Outcome of temporal lobe epilepsy surgery evaluated with bitemporal intracranial electrode recordings

A spatial perturbation framework to validate implantation of the epileptogenic zone

Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is the gold standard to delineate surgical targets in focal drug-resistant epilepsy. SEEG uses electrodes placed directly into the brain to identify the seizure-onset zone (SOZ). However, its major constraint is limited brain coverage, potentially leading to misidentification of the 'true' SOZ. Here, we propose a framework to assess adequate SEEG sampling by coupling epileptic biomarkers with their spatial distribution and measuring the system's response to a perturbation of this coupling. We demonstrate that the system's response is strongest in well-sampled patients when virtually removing the measured SOZ. We then introduce the spatial perturbation map, a tool that enables qualitative assessment of the implantation coverage. Probability modelling reveals a higher likelihood of well-implanted SOZs in seizure-free patients or non-seizure free patients with incomplete SOZ resections, compared to non-seizure-free patients with complete resections. This highlights the framework's value in sparing patients from unsuccessful surgeries resulting from poor SEEG coverage.

Stereo-Encephalographic Presurgical Evaluation of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: An Evolving Science

Drug-resistant epilepsy is present in nearly 30% of patients. Resection of the epileptogenic zone has been found to be the most effective in achieving seizure freedom. The study of temporal lobe epilepsy for surgical treatment is extensive and complex. It involves a multidisciplinary team in decision-making with initial non-invasive studies (Phase I), providing 70% of the required information to elaborate a hypothesis and treatment plans. Select cases present more complexity involving bilateral clinical or electrographic manifestations, have contradicting information, or may involve deeper structures as a part of the epileptogenic zone. These cases are discussed by a multidisciplinary team of experts with a hypothesis for invasive methods of study. Subdural electrodes were once the mainstay of invasive presurgical evaluation and in later years most Comprehensive Epilepsy Centers have shifted to intracranial recordings. The intracranial recording follows original concepts since its development by Bancaud and Talairach, but great advances have been made in the field. Stereo-electroencephalography is a growing field of study, treatment, and establishment of seizure pattern complexities. In this comprehensive review, we explore the indications, usefulness, discoveries in interictal and ictal findings, pitfalls, and advances in the science of presurgical stereo-encephalography for temporal lobe epilepsy.

Seizure outcomes of large volume temporo-parieto-occipital and frontal surgery in children with drug-resistant epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigate the seizure outcomes of temporo-parieto-occipital (TPO) and frontal disconnections or resections in children with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in order to determine factors which may predict surgical results.

METHODS

Children with DRE, who underwent either TPO or frontal disconnection or resection at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children between 2000 and 2017, were identified from a prospectively collated operative database. Demographic data, age at surgery, type of surgery, scalp EEGs and operative histopathology were collected. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was assessed to determine completeness of disconnection and presence of radiological lesion beyond the disconnection margins. Seizure outcome at 6, 12, and 24 months post-surgery was assessed using the Engel Scale (ES). Logistic regression was used to identify relationships between data variables and seizure outcome.

RESULTS

46 children (males = 28, females = 18; age range 0.5-16.6 years) who underwent TPO (n = 32, including a re-do disconnection) or frontal disconnection or resection (n = 15) were identified. Patients in the TPO treatment group had more favourable seizure outcomes than those in the frontal treatment group (ES I-II in 56 %vs 47 % at 6 months, 52 % vs 46 % at 12 months). Presence of the lesion beyond disconnection boundaries and older age at the time of surgery were associated with poorer seizure outcome. Gender, surgery type, completeness of disconnection, scalp EEG findings and underlying pathology were not related to seizure outcome, but subgroup numbers were small.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TPO and frontal disconnection are effective treatments for selected children with posterior multi-lobar or diffuse frontal lobe epilepsy. Confinement of the MRI lesion within the disconnection margins and a younger age at surgery are associated with favourable seizure outcomes. Further studies are required to elucidate these findings.

Bilateral epileptogenesis in temporal lobe epilepsy due to unilateral hippocampal sclerosis: A case series

INTRODUCTION

Bitemporal epilepsy (biTLE), a potential cause of failure in TLE surgery, is rarely associated with unilateral HS and could be suggested by not lateralizing ictal scalp EEG/interictal PET-FDG findings. We evaluated the proportion of biTLE in a population of drug-resistant TLE-HS subjects who underwent intracranial investigation for lateralizing purpose.

METHODS

We retrospectively included all consecutive refractory TLE-HS patients and not lateralizing ictal scalp EEG/interictal PET-FDG findings, investigated by intracranial bilateral longitudinal hippocampal electrodes. Demographic characteristics, electroclinical findings and seizure outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 14 subjects (7 males; mean age 39.5 years; mean age at disease onset 14.4 years), 7 of them had biTLE diagnosed after intracranial investigations. In the remaining 7 with unilateral epileptogenesis (uniTLE) anterior temporal lobectomy was performed (6/7 were in Engel class I). Preoperative neuropsychological assessment differentiated biTLE from uniTLE, as it was normal in six uniTLE patients but only in one with biTLE (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Not lateralizing ictal scalp EEG and functional imaging findings in TLEHS should alert about the possibility of a true biTLE also in presence of unilateral findings at MRI. Intracranial investigations with bilateral longitudinal hippocampal electrodes can localize the EZ with a good risk-benefit profile. Consistently with the warning on memory functions in TLE patients explored by using longitudinal hippocampal electrodes, further studies are needed to better define the optimal investigation strategy.

Stereoelectroencephalography Versus Subdural Strip Electrode Implantations: Feasibility, Complications, and Outcomes in 500 Intracranial Monitoring Cases for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Both stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural strip electrodes (SSE) are used for intracranial electroencephalographic recordings in the invasive investigation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare SEEG and SSE with respect to feasibility, complications, and outcome in this single-center study.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, periprocedural parameters, complications, and outcome were acquired from a pro- and retrospectively managed databank to compare SEEG and SSE cases.

RESULTS

A total of 500 intracranial electroencephalographic monitoring cases in 450 patients were analyzed (145 SEEG and 355 SSE). Both groups were of similar age, gender distribution, and duration of epilepsy. Implantation of each SEEG electrode took 13.9 ± 7.6 min (20 ± 12 min for each SSE; P &lt; .01). Radiation exposure to the patient was 4.3 ± 7.7 s to a dose area product of 14.6 ± 27.9 rad*cm2 for SEEG and 9.4 ± 8.9 s with 21 ± 22.4 rad*cm2 for SSE (P &lt; .01). There was no difference in the length of stay (12.2 ± 7.2 and 12 ± 6.3 d). The complication rate was low in both groups. No infections were seen in SEEG cases (2.3% after SSE). The rate of hemorrhage was 2.8% for SEEG and 1.4% for SSE. Surgical outcome was similar.

CONCLUSION

SEEG allows targeting deeply situated foci with a non-inferior safety profile to SSE and seizure outcome comparable to SSE.

Multiphasic Side-Switching Seizures Are Easily Misdiagnosed as Unilateral Seizures During a Single EEG Monitoring Session: A Specific Subtype of Bitemporal Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Bitemporal epilepsy (BTLE) is a specific anatomoelectroclinical phenotype in the spectrum of temporal lobe epilepsy. The diagnosis of BTLE and the evaluation of the degree of seizure lateralization in BTLE patients are greatly influenced by the duration of EEG recording and the number of recorded habitual seizures.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 25-year-old woman had a 5-year history of seizures. Her habitual seizures were described as sudden behavioral arrest, staring, unresponsiveness, and oral automatisms, with auras of fear and palpitation. Intermittent scalp electroencephalography (EEG) and intracranial EEG monitoring over 3 years showed multiphasic side-switching seizures. The seizures were limited to 1 temporal lobe within 1 phase and switched sides between phases. Despite antiepileptic drugs and vagus nerve stimulation, her seizures remained uncontrolled. The patient finally underwent unilateral anteromedial temporal lobectomy, mainly based on >60% of seizures recorded originating from the left side. The patient has been seizure free for more than 1 year at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This patient presented 1 specific subtype of BTLE that is prone to be misdiagnosed as unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy if the patient is recorded for a relatively short term, e.g., over a common EEG monitoring duration of 1 to 2 weeks.

The surgical outcome of patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to explore the surgical outcome of unilateral anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) for patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (BTLE).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who were diagnosed with BTLE by scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) and underwent ATL from 2001 to 2015. In addition, 80 patients were randomly selected as a control group.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen patients were included in this study and were divided into four groups by intracranial recordings as follows: 78 patients with unilateral seizure onset (Group 1), 13 patients with lateralizable dominant seizure onset (Group 2), 14 patients with lateralizable neuroimaging abnormalities (Group 3), and 12 patients without lateralizable dominant seizure onset or neuroimaging abnormalities (Group 4). The 12 patients in Group 4 declined surgical resection, whereas the remaining 105 patients received ATL, and 93 of them were followed up for more than 1 year after surgery. At the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-ups the percentage of patients who were seizure free was 52.9%, 56.5%, and 58.9%, respectively. For the mean postoperative efficacy, there was a statistical difference in patients who were seizure free either between Group 1 + Group 2 + Group 3 and the control group (44.1% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.002), or between Group 1 and the control group (48.5% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.019), or between Group 2 + Group 3 and the control group (32.0% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.002). However, the difference was significant only at the first year follow-up, and there was no significant difference afterward.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although the surgical outcome of patients with BTLE is not as good as that of patients with unilateral TLE in short-term follow-up, quite a portion of these patients could benefit from unilateral temporal lobe resection in the long term.