A Randomized Controlled Trial on Safety of Steroid Avoidance in Immunologically Low-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

Immunosuppressive drug combinations after kidney transplantation and post-transplant diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation (KT). This systematic review investigated the effect of different immunosuppressive regimens on the risk of PTDM. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included KT recipients with any immunosuppression and reported PTDM outcomes up to 1 October 2023. The analysis included 125 RCTs. We found no differences in PTDM risk within induction therapies. In de novo KT, there was an increased risk of developing PTDM with tacrolimus versus cyclosporin (RR 1.71, 95%CI [1.38-2.11]). No differences were observed between tacrolimus+mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) and tacrolimus+MMF/MPA, but there was a tendency towards a higher risk of PTDM in the cyclosporin+mTORi group (RR 1.42, 95%CI [0.99-2.04]). Conversion from cyclosporin to an mTORi increased PTDM risk (RR 1.89, 95%CI [1.18-3.03]). De novo belatacept compared with a calcineurin inhibitor resulted in 50% lower risk of PTDM (RR 0.50, 95%CI [0.32-0.79]). Steroid avoidance resulted in 31% lower PTDM risk (RR 0.69, 95%CI [0.57-0.83]), whereas steroid withdrawal resulted in no differences. Immunosuppression should be decided on an individual basis, carefully weighing the risk of future PTDM and rejection.

Current use of antithymoglobulin as induction regimen in kidney transplantation: A review

Currently, various immunosuppressive drugs are used in organ transplantation. In particular, antithymoglobulin is a widely used drug in kidney transplantation in Korea, accounting for 20% of all induction therapy. According to existing studies, antithymoglobulin induction therapy has several advantages and disadvantages compared with other immunotherapies depending on the kidney transplant situation (dead donor, living donor, low-risk recipient, and high-risk recipient) or antithymoglobulin dose. In this review, we summarize the research conducted so far on antithymoglobulin and hope that antithymoglobulin research on kidney transplantation will be actively conducted in the future.

Post-Transplant Bone Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Diagnosis and Management

Kidney transplantation is the preferred gold standard modality of treatment for kidney failure. Bone disease after kidney transplantation is highly prevalent in patients living with a kidney transplant and is associated with high rates of hip fractures. Fractures are associated with increased healthcare costs, morbidity and mortality. Post-transplant bone disease (PTBD) includes renal osteodystrophy, osteoporosis, osteonecrosis and bone fractures. PTBD is complex as it encompasses pre-existing chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disease and compounding factors after transplantation, including the use of immunosuppression and the development of de novo bone disease. After transplantation, the persistence of secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism, renal osteodystrophy, relative vitamin D deficiency and high levels of fibroblast growth factor-23 contribute to post-transplant bone disease. Risk assessment includes identifying both general risk factors and kidney-specific risk factors. Diagnosis is complex as the gold standard bone biopsy with double-tetracycline labelling to diagnose the PTBD subtype is not always readily available. Therefore, alternative diagnostic tools may be used to aid its diagnosis. Both non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapy can be employed to treat PTBD. In this review, we will discuss pathophysiology, risk assessment, diagnosis and management strategies to manage PTBD after kidney transplantation.

The use of lymphocyte-depleting antibodies in specific populations of kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recommendations of the use of antibody induction treatments in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are based on moderate quality and historical studies. This systematic review aims to reevaluate, based on actual studies, the effects of different antibody preparations when used in specific KTR subgroups.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL and selected randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies looking at different antibody preparations used as induction in KTR. Comparisons were categorized into different KTR subgroups: standard, high risk of rejection, high risk of delayed graft function (DGF), living donor, and elderly KTR. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven RCT and 99 observational studies were finally included. Compared to anti-interleukin-2-receptor antibodies (IL2RA), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) reduced the risk of acute rejection at two years in standard KTR (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.61-0.89) and high risk of rejection KTR (RR 0.55, 95%CI 0.43-0.72), but without decreasing the risk of graft loss. We did not find significant differences comparing ATG vs. alemtuzumab or different ATG dosages in any KTR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite many studies carried out on induction treatment in KTR, their heterogeneity and short follow-up preclude definitive conclusions to determine the optimal induction therapy. Compared with IL2RA, ATG reduced rejection in standard-risk, highly sensitized, and living donor graft recipients, but not in high DGF risk or elderly recipients. More studies are needed to demonstrate beneficial effects in other KTR subgroups and overall patient and graft survival.

Clinical Evidence on the Purported Pharmacokinetic Interactions between Corticosteroids and Mycophenolic Acid

Corticosteroids (steroids) are commonly used concurrently with mycophenolic acid (MPA) as the first-line immunosuppression therapy for the prevention of rejection in solid organ transplantations. Steroids are also commonly administered with MPA in various autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus and idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Despite various review articles having suggested the presence of pharmacokinetic interactions between MPA and steroids, definitive data have not yet been demonstrated. The aim of this Current Opinion is to critically evaluate the available clinical data and propose the optimal study design for characterising the MPA-steroid pharmacokinetic interactions. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for relevant clinical articles in English as of September 29, 2022, where a total of 8 papers have been identified as supporting and 22 as non-supporting the purported drug interaction. To objectively evaluate the data, novel assessment criteria to effectively diagnose the interaction based on known MPA pharmacology were formulated, including the availability of independent control groups, prednisolone concentrations, MPA metabolite data, unbound MPA concentrations, and the characterisations of entero-hepatic recirculation and MPA renal clearance. Overall, the majority of the identified corticosteroid data were pertaining to prednisone or prednisolone. Our assessment indicated that no conclusive mechanistic data supporting the interaction are available in the current clinical literature, and further studies are required to quantify the effects/mechanisms of steroid-tapering or withdrawal on MPA pharmacokinetics. This current opinion provides justification for further translational investigations, as this particular drug interaction has the potential to exert significant adverse outcomes in patients prescribed MPA.

The Association of Pre-Transplant C-Peptide Level with the Development of Post-Transplant Diabetes: A Cohort Study

Background

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is an important complication after kidney transplantation that results in reduced patient and allograft survival. Although there are established risk factors for PTDM, whether pretransplant C-peptide levels associate with PTDM is unknown. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to examine the association of pretransplant C-peptide levels with PTDM.

Methods

This was a cohort study of nondiabetic adult patients who underwent kidney transplant in Nova Scotia, Canada, between January 1, 2016, and March 31, 2021, with fasting C-peptide levels measured before transplant. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association of pretransplant C-peptide (dichotomized around the median) with PTDM at 1 year post transplant. Given the known association between pretransplant obesity and PTDM, we repeated our primary analysis in a cohort restricted to a BMI of 20-35 kg/m².

Results

The median C-peptide value was 3251 (Q1 2480, Q3 4724); pretransplant C-peptide level was dichotomized at 3000 pmol/L. PTDM occurred in 25 (19%) individuals. Thirty percent of patients in the high and only 2% of patients in the low C-peptide groups developed PTDM (P<0.001). A C-peptide level ≥3000 pmol/L was strongly associated with PTDM in multivariable analysis (OR=18.9, 95% CI, 2.06 to 174.2). In a restricted cohort with a BMI of 20-35 kg/m², an elevated pretransplant C-peptide remained independently associated with the risk of PTDM (OR=15.7, 95% CI, 1.64 to 150.3). C-peptide was the only factor independently associated with PTDM in this restricted BMI cohort.

Conclusions

A pretransplant C-peptide level ≥3000 pmol/L was associated with a nearly 20-fold increased odds of PTDM at 1 year post kidney transplantation. Identifying patients with high pretransplant C-peptide levels may therefore help identify those at risk for PTDM who may benefit from focused preventative and therapeutic interventions and support.

Dyslipidemia in Renal Transplant Recipients

Dyslipidemia is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation (KT) and is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Renal transplant recipients (RTRs) are considered at high, or very high, risk of CVD, which is a leading cause of death in this patient group. Despite many factors of post-transplant dyslipidemia, the immunosuppressive treatment has the biggest influence on a lipid profile. There are no strict dyslipidemia treatment guidelines for RTRs, but the ones proposing an individual approach regarding CVD risk seem most suitable. Proper diet and physical activity are the main general measures to manage dyslipidemia and should be introduced initially in every patient after KT. In the case of an insufficient correction of lipemia, statins are the basis for hypolipidemic treatment. Statins should be introduced with caution to avoid serious side-effects (e.g., myopathy) or drug-drug interactions, especially with immunosuppressants. To lower the incidence of adverse effects, and improve medication adherence, ezetimibe in combination with statins is recommended. Fibrates and bile sequestrants are not recommended due to their side-effects and variable efficacy. However, several new lipid-lowering drugs like Proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type9 (PCSK9) inhibitors may have promising effects in RTRs, but further research assessing efficacy and safety is yet to be carried out.