Can suitable candidates for levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel therapy be identified using current evidence?

How to Use the New European Academy of Neurology/Movement Disorder Society European Section Guideline for Invasive Therapies in Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

The decision to choose invasive treatments for Parkinson's disease (PD) is complex and needs careful consideration.

OBJECTIVES

Although the recommendations of the European Academy of Neurology/Movement Disorder Society European Section guideline for invasive therapies of PD are useful, the different clinical profiles of people with PD who seek advice for possible invasive therapy need further attention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Here we describe 8 clinical standard situations of people with PD unsatisfied with their current oral treatment where invasive therapies may be considered. These are PD patients presenting with the following symptoms: (1) severe motor fluctuations, (2) beginning of levodopa-responsive fluctuations, severe tremor at (3) young or (4) advanced age, (5) impulse control disorders and related behavioral disorders, (6) hallucinations and psychosis, (7) minimal cognitive impairment or mild dementia, and (8) patients in need of palliative care. For some of these conditions, evidence at lower level or simple clinical considerations exist.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no one-fits-all answers, but physician and patient should discuss each option carefully considering symptom profile, psychosocial context, availability of therapy alternatives, and many other factors. The current paper outlines our proposed approach to these circumstances.

Levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel infusion in advanced Parkinson’s disease: real-world experience and practical guidance

As Parkinson’s disease (PD) progresses, treatment needs to be adapted to maintain symptom control. Once patients develop advanced PD, an optimised regimen of oral and transdermal medications may no longer provide adequate relief of OFF periods and motor complications can emerge. At this point, patients may wish to consider a device-aided therapy (DAT) that provides continuous dopaminergic stimulation to help overcome these issues. Levodopa–entacapone–carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) infusion is a recently developed DAT option. The aim of this article is twofold: (1) to give an overview of the pharmacokinetics of LECIG infusion and clinical experience to date of its use in patients with advanced PD, including real-world data and patient-reported outcomes from a cohort of patients treated in Sweden, the first country where it was introduced, and (2) based on that information to provide practical guidance for healthcare teams starting patients on LECIG infusion, whether they are transitioning from oral medications or from other DATs, including recommendations for stepwise dosing calculation and titration. In terms of clinical efficacy, LECIG infusion has been shown to have a similar effect on motor function to standard levodopa–carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) infusion but, due to the presence of entacapone in LECIG, the bioavailability of levodopa is increased such that lower overall levodopa doses can be given to achieve therapeutically effective plasma concentrations. From a practical standpoint, LECIG infusion is delivered using a smaller cartridge and pump system than LCIG infusion. In addition, for patients previously treated with LCIG infusion who have an existing percutaneous endoscopic transgastric jejunostomy (PEG-J) system, this is compatible with the LECIG infusion system. As it is a relatively new product, the long-term efficacy and safety of LECIG infusion remain to be established; however, real-world data will continue to be collected and analysed to provide this information and help inform future clinical decisions.

Intrajejunal Infusion of Levodopa/Carbidopa for Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review

Advanced Parkinson's disease is inconsistently defined, and evidence is lacking in relation to device‐aided therapies. To update existing reviews of intrajejunal infusion of levodopa/carbidopa (LCIG), we performed a literature search for relevant articles (to November 3, 2020) using PubMed supplemented by hand searching. Retrieved articles were categorized by relevance to identified research questions, including motor complications and symptoms; nonmotor symptoms; functioning, quality of life, and caregiver burden; optimal timing of treatment initiation and administration duration; discontinuation; and complications. Most eligible studies (n = 56) were open‐label, observational studies including relatively small patient numbers. LCIG consistently reduces OFF time and increased ON time without troublesome dyskinesia with varying effects regarding ON time with troublesome dyskinesia and the possibility of diphasic dyskinesia. More recent evidence provides some increased support for the benefits of LCIG in relation to nonmotor symptoms, quality of life, activities of daily living, and reduced caregiver burden. Patient age does not appear to significantly impact the effectiveness of LCIG. Discontinuation rates with LCIG (~17%–26%) commonly relate to device‐related issues, although the ability to easily discontinue LCIG may represent a potential benefit. LCIG may be a favorable option for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease who show predominant nonmotor symptoms and vulnerability to complications of other advanced therapy modalities. Larger, well‐controlled studies, including precise investigation of cost effectiveness, would further assist treatment selection. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Intrajejunal vs oral levodopa-carbidopa therapy in Parkinson disease: A retrospective cohort study

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is a method of continuous administration of levodopa - the standard treatment in Parkinson disease (PD, a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by resting tremor, rigidity, gait impairment, and bradykinesia), thought to reduce the short-life and pulsatile problems of oral administration. We aimed to study the effects of Levodopa-Carbidopa therapy in 2 separate groups: one with intrajejunal administration of Levodopa-Carbidopa gel and the second with oral therapy.We performed an observational retrospective Romanian cohort study on 61 patients diagnosed with PD patients, with Hoehn and Jahr 3 and 4 stages, recruited from a single regional tertiary center in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, between 2009 and 2019.The mean adjusted UPDRS III (and similarly for UPDRS II) improved in the LCIG compared to the oral therapy group with 15.6 (95% CI 12.0-19.2, P < .001), and with 18.4 (95% CI 13.8-22.9, P < .001), stratified for the Hoehn and Jahr stages 3 and 4. There was a 41.7% (10) reduction in dyskinesia, and 29.2% reduction in wearing off/on-off at 1 year in the LCIG group compared to 0% (0) dyskinesia reduction, and 2.7% reduction in wearing off/on-off in the oral therapy group.Continuous intrajejunal infusion of LCIG ensures a significant and clinical reduction in motor fluctuations compared to oral therapy in advanced PD, even after adjustment for important confounders.

Parkinson's disease advanced therapies - A systematic review: More unanswered questions than guidance

In advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), therapeutic interventions include device-aided therapies such as continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI), levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) infusion, and deep brain stimulation (DBS). We reappraised the evidence guiding the decision of appropriate device-aided therapies in advanced PD, and systematically reviewed the literature (including ongoing clinical trials) comparing CSAI, LCIG, DBS in terms of efficacy and cost-effectiveness, with particular consideration to possible conflicts of interests. Of 14,980 documents screened, sixteen were included (4 and 13 studies examining efficacy and cost-effectiveness, respectively). LCIG and DBS showed higher efficacy compared to best medical therapy (BMT). DBS was more expensive than BMT and LCIG. Lifetime costs of CSAI were lower of those of DBS, and DBS lifetime costs were lower than those of LCIG. The majority of studies (11 out of 16) showed direct or indirect sponsorship from pharmaceutical or device companies. Only one ongoing clinical trial comparing LCIG with DBS was found. Device-aided therapies address unmet needs in advanced PD. LCIG and DBS are superior to BMT in head-to-head studies; however, initial and lifetime costs should be considered when choosing those therapies. Guidelines to assist clinicians and patients to choose device-aided therapies, free from conflict of interests, are required.

Subclinical affective and cognitive fluctuations in Parkinson's disease: a randomized double-blind double-dummy study of Oral vs. Intrajejunal Levodopa

BACKGROUND

Chronic levodopa treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD) may promote undesirable motor and non-motor fluctuations. Compared to chronic oral levodopa treatment, continuous infusion of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) in advanced PD reduces motor fluctuations. However, differences in their effect on acute non-motor changes were not formally demonstrated.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study to compare acute non-motor changes between intermittent oral immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa (LC-IR) and LCIG.

METHODS

After > 12-h OFF, thirteen PD patients chronically treated with LCIG and without history of non-motor swings, were allocated to receive first, LCIG infusion plus three oral doses of placebo, or placebo infusion plus three oral doses of LC-IR. Over-encapsulated oral medication (LC-IR or placebo) was administered every 2 h. We monitored plasmatic levels of levodopa, motor status (UPDRS-III), mood, anxiety, and frontal functions at baseline (0-h) and hourly after each oral challenge.

RESULTS

Repeated-measures ANOVAs showed significant group by treatment interaction indicating more fluctuations of levodopa plasma levels with LC-IR. No significant interactions were seen in the temporal profile of motor status, anxiety, mood and cognition. However, point-to-point parametric and nonparametric tests showed a significant more marked and more sustained improvement in anxiety scores under LCIG. A significant improvement of mood and verbal fluency was seen a + 3-h only under LCIG.

DISCUSSION

Our sample of advanced PD patients exhibited moderate but significant non-motor fluctuations. LCIG was associated with a more favorable profile of acute affective and cognitive fluctuations that was particularly expressed at the first part of the infusion curve.

Long-term effect of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel on axial signs in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Few studies have suggested that levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) may have a benefit on Parkinson's disease (PD) axial signs.

AIMS OF THE STUDY

To investigate the long-term effect of LCIG on axial signs and the related prognostic factors.

METHODS

A retrospective study on 49 PD patients treated with LCIG. Axial signs as per the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale axial score (AS), Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale, and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) were assessed at baseline (before starting LCIG treatment) and at the last follow-up (FU).

RESULTS

After 47.6 ± 30 months of treatment, total AS deteriorated while motor complications still improved, in spite of a significant LEDD/Kg increment. When adjusted for LCIG treatment duration, a higher AS and freezing of gait severity at FU were predicted by a baseline lower response to l-dopa and higher H&Y (P < 0.01) and they were related to a lower independency in activity of daily life at FU (P < 0.001). Single axial items remain stable up to one year and postural instability up to four years.

CONCLUSION

Baseline disease severity and the magnitude of l-dopa response predict axial signs' severity after around four years of LCIG treatment, with consequent implication on patients' functional independence.

Adjunctive Therapies in Parkinson's Disease: How to Choose the Best Treatment Strategy Approach

End-of-dose motor fluctuations are regarded as one of the core troublesome symptoms by patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Treatment of levodopa (L-dopa)-induced motor fluctuations is still an unmet medical need. L-dopa is the gold standard in the treatment of motor PD symptoms; notwithstanding, a wide range of adjunct therapies are currently available for the treatment of end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Additionally, device-aided therapies, such as deep brain stimulation, L-dopa-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion, and on-demand injection or continuous apomorphine infusion, may be considered when oral treatments are not sufficient to control motor fluctuations. In spite of the several evidence-based reviews and guidelines available, there is no agreement on which add-on therapy should be started first or its optimal timing. Equally challenging is the choice and timing between device-aided therapies. Herein, we propose a general overview of oral and device-aided treatments for PD patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations, offering two possible algorithms that can guide clinicians during the therapeutic decision process.