Experiencia clínica en una consulta de alta resolución de nódulo tiroideo

Evaluation of a Clinical Pathway for Thyroid Nodular Disease: Timings and Delays in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Thyroid Cancer

Background: Due to the high prevalence of nodular thyroid disease in the general population and the need to rule out malignant tumours, a clinical pathway for nodular thyroid disease was created at our tertiary-level hospital. Our study aimed to quantify timings and delays in diagnosis and treatment in this clinical pathway, specifically for patients who were diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients who were newly diagnosed with thyroid cancer and who had been previously evaluated in the clinical pathway for nodular thyroid disease at our institution during 2015–2017. Patient demographics, previous diagnostic studies, cytological results, tumour details and key dates were analysed to identify wait times in diagnosis and treatment. Results: Forty patients with thyroid cancer were included. The diagnostic delay had a median time of 60 days, and the treatment delay was dependent on cytopathological results. The main cause for delay in the diagnostic phase was the timing of the thyroid ultrasound performed by the radiology department. In the treatment phase, patients with a cytological result of Bethesda III, V or VI underwent surgery at the suggested time, while those in the Bethesda II or IV category did not. Conclusions: The major delay found in the diagnostic phase was the timing of the thyroid ultrasound performed by the radiology department. We are not suggesting that this step must be eliminated, though the implementation of routine ultrasonography in a thyroid clinic can help identify patients who need more urgent evaluation for fine needle aspiration cytology. In our hospital, decision for surgery is based mainly on the cytopathological report. Imaging studies and/or molecular testing could be considered to reduce treatment delays.

Diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules in Spain. Results of a national survey

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid nodule (TN) is a common reason for consultation in daily practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnosis and treatment of TNs in our environment and to assess the current status regarding the existence and structure of high-resolution TN clinics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Members of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition were invited in 2018 to participate in an online survey on the diagnostic and therapeutic processes of TN.

RESULTS

A total of 211 valid surveys were received. Of all respondents, 30.8% stated that there were high-resolution TN clinics in their environment, with the endocrinologist being the main person responsible for performing ultrasonography (87.7%) and fine needle aspiration (FNA) (69.2%). For ultrasound classification of TNs, 32.7% used the ATA criteria, 32.2% the TI-RADS criteria, and 22.7% no classification. In situ verification of sample suitability was performed in 35.5% of the cases, and molecular analysis in 8.1%. With regard to clinical discharge, 65.4% would consider it after 5 years of follow-up and with a benign FNA. In the event of a Bethesda III result, 50.2% of respondents would repeat FNA and 35.5% would opt for surgery; if a Bethesda IV result was found, 95.8% would opt for surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

High-resolution TN clinics are structures increasingly implemented in our environment where the endocrinologist is the main person responsible for performing ultrasonography and FNA. The standard clinical practice in our specialty is consistent with most recommendations concerning clinical practice guidelines for TNs.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for thyroid malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically appraise and summarize the available evidence about the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (USFNA) for thyroid malignancy, and to explore the integration of these estimates with the probability of thyroid malignancy before USFNA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of multiple databases from each database's inception to August 2014 was performed. Eligible studies included those that evaluated patients with thyroid nodules who underwent USFNA and subsequent evaluation by histopathology or long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 32 studies at moderate risk of bias evaluating the USFNA diagnostic characteristics for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy. Results were imprecise and inconsistent across trials. The pooled likelihood ratio (LR) of thyroid malignancy for a benign USFNA result was 0.09 (95 % CI 0.06, 0.14; I (2) = 33 %), whereas the pooled LR for a malignant result was 197 (95 % CI, 68, 569; I (2) = 77 %). In the case of a suspicious for follicular neoplasm result, the pooled LR for malignancy was 0.6 (95 % CI, 0.4, 1.0; I (2) = 84 %) and 8.3 (95 % CI, 3.6, 19.2; I (2) = 89) for a result of suspicious for malignancy.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of USFNA warrants only limited confidence due to risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. However, some USFNA results (benign, malignant) are likely very helpful, by significantly changing the pre-test probability of thyroid cancer.

Prevalence of Cancer in Patients with Thyroid Nodules in the Island of Cyprus: Predictive Value of Ultrasound Features and Thyroid Autoimmune Status

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of thyroid carcinoma in patients who underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (USgFNA) of thyroid nodules in the island of Cyprus. Ultrasound features as well as the presence of autoimmune thyroid disease were evaluated as risk factors for malignancy.

METHODS

322 consecutively examined patients (272 females/50 males, age 13-81) underwent USgFNA of thyroid nodules in a referral endocrine clinic between July 2007 and July 2009. The ultrasonographic characteristics examined were: echogenicity, margin irregularity, composition, calcifications, presence of increased vasculature and nodule size. The presence or absence of autoimmune thyroid disease was recorded.

RESULTS

From the 548 nodules examined, 74 (13.6%) were classified as THY3, 4 or 5. 75 patients (123 nodules) underwent surgical resection. 46 patients (64 nodules) proved to have thyroid carcinoma by histology. There was a significant correlation of suspicious/malignant cytology with solid composition, hypoechogenicity, irregular margins and the presence of calcifications. A significant association was also noted between the presence of positive antithyroglobulin antibodies (p < 0.05) and Graves' disease (p = 0.01) with suspicious/malignant cytology.

CONCLUSION

The overall prevalence of thyroid cancer was 14.3%. Ultrasound characteristics were highly predictive of thyroid malignancy. Thyroid autoimmunity should be considered as a risk factor.

[Review of the current value of ultrasonography in the characterization of thyroid nodules]

The widespread use of medical imaging to study diseases of the neck reveals the prevalence of thyroid nodules can be as high as 67%. This is an important problem for the healthcare system because after analyzing the characteristics of the nodules a decision must be made regarding whether to perform fine-needle aspiration cytology to determine whether the lesion is malignant. In this article, we review the techniques for ultrasonographic study and fine-needle aspiration. We discuss the different guidelines for characterizing thyroid nodules and the criteria that help determine which patients need fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis and when an invasive procedure is unnecessary and can be avoided. Close collaboration with the different specialists involved in the management of thyroid nodules helps optimize resources and diagnostic performance.