1
|
Osumi H, Shinozaki E, Nakamura Y, Esaki T, Yasui H, Taniguchi H, Satake H, Sunakawa Y, Komatsu Y, Kagawa Y, Denda T, Shiozawa M, Satoh T, Nishina T, Goto M, Takahashi N, Kato T, Bando H, Yamaguchi K, Yoshino T. Clinical features associated with NeoRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer A SCRUM-Japan GOZILA substudy. Nat Commun 2024; 15:5885. [PMID: 39003289 PMCID: PMC11246505 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-50026-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024] Open
Abstract
"NeoRAS WT" refers to the loss of RAS mutations (MTs) following first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We evaluate the incidence and clinicopathological characteristics of NeoRAS WT mCRC using next-generation sequencing of plasma circulating tumor DNA. Patients with mCRC enrolled in the GOZILA study initially diagnosed with tissue RAS MT mCRC and received subsequent systemic therapy are eligible. NeoRAS WT is defined as the absence of detectable RAS MT in plasma and assessed in all eligible patients (Group A) and in a subgroup with at least one somatic alteration detected in plasma (Group B). Overall, 478 patients are included. NeoRAS WT prevalence is 19.0% (91/478) in Group A and 9.8% (42/429) in Group B. Absence of liver or lymph node metastasis and tissue RAS MTs other than KRAS exon 2 MTs are significantly associated with NeoRAS WT emergence. Overall, 1/6 and 2/6 patients with NeoRAS WT treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) show partial response and stable disease for ≥6 months, respectively. NeoRAS WT mCRC is observed at a meaningful prevalence, and anti-EGFR mAb-based therapy may be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Osumi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Shinozaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yoshiaki Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Taito Esaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hisateru Yasui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hiroya Taniguchi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hironaga Satake
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi, Japan
| | - Yu Sunakawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Kagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadamichi Denda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Manabu Shiozawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Taroh Satoh
- Palliative and Supportive Care Center, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Nishina
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan
| | - Masahiro Goto
- Department of Cancer Chemotherapy Center, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Naoki Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kato
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideaki Bando
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vanclooster P, Seghers S, Prenen H. State-of-the-art and upcoming trends in RAS-directed therapies in gastrointestinal malignancies. Curr Opin Oncol 2024; 36:313-319. [PMID: 38726828 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000001042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Overall, the review underscores the evolving landscape of KRAS-targeted therapy and the potential for these approaches to improve outcomes for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. It highlights the importance of ongoing research and clinical trials in advancing precision medicine strategies for KRAS-driven cancers. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the RAS signaling pathway and its significance in gastrointestinal malignancies. RECENT FINDINGS The introduction of KRAS inhibitor represents a significant advancement in the treatment landscape for KRAS-mutant cancers. In this review, we discuss upcoming trends in KRAS-targeted therapy, including the development of mutant-specific direct KRAS inhibitors like MRTX1133 and pan-RAS inhibitors such as RMC-6236. It also explores indirect RAS inhibitors targeting upstream and downstream components of the RAS pathway. Additionally, the review examines other upcoming strategies like combination therapies, such as CDK4/6 and ERK MAPK inhibitors, as well as adoptive cell therapy and cancer vaccines targeting KRAS-mutant cancers. SUMMARY Targeting RAS has become an important strategy in treating gastrointestinal cancer. These findings in this review underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, integrating advances in molecular profiling, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and clinical research to optimize treatment strategies for patients with KRAS-mutant gastrointestinal malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sofie Seghers
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem
- Center for Oncological Research (CORE)
| | - Hans Prenen
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem
- Center for Oncological Research (CORE)
- Integrated Personalized & Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Iguchi K, Shiozawa M, Uchiyama M, Asari M, Numata K, Rino Y, Saito A. Temporal dynamics of RAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA in metastatic colorectal cancer: clinical significance of mutation loss during treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:281. [PMID: 38805050 PMCID: PMC11133214 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05805-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), RAS mutation loss may occur during the standard-of-care regimen. In this study, we aimed to investigate the temporal dynamics of the RAS gene and its clinical significance. METHODS This was a retrospective, single-center study that included 82 patients with tissue RAS-mutant (RAS-MT) mCRC who underwent circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS monitoring between January, 2013-April, 2023. Patients were analyzed for the rate of change over time to acquired RAS mutation loss (aRAS-ML) and clinicopathological factors. The prognostic relevance of mutation loss was assessed. RESULTS aRAS-ML was detected in 33 (40.2%) patients, 32 of whom had a mutation loss in the first ctDNA RAS assay. Patients with a RAS mutation detected in the first assay had a median time of 8 months until the second ctDNA RAS assay, with 4.5% cases newly converted to aRAS-ML; no new conversions were detected at the third assay. The aRAS-ML group exhibited more single-organ metastases in the target organ during ctDNA measurement (aRAS-ML: 84.8% vs. RAS-MT: 59.2%, p = 0.02). Of the 33 patients with aRAS-ML, seven (21.2%) received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy, with a median progression-free survival of 8 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that persistent ctDNA RAS mutation was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-6.3, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION The rate of ctDNA mutation loss in patients with RAS-MT mCRC decreases over time. Therefore, using a ctDNA RAS assay early in treatment will assist in challenging the use of EGFR regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenta Iguchi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2, Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan.
| | - Manabu Shiozawa
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2, Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Mamoru Uchiyama
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2, Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Masahiro Asari
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2, Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Koji Numata
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2, Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama, 241-8515, Japan
| | - Yasushi Rino
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Aya Saito
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mondal D, Shinde S, Sinha V, Dixit V, Paul S, Gupta RK, Thakur S, Vishvakarma NK, Shukla D. Prospects of liquid biopsy in the prognosis and clinical management of gastrointestinal cancers. Front Mol Biosci 2024; 11:1385238. [PMID: 38770216 PMCID: PMC11103528 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1385238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers account for one-fourth of the global cancer incidence and are incriminated to cause one-third of cancer-related deaths. GI cancer includes esophageal, gastric, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers, mostly diagnosed at advanced stages due to a lack of accurate markers for early stages. The invasiveness of diagnostic methods like colonoscopy for solid biopsy reduces patient compliance as it cannot be frequently used to screen patients. Therefore, minimally invasive approaches like liquid biopsy may be explored for screening and early identification of gastrointestinal cancers. Liquid biopsy involves the qualitative and quantitative determination of certain cancer-specific biomarkers in body fluids such as blood, serum, saliva, and urine to predict disease progression, therapeutic tolerance, toxicities, and recurrence by evaluating minimal residual disease and its correlation with other clinical features. In this review, we deliberate upon various tumor-specific cellular and molecular entities such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor-educated platelets (TEPs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), exosomes, and exosome-derived biomolecules and cite recent advances pertaining to their use in predicting disease progression, therapy response, or risk of relapse. We also discuss the technical challenges associated with translating liquid biopsy into clinical settings for various clinical applications in gastrointestinal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepankar Mondal
- Department of Biotechnology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Sapnita Shinde
- Department of Biotechnology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Vibha Sinha
- Department of Biotechnology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Vineeta Dixit
- Department of Botany, Sri Sadguru Jagjit Singh Namdhari College, Garhwa, Jharkhand, India
| | - Souvik Paul
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Rakesh Kumar Gupta
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
| | | | | | - Dhananjay Shukla
- Department of Biotechnology, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Johnson D, Chee CE, Wong W, Lam RCT, Tan IBH, Ma BBY. Current advances in targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer - Clinical translation and future directions. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 125:102700. [PMID: 38422896 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
The last two decades have witnessed major breakthroughs in the development of targeted therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), an achievement which stems largely from advances in translational research. Precision medicine is now widely practiced in routine oncological care, where systemic therapy is individualized based on clinical factors such as primary tumor sidedness, location and number of metastases, as well as molecular factors such as the RAS and BRAF mutation status, mismatch repair / microsatellite status and presence of other actionable genomic alterations in the tumor. The optimal selection of patients with RAS and BRAF-wild type (WT), left-sided primary tumor for treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and chemotherapy (chemo) has markedly improved survival in the first-line setting. The pivotal trials of cetuximab in combination with BRAF/ MEK inhibitor for BRAF V600E mutant mCRC, and panitumumab with KRAS G12C inhibitor in KRAS(G12C)-mutant mCRC have been practice-changing. Anti-HER2 small molecular inhibitor, antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates have significantly improved the treatment outcome of patients with HER2 amplified mCRC. Anti-angiogenesis agents are now used across all lines of treatment and novel combinations with immune-checkpoint inhibitors are under active investigation in MSS mCRC. The non-invasive monitoring of molecular resistance to targeted therapies using Next Generation Sequencing analysis of circulating tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) and captured sequencing of tumors have improved patient selection for targeted therapies. This review will focus on how latest advances, challenges and future directions in the development of targeted therapies in mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Johnson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Cheng Ean Chee
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore.
| | - Wesley Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Rachel C T Lam
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| | - Iain Bee Huat Tan
- National Cancer Centre Singapore and Duke NUS, Graduate Medical School and Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Brigette B Y Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Contreras-Toledo D, Jiménez-Fonseca P, López CL, Montes AF, López Muñoz AM, Vázquez Rivera F, Alonso V, Alcaide J, Salvà F, Covela Rúa M, Guillot M, Martín Carnicero A, Jimeno Mate R, Cameselle García S, Asensio Martínez E, González Astorga B, Fernandez-Diaz AB, González Villaroel P, Virgili Manrique AC, Melián Sosa M, Alonso B, Cousillas Castiñeiras A, Castañón López C, Aparicio J, Carmona-Bayonas A. Dynamic nature of BRAF or KRAS p.G12C mutations in second-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer patients: do early and late effects exist? Br J Cancer 2024; 130:777-787. [PMID: 38191609 PMCID: PMC10912758 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02563-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling network aberrations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) generate intrinsic dynamic effects and temporal variations that are crucial but often overlooked in clinical trial populations. Here, we investigate the time-varying impact of MAPK pathway mutation genotype on each treatment line's contribution to the overall clinical course. METHODS The PROMETEO study focused on mCRC patients undergoing second-line treatment at 20 hospitals. We evaluated genotypes and employed flexible models to analyse the dynamic effect of each mutation. RESULTS We examined data derived from 1160 patients. The effects of KRAS G12C or G12V, and BRAF V600E are clearly time-varying, with unexpected consequences such as the deleterious effect of BRAF V600E vs other genotypes dissipating over time when subjects receive antiangiogenics, or KRAS G12V and G12C showing increasing aggressiveness over time. Thus, contrary to expectations, the 12-month survival rate from the second line for those who survived >6 months was 49.9% (95% CI, 32.7-67.3) for KRAS G12C and 59% (95% CI, 38.5-80.6) for BRAF V600E. CONCLUSIONS The dynamic perspective is essential for understanding the behaviour of tumours with specific genotypes, especially from the second line onward. This may be relevant in patient monitoring and treatment decision-making, particularly in cases with distinct mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Débora Contreras-Toledo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
| | - Paula Jiménez-Fonseca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, ISPA, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carlos López López
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Universidad de Cantabria (UNICAN), Santander, Spain
| | - Ana Fernández Montes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
| | | | - Francisca Vázquez Rivera
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Vicente Alonso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, IISA, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Julia Alcaide
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Medical Oncology Intercenter Unit, Hospital Universitario Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Francesc Salvà
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Vall D'Hebrón, Vall D´Hebrón Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Covela Rúa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo, Spain
| | - Mónica Guillot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | | | - Raquel Jimeno Mate
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marcos Melián Sosa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - Beatriz Alonso
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain
| | | | | | - Jorge Aparicio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Universidad de Murcia, IMIB, Murcia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Callesen LB, Boysen AK, Andersen CSA, Pallisgaard N, Spindler KLG. The Importance of Feasibility Assessment in the Design of ctDNA Guided Trials - Results From the OPTIPAL II Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:421-430.e1. [PMID: 37586928 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Both quantitative and molecular changes in ctDNA can hold important information when treating metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but its clinical utility is yet to be established. Before conducting a large-scale randomized trial, it is essential to test feasibility. This study investigates whether ctDNA is feasible for detecting patients who will benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and the prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) response. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with mCRC, who were considered for systemic palliative treatment and were eligible for ctDNA analysis. Mutational testing on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was done by ddPCR. ctDNA response from baseline to the third treatment cycle was evaluated in patients with detectable ctDNA at baseline. ctDNA maximum response was defined as undetectable ctDNA at the third treatment cycle, ctDNA partial response as any decrease in the ctDNA level, and ctDNA progression as any increase in the ctDNA level. RESULTS Forty-nine patients were included. The time to test results for mutational testing on cfDNA was significantly shorter than on tumor tissue (p < .001). Progression-free survival were 11.2 months (reference group), 7.5 months (HR = 10.7, p= .02), and 4.6 months (HR = 11.4, p= .02) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively. Overall survival was 31.2 months (reference group), 15.2 months (HR = 4.1, p= .03), and 9.0 months (HR = 2.6, p= .03) in patients with ctDNA maximum response, partial response, and progression, respectively. CONCLUSION Pretreatment mutational testing on cfDNA in daily clinic is feasible and can be applied in randomized clinical trials evaluating the clinical utility of ctDNA. Early dynamics in ctDNA during systemic treatment hold prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Bach Callesen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | | | - Christina Søs Auður Andersen
- Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark; Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Niels Pallisgaard
- Department of Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Næstved, Denmark; Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Karen-Lise Garm Spindler
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nicolazzo C, Magri V, Marino L, Belardinilli F, Di Nicolantonio F, De Renzi G, Caponnetto S, De Meo M, Giannini G, Santini D, Cortesi E, Gazzaniga P. Genomic landscape and survival analysis of ctDNA “neo-RAS wild-type” patients with originally RAS mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1160673. [PMID: 37064137 PMCID: PMC10093715 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1160673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe term “neo-RAS wild-type” refers to the switch to RAS wild-type disease in plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from originally RAS mutant colorectal cancers. Consistently, the hypothesis to re-determine RAS mutational status in ctDNA at disease progression in RAS mutant mCRC opened to a new perspective for clinically-based selection of patients to be treated with EGFR inhibitors. Currently, the genomic landscape of “neo-RAS wild-type” is unknown. This is a prospective study aimed to investigate clinical and genomic features associated with RAS mutation clearance in a large cohort of RAS mutant mCRC patients who converted to RAS wild- type in liquid biopsy at failure of first-line treatments. Secondary aim was to investigate the long term prognostic significance of “true neo-RAS wild- type”.Patients and methods70 patients with stage IV RAS mutant colorectal cancer were prospectively enrolled. Plasma samples were collected at progression from first-line treatment. RAS/BRAF mutations in plasma were assessed by RT-PCR. In RAS/BRAF wild-type samples, ctDNA was used to generate libraries using a 17 genes panel whose alteration has clinical relevance. To investigate the prognostic significance of RAS mutation clearance, test curves for PFS and OS were represented by Kaplan-Meier estimator plot and Log-rank test.ResultsThe most commonly detected actionable mutations in “neo-RAS wild-type” were: PIK3CA (35.7%); RET (11.9%); IDH1 (9.5%); KIT (7%); EGFR (7%); MET (4.7%); ERBB2 (4.7%); FGFR3 (4.7%). Both OS and post-progression survival were longer in patients with “neo-RAS wild-type” compared to those who remained RAS mutant (p<0.001 for both).ConclusionsDe-novo-targetable mutations occured in a large percentage of “neo-RAS wild-type”, being PIK3CA the most commonly detected. RAS mutation clearance in ctDNA is associated with long- term improvement of overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Nicolazzo
- Lab. Liquid Biopsy, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentina Magri
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Marino
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Belardinilli
- Lab. Liquid Biopsy, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gianluigi De Renzi
- Lab. Liquid Biopsy, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Salvatore Caponnetto
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela De Meo
- Lab. Liquid Biopsy, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Giannini
- Lab. Liquid Biopsy, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Cortesi
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Gazzaniga
- Lab. Liquid Biopsy, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- *Correspondence: Paola Gazzaniga,
| |
Collapse
|