Antiseizure drugs use during pregnancy and congenital malformations: A retrospective review from the United Arab Emirates

Seizure control and adverse outcomes of lamotrigine use during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to summarize existing evidence on the adverse pregnancy outcomes and seizure control effects of using lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy in pregnancy women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in various databases including Cochrane, Web of Science, CBM, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Pregnancy Registration Center databases to identify relevant studies. The search was concluded up to January 2024. Studies comparing LTG with other antiseizure medications (ASMs) for treating epilepsy in pregnant women were included, with no language or regional restrictions.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies were included for analysis, with 16 studies reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes and 6 studies reporting seizure control outcomes. Meta-analysis showed that compared to monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), sodium valproate (VPA), and levetiracetam (LEV), LTG monotherapy had a slightly weaker ability to control seizures during pregnancy, with ORs and 95 %CIs of 0.65 (0.57-0.75; CBZ), 0.50 (0.32-0.79; VPA), and 0.55 (0.36-0.84; LEV). Regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes, the occurrence rate of LTG monotherapy was significantly lower than that of CBZ, VPA, phenytoin (PHT), and phenobarbital (PHB), with ORs and 95 %CIs ranging from 0.30 (0.25-0.35; VPA) to 0.68 (0.56-0.81; CBZ).

CONCLUSION

Based on meta-analysis, LTG and LEV appear to be preferred medications for controlling seizures during pregnancy. This review provides further support for the use of LTG monotherapy in pregnant WWE, building upon existing evidence for clinical practitioners.

Antiseizure medications use during pregnancy and congenital malformations: A retrospective study in Saudi Arabia

AIM

To evaluate the incidence of congenital malformations in children exposed prenatally to antiseizure medications (ASMs), to assess other perinatal and fetal complications, and to determine the potential predictors for these complications.

METHOD

A retrospective review of pregnancy outcomes of women with epilepsy. Patients were followed up at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between Dec 1993 and Oct 2020.

RESULTS

Of 162 pregnancies included, 10 (6.17%) congenital malformations were observed, 6.82% in ASM-exposed babies versus 3.33% in babies of epilepsy-untreated mothers (P = 0.69). The overall incidence of perinatal and fetal complications was 53%; most frequent were low birth weight (24%), preterm birth (19%), transfer to neonatal intensive care unit (18%) and abortion (8%). These complications were higher in the untreated group (66.67%) than in the ASM group (50%). The use of other non-antiseizure medications during pregnancy was the only factor that significantly increased the risk of complications.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal exposure to ASMs was associated with increased risk of congenital malformations. However, overall perinatal and fetal complications were higher in the untreated group than in the ASM group, which could be explained by maternal seizures. Therefore, taking ASMs to control epilepsy and prevent perinatal complications may outweigh the risks of teratogenicity.