Harding A, Harper B, Stone D, O'Neill C, Berger P, Harris S, Donatuto J. Conducting research with tribal communities: sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2012;
120:6-10. [PMID:
21890450 PMCID:
PMC3261947 DOI:
10.1289/ehp.1103904]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2011] [Accepted: 09/02/2011] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
When conducting research with American Indian tribes, informed consent beyond conventional institutional review board (IRB) review is needed because of the potential for adverse consequences at a community or governmental level that are unrecognized by academic researchers.
OBJECTIVES
In this article, we review sovereignty, research ethics, and data-sharing considerations when doing community-based participatory health-related or natural-resource-related research with American Indian nations and present a model material and data-sharing agreement that meets tribal and university requirements.
DISCUSSION
Only tribal nations themselves can identify potential adverse outcomes, and they can do this only if they understand the assumptions and methods of the proposed research. Tribes must be truly equal partners in study design, data collection, interpretation, and publication. Advances in protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) are also applicable to IRB reviews, as are principles of sovereignty and indigenous rights, all of which affect data ownership and control.
CONCLUSIONS
Academic researchers engaged in tribal projects should become familiar with all three areas: sovereignty, ethics and informed consent, and IPR. We recommend developing an agreement with tribal partners that reflects both health-related IRB and natural-resource-related IPR considerations.
Collapse