1
|
Russell JS. Systemic Management of Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:1063-1072. [PMID: 39066856 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01249-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Adrenocortical cancer (ACC) is a rare and aggressive disease. Surgery has traditionally been the primary treatment for locally advanced disease with ongoing controversy around the optimal neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment options. Unfortunately, local recurrence and the eventual development of metastatic disease is common and five-year survival rates are poor. While many trials have evaluated novel systemic agents to treat advanced adrenocortical cancer, only a few drugs have demonstrated any response at all. To date, only one drug, mitotane, is approved in the US for ACC and no regimen has clearly shown an increase in overall survival. In advanced metastatic or unresectable disease, data supports the first line regimen of EDP chemotherapy + mitotane as the primary treatment modality. In the second line, while data is limited, we would recommend consideration of immunotherapy using a PD(L)1 agent combined with a TKI/VEGF inhibitor or combination immunotherapy with PD1/CTLA-4 drugs. In all cases, we always prefer a clinical trial as available. This article reviews data from multiple studies evaluating novel systemic agents against ACC and discusses current systemic therapy combinations and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffery S Russell
- Division of Medical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Turla A, Laganà M, Cremaschi V, Zamparini M, De Maria L, Consoli F, Abate A, Tamburello M, Alberti A, Sigala S, Grisanti S, Fontanella MM, Cosentini D, Berruti A. Outcome of brain metastases from adrenocortical carcinoma: a pooled analysis. J Endocrinol Invest 2024; 47:223-234. [PMID: 37354248 PMCID: PMC10776734 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-023-02140-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain metastases rarely complicate the natural history of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). No information is available regarding the life expectancy and efficacy of treatments in ACC patients with brain involvement. METHODS A pooled analysis was performed by searching on PubMed and using the keywords: "brain metastases in adrenocortical carcinoma", and "leptomeningeal metastases in adrenocortical carcinoma". Four patients diagnosed at Spedali Civili Hospital in Brescia were added to the analysis. Data concerning demographic, disease characteristics, adopted treatments and patient prognosis were collected. RESULTS A total of 27 patients (18 adults and 9 children) were included in this study, 22 of them had an adequate follow-up. Brain metastases occurred late in the natural history of adult patients but not in that of children. Surgery plus/minus radiation therapy was the treatment of choice. Adult patients with brain metastases had a poor prognosis with a median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 2 and 7 months, respectively. Median PFS and OS were not attained in children. CONCLUSION Brain metastases in ACC patients are rare and are associated with poor prognosis, particularly in adults. Surgery plus/minus radiotherapy is the only therapeutic approach that can offer patients a chance to obtain durable local disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Turla
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Laganà
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - V Cremaschi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Zamparini
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - L De Maria
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - F Consoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Abate
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M Tamburello
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Alberti
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - S Sigala
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - S Grisanti
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M M Fontanella
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - D Cosentini
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - A Berruti
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Debets P, Dreijerink KMA, Engelsman A, Dahele M, Haak HR, Steenaard RV, Kapiteijn E, Corssmit E, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW. Impact of EDP-M on survival of patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma: A population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113424. [PMID: 37977106 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Historically, stage IV adrenocortical carcinoma (mACC) has a poor prognosis with a median overall survival (OS) of only 5 months. Based on the FIRM-ACT trial published in 2012, guidelines now advise first line systemic treatment with etoposide, cisplatin, doxorubicin and mitotane (EDP-M). The effect of EDP-M on patient survival in clinical practice in the Netherlands is unknown. METHODS The data of all patients with mACC (2005-2020) were obtained from the Netherlands comprehensive cancer organization (IKNL). The effect of EDP-M on patient survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis including clinical, therapy and tumor characteristics. RESULTS In total 167 patients with mACC were included. For patients diagnosed from 2014 onwards, EDP-M (in 22 patients (22%)) lead to a numerically but not statistically significant improved OS compared to those not receiving EDP-M (11.8 vs 5.6 months, p = 0.525). For systemic treatments, patients treated with mitotane only had the best 5-year OS (11.4%, p = 0.006) regardless of year of diagnosis. In multivariate Cox regression analysis EPD-M was not associated with OS; palliative adrenalectomy (HR: 0.26, p = <.001) and local treatment of metastases (HR: 0.35, p = 0.001) were associated with a better OS and a primary tumor Ki-67 index > 20% (HR: 2.67, p = 0.003) with a worse OS from 2014 onwards. Patients diagnosed before 2014 had a significantly poorer OS compared to from 2014 onwards (5-yr: 4.5 vs 8.4%, OS: 6.8 vs 8.3 months, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION OS for mACC in the Netherlands has improved in the last decade. Receiving EDP-M did not significantly improve OS for patients with mACC. The use of multimodality treatment including palliative adrenalectomy, mitotane and local treatment of (oligo-)metastases in appropriately selected patients has improved the OS for mACC patients since 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pien Debets
- Amsterdam UMC location VU Medical Center, department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen M A Dreijerink
- Amsterdam UMC location VU Medical Center, department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anton Engelsman
- Amsterdam UMC location VU Medical Center, department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Max Dahele
- Amsterdam UMC location VU Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Harm R Haak
- Maxima Medical Center, department of Internal Medicine, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Maastricht University, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rebecca V Steenaard
- Maxima Medical Center, department of Internal Medicine, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Maastricht University, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Ageing and Long-Term Care, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Eleonora Corssmit
- Leiden University Medical Center, Center of Endocrine Tumours, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hescot S, Debien V, Hadoux J, Drui D, Haissaguerre M, de la Fouchardiere C, Vezzosi D, Do Cao C, Libé R, Le Tourneau C, Baudin E, Massard C, du Rusquec P. Outcome of adrenocortical carcinoma patients included in early phase clinical trials: Results from the French network ENDOCAN-COMETE. Eur J Cancer 2023; 189:112917. [PMID: 37277263 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At metastatic stage, treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) relies in first line on mitotane therapy, combination of mitotane with locoregional therapies or cisplatin-based chemotherapy according to initial presentation. In second line, ESMO-EURACAN recommendations favour enrolment of patients in clinical trials investigating experimental therapies. However, the benefit of this approach remains unknown. METHODS The aim of our retrospective study was to analyse the inclusion and outcomes of all patients of the French cohort ENDOCAN-COMETE included in early clinical trials between 2009 and 2019. RESULTS Of the 141 patients for whom a local or national multidisciplinary tumour board recommended, as first choice, to look for clinical trial, 27 patients (19%) were enroled in 30 early clinical trials. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.02 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]; 2.3-4.6) and median overall survival (OS) was 10.2 months (95% CI; 7.13-16.3) while the best response, evaluable in 28 of 30 trial participants according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, was partial response for 3 patients (11%) stable disease for 14 patients (50%) and progressive disease for 11 patients (39%), resulting in a disease control rate of 61%. Median growth modulation index (GMI) in our cohort was 1.32, with a significantly prolonged PFS in 52% of the patients compared to the previous line. The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score was not associated with OS in this cohort. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that patients with metastatic ACC benefit from inclusion in early clinical trials in second line. As recommended, if a clinical trial is available, it should be the first choice for suitable patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ségolène Hescot
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Debien
- DITEP, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles (H.U.B), Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julien Hadoux
- Service d'Oncologie Endocrinienne, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Delphine Drui
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service d'Endocrinologie-Diabétologie et Nutrition, Institut du thorax, Nantes, France
| | - Magalie Haissaguerre
- Département d'Endocrinologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Bordeaux, Institut D'Oncologie de Bordeaux, INSERM, Pessac, France
| | | | - Delphine Vezzosi
- Service d'Endocrinologie, Hopital Larrey, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Rossella Libé
- Service d'Endocrinologie, French National Network for Adrenal Cancers ENDOCAN-COMETE, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France; Unité de Recherche INSERM U900, Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Eric Baudin
- Service d'Oncologie Endocrinienne, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| | | | - Pauline du Rusquec
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France; Unité de Recherche INSERM U900, Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Padua TCD, Marandino L, Raggi D, Hallanger-Johnson J, Kutikov A, Spiess PE, Necchi A. A Systematic Review of Published Clinical Trials in the Systemic Treatment of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An Initiative Led on Behalf of the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2023; 21:1-7. [PMID: 36376169 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a very rare endocrine cancer and is associated with a poor prognosis. There is a paucity of randomized clinical trials for this rare disease. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature on systemic therapy options in different stages of ACC. A systematic review was performed using Pubmed and Embase databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A total of 24 trials of systemic therapy in the treatment of ACC were identified and included in this review. Only one clinical trial in the adjuvant setting was identified, the negative phase III trial ADIUVO, which tested mitotane in low to intermediate-risk ACC patients. In the treatment of advanced ACC, cisplatin-based chemotherapy was evaluated in small and non-randomized phase II trials, and response rates ranged from 21% to 53.5%. The phase III trial FIRM-ACT compared etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and mitotane versus treatment with streptozotocin and mitotane and showed no difference in OS, but higher RR and PFS were reported with the multi-drug regimen. Six clinical trials of immunotherapy and seven studies of targeted therapy in advanced ACC were included, with modest activity and no phase 3 trials were identified. Treatment recommendations of ACC are based on retrospective and small studies with limited systemic therapy options. International and multi-center collaboration is essential to expand clinical research and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Daniele Raggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, MI, Italy
| | | | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, MI, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Turla A, Laganà M, Grisanti S, Abate A, Ferrari VD, Cremaschi V, Sigala S, Consoli F, Cosentini D, Berruti A. Supportive therapies in patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma submitted to standard EDP-M regimen. Endocrine 2022; 77:438-443. [PMID: 35567656 PMCID: PMC9385801 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03075-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The management of patients with advanced/metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is challenging, EDP-M (etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin combined with mitotane) is the standard regimen. However, it is quite toxic, so an adequate supportive therapy is crucial to reduce as much as possible the side effects and maintain the dose intensity of cytotoxic agents. METHODS We describe the main side effects of the EDP-M scheme and the best way to manage them based on the experience of the Medical Oncology Unit of the Spedali Civili of Brescia. We also deal with the administration of EDP-M in specific frail patients, such as those with huge disease extent and poor performance status (PS) and those with mild renal insufficiency. RESULTS In patients with hormone secreting ACC the rapid control of Cushing syndrome using adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors such as metyrapone or osilodrostat is mandatory before starting EDP-M. Primary prophylaxis of neutropenia with Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factors is crucial and should be introduced at the first chemotherapy cycle. Possible mitotane induced hypoadrenalism should be always considered in case of persistent nausea and vomiting and asthenia in the interval between one cycle to another. In case of poor PS. A 24 h continuous infusion schedule of cisplatin could be an initial option in patients with poor PS as well as to reduce the risk of nefrotoxocity in patients with mild renal impairment. CONCLUSION A careful and accurate supportive care is essential to mitigate EDP-M side effects as much as possible and avoid that, due to toxicity, patients have to reduce doses and or postpone cytotoxic treatment with a negative impact on efficacy of this chemotherapy regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Turla
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marta Laganà
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Grisanti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Abate
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Vittorio Domenico Ferrari
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Valentina Cremaschi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sandra Sigala
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca Consoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Deborah Cosentini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Berruti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cremaschi V, Abate A, Cosentini D, Grisanti S, Rossini E, Laganà M, Tamburello M, Turla A, Sigala S, Berruti A. Advances in adrenocortical carcinoma pharmacotherapy: what is the current state of the art? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1413-1424. [PMID: 35876101 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2106128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgery, followed or not by adjuvant mitotane, is the current mainstay of therapy for patients with early-stage adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Mitotane, either alone or in association with EDP (Etoposide-Doxorubicin-Cisplatin) combination chemotherapy, is the standard approach for patients with metastatic ACC. AREAS COVERED The activity of newer cytotoxic drugs, radioligands, targeted therapies and immunotherapy, both in preclinical and in clinical studies, will be reviewed in this paper. EXPERT OPINION ADIUVO trial revealed that the administration of adjuvant mitotane is not advantageous in patients with good prognosis. Future strategies are to intensify efforts in adjuvant setting in patients with high risk of relapse. In patients with advanced/metastatic disease, modern targeted therapies have shown significant cytotoxicity in preclinical studies, however, studies in ACC patients reported disappointing results so far. The absence of targeted agents specifically inhibiting the major molecular pathways of ACC growth is the main cause of the failure of these drugs. Since ACC is often antigenic but poorly immunogenic, the results of immunotherapy trials appeared inferior to those achieved in the management of patients with other malignancies. Radioligand therapy may also be a promising approach. Combination of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy could be interesting to be tested in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Cremaschi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Abate
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Deborah Cosentini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Salvatore Grisanti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Elisa Rossini
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marta Laganà
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mariangela Tamburello
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonella Turla
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sandra Sigala
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Berruti
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|