1
|
Milan A, Alzahrany M, Gupta A. Hyperventilation Induced Seizures in Focal Epilepsy: Two Cases and a Review of Literature. Clin EEG Neurosci 2024; 55:576-580. [PMID: 38166403 DOI: 10.1177/15500594231222982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2024]
Abstract
We report two cases of temporo-perisylvian epilepsy with habitual seizures consistently inducible by hyperventilation (HV). One case was non-lesional, while the other was a lesional temporo-perisylvian epilepsy. Both underwent surgical resection and were seizure-free or nearly seizure-free thereafter. We discuss the pathophysiological changes evoked by HV in healthy brains, and those with generalized and focal epilepsy. We provide a comprehensive and critical review of the literature on the role of HV in focal epilepsy. We suggest HV should be considered an activation method for patients with focal epilepsy during epilepsy monitoring unit admissions and may help in the localization of the epileptogenic network/zone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Milan
- Section of Pediatric Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Epilepsy Unit, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
- Liga Chilena Contra La Epilepsia, Santiago, Chile
| | - Majed Alzahrany
- Section of Pediatric Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ajay Gupta
- Section of Pediatric Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stoupi NA, Weijs ML, Imbach L, Lenggenhager B. Heartbeat-evoked potentials following voluntary hyperventilation in epilepsy patients: respiratory influences on cardiac interoception. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1391437. [PMID: 39035777 PMCID: PMC11259972 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1391437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Current evidence indicates a modulating role of respiratory processes in cardiac interoception, yet whether altered breathing patterns influence heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEP) remains inconclusive. Methods Here, we examined the effects of voluntary hyperventilation (VH) as part of a clinical routine examination on scalp-recorded HEPs in epilepsy patients (N = 80). Results Using cluster-based permutation analyses, HEP amplitudes were compared across pre-VH and post-VH conditions within young and elderly subgroups, as well as for the total sample. No differences in the HEP were detected for younger participants or across the full sample, while an increased late HEP during pre-VH compared to post-VH was fond in the senior group, denoting decreased cardiac interoceptive processing after hyperventilation. Discussion The present study, thus, provides initial evidence of breathing-related HEP modulations in elderly epilepsy patients, emphasizing the potential of HEP as an interoceptive neural marker that could partially extend to the representation of pulmonary signaling. We speculate that aberrant CO2-chemosensing, coupled with disturbances in autonomic regulation, might constitute the underlying pathophysiological mechanism behind the obtained effect. Available databases involving patient records of routine VH assessment may constitute a valuable asset in disentangling the interplay of cardiac and ventilatory interoceptive information in various patient groups, providing thorough clinical data to parse, as well as increased statistical power and estimates of effects with higher precision through large-scale studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niovi A Stoupi
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Marieke L Weijs
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Imbach
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Swiss Epilepsy Center, Klinik Lengg, Zürich, Switzerland
- Zurich Neuroscience Center, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Montenegro MA, Valente K. EEG in focal and generalized epilepsies: Pearls and perils. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 156:109825. [PMID: 38838461 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Correctly diagnosing and classifying seizures and epilepsies is vital to ensure a tailored approach to patients with epilepsy. The ILAE seizure classification consists of two main groups: focal and generalized. Establishing if a seizure is focal or generalized is essential to classify the epilepsy type and the epilepsy syndrome, providing more personalized treatment and counseling about prognosis. EEG is one of the most essential tools for this classification process and further localization of the epileptogenic focus. However, some EEG findings are misleading and may postpone the correct diagnosis and proper treatment. Knowing the most common EEG pitfalls in focal and generalized epilepsies is valuable for clinical practice, avoiding misinterpretations. Some atypical features can be challenging in focal epilepsies, such as secondary bilateral synchrony, focal epileptiform activity induced by hyperventilation and photic stimulation, and non-focal slowing. On the other hand, more than 60 % of persons with idiopathic generalized epilepsies have at least one type of atypical abnormality. In this manuscript, we describe and illustrate some of the most common EEG findings that can make even experienced epileptologists question not only where the epileptogenic focus is but also if the patient has focal or generalized epilepsy. This review summarizes the perils and provide some pearls to assist EEG readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kette Valente
- University of São Paulo Medical School (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rana M, Steenari M, Shrey D. Hyperventilation and Seizures: Not a New Sense: A Literature Review. Neuropediatrics 2023; 54:359-364. [PMID: 37813123 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
Hyperventilation and seizures have a long association in the clinical literature and were known to have a relationship long before the electroencephalogram (EEG) was used to record changes in brain activity. As the use of EEG recording progressed, hyperventilation was the first activation method used to assist with diagnosis of epilepsy. Along with slowing of brain activity, hyperventilation can activate epileptiform spiking activity in patients with epilepsy. Currently, hyperventilation is used in standard practice to assist with the diagnosis of epilepsy during EEG recording. Hyperventilation activates epileptiform spiking activity more often than seizures but can trigger clinical seizures in up to 50% of patients with generalized epilepsy. It is more likely to trigger events in children with absence seizures than adults, and it acts as a trigger in patients with focal epilepsy far less often. However, while some clinicians suggest that its diagnostic value is limited, especially in adults with focal epilepsies, others suggest that it is simple, safe, and an important diagnostic tool, even in these patients. This review presents the history of hyperventilation and seizures, its use in the clinical practice, and possible mechanisms involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandeep Rana
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Neurology, Carilion Clinic, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine Roanoke, Virginia, United States
| | - Maija Steenari
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine Division of Neurology, CHOC, 1201 W La Veta Avenue, Orange, California, United States
| | - Daniel Shrey
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Irvine Division of Neurology, CHOC, 1201 W La Veta Avenue, Orange, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhuravlev D, Lebedeva A, Lebedeva M, Guekht A. Current concepts about autonomic dysfunction in patients with epilepsy. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2022; 122:131-138. [DOI: 10.17116/jnevro2022122031131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
6
|
Schuler AL, Pellegrino G. fMRI Acoustic Noise Enhances Parasympathetic Activity in Humans. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11111416. [PMID: 34827415 PMCID: PMC8615429 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is one of the most important neuroimaging techniques; nevertheless, the acoustic noise of the MR scanner is unavoidably linked to the process of data acquisition. We hypothesized that the auditory noise of the scanner has an effect on autonomic activity. METHODS We measured heart rate variability (HRV) while exposing 30 healthy subjects to fMRI noise. In doing so, we demonstrated an increase in parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) activity compared to silence and white noise and a decrease in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity compared to white noise. CONCLUSIONS The influence of MR scanner noise on the autonomic nervous system should be taken into account when performing fMRI experiments.
Collapse
|
7
|
Design of MRI structured spiking neural networks and learning algorithms for personalized modelling, analysis, and prediction of EEG signals. Sci Rep 2021; 11:12064. [PMID: 34103545 PMCID: PMC8187669 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90029-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel method and algorithms for the design of MRI structured personalized 3D spiking neural network models (MRI-SNN) for a better analysis, modeling, and prediction of EEG signals. It proposes a novel gradient-descent learning algorithm integrated with a spike-time-dependent-plasticity algorithm. The models capture informative personal patterns of interaction between EEG channels, contrary to single EEG signal modeling methods or to spike-based approaches which do not use personal MRI data to pre-structure a model. The proposed models can not only learn and model accurately measured EEG data, but they can also predict signals at 3D model locations that correspond to non-monitored brain areas, e.g. other EEG channels, from where data has not been collected. This is the first study in this respect. As an illustration of the method, personalized MRI-SNN models are created and tested on EEG data from two subjects. The models result in better prediction accuracy and a better understanding of the personalized EEG signals than traditional methods due to the MRI and EEG information integration. The models are interpretable and facilitate a better understanding of related brain processes. This approach can be applied for personalized modeling, analysis, and prediction of EEG signals across brain studies such as the study and prediction of epilepsy, peri-perceptual brain activities, brain-computer interfaces, and others.
Collapse
|
8
|
Szurhaj W, Leclancher A, Nica A, Périn B, Derambure P, Convers P, Mazzola L, Godet B, Faucanie M, Picot MC, De Jonckheere J. Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction and Risk of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy. Neurology 2021; 96:e2619-e2626. [PMID: 33837114 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000011998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to test whether patients who died of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) had an abnormal cardiac autonomic response to sympathetic stimulation by hyperventilation. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, observational, case-control study of a group of patients who died of SUDEP and controls who were matched to the patients for epilepsy type, drug resistance, sex, age at EEG recording, age at onset of epilepsy, and duration of epilepsy. We analyzed the heart rate (HR) and HR variability (HRV) at rest and during and after hyperventilation performed during the patient's last EEG recording before SUDEP. In each group, changes over time in HRV indexes were analyzed with linear mixed models. RESULTS Twenty patients were included in each group. In the control group, the HR increased and the root mean square of successive RR-interval differences (RMSSD) decreased during the hyperventilation and then returned to the baseline values. In the SUDEP group, however, the HR and RMSSD did not change significantly during or after hyperventilation. A difference in HR between the end of the hyperventilation and 4 minutes after its end discriminated well between patients with SUDEP and control patients (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.870, sensitivity 85%, specificity 75%). CONCLUSION Most of patients with subsequent SUDEP have an abnormal cardiac autonomic response to sympathetic stimulation through hyperventilation. An index reflecting the change in HR on hyperventilation might be predictive of the risk of SUDEP and could be used to select patients at risk of SUDEP for inclusion in trials assessing protective measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Szurhaj
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France.
| | - Alexandre Leclancher
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| | - Anca Nica
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| | - Bertille Périn
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| | - Philippe Derambure
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| | - Philippe Convers
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| | - Laure Mazzola
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| | - Bertrand Godet
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| | - Marie Faucanie
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| | - Marie-Christine Picot
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| | - Julien De Jonckheere
- From the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (W.S., A.L., B.P.), Amiens University Medical Center; Equipe Chimere UR7516-Université Picardie Jules Verne (W.Z.), Amiens; Neurology Department (A.N.), Rennes University Hospital, CIC 1414, LTSI, INSERM U1099; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (P.D.)and INSERM CIC-IT 1403 (J.D.j.), Lille University Medical Center; Neurology Department (P.C., L.M.), University Hospital, St Etienne; INSERM U 1028 (L.M.), CNRS UMR, ''Central Integration of Pain'' Group, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology (B.G.), Limoges University Medical Center; and Unité de Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologie (Département Information Médicale) (M.F., M.-C.P.), CHU Montpellier, and INSERM (M.-C.P.), Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1411, Université Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lanzone J, Imperatori C, Assenza G, Ricci L, Farina B, Di Lazzaro V, Tombini M. Power Spectral Differences between Transient Epileptic and Global Amnesia: An eLORETA Quantitative EEG Study. Brain Sci 2020; 10:brainsci10090613. [PMID: 32899970 PMCID: PMC7563784 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10090613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Transient epileptic amnesia (TEA) is a rare epileptic condition, often confused with transient global amnesia (TGA). In a real-life scenario, differential diagnosis between these two conditions can be hard. In this study we use power spectral analysis empowered by exact Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (eLORETA) to evidence the differences between TEA and TGA. Fifteen patients affected by TEA (64.2 ± 5.2 y.o.; 11 female/4 male; 10 left and 5 right temporal epileptic focus) and 15 patients affected by TGA (65.8 ± 7.2 y.o.; 11 females/4 males) were retrospectively identified in our clinical records. All patients recorded EEGs after symptoms offset. EEGs were analyzed with eLORETA to evidence power spectral contrast between the two conditions. We used an inverse problem solution to localize the source of spectral differences. We found a significant increase in beta band power over the affected hemisphere of TEA patients. Significant results corresponded to the uncus and para-hippocampal gyrus, respectively Brodmann’s Areas: 36, 35, 28, 34. We present original evidence of an increase in beta power in the affected hemisphere (AH) of TEA as compared to TGA. These differences involve key areas of the memory network located in the mesial temporal lobe. Spectral asymmetries could be used in the future to recognize cases of amnesia with a high risk of epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Lanzone
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.A.); (L.R.); (V.D.L.); (M.T.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Claudio Imperatori
- Cognitive and Clinical Psychology Laboratory, Department of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Via degli Aldobrandeschi 190, 00163 Rome, Italy; (C.I.); (B.F.)
| | - Giovanni Assenza
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.A.); (L.R.); (V.D.L.); (M.T.)
| | - Lorenzo Ricci
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.A.); (L.R.); (V.D.L.); (M.T.)
| | - Benedetto Farina
- Cognitive and Clinical Psychology Laboratory, Department of Human Sciences, European University of Rome, Via degli Aldobrandeschi 190, 00163 Rome, Italy; (C.I.); (B.F.)
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.A.); (L.R.); (V.D.L.); (M.T.)
| | - Mario Tombini
- Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, 00128 Rome, Italy; (G.A.); (L.R.); (V.D.L.); (M.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The role of chronobiology in drug-resistance epilepsy: The potential use of a variability and chronotherapy-based individualized platform for improving the response to anti-seizure drugs. Seizure 2020; 80:201-211. [DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
11
|
Electroencephalography at the time of Covid-19 pandemic in Italy. Neurol Sci 2020; 41:1999-2004. [PMID: 32588368 PMCID: PMC7316521 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04546-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Objective During the Covid-19 pandemic, government restrictions limited health care to urgent needs. Neurophysiology centers had to suddenly reschedule their activities, with a lack of specific recommendations about electroencephalography (EEG) execution. During the pandemic phase 1, we launched an online survey to understand the flaws and strengths of the EEG management in Italy at the time of Covid-19 pandemic. Methods A 45-item online survey (published from April 16 to 30, 2020), endorsed by the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SINC), the Italian League Against epilepsy (LICE), and the Italian Association of Neurophysiology technologists (AITN), collected EEG management data (EEG’s number and type, indications, personnel and patients safety, devices’ sanification) during the Covid-19 pandemic. Results We received responses from 206 centers. The number of EEGs performed was reduced by 76 ± 20%, and several types of specific EEG (video-EEG, ambulatory-EEG, LTM, polysomnography) were reduced at a minimum. Half of the centers performed inpatient EEGs only for urgencies. Repetitive seizures, encephalitis, and non-convulsive status epilepticus were the most common indications. Covid-19-positive patients received less EEG than negative ones (p < 0.0001). EEG requests came mainly not only from neurologists (n = 176) but also from general practitioners (n = 40), emergentists (n = 79), intensivists (n = 72), and other specialists (n = 53). Those centers which continued performing outpatient EEG examinations were instructed to perform the EEG after a Covid-19-related symptom screening for patients and using personal protective equipment (PPE) through all the procedure. Inpatient EEGs were performed using FFP2/FFP3 masks by neurophysiology technologists in only 50% of cases. Patients executed hyperventilation only for real clinical needs, but often (56%) with a mask. Conclusions Italian neurophysiology centers strongly adhered to government restrictions of lockdown. Some issues emerged, ranging from the evaluation of a proper indication for EEG, technical procedures of EEG recording, and protection of neurophysiology technicians.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ba-Armah D, Jain P, Whitney R, Donner E, Drake J, Go C, Nair RR, Snead OC, Weiss S, Widjaja E, Yamamoto E, Ye A, Yamasaki H, Ochi A. Misleading Focal Clinical, Neurophysiologic, and Imaging Features in 2 Children With Generalized Epilepsy Who Underwent Invasive Electroencephalographic (EEG) Monitoring. J Child Neurol 2020; 35:418-424. [PMID: 32065003 DOI: 10.1177/0883073819901228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Children and adults with genetic generalized epilepsy may have focal clinical seizure symptoms as well as electroencephalographic (EEG) findings. This may pose a diagnostic challenge to clinicians, especially when concomitant focal neuroimaging findings exist and the epilepsy is medically refractory. We sought to highlight the challenges that clinicians may face through the description of 2 children with suspected genetic generalized epilepsy who had both focal seizure symptoms and EEG/neuroimaging findings and underwent invasive EEG monitoring. Ultimately, invasive monitoring failed to demonstrate a focal origin for the seizures in both cases, and instead confirmed the presence of genetic generalized epilepsy. We demonstrate that ≥3-Hz generalized monomorphic spike and waves are less likely to represent secondary bilateral synchrony, that focal neuroimaging findings may not always be causal and that repeated hyperventilation is an essential activation procedure for genetic generalized epilepsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duaa Ba-Armah
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Puneet Jain
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, BLK Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Robyn Whitney
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Donner
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - James Drake
- Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cristina Go
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - O Carter Snead
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shelly Weiss
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Elysa Widjaja
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children, and Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eriko Yamamoto
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Annette Ye
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Haruka Yamasaki
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ayako Ochi
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jain P, Gulati P, Morrison-Levy N, Yau I, Alsowat D, Otsubo H, Ochi A, Whitney R. “Breath holding spells” in a child with SCN8A-related epilepsy: Expanding the clinical spectrum. Seizure 2019; 65:129-130. [DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
14
|
Myers KA, Sivathamboo S, Perucca P. Heart rate variability measurement in epilepsy: How can we move from research to clinical practice? Epilepsia 2018; 59:2169-2178. [PMID: 30345509 DOI: 10.1111/epi.14587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Our objective was to critically evaluate the literature surrounding heart rate variability (HRV) in people with epilepsy and to make recommendations as to how future research could be directed to facilitate and accelerate integration into clinical practice. We reviewed relevant HRV publications including those involving human subjects with seizures. HRV has been studied in patients with epilepsy for more than 30 years and, overall, patients with epilepsy display altered interictal HRV, suggesting a shift in autonomic balance toward sympathetic dominance. This derangement appears more severe in those with temporal lobe epilepsy and drug-resistant epilepsy. Normal diurnal variation in HRV is also disturbed in at least some people with epilepsy, but this aspect has received less study. Some therapeutic interventions, including vagus nerve stimulation and antiepileptic medications, may partially normalize altered HRV, but studies in this area are sometimes contradictory. During seizures, the changes in HRV may be complex, but the general trend is toward a further increase in sympathetic overactivity. Research in HRV in people with epilepsy has been limited by inconsistent experimental protocols and studies that are often underpowered. HRV measurement has the potential to aid clinical epilepsy management in several possible ways. HRV may be useful in predicting which patients are likely to benefit from surgical interventions such as vagus nerve stimulation and focal cerebral resection. As well, HRV could eventually have utility as a biomarker of risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). However, at present, the inconsistent measurement protocols used in research are hindering translation into clinical practice. A minimum protocol for HRV evaluation, to be used in all studies involving epilepsy patients, is necessary to eventually allow HRV to become a useful tool for clinicians. We propose a straightforward protocol, involving 5-minute measurements of root mean square of successive differences in wakefulness and light sleep.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth A Myers
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Shobi Sivathamboo
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Piero Perucca
- Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|