemia complications.

A hemodynamic analysis of fenestrated physician-modified endograft repair for complicated aortic dissections involving the visceral arteries

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to perform patient-specific hemodynamic simulations of the patients with complicated aortic dissection underwent Physician-modified endograft (PMEG) and evaluate the treatment outcome.

METHOD

12 patient-specific models were reconstructed from computed tomography angiography (CTA) data of 6 patients with complicated aortic dissection before and after the PMEG. Hemodynamic simulations were conducted with the same time-varying volumetric flow rate extracted from the literature and 3-element Windkessel model (3 EWM) boundary conditions were applied at the aortic outlet. Hemodynamic indicators such as time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), relative residence time (RRT) and endothelial cell activation potential (ECAP) were obtained to evaluate the postoperative effect of PMEG.

RESULTS

Comparing with the preoperative models, the flow rates of most visceral arteries were increased in the postoperative models (PSMA = 0.012, PRRA = 0.013, and PLRA = 0.005). Pressure and TAWSS in visceral regions were significantly reduced (PP = 0.003 and PTAWSS = 0.017). With the false lumens (FL) covered by the stent grafts, the average TAWSS level increased in the regions of postoperative abdominal aorta (P = 0.002), and the average RRT and ECAP values decreased significantly (PRRT = 0.02 and PECAP = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that PMEG, as a new technique for the treatment of complicated aortic dissection involving the distal tears in the visceral region, can effectively restore the abnormal blood supply of the visceral arteries, reduce the risk of aortic rupture, the formation of aortic dissection aneurysm (ADA), and thrombosis. This corresponds well with clinical retrospective studies and 1-year follow-up outcomes. The findings of this study are of great significance for the development of PMEG.

Mechanical Comparison between Fenestrated Endograft and Physician-Made Fenestrations

INTRODUCTION

A fenestrated endograft (FE) is the first-line endovascular option for juxta and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. A physician-modified stent-graft (PMSG) and laser in situ fenestration (LISF) have emerged to circumvent manufacturing delays, anatomic standards, and the procedure's cost raised by FE. The objective was to compare different fenestrations from a mechanical point of view.

METHODS

In total, five Zenith Cook fenestrations (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) and five Anaconda fenestrations (Terumo Company, Inchinnan, Scotland, UK) were included in this study. Laser ISF and PMSG were created on a Cook TX2 polyethylene terephthalate (PET) cover material (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA). In total, five LISFs and fifty-five PMSG were created. All fenestrations included reached an 8 mm diameter. Radial extension tests were then performed to identify differences in the mechanical behavior between the fenestration designs. The branch pull-out force was measured to test the stability of assembling with a calibrated 8 mm branch. Fatigue tests were performed on the devices to assess the long-term outcomes of the endograft with an oversized 9 mm branch.

RESULTS

The results revealed that at over 2 mm of oversizing, the highest average radial strength was 33.4 ± 6.9 N for the Zenith Cook fenestration. The radial strength was higher with the custom-made fenestrations, including both Zenith Cook and Anaconda fenestrations (9.5 ± 4.7 N and 4.49 ± 0.28 N). The comparison between LISF and double loop PMSG highlighted a higher strength value compared with LISF (3.96 N ± 1.86 vs. 2.7 N ± 0.82; p= 0.018). The diameter of the fenestrations varied between 8 and 9 mm. As the pin caliber inserted in the fenestration was 9 mm, one could consider that all fenestrations underwent an "elastic recoil" after cycling. The largest elastic recoil was observed in the non-reinforced/OC fenestrations (40%). A 10% elastic recoil was observed with LISF.

CONCLUSION

In terms of mechanical behavior, the custom-made fenestration produced the highest results in terms of radial and branch pull-out strength. Both PMSG and LISF could be improved with the standardization of the fenestration creation protocol.