|
1
|
Li M, Zhang P, Zhang X, Chen Q, Cao Q, Zhang Y, Xiao H. Bis-Schiff base cellulosic nanocrystals for Hg (II) removal from aqueous solution with high adsorptive capacity and sensitive fluorescent response. Int J Biol Macromol 2023; 242:124802. [PMID: 37182619 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Mercury pollution in aqueous solutions is a severe problem in environmental protection and the contaminated water may cause serious risks to human health. Based on the constant development of adsorptive materials, adsorption technique is widely applied as an efficient and convenient approach to eliminate mercury species from waters. In this work, we report a one-pot procedure to prepare a bis-Schiff base cellulosic adsorbent to integrate the advantages of large adsorptive capacity and excellent fluorescent recognition towards mercury ions. The adsorption experiments demonstrate that sulfydryl-contained cellulosic nanocrystals exhibit specific affinity with mercury species and the adsorption capacity reaches as high as 624.8 mg/g at room temperature. Besides, the introduction of rhodamine moiety endows the material a 19 times enhancement of selective "off-on" fluorescent sensing while exposed to mercury. Additionally, the bifunctional adsorbent material shows high sensitivity towards mercury ions in aqueous solution with detection limits of as low as 8.29 × 10-8 M for fluorescence and 5.9 × 10-9 M for UV-vis spectrum, respectively. The fitting results of the adsorption models indicate a monolayer adsorption during the uptake of mercury ions and the removal process follows the pseudo-second order kinetics. Moreover, density functional theory studies are employed to further understand the adsorptive and responsive mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Li
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, PR China; MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, PR China.
| | - Panpan Zhang
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, PR China; MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, PR China
| | - Xuemeng Zhang
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, PR China; MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, PR China
| | - Qian Chen
- Department of Chemistry, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, PR China
| | - Qianyong Cao
- Department of Chemistry, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, PR China
| | - Yuling Zhang
- Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, PR China; MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, PR China
| | - Huining Xiao
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton E3B 5A3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|