Current challenges of hydrothermal treated wastewater (HTWW) for environmental applications and their perspectives: A review

Anaerobic digestion of process water from hydrothermal treatment processes: a review of inhibitors and detoxification approaches

Integrating hydrothermal treatment processes and anaerobic digestion (AD) is promising for maximizing resource recovery from biomass and organic waste. The process water generated during hydrothermal treatment contains high concentrations of organic matter, which can be converted into biogas using AD. However, process water also contains various compounds that inhibit the AD process. Fingerprinting these inhibitors and identifying suitable mitigation strategies and detoxification methods is necessary to optimize the integration of these two technologies. By examining the existing literature, we were able to: (1) compare the methane yields and organics removal efficiency during AD of various hydrothermal treatment process water; (2) catalog the main AD inhibitors found in hydrothermal treatment process water; (3) identify recalcitrant components limiting AD performance; and (4) evaluate approaches to detoxify specific inhibitors and degrade recalcitrant components. Common inhibitors in process water are organic acids (at high concentrations), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), oxygenated organics, and N-heterocyclic compounds. Feedstock composition is the primary determinant of organic acid and TAN formation (carbohydrates-rich and protein-rich feedstocks, respectively). In contrast, processing conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, reaction duration) influence the formation extent of oxygenated organics and N-heterocyclic compounds. Struvite precipitation and zeolite adsorption are the most widely used approaches to eliminate TAN inhibition. In contrast, powdered and granular activated carbon and ozonation are the preferred methods to remove toxic substances before AD treatment. Currently, ozonation is the most effective approach to reduce the toxicity and recalcitrance of N and O-heterocyclic compounds during AD. Microaeration methods, which disrupt the AD microbiome less than ozone, might be more practical for nitrifying TAN and degrading recalcitrant compounds, but further research in this area is necessary.

Valorization of cannabis waste via hydrothermal carbonization: solid fuel production and characterization

Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) was employed to convert cannabis waste into valuable solid fuel (hydrochar) under different operating conditions, including reaction temperature (170-230 °C), biomass-water ratio (1:10-1:20), and residence time of 60 min. The produced hydrochar was examined for their fuel properties including calorific value (HHV), proximate and ultimate analysis, thermal stability and combustion behavior, etc. The results revealed higher HTC temperature led to a higher degree of carbonization, which is beneficial for increasing carbon content and HHV of the hydrochar. The HHV of the hydrochar improved significantly up to 24.65 MJ/kg after the HTC compared to 17.50 MJ/kg for cannabis waste. The energy yield of hydrochar from the HTC process was in a range of 70.41-82.23%. The optimal HTC condition was observed at 230 °C and a biomass-water ratio of 1:10, producing high-quality hydrochar with 24.24 MJ/kg HHV and 72.28% energy yield. The hydrochar had similar fuel characteristics to lignite coal with significantly lower ash content. Additionally, recirculation of liquid effluent showed a positive influence on the HHV of hydrochar besides minimizing the release of wastewater from the HTC process. The study revealed that HTC is a promising technique for valorization of cannabis waste into high-value solid fuel, which can be potentially an alternative to coal.

Microbial insights towards understanding the role of hydrochar in enhancing phenol degradation in anaerobic digestion

Anaerobic digestion (AD) of wastewater is the most promising bioprocess for organic conversion, however, phenol is toxic and resistant to anaerobic degradation. The current study compared the effect of hydrochar and granular activated carbon (GAC) on AD of phenol at four concentrations (100 mg/L, 250 mg/L, 500 mg/L and 1000 mg/L). Results demonstrated that hydrochar significantly improved the methane production rate and reduced the lag phase at all concentrations of phenol. The methane production rate was improved by about 50% at both 100 mg/L and 250 mg/L phenol, while it was raised by >160% at 500 mg/L and 1000 mg/L phenol by hydrochar. The GAC only increased the methane production rate at 500 mg/L and 1000 mg/L due to high adsorption capacity. Further, the adsorption of phenol by hydrochar had no apparent impact on the methane production rate, even though certain amounts of phenol were adsorbed. At 500 mg/L, the amount of methane produced significantly increased, so 16S rRNA transcripts sequencing and metabolomic analysis were conducted. 16S rRNA transcripts sequencing analysis indicated that hydrochar resulted in the enrichment of syntrophic bacteria (e.g., Syntrophorhabdus &Syntrophobacter) and Methanosaeta, which might be related with direct interspecies electron transfer. Further, it was noticed that the growth of Methanobacterium was repressed at 500 mg/L phenol, while hydrochar promoted its growth. Phenol was degraded into L-tyrosine and then followed the benzoate degradation pathway for methane production as revealed by metabolomic analysis. In addition, metabolomic analysis also revealed that hydrochar promoted the degradation of all metabolites and enhanced the phenol degradation into methane.