Reanimating Patients After Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: A Practical Approach Informed by Best Evidence

Characteristics and Outcomes of Traumatic Cardiac Arrests in the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about survival outcomes after traumatic cardiac arrest in Asia, or the association of Utstein factors with survival after traumatic cardiac arrests. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic cardiac arrests in Asia, and analyze Utstein factors associated with survival.

METHODS

Traumatic cardiac arrest patients from 13 countries in the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study registry from 2009 to 2018 were analyzed. Multilevel logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the primary outcomes of survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2), and the secondary outcome of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

RESULTS

There were 207,455 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases, of which 13,631 (6.6%) were trauma patients aged 18 years and above with resuscitation attempted and who had survival outcomes reported. The median age was 57 years (interquartile range 39-73), 23.0% received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), 1750 (12.8%) had ROSC, 461 (3.4%) survived to discharge, and 131 (1.0%) had CPC 1-2. Factors associated with higher rates of survival to discharge and favorable neurological outcome were arrests witnessed by emergency medical services or private ambulances (survival to discharge adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.99-4.38; CPC 1-2 aOR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.25-5.27), bystander CPR (survival to discharge aOR = 2.16; 95% CI 1.71-2.72; CPC 1-2 aOR = 4.98, 95% CI = 3.27-7.57), and initial shockable rhythm (survival to discharge aOR = 12.00; 95% CI = 6.80-21.17; CPC 1-2 aOR = 33.28, 95% CI = 11.39-97.23) or initial pulseless electrical activity (survival to discharge aOR = 3.98; 95% CI = 2.99-5.30; CPC 1-2 aOR = 5.67, 95% CI = 3.05-10.53) relative to asystole.

CONCLUSIONS

In traumatic cardiac arrest, early aggressive resuscitation may not be futile and bystander CPR may improve outcomes.

No Resuscitative Thoracotomy? When to Stop Chest Compressions After Prehospital Traumatic Cardiac Arrest

INTRODUCTION

Although indications and outcomes for trauma patients who require resuscitative thoracotomies are well studied, little is known about how prehospital chest compressions support survival in patients who do not meet criteria for subsequent resuscitative thoracotomy.

METHODS

Data from a single institutional retrospective review of trauma patients who required prehospital chest compressions from 1/2015 to 12/2020 were collected. Patients who underwent compressions only were compared to those who underwent subsequent resuscitative thoracotomy. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were identified, 22 of whom underwent compressions only and 30 of whom went on to undergo thoracotomy. Patients who underwent compressions only were more likely to be female (36% vs 10%, P = .04), older (mean 46 vs 35 years, P = .04), and to experience blunt trauma (78% vs 43%, P = .01). Injury severity score was similar between the cohorts (mean 18 vs 28, P = .11). One patient in the compressions only cohort had a REBOA placed compared to two in the thoracotomy cohort (1.9% vs 3.67%, P > .99). Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 17% of the compressions only cohort compared to 45% of the thoracotomy cohort (P = .03). In-hospital mortality in the compressions only cohort was 100%, whereas in-hospital mortality in the thoracotomy cohort was 94% (P = .50), with a mean of zero survival days in both groups (P = .33).

CONCLUSION

Prehospital chest compressions without thoracotomy were uniformly fatal, even if transient ROSC was obtained. Our findings support termination of chest compressions for those trauma patients who do not meet criteria for resuscitative thoracotomy.

Algorithm to Improve Resuscitation Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: This study proposed an algorithm to improve resuscitation outcomes in the emergency department (ED) for patients with traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (TOHCA). We also performed a retrospective chart review of patient outcomes before and after implementing the algorithm and sought to define factors that might influence patient outcomes.

Methods: In September 2018, we implemented an algorithm for patients with TOHCA. This algorithm rapidly identifies possible causes of TOHCA and recommends appropriate interventions. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of all patients with TOHCA during a five-year period (comprising periods before and after the algorithm) and compared the results before and after the implementation of the algorithm.

Results: After this algorithm was implemented, the use of the ED interventions of blood transfusion, placement of a large-bore central venous catheter, and thoracostomy increased significantly. The rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) also increased (before vs. after: ROSC: 23.6% vs. 41.5%, P = 0.035). Regarding hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge, we observed the trend of increment (hospital admission: 18.2% vs. 24.6%, P = 0.394; survival to hospital discharge: 0.0% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.107). Admitted patients exhibited a higher end-tidal CO₂ level during resuscitation than nonadmitted patients [admitted vs. nonadmitted: 41.5 (33.3-52.0) vs. 12.0 (7.5-18.8), P = 0.001].

Conclusion: Our algorithm prioritizes the three major treatable causes of TOHCA: impedance of venous return, hypovolemia, and hypoxia. We found that rate of ROSC increased with the increasing implementation of the ED interventions recommended by the algorithm.

Resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest. An Utstein-based case series

AIMS

Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is still a leading cause of mortality worldwide. In recent years, resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been progressively studied as an adjunct to standard advanced life support (ALS) in both traumatic and non-traumatic refractory OHCA. Since January 2019, the REBOA procedure has been applied to all the patients experiencing both traumatic and non-traumatic refractory OHCA (≥15 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation) not eligible for ECPR for clinical or logistic reasons. We aimed at describing the feasibility and effects of REBOA performed both in the Emergency Department and in the pre-hospital environment served by the local HEMS for refractory OHCA.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients experiencing refractory OHCA and in whom REBOA was attempted in 2019 and 2020 were included in the study, Utstein data and REBOA specific variables were recorded.

RESULTS

Successful catheter placement was achieved in 18 out of 20 patients, 11 of these were non-traumatic OHCAs while 7 were traumatic OHCAs, the 2 failures were related to repeated arterial puncture failure. Median time between the EMS dispatch and REBOA catheter placing attempt was 46 min. An increase in etCO₂ over 10 mmHg was observed after balloon inflation in 12 out of 18 patients (8/11 non-traumatic and 4/7 traumatic OHCAs), a sustained ROSC was observed in 5 patients (1 traumatic and 4 non-traumatic OHCA) that were subsequently admitted to the ICU. Four out of the 5 patients reached the criteria for brain death in the subsequent 24 h while one patient experienced another episode of refractory cardiac arrest in ICU and subsequently died.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm the feasibility of REBOA technique as an adjunct to ALS in both the ED and prehospital phase and most of the treated patients experienced a transient ROSC after balloon inflation while 5 out of 18 experienced a sustained ROSC. However, while in the trauma setting increasing evidence suggests an improved survival when REBOA is applied to refractory OHCA, in non-traumatic OHCA this has yet to be demonstrated and large studies are needed.

Decision making in prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest; A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Despite improving survival of patients in prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA), initiation and/or discontinuation of resuscitation of TCA patients remains a subject of debate among prehospital emergency medical service providers. The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence decision making by prehospital emergency medical service providers during resuscitation of patients with TCA.

METHODS

Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted with experienced ambulance nurses, HEMS nurses and HEMS physicians individually, followed by a focus group discussion. Participants had to be currently active in prehospital medicine in the Netherlands. Interviews were encoded for analysis using ATLAS.ti. Using qualitative analysis, different themes around decision making in TCA were identified.

RESULTS

Eight themes were identified as being important factors for decision making during prehospital TCA. These themes were: (1) factual information (e.g., electrocardiography rhythm or trauma mechanism); (2) fear of providing futile care or major impairment if return of spontaneous circulation was obtained; (3) potential organ donation; (4) patient age; (5) suspicion of attempted suicide; (6) presence of bystanders or family; (7) opinions of other team members; and (8) training and education. Several ambulance nurses reported they do not feel adequately supported by the current official national ambulance guidelines on TCA, nor did they feel sufficiently trained to perform pre-hospital interventions such as endotracheal intubation or needle thoracocentesis on these patients.

CONCLUSION

Eight themes were identified as being important for decision making during prehospital TCA. While guidelines based on prognostic factors are important, it should be recognized that decision making in TCA is impacted by more than factual information alone. This should be reflected in educational programs and future guidelines.

Prehospital blunt traumatic arrest resuscitation augmented by whole blood: a case report

BACKGROUND

Prehospital hemorrhagic shock accounts for approximately 25,000 civilian deaths annually in the United States. A balanced, blood-based resuscitation strategy is hypothesized to be the optimal treatment for these patients. Due to logistical constraints, delivering a balanced, blood-based resuscitation is difficult in the prehospital setting. A low titer O⁺ whole blood (LTO⁺ WB) ground ambulance initiative, may help alleviate this capability gap.

CASE REPORT

A 37-year-old female was involved in a motor vehicle collision at approximately 16:30. While she was trapped inside the vehicle, her mental status deteriorated. The patient was successfully extricated at 17:04 and found to be in cardiac arrest. The paramedics and firefighters quickly secured her airway and applied a mechanical CPR device. The first responder team obtained return of spontaneous circulation, but the patient's blood pressure was 43/27 mmHg. The paramedics transfused one unit of LTO⁺ WB. Twenty-one minutes after the initial LTO⁺ WB transfusion, the air ambulance team transfused a second unit of LTO⁺ WB. Upon hospital arrival, the transfusion was completed, and the patient's shock index improved to 1.0. The trauma team identified a grade 5 splenic injury with active extravasation. Interventional radiology performed an angiogram and successfully embolized the tertiary branches of the inferior splenic pole. She was extubated on postinjury Day one and discharged to her home neurologically intact on postinjury Day 12.

CONCLUSION

The prehospital availability of LTO⁺ WB may enhance the resuscitation of critically ill trauma patients.