Bone-anchored versus tooth-anchored expansion appliances: Long-term effects on the condyle-fossa relationship

Biomechanics of conventional and miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion

Posterior Crossbite is a common condition resulting because of transverse maxillary deficiency. The growth of the craniofacial complex finishes first in the transverse dimension, followed by sagittal and vertical dimensions. Conventional rapid palatal expansion (RPE) appliances are commonly used to correct transverse maxillary deficiency. Although RPE is efficient in correcting posterior crossbite, it results in dental side effects such as buccal tipping of maxillary molars, root resorption, bone dehiscence, and relapse. Mini-implant-assisted RPE has been introduced to increase the skeletal effects of expansion especially in patients with increased maturation and greater interdigitation of midpalatal suture. This article will review the biomechanics of RPE and mini-implant-assisted RPE. Additionally, the different designs of MARPE and the long-term clinical effects of expansion appliances will also be discussed in detail.

Analysis of changes and correlation in condyle-fossa relationship after maxillary skeletal expansion

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the changes in condyle-glenoid fossa relationship after maxillary skeletal expansion (MSE) and to verify the correlation between the condyle positional changes and expansion effect.

METHODS

In this study, 20 patients (mean age 21.1 ± 5.7 years, 8 male, 12 female) with maxillary transverse deficiency (MTD) were treated with the MSE appliance, which contained molar bands and a expander with four micro-implants. The CBCT images were taken before expansion (T0), after expansion (T1) and after 6 months of maintenance (T2). The posterior TMJ space (PS), superior TMJ space (SS), anterior TMJ space, coronal lateral TMJ space (CLS), coronal medial TMJ space (CMS), condyle axis angle, maxillary basal bone width (BWM), inter-molars width, nasal bone width, molar inclination and molar palatal cusp height (U6H) were measured using Dolphin Imaging.

RESULTS

At T1, compared with T0, the PS and SS significantly increased by 0.41 mm (P = .008) and 0.3 mm (P = .007). But only the SS significantly increased by 0.21 mm (P = .025) at T2. There was a significant difference of 0.37 mm (left-right, P = .014) between the left and right SS at T0, but no significant difference at T1 and T2. The increased BMW showed weak positive correlations with the change of PS (P = .015) and CMS (P = .031), and the decreased U6H showed weak negative correlations with the change of PS (P = .015) and CLS (P = .031) at T1.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MSE led to an increase in the SS and PS, which were weakly correlated with BWM and U6H. But this effect in the TMJ space gradually diminished after 6 months of maintenance, and the symmetry of the condyle-fossa relationship was preserved.

Effectiveness of miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness and side effects of miniscrew-assisted rapid maxillary expansion (MARME) with conventional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in the treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. The quality of included RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome was the extent of dentoskeletal expansion achieved. Secondary outcomes were the dental and periodontal side effects. We calculated summary weighted mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Six RCTs involving 287 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared to conventional RME, MARME was associated with a greater palatal suture opening (mm) measured at the anterior nasal spine (MD = 1.21, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.66), first premolars (MD = 1.13, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.55), first molars (MD = 1.18, 95% CI 0.28 to 2.09), and posterior nasal spine (MD = 1.14, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.98), increased palatal width (mm) at the first molars (MD = 0.75, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.20), and reduced buccal inclination (degrees) of the first premolars (MD =  - 6.06, 95% CI - 10.36 to - 1.76) and first molars (MD =  - 3.17, 95% CI - 5.35 to - 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

MARME is associated with the following advantages over traditional tooth-borne RME: increased palatal suture opening, increased palatal width, and reduced buccal tooth inclination.

REGISTRATION

This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021256750.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

MARME may be preferred over conventional RME in cases with fused mid-palatal sutures or where further buccal tooth inclination is undesirable.