1
|
Byrnes M, Thompson NR, Hantus ST, Fesler JR, Ying Z, Ayub N, Rubinos C, Zafar S, Sivaraju A, Punia V. Characteristics and Attendance of Patients Eligible for the PASS Clinic: A Transition of Care Model After Acute Symptomatic Seizures. Neurol Clin Pract 2024; 14:e200232. [PMID: 38213398 PMCID: PMC10781564 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000200232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Most acute symptomatic seizure (ASyS) patients stay on antiseizure medications (ASM) long-term, despite low epilepsy development risk. The Post-Acute Symptomatic Seizure (PASS) clinic is a transition of care model for ASyS patients who individualize ASM management with the goal of a safe deprescription. We evaluated patients discharged on ASMs after a witnessed or suspected ASyS to analyze their PASS clinic visit attendance and its predictors. Methods A single-center, retrospective cohort study of adults without epilepsy who were discharged from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019, on first-time ASMs due to witnessed or suspected ASyS (PASS clinic-eligible). We fit a cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model to analyze factors associated with PASS clinic attendance, which depends on survival in this patient population that has a high early postdischarge mortality (a competing risk). We checked for multicollinearity and the assumption of proportional hazards. Results Among 307 PASS clinic-eligible patients, 95 (30.9%) attended the clinic and 136 (44.3%) died during a median follow-up of 14 months (interquartile range = 2-34). ASyS occurred in 60.2% (convulsive 47%; electrographic 26.7%) of patients. ASMs were continued in the absence of ASyS or epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) in 27% of patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of EAs (HR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.10-2.59), PASS clinic appointments provided before discharge (HR = 3.39, 95% CI 2.15-5.33), and less frequently noted ASyS etiologies such as autoimmune encephalitis (HR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.07-3.86) were associated with an increased clinic attendance rate. Medicare/Medicaid insurance (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.78, p = 0.005) and the presence of progressive brain injury (i.e., tumors; HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.95, p = 0.032) were associated with reduced rate of PASS clinic attendance. Discussion Our real-world data highlight the need for appropriate postdischarge follow-up of ASyS patients, which can be fulfilled by the PASS clinic model. Modest PASS clinic attendance can be significantly improved by adhering to a structured discharge planning process whereby appointments are provided before discharge. Future research comparing patient outcomes, specifically safe ASM discontinuation in a PASS clinic model to routine clinical care, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MarieElena Byrnes
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| | - Nicolas R Thompson
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| | - Stephen T Hantus
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| | - Jessica R Fesler
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| | - Zhong Ying
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| | - Neishay Ayub
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| | - Clio Rubinos
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| | - Sahar Zafar
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| | - Adithya Sivaraju
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| | - Vineet Punia
- Epilepsy Center (MB, STH, JRF, ZY, VP), Neurological Institute; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (NRT), Lerner Research Institute; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (NRT), Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH; Rhode Island Hospital (NA), Brown University; University of North Carolina (CR), Chapel Hill; Massachusetts General Hospital (SZ), Harvard University; Yale New Haven Hospital (AS), Yale University
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Villanueva V, Rodriguez-Osorio X, Juiz-Fernández Á, Sayas D, Hampel K, Castillo A, Montoya J, Garcés M, Campos D, Rubio-Nazábal E, Fernández-Cabrera A, Gifreu A, Santamarina E, Hernández Pérez G, Falip M, Parejo-Carbonell B, García-Morales I, Martínez AB, Massot M, Asensio M, Giménez J, Guillén V, Ruiz-Giménez J, Chavarria B, Rocamora R, Escalza I. Real-life evidence about the use of intravenous brivaracetam in urgent seizures: The BRIV-IV study. Epilepsy Behav 2023; 147:109384. [PMID: 37634373 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Urgent seizures are a medical emergency for which new therapies are still needed. This study evaluated the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV-BRV) in an emergency setting in clinical practice. METHODS BRIV-IV was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. It included patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with urgent seizures (including status epilepticus (SE), acute repetitive seizures, and high-risk seizures) and who were treated with IV-BRV according to clinical practice in 14 hospital centers. Information was extracted from clinical charts and included in an electronic database. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the rate of IV-BRV responder patients, the rate of patients with a sustained response without seizure relapse in 12 h, and the time between IV-BRV administration and clinical response. Primary safety endpoints were comprised the percentage of patients with adverse events and those with adverse events leading to discontinuation. RESULTS A total of 156 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 57.7 ± 21.5 years old with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy for 57.1% of patients. The most frequent etiologies were brain tumor-related (18.1%) and vascular (11.2%) epilepsy. SE was diagnosed in 55.3% of patients. The median time from urgent seizure onset to IV treatment administration was 60.0 min (range: 15.0-360.0), and the median time from IV treatment to IV-BRV was 90.0 min (range: 30.0-2400.0). Regarding dosage, the mean bolus infusion was 163.0 ± 73.0 mg and the mean daily dosage was 195.0 ± 87.0 mg. A total of 77.6% of patients responded to IV-BRV (66.3% with SE vs. 91% other urgent seizures) with a median response time of 30.0 min (range: 10.0-60.0). A sustained response was achieved in 62.8% of patients. However, adverse events were reported in 14.7%, which were predominantly somnolence and fatigue, with 4.5% leading to discontinuation. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged with oral brivaracetam. CONCLUSION IV-BRV in emergency settings was effective, and tolerability was good for most patients. However, a larger series is needed to confirm the outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente Villanueva
- Member of ERN EPICARE, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | | | - Debora Sayas
- Member of ERN EPICARE, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Kevin Hampel
- Member of ERN EPICARE, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Javier Montoya
- Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mercedes Garcés
- Member of ERN EPICARE, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Dulce Campos
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mercé Falip
- Hospital Universitario Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Juana Giménez
- Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis, Alicante, Spain
| | - Virginia Guillén
- Hospital General Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Beatriz Chavarria
- Member of ERN EPICARE, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Rocamora
- Member of ERN EPICARE, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|