Indications for continuous electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring: What do they tell us?

Characteristics and Attendance of Patients Eligible for the PASS Clinic: A Transition of Care Model After Acute Symptomatic Seizures

Background and Objectives

Most acute symptomatic seizure (ASyS) patients stay on antiseizure medications (ASM) long-term, despite low epilepsy development risk. The Post-Acute Symptomatic Seizure (PASS) clinic is a transition of care model for ASyS patients who individualize ASM management with the goal of a safe deprescription. We evaluated patients discharged on ASMs after a witnessed or suspected ASyS to analyze their PASS clinic visit attendance and its predictors.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective cohort study of adults without epilepsy who were discharged from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019, on first-time ASMs due to witnessed or suspected ASyS (PASS clinic-eligible). We fit a cause-specific Cox proportional hazards model to analyze factors associated with PASS clinic attendance, which depends on survival in this patient population that has a high early postdischarge mortality (a competing risk). We checked for multicollinearity and the assumption of proportional hazards.

Results

Among 307 PASS clinic-eligible patients, 95 (30.9%) attended the clinic and 136 (44.3%) died during a median follow-up of 14 months (interquartile range = 2-34). ASyS occurred in 60.2% (convulsive 47%; electrographic 26.7%) of patients. ASMs were continued in the absence of ASyS or epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) in 27% of patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that the presence of EAs (HR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.10-2.59), PASS clinic appointments provided before discharge (HR = 3.39, 95% CI 2.15-5.33), and less frequently noted ASyS etiologies such as autoimmune encephalitis (HR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.07-3.86) were associated with an increased clinic attendance rate. Medicare/Medicaid insurance (HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.78, p = 0.005) and the presence of progressive brain injury (i.e., tumors; HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.95, p = 0.032) were associated with reduced rate of PASS clinic attendance.

Discussion

Our real-world data highlight the need for appropriate postdischarge follow-up of ASyS patients, which can be fulfilled by the PASS clinic model. Modest PASS clinic attendance can be significantly improved by adhering to a structured discharge planning process whereby appointments are provided before discharge. Future research comparing patient outcomes, specifically safe ASM discontinuation in a PASS clinic model to routine clinical care, is needed.

Real-life evidence about the use of intravenous brivaracetam in urgent seizures: The BRIV-IV study

PURPOSE

Urgent seizures are a medical emergency for which new therapies are still needed. This study evaluated the use of intravenous brivaracetam (IV-BRV) in an emergency setting in clinical practice.

METHODS

BRIV-IV was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. It included patients ≥18 years old who were diagnosed with urgent seizures (including status epilepticus (SE), acute repetitive seizures, and high-risk seizures) and who were treated with IV-BRV according to clinical practice in 14 hospital centers. Information was extracted from clinical charts and included in an electronic database. Primary effectiveness endpoints included the rate of IV-BRV responder patients, the rate of patients with a sustained response without seizure relapse in 12 h, and the time between IV-BRV administration and clinical response. Primary safety endpoints were comprised the percentage of patients with adverse events and those with adverse events leading to discontinuation.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 57.7 ± 21.5 years old with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy for 57.1% of patients. The most frequent etiologies were brain tumor-related (18.1%) and vascular (11.2%) epilepsy. SE was diagnosed in 55.3% of patients. The median time from urgent seizure onset to IV treatment administration was 60.0 min (range: 15.0-360.0), and the median time from IV treatment to IV-BRV was 90.0 min (range: 30.0-2400.0). Regarding dosage, the mean bolus infusion was 163.0 ± 73.0 mg and the mean daily dosage was 195.0 ± 87.0 mg. A total of 77.6% of patients responded to IV-BRV (66.3% with SE vs. 91% other urgent seizures) with a median response time of 30.0 min (range: 10.0-60.0). A sustained response was achieved in 62.8% of patients. However, adverse events were reported in 14.7%, which were predominantly somnolence and fatigue, with 4.5% leading to discontinuation. Eighty-six percent of patients were discharged with oral brivaracetam.

CONCLUSION

IV-BRV in emergency settings was effective, and tolerability was good for most patients. However, a larger series is needed to confirm the outcomes.