Enantioselective effect of trifloxystrobin in early-stage zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos: Cardiac abnormalities impacted by E,E-trifloxystrobin enantiomer

Combined toxicity of trifloxystrobin and fluopyram to zebrafish embryos and the effect on bone development

Trifloxystrobin (TRI) is a methacrylate fungicide, and fluopyram (FLU) is a new pyridylethylbenzamide fungicide and nematicide. Both are often detected in water bodies and may be highly toxic to many aquatic organisms. Unfortunately, the aquatic biological risks of single FLU or a mixture of trifloxystrobin and fluopyram have not been reported. In this study, zebrafish was selected as the test organism to investigate the combined toxicity of trifloxystrobin and fluopyram to zebrafish. After zebrafish embryos exposed to three pesticide solutions, Alcian-blue staining, Alizarin-red staining and quantitative PCR (qPCR) were performed. The results indicated that 96h-LC50 of TRI was 0.159 mg·L-1 to zebrafish embryo, which was highly toxic. The 96h-LC50 of FLU to zebrafish embryos was 4.375 mg·L-1, being moderately toxic. The joint toxicity to zebrafish embryos(FLU at 96h-LC50 and TRI at 96h-LC50 in a 1:1 weight ratio to form a series of concentration treatment groups) was antagonistic. Both trifloxystrobin and fluopyram also inhibited the skeletal development of zebrafish and showed to be antagonistic. The results of qPCR indicated upregulations of different genes upon three different treatments. TRI mainly induced Smads up-expression, which may affect the BMP-smads pathway. FLU mainly induced an up-expression of extracellular BMP ligands and type I receptor (Bmpr-1a), which may affect the BMP ligand receptor pathway. The 1:1 mixture (weight ratio) of trifloxystrobin and fluopyram induced a reduction of the genes of extracellular BMP ligand (Smads) and type I receptor (Bmpr1ba), which may down-regulate BMP signaling and thus attenuating cartilage hyperproliferation, hypertrophy and mineralization. The results warren an interest in further studying the effect of the two fungicides in a mixture on zebrafish.

Enantioselectivity in ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals, illicit drugs, and industrial persistent pollutants in aquatic and terrestrial environments: A review

At present, there is a serious concern about the alarming number of recalcitrant contaminants that can negatively affect biodiversity threatening the ecological status of marine, estuarine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems (e.g., agricultural soils and forests). Contaminants of emerging concern (CEC) such as pharmaceuticals (PHAR), illicit drugs (ID), industrial persistent pollutants, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and chiral ionic solvents are globally spread and potentially toxic to non-target organisms. More than half of these contaminants are chiral and have been measured at different enantiomeric proportions in diverse ecosystems. Enantiomers can exhibit different toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics, and thus, can cause different toxic effects. Therefore, the enantiomeric distribution in occurrence cannot be neglected as the toxicity and other adverse biological effects are expected to be enantioselective. Hence, this review aims to reinforce the recognition of the stereochemistry in environmental risk assessment (ERA) of chiral CEC and gather up-to-date information about the current knowledge regarding the enantioselectivity in ecotoxicity of PHAR, ID, persistent pollutants (PCBs and PBDEs) and chiral ionic solvents present in freshwater and agricultural soil ecosystems. We performed an online literature search to obtain state-of-the-art research about enantioselective studies available for assessing the impact of these classes of CEC. Ecotoxicity assays have been carried out using organisms belonging to different trophic levels such as microorganisms, plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates, and considering ecologically relevant aquatic and terrestrial species or models organisms recommended by regulatory entities. A battery of ecotoxicity assays was also reported encompassing standard acute toxicity to sub-chronic and chronic assays and different endpoints as biomarkers of toxicity (e.g., biochemical, morphological alterations, reproduction, behavior, etc.). Nevertheless, we call attention to the lack of knowledge about the potential enantioselective toxicity of many PHAR, ID, and several classes of industrial compounds. Additionally, several questions regarding key species, selection of most appropriate toxicological assays and ERA of chiral CEC are addressed and critically discussed.

Developmental toxicity of fipronil and its two metabolites towards zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos

Fipronil (FIL) use is currently regulated in several countries due to its specific toxicity to bees. This study investigated the possible developmental toxicities as well as the acute toxicities of FIL, fipronil sulfide (FIL-SI), and fipronil sulfone (FIL-SO) to zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. At concentrations up to 5000 μg L-1, FIL- and FIL-SI-treated embryos exhibited significant mortality at 96 h postfertilization. Body length was significantly shortened with increasing concentrations in FIL- and FIL-SI-treated embryos. However, FIL-SO-treated embryos exhibited low mortality with high hatching rates. Body length was also significantly shortened in FIL-SO-treated embryos. Regarding the number of intersegmental vessels (ISVs), all chemical-treated embryos showed high ISV numbers with increasing concentrations of each chemical. FIL and FIL-SI induced abnormal heart formation with heart dysfunction in embryos, whereas FIL-SO did not induce any difference in heart development compared with the control. Abnormal heart formation may be related to the upregulation of nppa responsible for the expression of natriuretic peptides in embryos. Embryonic acetylcholinesterase activity was decreased gradually according to the increase in FIL and FIL-SI concentrations, whereas FIL-SO did not cause any change in enzyme activity. Il-1β responsible for the occurrence of injury or infection was highly upregulated in FIL-SI- and FIL-SO-treated embryos. Therefore, reduction to FIL-SI may be associated with FIL toxicity, whereas oxidation to FIL-SO may be a detoxification route in the environment.