1
|
Jitsakulchaidej P, Wivatvongvana P, Kitisak K. Normal parameters for diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation using a parabolic coil with biphasic pulse stimulation. BMC Neurol 2022; 22:510. [PMID: 36585660 PMCID: PMC9805266 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02977-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND TMS is being used to aid in the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) illnesses. It is useful in planning rehabilitation programs and setting appropriate goals for patients. We used a parabolic coil with biphasic pulse stimulation to find normal values for diagnostic TMS parameters. OBJECTIVES 1. To determine the normal motor threshold (MT), motor evoked potentials (MEP), central motor conduction time (CMCT), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and silent period (SP) values. 2. To measure the MEP latencies of abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) at various ages, heights, and arm and leg lengths. STUDY DESIGN Descriptive Study. SETTING Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. SUBJECTS Forty-eight healthy participants volunteered for the study. METHODS All participants received a single diagnostic TMS using a parabolic coil with biphasic pulse stimulation on the left primary motor cortex (M1). All parameters: MT, MEP, CMCT, ICF, SICI, and SP were recorded through surface EMGs at the right APB and EDB. Outcome parameters were reported by the mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR), according to data distribution. MEP latencies of APB and EDB were also measured at various ages, heights, and arm and leg lengths. RESULTS APB-MEP latencies at 120% and 140% MT were 21.77 ± 1.47 and 21.17 ± 1.44 ms. APB-CMCT at 120% and 140% MT were 7.81 ± 1.32 and 7.19 ± 1.21 ms. APB-MEP amplitudes at 120% and 140% MT were 1.04 (0.80-1.68) and 2.24 (1.47-3.52) mV. EDB-MEP latencies at 120% and 140% MT were 37.14 ± 2.85 and 36.46 ± 2.53 ms. EDB-CMCT at 120% and 140% MT were 14.33 ± 2.50 and 13.63 ± 2.57 ms. EDB-MEP amplitudes at 120% and 140% MT were 0.60 (0.38-0.98) and 0.95 (0.69-1.55) mV. ICF amplitudes of APB and EDB were 2.26 (1.61-3.49) and 1.26 (0.88-1.98) mV. SICI amplitudes of APB and EDB were 0.21 (0.13-0.51) and 0.18 (0.09-0.29) mV. MEP latencies of APB at 120% and 140% MT were different between heights < 160 cm and ≥ 160 cm (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) and different between arm lengths < 65 and ≥ 65 cm (p = 0.022 and p = 0.002). CONCLUSION We established diagnostic TMS measurements using a parabolic coil with a biphasic pulse configuration. EDB has a higher MT than APB. The 140/120 MEP ratio of APB and EDB is two-fold. The optimal MEP recording for APB is 120%, whereas EDB is 140% of MT. CMCT by the F-wave is more convenient and tolerable for patients. ICF provides a twofold increase in MEP amplitude. SICI provides a ¼-fold of MEP amplitude. SP from APB and EDB are 121.58 ± 21.50 and 181.01 ± 40.99 ms, respectively. Height and MEP latencies have a modest relationship, whereas height and arm length share a strong positive correlation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pimthong Jitsakulchaidej
- grid.7132.70000 0000 9039 7662Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200 Thailand
| | - Pakorn Wivatvongvana
- grid.7132.70000 0000 9039 7662Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200 Thailand
| | - Kittipong Kitisak
- grid.7132.70000 0000 9039 7662Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200 Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shibuya K, Otani R, Suzuki YI, Kuwabara S, Kiernan MC. Neuronal Hyperexcitability and Free Radical Toxicity in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Established and Future Targets. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15040433. [PMID: 35455429 PMCID: PMC9025031 DOI: 10.3390/ph15040433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating disease with evidence of degeneration involving upper and lower motor neuron compartments of the nervous system. Presently, two drugs, riluzole and edaravone, have been established as being useful in slowing disease progression in ALS. Riluzole possesses anti-glutamatergic properties, while edaravone eliminates free radicals (FRs). Glutamate is the excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain and spinal cord and binds to several inotropic receptors. Excessive activation of these receptors generates FRs, inducing neurodegeneration via damage to intracellular organelles and upregulation of proinflammatory mediators. FRs bind to intracellular structures, leading to cellular impairment that contributes to neurodegeneration. As such, excitotoxicity and FR toxicities have been considered as key pathophysiological mechanisms that contribute to the cascade of degeneration that envelopes neurons in ALS. Recent advanced technologies, including neurophysiological, imaging, pathological and biochemical techniques, have concurrently identified evidence of increased excitability in ALS. This review focuses on the relationship between FRs and excitotoxicity in motor neuronal degeneration in ALS and introduces concepts linked to increased excitability across both compartments of the human nervous system. Within this cellular framework, future strategies to promote therapeutic development in ALS, from the perspective of neuronal excitability and function, will be critically appraised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazumoto Shibuya
- Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8677, Japan; (K.S.); (R.O.); (Y.-i.S.); (S.K.)
| | - Ryo Otani
- Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8677, Japan; (K.S.); (R.O.); (Y.-i.S.); (S.K.)
| | - Yo-ichi Suzuki
- Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8677, Japan; (K.S.); (R.O.); (Y.-i.S.); (S.K.)
| | - Satoshi Kuwabara
- Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8677, Japan; (K.S.); (R.O.); (Y.-i.S.); (S.K.)
| | - Matthew C. Kiernan
- Brain and Mind Centre, Department of Neurology, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney 2050, Australia
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in 2014. Epilepsy is a common neurological condition characterised by recurrent seizures. Pharmacological treatment remains the first choice to control epilepsy. Sulthiame (STM) is widely used as an antiepileptic drug in Europe and Israel. In this review, we have presented a summary of evidence for the use of STM as monotherapy in epilepsy. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and side effect profile of STM as monotherapy when compared with placebo or another antiepileptic drug for people with epilepsy. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases on 13 April 2020: the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 10 April 2020). CRS Web includes randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the specialised registers of Cochrane Review Groups including Cochrane Epilepsy. We imposed no language restrictions. We contacted the manufacturers of STM and researchers in the field to ask about ongoing and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled monotherapy trials of STM in people of any age with epilepsy of any aetiology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We followed standard Cochrane methodology. Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted the relevant data. We assessed the following outcomes: treatment withdrawal; seizure-free at six months; adverse effects; and quality of life scoring. We conducted the primary analyses by intention-to-treat where possible, and presented a narrative analysis of the data. MAIN RESULTS We included four studies involving a total of 355 participants: three studies (209 participants) with a diagnosis of benign epilepsy of childhood with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS), and one study (146 participants) with a diagnosis of generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). STM was given as monotherapy compared with placebo and with levetiracetam in the BECTS studies, and compared with phenytoin in the GTCS study. An English translation of the full text of one of the BECTS studies could not be found, and analysis of this study was based solely on the English translation of the abstract. For the primary outcome, the total number of dropouts caused either by seizure recurrence or adverse reaction was significantly higher in the levetiracetam treatment arm compared to the STM treatment arm (RR 0.32, 95% Cl 0.10 to 1.03; 1 study, 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). For the secondary outcomes for this comparison, results for seizure freedom were inconclusive (RR 1.12, 95% Cl 0.88 to 1.44; 1 study, 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Reporting of adverse effects was incomplete. Participants receiving STM were significantly less likely to develop gingival hyperplasia than participants receiving phenytoin in the GTCS study (RR 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.58; 1 study, 146 participants; low-certainty evidence). No further statistically significant adverse events were noted when STM was compared with phenytoin or placebo. The most common adverse events were related to behavioural disturbances when STM was compared with levetiracetam (RR 0.95, 95% Cl 0.59 to 1.55; 1 study, 43 participants; low-certainty evidence), with the same incidence in both groups. No data were reported for quality of life. Overall, we assessed one study at high risk of bias and one study at unclear bias across the seven domains, mainly due to lack of information regarding study design. Only one trial reported effective methods for blinding. The risk of bias assessments for the other two studies ranged from low to high. We rated the overall certainty of the evidence for the outcomes as low using the GRADE approach. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review provides insufficient information to inform clinical practice. Small sample sizes, poor methodological quality, and lack of data on important outcome measures precluded any meaningful conclusions regarding the efficacy and tolerability of sulthiame as monotherapy in epilepsy. More trials, recruiting larger populations, over longer periods, are needed to determine whether sulthiame has a clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mariangela Panebianco
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anthony G Marson
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bresnahan R, Martin‐McGill KJ, Milburn‐McNulty P, Powell G, Sills GJ, Marson AG. Sulthiame add-on therapy for epilepsy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 8:CD009472. [PMID: 31453633 PMCID: PMC6710989 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009472.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 10. Epilepsy is a common neurological condition, characterised by recurrent seizures. Most people respond to conventional antiepileptic drugs, however, around 30% will continue to experience seizures, despite treatment with multiple antiepileptic drugs. Sulthiame, also known as sultiame, is a widely used antiepileptic drug in Europe and Israel. We present a summary of the evidence for the use of sulthiame as add-on therapy in epilepsy. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and tolerability of sulthiame as add-on therapy for people with epilepsy of any aetiology compared with placebo or another antiepileptic drug. SEARCH METHODS For the latest update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register and CENTRAL (17 January 2019), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to January 16, 2019), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP Search Portal (17 January 2019). We imposed no language restrictions. We contacted the manufacturers of sulthiame, and researchers in the field to seek any ongoing or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of add-on sulthiame, with any level of blinding (single, double or unblinded) in people of any age, with epilepsy of any aetiology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, and extracted relevant data. We assessed these outcomes: (1) 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency between baseline and end of follow-up; (2) complete cessation of seizures during follow-up; (3) mean seizure frequency; (4) time-to-treatment withdrawal; (5) adverse effects; and (6) quality of life. We used intention-to-treat for primary analyses. We presented results as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). However, due to the paucity of trials, we mainly conducted a narrative analysis. MAIN RESULTS We included one placebo-controlled trial that recruited 37 infants with newly diagnosed West syndrome. This trial was funded by DESITIN Pharma, Germany. During the study, sulthiame was given as an add-on therapy to pyridoxine. No data were reported for the outcomes: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency between baseline and end of follow-up; mean seizure frequency; or quality of life. For complete cessation of seizures during a nine-day follow-up period for add-on sulthiame versus placebo, the RR was 11.14 (95% CI 0.67 to 184.47; very low-certainty evidence), however, this difference was not shown to be statistically significant (P = 0.09). The number of infants experiencing one or more adverse events was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.64; very low-certainty evidence; P = 0.63). Somnolence was more prevalent amongst infants randomised to add-on sulthiame compared to placebo, but again, the difference was not statistically significant (RR 3.40, 95% CI 0.42 to 27.59; very low-certainty evidence; P = 0.25). We were unable to conduct meaningful analysis of time-to-treatment withdrawal and adverse effects due to incomplete data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Sulthiame may lead to a cessation of seizures when used as an add-on therapy to pyridoxine in infants with West syndrome, however, we are very uncertain about the reliability of this finding. The included study was small and had a significant risk of bias, largely due to the lack of details regarding blinding and the incomplete reporting of outcomes. Both issues negatively impacted the certainty of the evidence. No conclusions can be drawn about the occurrence of adverse effects, change in quality of life, or mean reduction in seizure frequency. No evidence exists for the use of sulthiame as an add-on therapy in people with epilepsy outside West syndrome.Large, multi-centre randomised controlled trials are needed to inform clinical practice, if sulthiame is to be used as an add-on therapy for epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Bresnahan
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of LiverpoolDepartment of Molecular and Clinical PharmacologyLower LaneLiverpoolUKL9 7LJ
| | - Kirsty J Martin‐McGill
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of LiverpoolDepartment of Molecular and Clinical PharmacologyLower LaneLiverpoolUKL9 7LJ
- University of ChesterDepartment of Clinical Sciences and NutritionFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Life SciencesChesterUK
| | | | - Graham Powell
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation TrustLower LaneFazakerleyLiverpoolUKL9 7LJ
| | | | - Anthony G Marson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of LiverpoolDepartment of Molecular and Clinical PharmacologyLower LaneLiverpoolUKL9 7LJ
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation TrustLower LaneFazakerleyLiverpoolUKL9 7LJ
- Liverpool Health PartnersLiverpoolUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy is a common neurological condition characterised by recurrent seizures. Most patients respond to conventional antiepileptic drugs, however, around 30% will continue to experience seizures despite multiple antiepileptic drugs. Sulthiame, also known as sultiame, is a widely used antiepileptic drug in Europe and Israel. We present a summary of the evidence for the use of sulthiame as add-on therapy in epilepsy. OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and side-effect profile of sulthiame as add-on therapy compared with placebo or another antiepileptic drug. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP Search Portal on 11 August 2015. No language restrictions were imposed. We contacted the manufacturers of sulthiame and researchers in the field to seek any ongoing or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled add-on trials of sulthiame in people of any age with epilepsy of any aetiology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted relevant data. The following outcomes were assessed: 1) reduction in seizure frequency of 50% or greater between baseline and end of follow-up; 2) complete cessation of seizures during follow-up; 3) mean seizure frequency; 4) time to treatment withdrawal; 5) adverse drug effects; and 6) quality of life scoring. Primary analyses were intention-to-treat. We present a narrative analysis. MAIN RESULTS We included one trial with 37 participants with a new diagnosis of West syndrome. Sulthiame was given as an add-on therapy to pyridoxine. No data were reported for outcomes 1), 3) or 6). Overall risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for complete cessation of seizures during a nine-day follow-up period versus placebo was 0.71 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.96). Meaningful analysis of time to treatment withdrawal and adverse drug effects was not possible due to incomplete data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Sulthiame may lead to a cessation of seizures when used as an add-on therapy to pyridoxine in patients with West syndrome. The included study was small and had a significant risk of bias which limits the impact of the evidence. No conclusions can be drawn about the occurrence of adverse drug effects, change in quality of life or mean reduction in seizure frequency. No evidence exists for the use of sulthiame as an add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy outside West syndrome. Large, multi-centre randomized controlled trials are necessary to inform clinical practice if sulthiame is to be used as an add-on therapy for epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Milburn-McNulty
- The Walton Centre for Neurology & Neurosurgery NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool, UK, L9 7LJ
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy is a common neurological condition characterised by recurrent seizures. Sulthiame (STM) is widely used as an antiepileptic drug in Europe and Israel. In this review, we present a summary of evidence for the use of STM as monotherapy in epilepsy. OBJECTIVES To examine the efficacy and side effect profile of STM as monotherapy when compared with placebo or another antiepileptic drug. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register (24 October 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 9), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 24 October 2013), SCOPUS (1823 to 24 October 2013), the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal (28 October 2013) and ClinicalTrials.gov (28 October 2013). We imposed no language restrictions. We contacted the manufacturers of STM and researchers in the field to ask about ongoing and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled monotherapy trials of STM in people of any age with epilepsy of any aetiology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted the relevant data.The following outcomes were assessed: (1) time to treatment failure; (2) time to 12-month remission; (3) proportion seizure free at 12 months; (4) adverse effects; and (5) quality of life scoring. Primary analyses were intention-to-treat when possible. A narrative analysis of the data was presented. MAIN RESULTS Two studies representing 100 participants with a diagnosis of benign epilepsy of childhood with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS) and one study representing 146 participants with a diagnosis of generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) were included. STM was given as monotherapy compared with placebo in the BECTS studies and compared with phenytoin in the GTCS study. An English translation of the full text of one of the BECTS studies could not be found, and analysis of this study was based solely on the English translation of the abstract. No data were reported for outcome (1), (2), (3) or (5). Reporting of adverse effects was incomplete. Participants receiving STM were significantly less likely to develop gingival hyperplasia than were participants receiving phenytoin in the GTCS study (risk ratio (RR) 0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.58). No further statistically significant adverse events were noted when STM was compared with phenytoin or placebo. Two ongoing studies comparing STM monotherapy versus placebo or levetiracetam in BECTS were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Small sample size, poor methodological quality and lack of data on important outcome measures prevent any meaningful conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of sulthiame as monotherapy in epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Milburn-McNulty
- The Walton Centre for Neurology & Neurosurgery NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Lane, Fazakerley, Liverpool, UK, L9 7LJ
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epilepsy is a common neurological condition characterised by recurrent seizures. Most patients respond to conventional antiepileptic drugs, however, around 30% will continue to experience seizures despite multiple antiepileptic drugs. Sulthiame is a widely used antiepileptic drug in Europe and Israel. We present a summary of the evidence for the use of sulthiame as add-on therapy in epilepsy. OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and side-effect profile of sulthiame as add-on therapy compared with placebo or another antiepileptic drug. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and the WHO IRCTRP Search Portal on 28th August 2012. No language restrictions were imposed. We contacted the manufacturers of sulthiame and researchers in the field to seek any ongoing or unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised placebo-controlled add-on trials of sulthiame in people of any age with epilepsy of any aetiology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted relevant data. The following outcomes were assessed: (1) reduction in seizure frequency of 50% or greater between baseline and end of follow-up (2) complete cessation of seizures during follow-up (3) mean seizure frequency (4) time to treatment withdrawal (5) adverse drug effects (6) quality of life scoring. Primary analyses were intention-to-treat. Narrative analysis is presented. MAIN RESULTS One trial was included representing 37 patients with a new diagnosis of West syndrome. Sulthiame was given as an add-on therapy to pyridoxine. No data were reported for outcomes (1), (3) or (6). Overall risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for complete cessation of seizures during a nine-day follow-up period versus placebo was 0.71 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.96). Meaningful analysis of time to treatment withdrawal and adverse drug effects was impossible due to incomplete data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Sulthiame may lead to a cessation of seizures when used as an add-on therapy to pyridoxine in patients with West syndrome. The included study was small and had a significant risk of bias which limits the impact of the evidence. No conclusions can be drawn on the occurrence of adverse drug effects, change in quality of life or mean reduction in seizure frequency. No evidence exists for the use of sulthiame as an add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy outside West syndrome. Large, multi-centre randomised controlled trials are necessary to inform clinical practice if sulthiame is to be used as an add-on therapy for epilepsy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Groppa S, Oliviero A, Eisen A, Quartarone A, Cohen LG, Mall V, Kaelin-Lang A, Mima T, Rossi S, Thickbroom GW, Rossini PM, Ziemann U, Valls-Solé J, Siebner HR. A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol 2012; 123:858-82. [PMID: 22349304 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 787] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2011] [Revised: 01/16/2012] [Accepted: 01/22/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an established neurophysiological tool to examine the integrity of the fast-conducting corticomotor pathways in a wide range of diseases associated with motor dysfunction. This includes but is not limited to patients with multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, movement disorders, disorders affecting the spinal cord, facial and other cranial nerves. These guidelines cover practical aspects of TMS in a clinical setting. We first discuss the technical and physiological aspects of TMS that are relevant for the diagnostic use of TMS. We then lay out the general principles that apply to a standardized clinical examination of the fast-conducting corticomotor pathways with single-pulse TMS. This is followed by a detailed description of how to examine corticomotor conduction to the hand, leg, trunk and facial muscles in patients. Additional sections cover safety issues, the triple stimulation technique, and neuropediatric aspects of TMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Groppa
- Department of Neurology, Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Swiderska N, Hawcutt D, Eaton V, Stockton F, Kumar R, Kneen R, Appleton R. Sulthiame in refractory paediatric epilepsies: An experience of an ‘old’ antiepileptic drug in a tertiary paediatric neurology unit. Seizure 2011; 20:805-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2011.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2011] [Revised: 08/07/2011] [Accepted: 08/09/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
|
10
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report on severe acid-base disturbance in a child with symptomatic epilepsy treated with sulthiame. RESULTS A 9.5-year-old boy with chronic generalized tonic-clonic seizures was treated with carbamazepine and valproic acid. Because of poor seizure control, sulthiame was added to the treatment. Two months later, he presented at the emergency department with severe weakness, headache, dizziness, dyspnea, anorexia, and confusional state. Arterial blood gas analysis showed mixed respiratory alkalosis with high anion gap metabolic acidosis. Sulthiame-induced acid-base disturbance was suspected. The drug was withheld for the first 24 hours and then restarted at a reduced dosage. The arterial blood gases gradually normalized, the confusion disappeared, and the patient was discharged home.Three months later, 4 weeks after an increase in sulthiame dosage, the patient was once again admitted with the same clinical picture. Improvement was noted after the drug dosage was reduced. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report of mixed respiratory alkalosis and metabolic acidosis in a child treated with sulthiame. Monitoring of the acid-base status should be considered in patients treated with sulthiame.
Collapse
|
11
|
Loo CK, McFarquhar TF, Mitchell PB. A review of the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a clinical treatment for depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 11:131-47. [PMID: 17880752 DOI: 10.1017/s1461145707007717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
There is growing interest worldwide in rTMS as a clinical treatment for depression. Apart from efficacy, its safety as a clinical treatment must be considered before its widespread use can be advocated. All published, sham-controlled rTMS depression trials were reviewed for reported side-effects and outcomes of formal neuropsychological testing. In addition, all reports of seizures occurring with rTMS were reviewed. Other safety concerns (effects on hearing; headache, pain, induced currents in electrical circuits, histotoxicity, electromagnetic field exposure, psychiatric complications, safety in pregnancy) are discussed. Common side-effects were of a minor nature, e.g. headache. There was a low incidence of accidental seizures and induced hypomania, both of which were associated with identified risk factors for which subjects should be screened. Long-term effects of repeated rTMS sessions are as yet unknown. When given within recommended guidelines, the overall safety profile of rTMS is good, and supports its further development as a clinical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen K Loo
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|